20.12.2013 Views

Untitled - UNU-IAS

Untitled - UNU-IAS

Untitled - UNU-IAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2 Differences in Environmental Policy Development<br />

Role of Local Government<br />

Japan<br />

Korea<br />

China<br />

Japan<br />

Korea<br />

China<br />

Japan<br />

Korea<br />

Local governments initiated environmental policy beginning with the Tokyo Prefectural Ordinance for<br />

Pollution Control of 1949. Subsequently, local governments adopted several advanced policy<br />

instruments such as environmental impact assessment in advance of the central government. Such local<br />

governments’ initiatives were possible because of the Local Autonomy System provided in the 1946<br />

Constitution.<br />

In the President Park Chung-Hee era, Korea centralized her administrative power, and the central<br />

government played the main role in environmental preservation. Until quite recently, local governments<br />

showed little or no concern about environmental issues. Because Korea has gradually restored the Local<br />

Autonomy System due to democratization since the late 1980s, large local governments such as Seoul<br />

and Taejon have enacted their own ordinances for environmental preservation since the mid 1990s.<br />

China has adopted the Democratic Centralized System based on her socialist constitution, and local<br />

governments have had very limited autonomy. For this reason, the central people’s government has<br />

dominated environmental protection activities. However, the Environmental Protection Law of 1989<br />

requires that local people’s governments accept responsibility for maintenance environment quality. In<br />

near future, the role of local governments will become important.<br />

Information Disclosure<br />

The citizens’ movements against pollution, represented in cases such as the Honshu- seishi Incident of<br />

1958, have had a strong influence on environmental policy development. In 1967 the Basic Law for<br />

Pollution Control was enacted in response to public pressures, and the Environmental White Paper for<br />

environmental information disclosure has been published annually since 1969.<br />

The Korean government, at one time, regarded anti-pollution movements as anti-government<br />

movements, such as the case of pollution damages in the Ulsan industrial area during the late 1960s.<br />

Since the early 1980s, environmental information disclosure has gradually been promoted. Since<br />

democratization in the late 1980s, campaigns in the mass media for environmental preservation have<br />

become prominent.<br />

Under the rule of Mao Zedong, information disclosure about both the state of environment and the<br />

public reaction against pollution was very limited. However, as a part of the policy reform since 1978,<br />

environmental policy has progressed. Since 1990, the Chinese government has published annual<br />

environmental reports.<br />

Influence from International Pressure<br />

Pressure from foreign countries, especially from USA, has influenced Japanese environmental policy<br />

development. Examples of this include the improvement of Sumida River’s water quality just before the<br />

Tokyo Olympic Games in 1964, the regulation on exhaust gases in the USA’s Muskie Act of 1970, and<br />

the criticism of Japanese pollution dumping in the U.S. President’s statement in 1970.<br />

Korea also reduced the air pollution in Seoul, just before the Seoul Olympic Games in 1988. In near<br />

future, the Korean government will be required to response to global environmental issues equal to<br />

developed countries as a member nation of OECD.<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!