24.10.2013 Views

Chambers Handbook for Judges - Federal Judicial Center

Chambers Handbook for Judges - Federal Judicial Center

Chambers Handbook for Judges - Federal Judicial Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Indeed, some judges <strong>for</strong>bid their law clerks to discuss pending cases<br />

even with other law clerks.<br />

Many district courts have rules <strong>for</strong>bidding court personnel to divulge<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation about pending cases. The duty to keep in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

confidential is grave; <strong>for</strong> example, willful violations of the <strong>Judicial</strong> Council<br />

of the District of Columbia’s Confidentiality Rule may result in disciplinary<br />

action, dismissal, and prosecution <strong>for</strong> criminal contempt. If<br />

friends, representatives of news media, or others inquire concerning<br />

any proceeding, the law clerk or secretary may refer them to the official<br />

record in the office of the clerk of court.<br />

D. In<strong>for</strong>ming the Judge of In<strong>for</strong>mation Received<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mally<br />

The judge should be apprised of in<strong>for</strong>mal communications to law clerks<br />

and secretaries regarding pending cases. For example, an attorney may<br />

call to state that there is no objection to a pending motion, or that<br />

both attorneys jointly request the continuance of a hearing. Because of<br />

the impact of these events on docket management, the judge may wish<br />

to take some action. For example, the judge may wish to call a conference<br />

of counsel, or devote increased attention to another matter <strong>for</strong><br />

which immediate preparation is necessary. In<strong>for</strong>mal in<strong>for</strong>mation can<br />

save the judge and the staff wasted ef<strong>for</strong>t.<br />

A dilemma arises when the law clerk or secretary receives specific<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation about the progress of settlement negotiations in a case in<br />

which the judge is to be the trier of fact. Settlement proposals or discussions<br />

are ordinarily inadmissible at trial, and there<strong>for</strong>e some judges<br />

shield themselves from knowledge of settlement negotiations that might<br />

affect their judgment. Other judges either like to, or are willing to,<br />

have such in<strong>for</strong>mation and are confident that they will not be<br />

influenced by it. <strong>Chambers</strong> staff must be guided by the policy of the<br />

individual judge in this regard.<br />

E. Courtroom Demeanor<br />

The law clerk, like the judge, is required to be impartial. During a jury<br />

trial, physical cues within view of the jurors may compromise impartiality<br />

and unfairly influence the jury. Even during a bench trial or<br />

16 <strong>Chambers</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Judges</strong>’ Law Clerks and Secretaries

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!