20.12.2013 Views

Windmill Road Corridor Zoning

Windmill Road Corridor Zoning

Windmill Road Corridor Zoning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Context<br />

<strong>Windmill</strong> <strong>Road</strong><br />

<strong>Windmill</strong> <strong>Road</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> <strong>Zoning</strong><br />

The current Land Use Bylaw (LUB) for this area focuses mainly on separating land uses, requirements for parking, distances between buildings and maximum heights. These<br />

zoning tools do little to encourage complete communities with a mix of uses, walkable streets, and protection of established neighbourhoods. Phase 1 of the Centre Plan proposes<br />

updating the existing LUB to accommodate opportunities for well-designed development on this key corridor, while protecting the character and scale of surrounding<br />

neighbourhoods.<br />

The maps below identify the portion of the corridor to be included in Phase 1 of the Centre Plan and affected by the amended LUB. Comments/feedback regarding the boundaries<br />

of the study site are welcome.<br />

<strong>Windmill</strong> <strong>Road</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong><br />

Boundary<br />

Street view of <strong>Windmill</strong> Rd. <strong>Corridor</strong><br />

Current <strong>Zoning</strong> in Dartmouth<br />

The C-2 zone allows most commercial uses, except for cabarets, pawn shops,<br />

and adult entertainment. There is no maximum building height (except for certain<br />

lands near Lake Banook where there is a 35' limit), and buildings can cover<br />

almost the entire lot except for 10' landscaped areas abutting streets and<br />

residential zones. The zone also allows certain residential uses - single and two<br />

unit dwellings, townhouses, and group homes. For more than 2 units the<br />

development agreement process, which requires public consultation and<br />

approval by council, allows consideration of larger scale buildings.<br />

The R-3 and R-4 zones allow single and two unit dwellings, townhouses, and<br />

group homes for up to 12 residents. For more than two dwelling units the<br />

development agreement process, which requires public consultation and<br />

approval of council, allows consideration of large scale buildings in the zone.<br />

There is no height limit in the zone.<br />

The R-2 zone allows only single and two unit dwellings, and group homes for up<br />

to 6 residents. Lot coverage of buildings is limited to 35%.<br />

The P (Parks) zone allows only parks and open spaces. The S (Institutional)<br />

zone allows schools, government offices, and public works.


Alternatives<br />

<strong>Windmill</strong> <strong>Road</strong><br />

<strong>Windmill</strong> <strong>Road</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> Case Study<br />

The case study below compares the existing build form context with the allowable full build-out under current regulations and the possible full build-out under proposed<br />

regulations. The specific site was chosen, as it highlights key attributes of the proposed regulations for its respective corridor.<br />

Existing Build Form Context<br />

Full Build-out Under Current Regulations<br />

Current zoning regulations focus on controlling and separating uses, i.e. commercial, residential and institutional<br />

uses. These regulations may include maximum heights, maximum lot coverage, and minimum requirements for<br />

parking and building setbacks to property lines. However, the existing regulations do little to encourage good<br />

design and only minimally reflect adjacent properties. The lack of design guidelines can result in a building that<br />

overwhelms its site, that does not positively contribute to the pedestrian experience, and which overshadows its<br />

adjacent neighbourhood.<br />

Possible Full Build-out Under Proposed Regulations<br />

The regulations under consideration will encourage mixed use residential and commercial developments along<br />

corridors, which will contribute to the concept of complete and walkable neighbourhoods. In some cases,<br />

maximum proposed heights will be greater than what is allowed under existing regulations. In other cases,<br />

the maximum proposed heights will be less than what is currently allowed. In both cases, however, the proposed<br />

height framework will better reflect the build form context of the existing neighbourhoods, all the while allowing<br />

for economically viable building heights. The maximum height and massing controls which will be applied to each<br />

site will preserve sky views, will ensure a minimum amount of sunlight on sidewalks, and will mitigate against<br />

adverse wind conditions. New design guidelines will result in an aesthetically pleasing architecture and will<br />

ensure a positive pedestrian experience.


Proposed<br />

<strong>Windmill</strong> <strong>Road</strong><br />

Facilitating Development While Protecting Neighbourhood Character<br />

This project proposes to create guidelines that will protect the unique characteristics of this neighbourhood and surrounding streets, while capitalizing on the opportunity to bring<br />

growth and vitality to the community. The guidelines will introduce key design standards to ensure that buildings fit and enhance the neighbourhood. These standards will protect<br />

sunlight and skyview, while controlling wind and shadow. Street wall heights, building heights, stepbacks, setbacks, etc. will respect adjacent properties while allowing for<br />

increased density.<br />

The table and images below describe some of the key design standards proposed for this area. Please share your thoughts on these.<br />

Key Building Variables<br />

<strong>Windmill</strong> Rd.<br />

Section View<br />

A<br />

Building Line<br />

(The line at which a new building<br />

must establish it's Street Wall)<br />

Setback needed to<br />

have 4.5m Sidewalk<br />

(-4.5m )<br />

B<br />

Required Public Way<br />

(distance between facing building<br />

lines)<br />

( 20.8m )<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Max Ht.<br />

Max Street Wall Ht.<br />

(% of distance between facing<br />

Building Lines)<br />

1.25* Public Way<br />

( 26.0m )<br />

80%<br />

( 16.64m )<br />

E<br />

Max Rear Ht.<br />

0.60 * Back Street R.O.W.<br />

( 18.0m )<br />

F<br />

Front Angular Plane<br />

45 degrees from top of<br />

Street Wall<br />

G<br />

Rear Angular Plane<br />

45 degrees from Rear Set<br />

Back at Rear Wall Ht.<br />

NOTE<br />

Design Guidelines<br />

Rules From Downtown<br />

Halifax Design Manual<br />

The proposed design standards reflect<br />

the existing buildings and maintain a<br />

human scale from the street by<br />

permitting a maximum of 4 storeys at the<br />

building front, which could then stepup<br />

to a maximum of 8 storeys.<br />

8 storeys would be the maximum height,<br />

based on the width of <strong>Windmill</strong> Rd.<br />

View Looking South West From <strong>Windmill</strong><br />

View Looking North West from <strong>Windmill</strong><br />

At the rear, the building would again<br />

stepdown to 5 storeys, to ensure that the<br />

existing neighbourhood at the rear is<br />

respected.<br />

View Looking North East From Rear.<br />

View Looking South East From Rear


What Do You Think?<br />

<strong>Windmill</strong> <strong>Road</strong><br />

<strong>Windmill</strong> <strong>Road</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> Neighbourhood Character<br />

The questions below are intended to help the Centre Plan team determine how residents feel about the proposed building form, and what other design qualities should be<br />

considered to enhance the neighbourhood.<br />

1. Think about a street that you like anywhere in the world. What is it about it that makes<br />

it great?<br />

2. Take a look at the proposed building model for this corridor, does this massing and<br />

scale achieve the goal of densification while still fitting well with the adjacent<br />

neighbourhoods? Do the step-backs and transitions respect adjacent properties?<br />

3. Understanding this is a corridor intended for densification, what should we protect and<br />

enhance? What other design qualities should be considered?<br />

4. Do you have any other comments?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!