20.10.2013 Views

Canada's Forest Inventory 2001 - Publications du gouvernement du ...

Canada's Forest Inventory 2001 - Publications du gouvernement du ...

Canada's Forest Inventory 2001 - Publications du gouvernement du ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.10 Volume<br />

Volume information in CanFI<strong>2001</strong> is generally derived from volume tables developed from field samples<br />

for provincial forest management inventories. It is stored as cubic metres per hectare for each of 87<br />

species. The number of species is so large because different species grow in different parts of Canada,<br />

and because source inventories vary in the detail to which their volume tables were created: some include<br />

what might be considered minor species, and some group species (e.g., maple, instead of red maple or<br />

sugar maple). In order to maintain as much detail as possible, CanFI<strong>2001</strong> does not aggregate species to<br />

the lowest common denominator.<br />

Table 15 lists volumes for species, grouped for the purpose of this report, in cubic metres, rather than<br />

in the millions of cubic metres usually used, in order to show contributions of minor species to the total.<br />

Spruces make up more than one-third (10 billion m 3 ) of the more than 29 billion m 3 of total wood volume<br />

in Canada. Pines and the poplar/aspen group contribute 5 billion m 3 and 4 billion m 3 , respectively. Figure<br />

34 shows percentage by volume of grouped species. Unlike Figure 32, which shows percentage based on<br />

area and species is the one listed first in a forest stand description, Figure 34 is based on volume tables.<br />

Because volume tables are developed from field samples, volumes are rarely calculated for unspecified<br />

conifers: thus, Figure 34 does not list unspecified conifers as the highest percentage.<br />

Figure 35 maps genera with the most volume in each mapping unit. A mapping unit may have<br />

the most volume represented by firs, but the majority of the total volume in the mapping unit may be<br />

represented by broadleaved genera. In Figure 35, this mapping unit would be classed as fir, whereas, when<br />

figures 37 and 38 are compared, the mapping unit may indicate more broadleaved volume than coniferous<br />

volume. The larch, cedar and other conifer species group is shown to be predominant in northern Quebec,<br />

because volume information from areas with similar characteristics was extrapolated to areas for which<br />

original data sources lacked volume information.<br />

Figure 36 shows total wood volume in Canada. The highest volume is found in coastal British<br />

Columbia, with the rest of the province also having high volumes. Ontario is the province with the second<br />

highest volumes per mapping unit.<br />

Figure 37 maps coniferous volume. British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Alberta have high<br />

concentrations of coniferous volumes. The map of broadleaved volume (Figure 38) indicates that southern<br />

Ontario, the southern edge of forest in Saskatchewan, and the region from central Alberta to northeastern<br />

British Columbia have higher concentrations of broadleaved volumes than other areas of the country.<br />

Percent<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Spruces<br />

Pines<br />

Poplar<br />

Firs<br />

Hemlocks<br />

Birches<br />

34<br />

Cedars<br />

Douglas-fir<br />

Figure 34. Volume percent by species, grouped by genus<br />

Maples<br />

Softwood<br />

Hardwood<br />

Larches<br />

All others

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!