The Generation Gap-WHY? - Herbert W. Armstrong
The Generation Gap-WHY? - Herbert W. Armstrong
The Generation Gap-WHY? - Herbert W. Armstrong
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
40 Th e PLAIN TRUTH November, 1968<br />
and elsewhere gat hered toget her at<br />
Jerusalem to observe God 's fest ival of<br />
Pentecost (Acts 2: 5-ll ) . As all these<br />
believers who received God's Holy<br />
Spirit gathered toget her, they were<br />
un ited in a bond of Christia n love and<br />
felIowship perhaps never before known.<br />
As many of those who came from a<br />
distance stayed 111 Jerusalem longer<br />
than they or igina lly int ended, it became<br />
necessary for them to sell part of their<br />
possessions and goods. <strong>The</strong>y had need<br />
of cash proceeds to pay the expense of<br />
this lengt hened stay.<br />
As is stated in Acts 4 :32, there was<br />
such a feeling of un ity in dealing wit h<br />
common prob lems, that no mall Mid<br />
o r recko ned in his own mi nd that<br />
his possessions - which he personally<br />
owned - were solely h is own. Rath er,<br />
he voluntarily used his possessions in<br />
such a way that they would fi ll the<br />
needs of the gro up as well as h imself.<br />
A man 's property still-legdliyremained<br />
his own, but he did not say it<br />
was his own. Instead he treated his own<br />
personal property as if it were common<br />
property.<br />
T hat the early Ch ristians did not<br />
pool all their resources and goods can<br />
also be proved by other scriptures.<br />
In Acts 5 : 1-1 1 - the vcry next chapter<br />
- is the story of Ananias and<br />
Sapphira who had a piece of pro perty<br />
they wished to sell in order to g ive the<br />
proceeds to the Church. T hey said they<br />
were giving ALL of it, but actually they<br />
kept back part for themselves. God<br />
pu nished them for lying.<br />
\'(fhen Peter rebuked them for this<br />
deed, he exp lained the legal relationship<br />
existing between these two people and<br />
their property. He said, "\X'h ilc it [ the<br />
property] remained, was it not tbine<br />
ou-n? And after it was sold, was it<br />
[ the money] not in thine own power?"<br />
( Acts 5:4. )<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no Communism here. Th ese<br />
early Christians were capitalists - they<br />
own ed p roperty !<br />
Th e property - as well as the money<br />
when it was sold - belonged comple tely<br />
and totally to Anan ias and Sapphira<br />
to do with as they willed . T hey could<br />
spend it, or contribute it. If contr ibuted,<br />
it was a voluntary, freewill offering.<br />
Th is is a far cry from Commun ism as<br />
it IS practiced today, whe re each indiv<br />
idual's property is confisc(Jted and<br />
the proceeds are distributed by a single<br />
person or a small committee or party.<br />
A final point to remember is that the<br />
New Testamen t makes frequent references<br />
to the rich and the poor in the<br />
Church. (See especially I Ti m. 6:17-19;<br />
James I :9-10. ) Th e believers at Antioc h<br />
were instru cted to give, each "according<br />
to h is ability" (Acts 11:29 ), when a<br />
collection was taken for the "poor<br />
saints" (Rom. 15:26) who were sufferin<br />
g a d rought in Jerusalem. Such<br />
d istinctions wou ld have. been impossi ble<br />
if all pro perty were had in common.<br />
Th ese facts PROVE that the early<br />
Chr istians did NOT p ractice Commu nism<br />
of AN Y kind. <strong>The</strong> Bible simply docs<br />
not teach Commu nism !<br />
WJat- our<br />
READERS SAY<br />
(Continued fro m inside fr ont cover}<br />
Darwin's T heory, etc. I have read one<br />
issue of Tb e P L AI N T RUT H . and I am<br />
really confused, for in it I saw my<br />
beliefs crash to earth. I am living in a<br />
state of ignorance, both to myself and<br />
to my Creator. I never knew your books<br />
could be so explosive, fo r my sole belief<br />
was that 'cheap things arc no good.' And<br />
<strong>The</strong> P LAIN T RUT H was free! I was<br />
shocked into changing my mind."<br />
Roy R.,<br />
T rin idad, W . I.<br />
N on -partisan<br />
"Please continue to send me your<br />
excellent magazine. What is most impressive<br />
is your honest, unbiased reporting.<br />
Such impartiality is possible,<br />
I think, only because you are independent<br />
of political pressures and backing.<br />
What you say hurts at times. But the<br />
med icine that cures is often bitter. And<br />
w hat ever you say is worth read ing because<br />
it provokes thought. Th ank you<br />
for the valuable material you have sent<br />
me."<br />
Tryne C. A.,<br />
T halambuwa, M aho, Ceylon .<br />
• Th e PLAIN TRUTH d oes not take<br />
sides, and ex presses no parlisan or<br />
national oiesopoint,<br />
HOW<br />
YOUR PLAIN TRUTH<br />
SCRIPTION HAS BEEN<br />
SUB<br />
PAID<br />
M any ask: " HOW' doe s it happen that<br />
my subscriptio n has been prepaid ? <strong>WHY</strong><br />
can't I pay my own ? HOW can you<br />
p ub lish a ma gazine of such qu ality w ithout<br />
advertisi ng revenu e ?"<br />
Th e answer is both simp le and astonishing<br />
! Tbe P LAI N TRUTH is utterl y uniq ue.<br />
Your pre pai d subscription is on ly one of<br />
many examples of that . It is a maga zine<br />
o f UNDE RSTAN D ING of today's fas t<br />
ch an ging and in credible worl d conditions<br />
- of changing soci al , family, and persona l<br />
problems - of the MEANIN G and PUR<br />
POSE of life.<br />
O thers report wo rld news - describe<br />
W HA 1"S \'