26.10.2013 Views

Stop Copyists From Undercutting Your Innovation - Foley & Lardner ...

Stop Copyists From Undercutting Your Innovation - Foley & Lardner ...

Stop Copyists From Undercutting Your Innovation - Foley & Lardner ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chint – What do we learn?<br />

Chint v. Schneider and Holley v. Samsung illustrate a<br />

trend towards higher damages awarded by Chinese<br />

courts – finally to a level to effectively deter<br />

infringement?<br />

Importance of forum – what is special about<br />

Zhejiang province?<br />

Failure to take advantage of the “utility model”<br />

patent system<br />

– In 2008, of the 226,000 utility model applications<br />

filed, < 1% were filed by foreign entities<br />

– Yet, these utility patents may well be enforceable<br />

©2009 <strong>Foley</strong> & <strong>Lardner</strong> LLP<br />

Chint - China’s IP Wisdom?<br />

In 1999<br />

– Hitachi, Panasonic, Mitsubishi, Time-Warner, Toshiba<br />

and JVC (6C) issued a statement alleging that various<br />

Chinese DVD player manufactories infringed about<br />

2,000 patents owned by 6C. Chinese DVD<br />

manufacturers, without assessment of the merit of<br />

the allegation, agreed to pay $4 royalty per player.<br />

– Then other foreign companies followed, as of 2006,<br />

Chinese DVD manufacturers pay about $20 royalty for<br />

each player, which equals about $12.5B profit within<br />

5 years.<br />

©2009 <strong>Foley</strong> & <strong>Lardner</strong> LLP<br />

39<br />

40<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!