Waste Management in Ireland: Benchmarking Analysis and ... - Forfás
Waste Management in Ireland: Benchmarking Analysis and ... - Forfás
Waste Management in Ireland: Benchmarking Analysis and ... - Forfás
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
18<br />
proposes that the l<strong>and</strong>fill levy be <strong>in</strong>creased further to €50 per tonne <strong>in</strong> 2011 <strong>and</strong> to €75<br />
per tonne <strong>in</strong> 2012. Such significant <strong>in</strong>creases would cement <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>’s position <strong>in</strong> the<br />
most expensive countries/ regions for l<strong>and</strong>fill disposal costs <strong>and</strong> would be a poor signal<br />
of national commitment to improv<strong>in</strong>g cost competitiveness 22 .<br />
Follow<strong>in</strong>g a European Court of Justice f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g, provisions were <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> the<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ance Act 2010 to apply VAT of 13.5% to waste services (net fee but not the levy)<br />
provided by local authorities. The market survey undertaken by RPS <strong>in</strong>dicated that VAT<br />
was be<strong>in</strong>g charged on the total figure (i.e. net fee <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>fill levy figure) thus<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the overall cost <strong>and</strong> amount<strong>in</strong>g to a form of double taxation.<br />
2.4.1.2 Negotiable L<strong>and</strong>fill Gate Fee <strong>in</strong> the Market<br />
It is recognised that the Irish l<strong>and</strong>fill gate fee <strong>in</strong> the market is often lower as the gate charge<br />
can be negotiated based on a number of factors such as the volumes of waste offered, the<br />
source of the waste, commercial pressures on the l<strong>and</strong>fill owner, credit rat<strong>in</strong>g of the supplier<br />
offer<strong>in</strong>g the waste, etc. Similar offers are likely to be available <strong>in</strong> other countries but it was<br />
not possible to ga<strong>in</strong> an underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of the negotiable price <strong>in</strong> other countries/ regions.<br />
Figure 6b: Negotiable L<strong>and</strong>fill Gate Fees <strong>in</strong> <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> versus Advertised Gate Fees <strong>in</strong><br />
Benchmarked Countries/ Regions (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g levy), 2010 (€ per tonne)<br />
€160.00<br />
€140.00<br />
€120.00<br />
€100.00<br />
€80.00<br />
€60.00<br />
€40.00<br />
€20.00<br />
€0.00<br />
Source: RPS<br />
43 42 54<br />
0 6 0<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gapore (2010)<br />
New Zeal<strong>and</strong> (2010)<br />
Maasachusetts<br />
(2010)<br />
Net Fee Levy<br />
22 52 57<br />
58<br />
Scotl<strong>and</strong> (2010)<br />
42 44<br />
In order to ga<strong>in</strong> an underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of how much the gate fees <strong>in</strong> <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> can vary, <strong>Forfás</strong><br />
asked RPS to seek quotes from a number of l<strong>and</strong>fill sites <strong>in</strong> <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> for negotiable<br />
l<strong>and</strong>fill gate fees. Six l<strong>and</strong>fill sites were surveyed by RPS (there were 30 open<br />
22<br />
Rega<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g competitiveness <strong>and</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g down costs are recognised as key pr<strong>in</strong>ciples to achieve<br />
economic stabilisation <strong>in</strong> the revised Programme for Government 2009.<br />
Fl<strong>and</strong>ers (2010)<br />
Sweden (2010)<br />
81<br />
56<br />
30<br />
<strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong> (2010) Range<br />
of negotiated price<br />
48<br />
64<br />
Denmark<br />
(2009/2010)<br />
30<br />
107<br />
Netherl<strong>and</strong>s (2010)