The Generation Gap-WHY? - Herbert W. Armstrong
The Generation Gap-WHY? - Herbert W. Armstrong
The Generation Gap-WHY? - Herbert W. Armstrong
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Who is REAllY for<br />
"Law and Order"?<br />
Who WILL bring " law and<br />
order" to our society? What<br />
is the ANSWER to the most<br />
disquieting domestic crisis of<br />
this century?<br />
by Roderick C. Me redith<br />
et A rising contempt of and disn<br />
regard f ~r law and order<br />
lies at the heart of the<br />
growing violence in America today,"<br />
says ]. Edgar Hoover.<br />
Why ?<br />
What has go ne wrong with Ameri <br />
can, British and other Western sooeties?<br />
In the United States-<br />
Why is it un safe for so many<br />
Americans to walk on their streets at<br />
night ? Why is the Can ad ian and<br />
British crime rate also spiralling<br />
upward?<br />
A Situation of CRISIS<br />
Overall, the FBI reports crime in<br />
the United States rose 21% during the<br />
first six months of 1968 over the corresponding<br />
months in 1967. Armed<br />
robberies increased 340/0 du ring this<br />
period. Violent crimes of murder,<br />
forcible rape, robbery and aggravated<br />
assault increased 21% as a group.<br />
From Vancouver, British Columbia,<br />
Police Chief Ralph Booth reported<br />
that major crime in Vancouver increased<br />
by eleven percent last year. He<br />
said the 1967 increase compared with<br />
an increase of only three percent in<br />
1966.<br />
W riting in the London Daily Express,<br />
Percy Hoskins stated earlier<br />
this year: "London in the late 1960's<br />
could become a mini-version of the<br />
Chicago of the 1930' s if violence continues<br />
to increase at its present rate.<br />
Already, after only 43 days of 1968 the<br />
trend is alarmingly clear. Last year,<br />
crimes of brutality, particularly when<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
so<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
62<br />
1960-1967<br />
63<br />
/<br />
64<br />
r ",:' rIJ r;<br />
[lCJJ1: I ~ -<br />
65<br />
-Ii'<br />
66<br />
I<br />
'I<br />
I l;{!J.;l/I v' f,lh<br />
~ I<br />
....-:. :~,=--:j::'-:-\-<br />
1960 61<br />
~<br />
, i~ I I I<br />
"<br />
67