20.10.2013 Views

Canada's Forest Inventory 2001 - Publications du gouvernement du ...

Canada's Forest Inventory 2001 - Publications du gouvernement du ...

Canada's Forest Inventory 2001 - Publications du gouvernement du ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.7 Biomass Estimation<br />

Biomass by component (stem wood, stem bark, branches, foliage) has been predicted for every vegetated<br />

record in the CanFI<strong>2001</strong> database. The methods used to estimate biomass reflect inherent characteristics<br />

of the database and availability of ground plot data. They were guided by an overall objective to derive<br />

empirical models that would logically convert volume to biomass where volume exists, or to relate<br />

biomass to land cover where volume does not exist. These methods can be grouped into four scenarios<br />

(Boudewyn, P.; Song, A.; and Gillis, M. Biomass estimation for vegetated areas of Canada. Natural<br />

Resources Canada, Canadian <strong>Forest</strong> Service, Victoria, B.C. Report in preparation.):<br />

Scenario 1: gross merchantable volume exists (treed, merchantable stands). Figure 5 summarizes<br />

the methods used to estimate biomass by component for CanFI<strong>2001</strong> records that<br />

contain volume.<br />

Scenario 2: gross merchantable volume is missing, but should exist. Volume is first estimated<br />

from look-up tables that contain average volume per hectare by various combinations of<br />

classifiers represented in CanFI<strong>2001</strong>. The methods of Scenario 1 are then applied.<br />

Scenario 3: vegetated treed land classes where gross merchantable volume is zero (treed,<br />

non-merchantable stands). Permanent sample plots and temporary sample plots that<br />

meet these criteria, along with published reports, were used to construct look-up tables<br />

of average biomass per hectare for various components by combinations of classifiers<br />

(ecozone and predominant genus).<br />

Scenario 4: vegetated, non-treed records (e.g., grasslands, shrubs, muskeg). A database of<br />

published information on biomass of these areas was created and used to develop look-up<br />

tables of average biomass per hectare by combinations of land classes and ecozones.<br />

Substitution guidelines were developed and implemented for combinations of classifiers that do not<br />

have models or look-up tables <strong>du</strong>e to gaps in the permanent or temporary sample plot development and<br />

publication databases. Biomass is now summarized similarly to volume, and many of the tables shown<br />

throughout the report include sections for biomass, or separate biomass tables.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!