04.11.2013 Views

The 2nd International Olympic Games in Athens 1906.

The 2nd International Olympic Games in Athens 1906.

The 2nd International Olympic Games in Athens 1906.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for not go<strong>in</strong>g to St. Louis, this behaviour now must be<br />

regarded as an <strong>in</strong>sult to the IOC and the <strong>Olympic</strong> <strong>Games</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Athens</strong>. This time he did not listen to WAGNER <strong>in</strong> Bayreuth,<br />

but prepared a conference <strong>in</strong> the Comédie Française. 85<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>Olympic</strong> <strong>Games</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Athens</strong> the eight IOC members<br />

present came together several times 86 for the 8 th Session:<br />

BRUNETTA d’USSEAUX (Italy), Count MERKATI (Greece), Count<br />

von der ASSEBURG and GEBARDT (Germany), Viktor BALCK<br />

and Count Clarence von ROSEN (Sweden), Baron Frederick<br />

W. van TUYLL van SEROOSKERKEN (<strong>The</strong> Netherlands) and<br />

GUTH (Bohemia). <strong>The</strong> representative of the British <strong>Olympic</strong><br />

Association, Lord William Henry DESBOROUGH 87 , also took part<br />

<strong>in</strong> the consultations. Unfortunately there is no protocol of the<br />

sessions. <strong>The</strong> secretary-general BRUNETTA d’USSEAUX would<br />

have been responsible. He died <strong>in</strong> 1918. His <strong>in</strong>heritance has<br />

vanished. Thus, we depend on COUBERTIN’S report <strong>in</strong> the Revue<br />

Olympique, accord<strong>in</strong>g to which the IOC members discussed<br />

,,standardised rules for the future <strong>Olympic</strong> <strong>Games</strong>”. A commission<br />

was already to meet on this <strong>in</strong> January 1907 <strong>in</strong> <strong>The</strong> Hague 88 .<br />

<strong>The</strong> question of the rules was noth<strong>in</strong>g new and unusual.<br />

COUBERTIN would not have had to write a résumé of his life’s<br />

work or a justification for his activities for this? Was noth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

else talked about <strong>in</strong> <strong>Athens</strong>? He rema<strong>in</strong>s silent <strong>in</strong> the Twentyone<br />

Years of Sport Campaign. <strong>The</strong> time between 1905 (Brussels)<br />

and 1908 (London) is not mentioned, apart from the art<br />

congress <strong>in</strong> Paris. In the <strong>Olympic</strong> Memories there are at least<br />

h<strong>in</strong>ts to be found: <strong>The</strong> members were supposed to have lost<br />

the direction, had decided on a reorganisation of the IOC and<br />

offered the Greek crown pr<strong>in</strong>ce honorary chairmanship. 89<br />

COUBERTIN on the IOC Session 1906 <strong>in</strong> <strong>Athens</strong><br />

“<strong>The</strong> n<strong>in</strong>e or ten colleagues who had come to <strong>Athens</strong> had temporarily<br />

lost the direction <strong>in</strong> the meet<strong>in</strong>g and Brunetta d’Usseaux felt<br />

<strong>in</strong>capable of br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g them back on to the right track. <strong>The</strong>y had<br />

come to a sort of decision of reorganis<strong>in</strong>g the IOC and even offer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the crown pr<strong>in</strong>ce honorary chairmanship.”<br />

So that was it! <strong>The</strong> IOC wanted to separate itself from<br />

COUBERTIN. To vote him directly out of office though had<br />

obviously appeared too risky to the few IOC members at the<br />

session <strong>in</strong> <strong>Athens</strong>. COUBERTIN had been elected president for<br />

ten years. So there were two possibilities: to found a new<br />

committee or to negotiate with COUBERTIN. <strong>The</strong>y opted for<br />

the second, perhaps because the eight IOC members<br />

constituted only a part of the committee. 90 It is also possible<br />

that not all agreed. BRUNETTA d’USSEAUX be<strong>in</strong>g COUBERTIN’S<br />

representative was surely on his side. He also had been the<br />

only IOC member present <strong>in</strong> <strong>Athens</strong> as well as <strong>in</strong> the Comédie<br />

Française a few weeks later. Was COUBERTIN not open for<br />

negotiations? Was this the reason why BRUNETTA d’USSEAUX<br />

had been <strong>in</strong> Paris? At any rate COUBERTIN wrote 25 years later:<br />

,,Apart from the last decision [?] all had to be approved by the president.<br />

He rejected all, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the honorary chairmanship of the crown<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ce.“ 9 1 As to how far COUBERTIN had to make concessions<br />

towards the IOC he himself does not <strong>in</strong>dicate. <strong>The</strong> Greek<br />

crown pr<strong>in</strong>ce met COUBERTIN <strong>in</strong> Paris and had “a long<br />

conversation on this topic. It was neither pleasant for him nor for me<br />

but the whole matter was so grotesque that <strong>in</strong> the end we both had to<br />

laugb about it.” 92<br />

Apart from BRUNETTA d’USSEAUX, COUBERTIN was <strong>in</strong>formed<br />

on the results of the session <strong>in</strong> <strong>Athens</strong> <strong>in</strong> letters by two further<br />

