roote-prokop-2013-g3-drosophila-genetics-training-all
roote-prokop-2013-g3-drosophila-genetics-training-all
roote-prokop-2013-g3-drosophila-genetics-training-all
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A. Prokop - A rough guide to Drosophila mating schemes 30<br />
Appendix 2. A trihybrid cross<br />
Example of a trihybrid cross between heterozygous parents (P, top) involving recessive <strong>all</strong>eles on X, 2 nd and<br />
3 rd chromosomes (separated by semicolons). Homologous <strong>all</strong>eles are separated by a horizontal line; maternal<br />
<strong>all</strong>eles are shown in black, paternal ones in blue. Mutant <strong>all</strong>eles are w (white; white eyes), vg (vestigial;<br />
reduced wings), e (ebony; dark body colour); phenotypes are indicated by fly diagrams (compare Fig. 9). In<br />
the first offspring/filial generation (F1) each chromosome has undergone independent assortment of <strong>all</strong>eles<br />
(demarcated by curly brackets) and each of the four possible outcomes per chromosome can be combined<br />
with any of the outcomes of the other two chromosomes resulting in 4 x 4 x 4 = 64 combinations. The Punnett<br />
square at the bottom systematic<strong>all</strong>y lists <strong>all</strong> possible combinations (different phenotype classes are colourcoded<br />
and display a 18:18:6:6:6:6:2:2 distribution; symbols are explained at the bottom). Red and blue<br />
stippled boxes show the same examples of two possible offspring in both the curly bracket scheme and the<br />
Punnett square. Note that the Punnett square reflects the numerical outcome of this cross in its full<br />
complexity, whereas the curly bracket strategy only qualitatively reflects potential combinations and is easier<br />
to interpret for the purpose of mating scheme design (Box 5).