Waste Management in Ireland: Benchmarking Analysis and ... - Forfás
Waste Management in Ireland: Benchmarking Analysis and ... - Forfás
Waste Management in Ireland: Benchmarking Analysis and ... - Forfás
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6<br />
or disposal for quantities of waste which would exceed those that they or their agents<br />
might reasonably expect to control as proposed by the Draft Statement.<br />
Improv<strong>in</strong>g waste management cost competitiveness: A number of proposed policy<br />
measures have the potential to further damage <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>’s cost competitiveness at a time<br />
when Irish companies are struggl<strong>in</strong>g to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> exports, market share <strong>and</strong><br />
employment. In particular:<br />
The Draft Statement of <strong>Waste</strong> Policy commits to very significant <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> the<br />
l<strong>and</strong>fill levy 5 . In light of recent policy measures to divert waste from l<strong>and</strong>fill (such as<br />
regulations to enforce segregation <strong>and</strong> separate collection <strong>and</strong> market <strong>in</strong>itiatives to<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease waste prevention <strong>and</strong> develop the national recyclates <strong>in</strong>dustry), the need<br />
for significant levies is lessened. Apply<strong>in</strong>g significantly <strong>in</strong>creased l<strong>and</strong>fill waste<br />
levies will <strong>in</strong>crease the costs of do<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess further, particularly for those <strong>in</strong><br />
manufactur<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>in</strong> key sectors such as food <strong>and</strong> pharmaceuticals), <strong>and</strong> runs counter<br />
to national policy to improve <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>’s cost competitiveness. <strong>Forfás</strong> recommends<br />
refra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g from these <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>and</strong>fill levy <strong>in</strong> the current economic climate<br />
<strong>and</strong> that any future <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>and</strong>fill levy should reflect the pric<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
externalities (environmental <strong>and</strong> other damage caused by l<strong>and</strong>fill) as proposed by<br />
the ESRI 6 .<br />
Postpon<strong>in</strong>g the waste-to-energy levy until a waste-to-energy market is established<br />
here 7 <strong>and</strong> avoid<strong>in</strong>g any volumetric based levies on waste-to-energy. This is seen as<br />
essential to develop<strong>in</strong>g the waste-to-energy market as a waste management option<br />
for Irish enterprise, ensur<strong>in</strong>g economies of scale are realised <strong>and</strong> avoid<strong>in</strong>g potential<br />
damage to <strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>’s reputation as a dest<strong>in</strong>ation for <strong>in</strong>vestment.<br />
A proposed cap on <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>eration levels should not be <strong>in</strong>troduced as it st<strong>and</strong>s to <strong>in</strong>hibit<br />
economies of scale which are key to br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g Irish waste costs more <strong>in</strong>to l<strong>in</strong>e with<br />
our competitors. This is essential to develop<strong>in</strong>g the waste-to-energy market as a<br />
waste management option for Irish enterprise <strong>and</strong> to avoid potential damage to<br />
<strong>Irel<strong>and</strong></strong>’s reputation as a dest<strong>in</strong>ation for <strong>in</strong>vestment.<br />
Recycl<strong>in</strong>g targets beyond exist<strong>in</strong>g EU commitments or penalties for local authorities<br />
which are proposed <strong>in</strong> the Draft Statement should be avoided as they will add to<br />
costs for Irish bus<strong>in</strong>esses.<br />
For l<strong>and</strong>fill, VAT is currently be<strong>in</strong>g applied on the total amount (net entry fee <strong>and</strong><br />
the l<strong>and</strong>fill levy) thus <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the overall cost for bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong> amount<strong>in</strong>g to a<br />
form of double taxation. <strong>Forfás</strong> recommends that the Revenue Commissioners<br />
reconsider their VAT Guidance Note for Public Bodies <strong>and</strong> require Local Authorities<br />
to charge VAT on the net fee only.<br />
Reduc<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g delays: Lengthy delays <strong>in</strong> the plann<strong>in</strong>g process are hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
negative impact on the timely delivery of key waste management <strong>in</strong>frastructures <strong>and</strong><br />
5<br />
The recent policy direction on waste levies has proposed that the levy should rise from €30 per tonne<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2010 to €50 per tonne <strong>in</strong> 2011 <strong>and</strong> to €75 per tonne <strong>in</strong> 2012.<br />
6<br />
The ESRI recommends a €44.50-55.10 levy for l<strong>and</strong>fills with no flar<strong>in</strong>g or gas capture <strong>and</strong> reduced rates<br />
for l<strong>and</strong>fills with appropriate methane management.<br />
7<br />
When the market is established, <strong>Forfás</strong> would be <strong>in</strong> favour of levies that reflect the pric<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
externalities as proposed by the ESRI - a €9.80-10.70 levy for urban <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erators (with no transfers to<br />
local residents) <strong>and</strong> a €6.00-6.10 levy for rural <strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>erators (with no transfers to local residents).