IOC members: TUYLL van SEROOSKERKEN 93 and MERKATI 94 .<br />

But they both refer to data already provided by BRUNETTA<br />

d’USSEAUX. Apparently he had sent out a form of protocol, so<br />

that they only go <strong>in</strong>to two <strong>in</strong>dividual areas of the session while<br />

describ<strong>in</strong>g their personal evaluation. <strong>The</strong>y both confirm that<br />

questions concern<strong>in</strong>g rules were <strong>in</strong>tensively discussed. Both<br />

mention the person of James SULLIVAN, the organiser of the<br />

<strong>Games</strong> 1904 <strong>in</strong> St. Louis and ma<strong>in</strong> critic of COUBERTIN.<br />

Apparently he took part <strong>in</strong> the sessions. TUYLL van<br />

SEROOSKERKEN and MERKATI consider <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g him by<br />

grant<strong>in</strong>g him membership <strong>in</strong> the IOC. 95 <strong>The</strong>y do not comment<br />

on the <strong>in</strong>tention of remov<strong>in</strong>g COUBERTIN from office.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to MERKATI though a reorganisation of the IOC<br />

85<br />

In his Mémoires Olympiques (p. 50) he also openly admits that he had needed an excuse.<br />

86<br />

In the previous sessions the participation was comparable: 1896 <strong>in</strong> <strong>Athens</strong> seven of 15, 1897 <strong>in</strong> Le Havre n<strong>in</strong>e of 16, 1901 <strong>in</strong> Paris n<strong>in</strong>e<br />

of 25, 1904 <strong>in</strong> London 14 of 31, 1905 <strong>in</strong> Brussels 15 of 29, 1906 <strong>in</strong> <strong>Athens</strong> eight of 31 members.<br />

87<br />

Lord William Hippolyte DESBOROUGH of TAPLOW, born GRENFELL (1855-1945) was from listed as IOC member <strong>in</strong> the Revue Olympique from July<br />

<strong>1906.</strong> Shortly beforehand he came <strong>in</strong> second <strong>in</strong> fenc<strong>in</strong>g (team rat<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>in</strong> <strong>Athens</strong>. C OUBERTIN knew him s<strong>in</strong>ce the London IOC Session of 1904.<br />

88<br />

Revue Olympique 6(1906)5, p. 80. <strong>The</strong> 10 th IOC Session 1907 <strong>in</strong> <strong>The</strong> Hague discussed the planned program of the <strong>Olympic</strong> <strong>Games</strong><br />

1908 <strong>in</strong> London <strong>in</strong> detail.<br />

89<br />

»Assemblés, les neuf ou dix collègues venus à Athènes y avaient un moment perdu le nord et Brunetta d’Usseaux s’était trouvé impuissant à les<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenir. Ils avaient voté une sorte de résolution impliquant le réorganisation procha<strong>in</strong>e du CIO et en avaient même offert la présidence d’honneur<br />

au pr<strong>in</strong>ce royal» (COUBERTIN, Mémoires, p. 53).<br />

90<br />

COUBERTIN also <strong>in</strong>dicates that: »Aussi bien la ‘session’ d’Athènes à laquelle ne participaient ni Laffan, ni Baillet-Latour, ni Blonay, ni Sloane, ne pouvait passer<br />

pour représenter la doctr<strong>in</strong>e olympique de façon <strong>in</strong>tégrale» (Mémoires, p. 53). Had these perhaps protested aga<strong>in</strong>st the decisions made <strong>in</strong> <strong>Athens</strong>?<br />

91<br />

»Tout cela d’ailleurs, sauf le dernière résolution, demeurait soumis à l’approbation du président. Or, le président désavoua le tout, y compris l’honorariat<br />

décerné au prime royal» (COUBERTIN, Mémoires, p. 53).<br />

92<br />

»Le pr<strong>in</strong>ce et moi nous eûmes, à Paris, peu après, un long entretien à ce sujet. Ce n’étends agréable ni pour lui, ni pour moi, mais la situation était si<br />

grotesque que nous f<strong>in</strong>îmes par en rire» (COUbert<strong>in</strong>, Mémoires, p. 53. Also <strong>in</strong>: Revue Olympique 7[1907]8, p. 319).<br />

93<br />

On 30.04. and 20.05.l906 (IOC Archive).<br />

94<br />

On 21.05. (IOC Archive). On the writ<strong>in</strong>g of DESBOROUGH to COUBERTIN see below.<br />

95<br />

But COUBERTIN did not accept him.<br />

JOURNAL OF OLYMPIC HISTORY ◆ VOLUME 10 ◆ DECEMBER 2001/JANUARY 2002 ◆ 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!