23.10.2013 Views

nanotechnologies and food discussion group minutes of the first

nanotechnologies and food discussion group minutes of the first

nanotechnologies and food discussion group minutes of the first

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

34<br />

35<br />

36<br />

37<br />

38<br />

39<br />

40<br />

41<br />

42<br />

43<br />

44<br />

45<br />

46<br />

47<br />

48<br />

49<br />

Consumer Engagement<br />

The FSA explained to <strong>the</strong> <strong>group</strong> that a series <strong>of</strong> <strong>nanotechnologies</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> citizens<br />

forums had been taking place since November 2010. The forums have been organised<br />

by <strong>the</strong> FSA <strong>and</strong> TNS/BMRB as a tool to discuss policy work with consumers <strong>and</strong><br />

examine awareness <strong>and</strong> attitudes towards <strong>nanotechnologies</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong>. The forums are<br />

designed very much to gain a qualitative insight into consumer attitudes towards<br />

<strong>nanotechnologies</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r than to produce hard statistics. The forums involved one<br />

hundred people in Engl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Scotl<strong>and</strong>. Participants were recruited to reflect a mix <strong>of</strong><br />

race, age <strong>and</strong> socioeconomic backgrounds <strong>and</strong> are being conducted in three waves<br />

(waves one <strong>and</strong> two are complete <strong>and</strong> wave three will take place in January/February).<br />

Most people had never heard <strong>of</strong> <strong>nanotechnologies</strong> in relation to <strong>food</strong> but were more<br />

aware <strong>of</strong> its use for o<strong>the</strong>r areas <strong>of</strong> technology e.g. nano iPods.<br />

Consumers were interested to know why <strong>nanotechnologies</strong> are needed in <strong>food</strong> uses<br />

<strong>and</strong> were better able to appreciate <strong>the</strong> potential benefits <strong>of</strong> <strong>nanotechnologies</strong> in relation<br />

to <strong>food</strong> packaging than <strong>food</strong> itself. They were concerned about safety aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>nanotechnologies</strong>, particularly <strong>the</strong> long-term safety, <strong>and</strong> about <strong>the</strong> environmental<br />

impact in relation to <strong>food</strong> packaging e.g. <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> plastic beer bottles with nanoclay<br />

embedded in <strong>the</strong> plastic as a means <strong>of</strong> preventing beer spoilage.<br />

The final wave <strong>of</strong> this research will look at what ethical issues <strong>the</strong>re may be <strong>and</strong> any<br />

wider implications that need to be considered. Consumers will <strong>the</strong>n be in a better<br />

position to provide a more reasoned argument about <strong>the</strong>ir views. It is expected that <strong>the</strong><br />

TNS/BMRB report on <strong>the</strong>se forums will be published by mid March <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> FSA will<br />

enquire whe<strong>the</strong>r a representative is available to give a presentation at <strong>the</strong> next<br />

<strong>discussion</strong> <strong>group</strong> meeting.<br />

Action: FSA to ask TNS/BMRB to give a presentation to <strong>the</strong> <strong>discussion</strong> <strong>group</strong>.<br />

EFSA’s guidance on <strong>the</strong> risk assessment <strong>of</strong> applications <strong>of</strong> nanoscience <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>nanotechnologies</strong> to <strong>food</strong> <strong>and</strong> feed.<br />

The FSA mentioned to <strong>the</strong> <strong>group</strong> that at <strong>the</strong> request <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Commission,<br />

EFSA’s Scientific Committee was producing practical guidance on <strong>the</strong> risk assessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> applications <strong>of</strong> nanoscience <strong>and</strong> <strong>nanotechnologies</strong> to <strong>food</strong> <strong>and</strong> feed. The Scientific<br />

Committee’s drafting <strong>group</strong> had prepared this draft guidance which was shortly<br />

expected to go out to public consultation. This guidance builds on EFSA’s previous<br />

opinion on <strong>nanotechnologies</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> published in 2009, but is a more practical <strong>and</strong><br />

pragmatic document aimed at risk assessors <strong>and</strong> applicants. The guidance details <strong>the</strong><br />

approaches to risk assessment <strong>and</strong> appropriate testing methods to be used depending<br />

on:<br />

a. Whe<strong>the</strong>r a material is nano or not<br />

b. If <strong>the</strong>re is exposure to <strong>the</strong> nanomaterial e.g. migration into <strong>food</strong>.<br />

c. If <strong>the</strong> nan<strong>of</strong>orm has an already approved non nan<strong>of</strong>orm <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> material.<br />

d. If <strong>the</strong> nan<strong>of</strong>orm does not have an already approved nan<strong>of</strong>orm <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> material.<br />

To note: EFSA’s draft guidance was published on 14 January 2011 for public<br />

consultation.<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!