nanotechnologies and food discussion group minutes of the first

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
Register of nano-foods, additives and food contact materials that have been
approved by EFSA (recommendation 26)
The FSA introduced this item prior to group discussion. The FSA explained that as
mentioned in the Government response, the Agency accepted this recommendation but
the register could also include products that may be classed as nano for various
reasons e.g. products that may fall within a grey area.
The group agreed it should be determined first and foremost what the purpose was and
who the list was intended for.. The group discussed whether the register should simply
be a list or a more general source of information, e.g. the nature of the nanomaterial,
where is it found, what is it used for, how long has it been used etc.. It was suggested
that the list should focus on engineered nanomaterials.
Some of the group questioned whether such a list was still necessary given the
amended FIR proposal which, if adopted, will result in engineered nanomaterials being
indicated on ingredient lists. Some members of the group questioned the term “nanofoods”
pointing out that the issue is about foods containing nanomaterials. Any register
would therefore be another version of EFSA’s approved list which may have gone
through the novel foods process hence an unnecessary duplication and use of
resources.
The FSA said it would draw up a more concrete proposal on taking forward this
recommendation based on the group’s ideas for discussion at the next meeting.
AOB
Action: FSA to draw up a more concrete proposal to take forward this
recommendation.
Group membership: The FSA asked the group any additional representation was
required. Which? suggested that it may be useful for a representative from the
Enforcement Authorities to participate in the group given the commitment to keep
enforcement officers informed about nanotechnologies and food.
GO-Science suggested that representative from the Department for Business
Innovation and Skills (BIS) could be invited, given their involvement in research funding
the support for innovation.
7. Date of next meeting
Action: FSA to consider whether to invite representatives from
Enforcement Authorities and BIS.
The FSA suggested that the next meeting will take place in approximately 2 months,
after the TNS/BMRB report on nanotechnologies citizens forums is published. Further
details would be circulated to the group shortly.
8