01.11.2013 Views

Bjarne Lied: C0-C2-frakturer - Oslo universitetssykehus

Bjarne Lied: C0-C2-frakturer - Oslo universitetssykehus

Bjarne Lied: C0-C2-frakturer - Oslo universitetssykehus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>C0</strong>-<strong>C2</strong> Frakturer<br />

100512<br />

<strong>Bjarne</strong> <strong>Lied</strong><br />

Nevrokirurgisk avdeling<br />

<strong>Oslo</strong> Universitetssykehus-Ullevål


Cervicale fracturer<br />

• Upubliserte data fra OUS- Ullevål (Fredø et al.)<br />

viser en estimert insidens på 11.8/100 000 pr år.<br />

• Ca, 46% <strong>C0</strong>-<strong>C2</strong> fracturer<br />

• Fallulykker dominerer<br />

• Ca. 25% opereres, resten behandles konservativt<br />

med krage.


Columna<strong>frakturer</strong> 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

<strong>C2</strong> 17 22 25 20 22 23<br />

C3-C7 19 51 55 74 59 74<br />

Thorakal 10 24 18 25 14 15<br />

Lumbal 17 19 26 14 15 19<br />

Skallestrekk 9 12 5 4 6 2<br />

Fjerne fiksasjon 1 7 14 14 12 6<br />

Columna<strong>frakturer</strong> 73 135 143 151 128 139


Comparative effectiveness of using computed tomography alone to<br />

exclude cervical spine injuries in obtunded or intubated patients: metaanalysis<br />

of 14,327 patients with blunt trauma.<br />

J Neurosurg. 2011 Sep;115(3):541-9. Panczykowski DM, Tomycz ND, Okonkwo DO.Source<br />

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA<br />

CONCLUSIONS:<br />

Modern CT alone is sufficient to detect unstable cervical spine injuries in<br />

trauma patients. Adjuvant imaging is unnecessary when the CT scan is<br />

negative for acute injury. Results of this meta-analysis strongly show<br />

that the cervical collar may be removed from obtunded or intubated<br />

trauma patients if a modern CT scan is negative for acute injury.


Clearing the cervical spine in obtunded patients.<br />

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 15;33(14):1547-53<br />

Harris TJ, Blackmore CC, Mirza SK, Jurkovich GJ.Source<br />

School of Medicine, University of Washington, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA.<br />

• Optimal method for excluding cervical spine injury in obtunded trauma<br />

patients remains controversial.<br />

• Of 590 screened patients, 367 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.<br />

• Initial CT imaging failed to identify an injury in 1 patient, for a false<br />

negative rate of 0.3% (1/367): a cervical cord contusion identified on<br />

subsequent physical examination, confirmed by magnetic resonance<br />

imaging, and managed nonoperatively.<br />

• Initial CT imaging identified all unstable cervical spine injuries in<br />

obtunded trauma patients.


MRI is unnecessary to clear the cervical spine in obtunded/comatose<br />

trauma patients: the four-year experience of a level I trauma center. J<br />

Trauma. 2008 May;64(5):1258-63.<br />

Tomycz ND, Chew BG, Chang YF, Darby JM, Gunn SR, Nicholas DH, Ochoa JB, Peitzman AB, Schwartz E, Pape HC, Spiro RM, Okonkwo<br />

DO.Source<br />

Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, USA. tomycznd@upmc.edu<br />

• A total of 690 patients were identified who had undergone<br />

contemporaneous C-spine CT and MRI. Of this group, 180 patients<br />

(26.2%) were identified as having a normal CT with sagittal and coronal<br />

reconstructions, no neurologic deficit, and Glasgow Coma Scale score<br />


Hva er normalanatomi?<br />

(occipitalisering av atlas 0.8-3% av befolkningen)


<strong>C0</strong>-<strong>C2</strong> normal anatomi, men obs<br />

splittfraktur


<strong>C0</strong>-<strong>C2</strong> ua, men obs. C4 og C5


Occipitale Condyle Fracturer,<br />

Anderson og Montesano, Spine 1988<br />

• Type 1; Comminuted from impact<br />

• Type 2; Extension of a linear basilar skull fracture<br />

• Type 3; Avulsion of a fragment fracture<br />

• Kun Type 3 blir ansett som ustabil


Anderson -Montesano<br />

• Type1,<br />

Udislosert occipital condyl<br />

fraktur. Stabil-Ingen<br />

behandling.<br />

• Evtl. krage for<br />

smertebehandling<br />

Tuppen av os<br />

odontoid


Anderson-Montesano<br />

• Type 2<br />

Dislosert occipital condyl<br />

fraktur<br />

• Stabil<br />

• Evtl. krage mot smerter<br />

Hypoglossus kanal


Ekstern immobilsering med MIAMI


Anderson -Montesano<br />

• Type 3<br />

• Bilateral condylfraktur<br />

Occipitocervical fix eller<br />

halovest


Tuli et al.<br />

nytt klassifiseringsssytem 1997<br />

(MR )<br />

• Type 1; Fracture undisplaced and stable.<br />

• Type 2A; Displaced fracture of occipital condyle<br />

with stability of the occiput C1-<strong>C2</strong> levels<br />

• Type 2B; Instability at the occiput –C1-<strong>C2</strong> levels


Tuli type 2B<br />

• ** Fracture<br />

• *Bilateral occipito-atlanto<br />

and atlanto-axial joint<br />

widening, equivalent to<br />

complete craniocervical<br />

dissociation


Occipitocervical fiksasjon<br />

• 2 skruer i occiput<br />

• Transartikular skrue C1-<br />

<strong>C2</strong><br />

• Massa lateralisskruer C3-<br />

C4<br />

• Beingraft for solid benet<br />

fusjon


Halovest


Atlasfracturer


Klassifisering<br />

• Type1: Fraktur av en bue (31-45%)<br />

• Type 2: Fractur av burst type( klassisk Jefferson<br />

fraktur 37-51%)<br />

• Type 3: Fraktur laterale massiv (13-37%)


