18.12.2013 Views

The Generation Gap-WHY? - Herbert W. Armstrong

The Generation Gap-WHY? - Herbert W. Armstrong

The Generation Gap-WHY? - Herbert W. Armstrong

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40 Th e PLAIN TRUTH November, 1968<br />

and elsewhere gat hered toget her at<br />

Jerusalem to observe God 's fest ival of<br />

Pentecost (Acts 2: 5-ll ) . As all these<br />

believers who received God's Holy<br />

Spirit gathered toget her, they were<br />

un ited in a bond of Christia n love and<br />

felIowship perhaps never before known.<br />

As many of those who came from a<br />

distance stayed 111 Jerusalem longer<br />

than they or igina lly int ended, it became<br />

necessary for them to sell part of their<br />

possessions and goods. <strong>The</strong>y had need<br />

of cash proceeds to pay the expense of<br />

this lengt hened stay.<br />

As is stated in Acts 4 :32, there was<br />

such a feeling of un ity in dealing wit h<br />

common prob lems, that no mall Mid<br />

o r recko ned in his own mi nd that<br />

his possessions - which he personally<br />

owned - were solely h is own. Rath er,<br />

he voluntarily used his possessions in<br />

such a way that they would fi ll the<br />

needs of the gro up as well as h imself.<br />

A man 's property still-legdliyremained<br />

his own, but he did not say it<br />

was his own. Instead he treated his own<br />

personal property as if it were common<br />

property.<br />

T hat the early Ch ristians did not<br />

pool all their resources and goods can<br />

also be proved by other scriptures.<br />

In Acts 5 : 1-1 1 - the vcry next chapter<br />

- is the story of Ananias and<br />

Sapphira who had a piece of pro perty<br />

they wished to sell in order to g ive the<br />

proceeds to the Church. T hey said they<br />

were giving ALL of it, but actually they<br />

kept back part for themselves. God<br />

pu nished them for lying.<br />

\'(fhen Peter rebuked them for this<br />

deed, he exp lained the legal relationship<br />

existing between these two people and<br />

their property. He said, "\X'h ilc it [ the<br />

property] remained, was it not tbine<br />

ou-n? And after it was sold, was it<br />

[ the money] not in thine own power?"<br />

( Acts 5:4. )<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is no Communism here. Th ese<br />

early Christians were capitalists - they<br />

own ed p roperty !<br />

Th e property - as well as the money<br />

when it was sold - belonged comple tely<br />

and totally to Anan ias and Sapphira<br />

to do with as they willed . T hey could<br />

spend it, or contribute it. If contr ibuted,<br />

it was a voluntary, freewill offering.<br />

Th is is a far cry from Commun ism as<br />

it IS practiced today, whe re each indiv<br />

idual's property is confisc(Jted and<br />

the proceeds are distributed by a single<br />

person or a small committee or party.<br />

A final point to remember is that the<br />

New Testamen t makes frequent references<br />

to the rich and the poor in the<br />

Church. (See especially I Ti m. 6:17-19;<br />

James I :9-10. ) Th e believers at Antioc h<br />

were instru cted to give, each "according<br />

to h is ability" (Acts 11:29 ), when a<br />

collection was taken for the "poor<br />

saints" (Rom. 15:26) who were sufferin<br />

g a d rought in Jerusalem. Such<br />

d istinctions wou ld have. been impossi ble<br />

if all pro perty were had in common.<br />

Th ese facts PROVE that the early<br />

Chr istians did NOT p ractice Commu nism<br />

of AN Y kind. <strong>The</strong> Bible simply docs<br />

not teach Commu nism !<br />

WJat- our<br />

READERS SAY<br />

(Continued fro m inside fr ont cover}<br />

Darwin's T heory, etc. I have read one<br />

issue of Tb e P L AI N T RUT H . and I am<br />

really confused, for in it I saw my<br />

beliefs crash to earth. I am living in a<br />

state of ignorance, both to myself and<br />

to my Creator. I never knew your books<br />

could be so explosive, fo r my sole belief<br />

was that 'cheap things arc no good.' And<br />

<strong>The</strong> P LAIN T RUT H was free! I was<br />

shocked into changing my mind."<br />

Roy R.,<br />

T rin idad, W . I.<br />

N on -partisan<br />

"Please continue to send me your<br />

excellent magazine. What is most impressive<br />

is your honest, unbiased reporting.<br />

Such impartiality is possible,<br />

I think, only because you are independent<br />

of political pressures and backing.<br />

What you say hurts at times. But the<br />

med icine that cures is often bitter. And<br />

w hat ever you say is worth read ing because<br />

it provokes thought. Th ank you<br />

for the valuable material you have sent<br />

me."<br />

Tryne C. A.,<br />

T halambuwa, M aho, Ceylon .<br />

• Th e PLAIN TRUTH d oes not take<br />

sides, and ex presses no parlisan or<br />

national oiesopoint,<br />

HOW<br />

YOUR PLAIN TRUTH<br />

SCRIPTION HAS BEEN<br />

SUB­<br />

PAID<br />

M any ask: " HOW' doe s it happen that<br />

my subscriptio n has been prepaid ? <strong>WHY</strong><br />

can't I pay my own ? HOW can you<br />

p ub lish a ma gazine of such qu ality w ithout<br />

advertisi ng revenu e ?"<br />

Th e answer is both simp le and astonishing<br />

! Tbe P LAI N TRUTH is utterl y uniq ue.<br />

Your pre pai d subscription is on ly one of<br />

many examples of that . It is a maga zine<br />

o f UNDE RSTAN D ING of today's fas t­<br />

ch an ging and in credible worl d conditions<br />

- of changing soci al , family, and persona l<br />

problems - of the MEANIN G and PUR­<br />

POSE of life.<br />

O thers report wo rld news - describe<br />

W HA 1"S \'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!