applicability of competition law principles on public sector ...

TABLE OF CASES
Akzo Nobel v. Commission, Case T-112/05 paragraph 62.
American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League (2008), F.3d 736
ArcellorMittal Luxembourg SA v Commission, Joined cases C-201/09 P and C-216/0996
Austin Rover Group, OJ 1988 L45/34.
Beguelin Import v GL Import-Export, [1971] ECR 949 (para 8).
Centrafarm v. Sterling Drug , [1974] ECR 1147 (para 45).
Christiani & Nielsen, OJ 1969 LI165/12.
City <strong>of</strong> Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Adver., 499 U.S. 365, 370 (1991)
Clearstream Banking AG . v Commission, Case T‐301/04, paragraph 198.
Commission v. Italy(V), [1998] ECR I-3851 (para. 49)
Coomber v. Justices <strong>of</strong> Berks, (1883-84) 9 App. Cas. 61,74.
Copperweld Corporation v. Independence Tube Corporation (1984), 104 S. Ct. 2739
Daimeler-Chrysler v. Commission, [2003] ECR II-5512 para 32.
Dansk Rorindustri and Others v. Commission, [2005] ECR I-5425 (para. 112)
Diego Cali & Figli v. Servizi ecologici porto di Genova, [1997] ECR I-1547 (para 16-17).
Eridania/ISI, M 62, 1991.
Europemballage and Continental Can v Commission, [1973] ECR 215 (para 15)
Federacion Espanola de Empresas de Tecnologia Sanitatria (‘FENIN’) v. Commission, [2006]
ECR I-6295 (para.25).
Federacion Espanola de Empresas de Tecnologia Sanitatria (‘FENIN’) v. Commission, [2006]
ECR I-6295 (para.25).
FENIN v. Commission, [2006] ECR I-6295 (para.25).
v