Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund
Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund
Avoided Deforestation (REDD) and Indigenous ... - Amazon Fund
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
approximately 13 million hectares, or 25% of the total area of that region, with 3% of the system’s<br />
area overlapping with 7% of the indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s located there. In many <strong>Amazon</strong> sub-regions,<br />
indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s make up large mosaics with direct- <strong>and</strong> indirect-use conservation units, both<br />
of which are managed by the federal as well as state governments.<br />
Historical deforestation which has accumulated within indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s in the <strong>Amazon</strong><br />
is not substantial <strong>and</strong> affects less than 2% of the area. Part of this deforestation is associated<br />
with certain forms of indigenous occupation of the territory – areas used for construction<br />
<strong>and</strong> expansion of villages, clearing of l<strong>and</strong> for agriculture – <strong>and</strong> part is due to non-indigenous<br />
occupation in the past, prior to official l<strong>and</strong> recognition processes, or current occupation resulting<br />
from ongoing invasions.<br />
To be sure, it is not by avoiding historical deforestation in indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s that consistent<br />
actions to guarantee the future of the vast carbon stock in these l<strong>and</strong>s can be developed. Wrongly<br />
degraded areas located in these l<strong>and</strong>s can <strong>and</strong> should be recovered, but the main focus should be<br />
on preventing patterns of deforestation that have been observed in other parts of the <strong>Amazon</strong><br />
from reaching indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s.<br />
<strong>Indigenous</strong> l<strong>and</strong>s in the <strong>Amazon</strong> are affected in various ways by processes of colonial<br />
occupation, agricultural frontier expansion, <strong>and</strong> implementation of large infrastructure projects.<br />
In other words, indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s (as well as conservation units <strong>and</strong> other forested areas) located<br />
along the “arc of deforestation” (including Eastern Pará, Northern Mato Grosso, <strong>and</strong> Central<br />
Rondônia) have forest carbon stocks <strong>and</strong> other environmental services which are exposed to<br />
greater pressures <strong>and</strong> are therefore subject to a higher level of future risk.<br />
Therefore, it may be concluded that indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s located in regions under greater<br />
pressure are better suited for development of <strong>REDD</strong>-type projects, which have reducing<br />
deforestation as their main objectives. In this case, these would be projects which intend to<br />
prevent, for decades, the regional deforestation pattern from penetrating indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s.<br />
Nevertheless, reducing deforestation, in spite of benefitting climate <strong>and</strong> offering other<br />
immediate positive results, is a limited-time objective, since it is hoped that, in the not-sodistant<br />
future, deforestation in the <strong>Amazon</strong> will be limited to legally permitted levels. The greater<br />
challenge, both in the short <strong>and</strong> long run, is ensuring perennial carbon stocks in the <strong>Amazon</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s for the future.<br />
In this strategy, the importance of indigenous l<strong>and</strong>s in more remote regions grows, more<br />
markedly so along the borders between Brazil <strong>and</strong> other <strong>Amazon</strong> countries, not only because of<br />
the vast area <strong>and</strong> large forest carbon stocks contained therein, but also because they make up<br />
Av o i d e d d e f o re s t A t i o n (redd) A n d i n d i g e n o u s p e o p l e s: experiences, chAllenges A n d o p p o r t u n i t i e s in t h e A m A zo n c o n t e x t 13