Phoenix Journal 197 - Four Winds 10

elow, please do so now before going on to John Ray’s reply to Mr. Bare.
Rob W. Bare, Esq.
c/o State Bar of Nevada
1325 Airmotive Way, Suite 140
Reno, Nevada 89502
February 9, 1997
John H. Ray
916 Swartmore Court
Schaumburg, Illinois 60193
Re: Complaint of HARASSMENT resulting from inquiry to State Bar of Nevada on conduct of certain
NV attorneys.
Dear Mr. Rob W. Bare, Esq.,
I find it highly probable that you, in finally acting on my Oct. 17, 1996 inquiry into the questionable conduct
of attorney(s) Abbott and Horton, Esqs., have now invoked this same harassing conduct towards me that
generated my initial concerns. This was the purpose of my request for an inquiry into this type of harassment
and coercion being condoned in Nevada.
I am now receiving packets of materials from unknown source(s) (postmarked, Las Vegas) with only the
envelope addressed to me. They contained a letter to you, Rob W. Bare, from an Ann Beam, President of
Infinite Balance, Inc. with copy(s) to Abbott and Horton, Esq. in reference to CONTACT, the Phoenix
Project. It seems this “CONTACT”, which I assume is another Nevada corporation, is also having difficulties
with Abbott and Horton, Esq., judging by the contents of this letter. I also received (unknown
source) a copy of a letter to a Doris Ekker from a Sharri, which also made reference to CONTACT.
These were in addition to copies of numerous legal filings involving various other Nevada corporations, a
George Green, Betty Tuten and motions to disqualify attorneys representing corporations in dispute with
David Horton’s clients. This was the exact complaints and rumors I had heard, which initiated concern for
my own as well as other Nevada corporations and caused me to request an inquiry.
I found it strange that in your previous response (delayed two months) you also referred to CONTACT
and not The Phoenix Institute for Research & Education mentioned in my original inquiry request. Then
suddenly I began receiving packets (from “unknown source[s]” that intentionally conceal their identity)
containing materials directly connected to a dispute between those representing CONTACT and the clients
of David Horton, Esq. I can’t help but suspect that you may be inadvertently providing unscrupulous
character(s) with the names and addresses of anyone inquiring into the conduct of David Horton, Esq.
which expands and perpetuates an already questionable and unethical practice of harassment. I am reluctant
to believe you would intentionally aline or jeopardize your reputation through association with this type
of intimidating actions against anyone questioning what I perceive to be unethical practices.
64