23.10.2013 Views

nanotechnologies and food discussion group minutes of the first

nanotechnologies and food discussion group minutes of the first

nanotechnologies and food discussion group minutes of the first

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

34<br />

35<br />

36<br />

37<br />

38<br />

39<br />

40<br />

41<br />

42<br />

43<br />

44<br />

45<br />

2. Purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>group</strong><br />

The FSA gave a short presentation, outlining <strong>the</strong> main Agency specific<br />

recommendations from <strong>the</strong> House <strong>of</strong> Lords report into <strong>nanotechnologies</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong>. The<br />

setting up <strong>of</strong> this <strong>discussion</strong> <strong>group</strong> stemmed from a recommendation from <strong>the</strong> House <strong>of</strong><br />

Lords <strong>and</strong> it was intended that <strong>the</strong> <strong>group</strong> will enable information to be exchanged<br />

between different sectors in <strong>the</strong> <strong>nanotechnologies</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> area in addition to helping<br />

<strong>the</strong> FSA take forward some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recommendations from <strong>the</strong> House <strong>of</strong> Lords report.<br />

3. Updates from <strong>the</strong> FSA<br />

Novel Foods<br />

The FSA explained <strong>the</strong> main regulatory developments in <strong>the</strong> Novel Foods area.<br />

Relating to <strong>the</strong> proposal to amend <strong>the</strong> Novel Foods Regulation, <strong>the</strong> common position <strong>of</strong><br />

Member States was adopted in March 2010 <strong>and</strong> this made explicit that any<br />

nanomaterial not used before 15 May 1997 would need assessment as a novel <strong>food</strong>.<br />

Following this, <strong>the</strong> European Parliament proposed 103 amendments on second<br />

reading. There were however no new amendments relating to engineered<br />

nanomaterials. The FSA explained that <strong>the</strong> proposal will undergo formal conciliation in<br />

February/March 2011 <strong>and</strong> if agreed <strong>the</strong> new regulation might be adopted in June 2011<br />

<strong>and</strong> come fully into effect in June 2013.<br />

The FSA outlined <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> engineered nanomaterial proposed in <strong>the</strong> amended<br />

novel <strong>food</strong> regulation proposal <strong>and</strong> explained <strong>the</strong> potential difficulties relating to this in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong> suitable methods to detect <strong>and</strong> measure nanoparticles in <strong>food</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>refore potential difficulties relating to enforcement. None<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> definition does<br />

have <strong>the</strong> capacity to be adapted relatively easily as science progresses. In terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Novel Foods Regulation, <strong>the</strong> FSA considers that a definition acts merely as a safety net<br />

as <strong>food</strong>s produced through <strong>nanotechnologies</strong> will be caught by <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

regulation ei<strong>the</strong>r because <strong>the</strong>y are novel or because <strong>the</strong>y are produced using a new<br />

production process.<br />

The FSA informed <strong>the</strong> <strong>group</strong> that in October 2010, DG SANCO issued a draft generic<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> “nanomaterial” drawing on advice from SCENIHR (<strong>the</strong> EU scientific<br />

committee on emerging <strong>and</strong> newly identified health risks) which went out to<br />

consultation. UK Government Departments responded to this consultation by raising a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> questions relating to limitations in current measurement techniques, <strong>the</strong><br />

possibility that existing materials which contain a very small proportion <strong>of</strong> a nanoscaled<br />

element may be unnecessarily classed as nanomaterials, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower size limit <strong>of</strong><br />

1nm.<br />

Food additives <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> contact materials<br />

There were no new developments since <strong>the</strong> publication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> House <strong>of</strong> Lords report,<br />

except that <strong>the</strong> revised framework for <strong>the</strong> regulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>food</strong> additives came into effect in<br />

January 2010 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> draft legislation on plastic <strong>food</strong> contact materials was near to<br />

being formally adopted.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!