13.11.2013 Views

Batchelder v. Kawamoto Appellees' Brief - Greines, Martin, Stein ...

Batchelder v. Kawamoto Appellees' Brief - Greines, Martin, Stein ...

Batchelder v. Kawamoto Appellees' Brief - Greines, Martin, Stein ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page<br />

B. The Trial Court Properly Exercised Its Discretion In Ruling<br />

That The Action Should Be Dismissed As A Matter Of<br />

International Comity. 40<br />

C. The Trial Court Properly Exercised Its Discretion To<br />

Dismiss Under The Doctrine Of Forum Non Conveniens. 43<br />

D. Plaintiffs Choice Of Forum Was Entitled To No Deference.<br />

44<br />

E. Japan Is An Adequate, Alternative Forum For Adjudication<br />

Of Plaintiff's Only Viable Claims - Those Asserted Against<br />

The Directors Of Honda Japan. 46<br />

F. Differences Between Japan And United States Do Not Render<br />

Japan An Inadequate Forum. 49<br />

G. Private Interest Factors Favored Dismissal. 52<br />

H. Public Interest Factors Likewise Favored Dismissal. 56<br />

a IV. THE COMPLAINT FAILS TO STATE A CLAIM UNDER SECTION<br />

14(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT, BECAUSE HONDA JAPAN IS AN<br />

EXEMPT FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER. 60<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

a<br />

STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES (NINTH CIRCUIT RULE 28-2.6)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!