C1 fractur jan 2012<br />

70 år gammel kvinne


Februar 2012


Ultimo april 2012


Jefferson fractur(buefractur C1)


Jefferson fractur<br />

• Behandles som regel konservativt med stiv<br />

nakkekrage i 12 uker.<br />

• Hvis laterale massiv er sprengt av mer enn 5<br />

millimeter overveies operativ behandling.


Konklusjon, hva er en ustabil<br />

skade <strong>C0</strong>-C1?<br />

• Bilateral occipital condyl fraktur eller ensidig<br />

occipital condyl fractur med tegn på kontralateral<br />

leddskade, <strong>C0</strong>/C1(>2mm) eller C1/<strong>C2</strong>(>3mm)<br />

• Her bør operativ behandling vurderes.


<strong>C2</strong> dens fraktur<br />

• Odontoid <strong>frakturer</strong> utgjør 9-15% av alle cervicale<br />

fracturer<br />

• Ofte lavenergitraume hos eldre pasienter<br />

• Hyppigste symptom er nakkesmerter,<br />

nevrologiske symptomer er sjeldne, men<br />

sannsynligvis mørketall for de som dør av fall på<br />

skadestedet.


Anderson and D` Alonzo 1974, senere<br />

subklassifisering av Hadley 1988 og<br />

Greuer 2005.


Surgical management of acute odontoid fractures: Surgery-related<br />

complications and long term outcomes in a consecutive series of 97<br />

patients. J.Trauma april 2012, Rizci, Fredø, <strong>Lied</strong>, Nakstad, Rønning,Helseth, <strong>Oslo</strong>, Norway<br />

• Klassifisering etter Grauer<br />

• 3/97 Type 2A<br />

• 63/97 Type 2C<br />

• 8/97 Type 2C<br />

• 23/97 Type 3


Surgical management of acute odontoid fractures: Surgery-related<br />

complications and long term outcomes in a consecutive series of 97<br />

patients. J.Trauma april 2012, Rizci, Fredø, <strong>Lied</strong>, Nakstad, Rønning,Helseth, <strong>Oslo</strong>, Norway<br />

• Studieperiode 2002-2009, alle <strong>C2</strong>-dens fracturer opereres ved Ullevål<br />

Sykehus<br />

• Med 2.7 mio innbyggere i Helse Sør-Øst, gir dette en insidens på 0,45<br />

opererte dens<strong>frakturer</strong> pr. 100 000 pr. år<br />

• Median alder 73 år (20-94),<br />

• 78.4% av pasientene var over 60 år og 34% var over 80 år


Surgical management of acute odontoid fractures: Surgery-related<br />

complications and long term outcomes in a consecutive series of 97<br />

patients. J.Trauma april 2012, Rizci, Fredø, <strong>Lied</strong>, Nakstad, Rønning,Helseth, <strong>Oslo</strong>, Norway<br />

• Resultater<br />

• 4.1% mortalitet iløpet av 30 dager<br />

• 2 pasienter fikk forverret nevrologisk status etter inngrepet<br />

• Ingen hematomer, infeksjoner, DVT eller LE<br />

• 57 pasienter tilgjengelig for CT kontroll med tanke på fusjon<br />

• 82% benet fusjon<br />

• 18% usikker fusjon(fibrøs fusjon)


74 år gammel kvinne november<br />

2005


Februar 2006, 3 mnd. Krage<br />

( MIAMI)


November 2006<br />

(ett år etter skaden)


Juli 2008


Status<br />

• Ingen spesielle plager fra nakken


Fremre fusjon dens fractur<br />

Type 2<br />

• Stulik et al. Acta Chir.Orthop.2002<br />

-fremre fusjon med en eller to skruer.<br />

91,3% tilheling.


C1/<strong>C2</strong>-skruer


CNS 2001<br />

• Type 2 fractur, alder>50 år eller fracturer type 2<br />

og 3 som er disloserte mer enn 5mm eller<br />

comminutte i alle aldre skal vurderes for<br />

fiksasjon.


Jackson fractur (Hangman)<br />

inndeling etter Effendi J.Bone and<br />

Joint Br.1981


Fraktur pars interarticularis <strong>C2</strong>


Hangman fraktur<br />

• Noe misvisende navn, da fractur av pars<br />

interarticularis <strong>C2</strong> som regel skyldes<br />

hyperekstensjon og axialt trykk.


Hangman fractur<br />

Type 2 and 3(Effendi) Case for Surgery.<br />

(UUS anterior fixation with bone graft)<br />

Pros: No turn around of the patient, shorter op. Time, less blood loss<br />

Cons: sometime technical more demanding<br />

less stability compared with post. Fix.


Behandlingsstrategi<br />

Traumatisk Spondylolisthesis<br />

of the Axis(Hangman)<br />

CNS 2001<br />

• Effendi type 2 og 3 bør vurderes for operativ<br />

behandling.


Takk for meg

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!