Chambers Handbook for Judges - Federal Judicial Center
Chambers Handbook for Judges - Federal Judicial Center
Chambers Handbook for Judges - Federal Judicial Center
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Indeed, some judges <strong>for</strong>bid their law clerks to discuss pending cases<br />
even with other law clerks.<br />
Many district courts have rules <strong>for</strong>bidding court personnel to divulge<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation about pending cases. The duty to keep in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
confidential is grave; <strong>for</strong> example, willful violations of the <strong>Judicial</strong> Council<br />
of the District of Columbia’s Confidentiality Rule may result in disciplinary<br />
action, dismissal, and prosecution <strong>for</strong> criminal contempt. If<br />
friends, representatives of news media, or others inquire concerning<br />
any proceeding, the law clerk or secretary may refer them to the official<br />
record in the office of the clerk of court.<br />
D. In<strong>for</strong>ming the Judge of In<strong>for</strong>mation Received<br />
In<strong>for</strong>mally<br />
The judge should be apprised of in<strong>for</strong>mal communications to law clerks<br />
and secretaries regarding pending cases. For example, an attorney may<br />
call to state that there is no objection to a pending motion, or that<br />
both attorneys jointly request the continuance of a hearing. Because of<br />
the impact of these events on docket management, the judge may wish<br />
to take some action. For example, the judge may wish to call a conference<br />
of counsel, or devote increased attention to another matter <strong>for</strong><br />
which immediate preparation is necessary. In<strong>for</strong>mal in<strong>for</strong>mation can<br />
save the judge and the staff wasted ef<strong>for</strong>t.<br />
A dilemma arises when the law clerk or secretary receives specific<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation about the progress of settlement negotiations in a case in<br />
which the judge is to be the trier of fact. Settlement proposals or discussions<br />
are ordinarily inadmissible at trial, and there<strong>for</strong>e some judges<br />
shield themselves from knowledge of settlement negotiations that might<br />
affect their judgment. Other judges either like to, or are willing to,<br />
have such in<strong>for</strong>mation and are confident that they will not be<br />
influenced by it. <strong>Chambers</strong> staff must be guided by the policy of the<br />
individual judge in this regard.<br />
E. Courtroom Demeanor<br />
The law clerk, like the judge, is required to be impartial. During a jury<br />
trial, physical cues within view of the jurors may compromise impartiality<br />
and unfairly influence the jury. Even during a bench trial or<br />
16 <strong>Chambers</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Judges</strong>’ Law Clerks and Secretaries