13.11.2013 Views

Executive Summary - GFDRR

Executive Summary - GFDRR

Executive Summary - GFDRR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

on the condition defined, specific intervention<br />

actions should be established, in which<br />

are considered, among other factors, mitigation<br />

works (when these are mitigable) or the<br />

resettlement of families (when it is not mitigable).<br />

In some cities where there is greater<br />

management capacity, progress has been<br />

made in the establishment of risk reduction<br />

criteria and intervention policies. However,<br />

implementing a national policy will provide<br />

instruments for the municipalities to duly develop<br />

actions oriented to appropriately manage<br />

high-risk areas.<br />

Reduce the amount of housing in<br />

high-risk areas by implementing integral<br />

neighborhood improvement and family resettlement<br />

programs from nonmitigable risk<br />

areas. The focalization of actions aimed at reducing<br />

exposure and vulnerability is an effective<br />

option to diminish risk conditions. This<br />

means incorporating in the POT and the PD<br />

projects and specific investments that are focused<br />

on implementing these two programs as<br />

basic axes to reduce existing risks. The development<br />

of these programs entails the participation<br />

of different municipal agencies so that their<br />

intervention is carried out completely and integrally.<br />

Sectors related to housing, education,<br />

social welfare, and public services, among others,<br />

should work jointly. Moreover, and with<br />

the purpose of protecting areas that have been<br />

resettled, surveillance, municipal land use,<br />

and occupation control programs are required<br />

through the participation and intervention<br />

not only from the responsible entities, but also<br />

within the same communities.<br />

Promote and continue the efforts carried<br />

out in the cities (case studies) for crosscutting<br />

inclusion of disaster risk management<br />

in planning and municipal investments as a<br />

fundamental strategy in land development.<br />

The cities studied (Bogota, Cali, Medellin,<br />

Barranquilla, Manizales, Cucuta) should promote<br />

more decisively and/or continue with the<br />

strategies that incorporate disaster risk management<br />

in planning, actions, and municipal<br />

or district investments. It should be pointed<br />

out that Cali needs to implement a specific<br />

strategy to mainly manage seismic risk and<br />

floods. Likewise, Barranquilla has to do the<br />

necessary to manage its landslides and floods<br />

(specifically for the well-known streams). A<br />

Risk Management Plan that relies on essential<br />

financing for its development should be<br />

prepared and implemented by all of the cities<br />

analyzed. This plan should include actions to<br />

carry out effective risk management caused by<br />

natural and unintentionally human-induced<br />

phenomena. Also, the plan should incorporate<br />

activities in risk knowledge and its reduction,<br />

as well as disaster management.<br />

Six MAIN challenges TO ACHIEVE governance in disaster risk management in Colombia and THIRTY proposed ACTIVITIES TO ACCOMPLISH it 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!