25.12.2013 Views

ABSTRACT - DRUM - University of Maryland

ABSTRACT - DRUM - University of Maryland

ABSTRACT - DRUM - University of Maryland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

where n = (R∆, −I∆) field describes the non-trivial configuration <strong>of</strong> the superconducting<br />

order parameter. We assume the following boundary condition for n<br />

field:<br />

|n(r)| → const as |r| → ∞. (3.35)<br />

As mentioned above, this model Hamiltonian has particle-hole symmetry, timereversal<br />

symmetry and chiral symmetry which is given by γ 5 . It anticommutes with<br />

the Dirac Hamiltonian {γ 5 , H D } = 0. Therefore, all zero modes Ψ 0 <strong>of</strong> H D are<br />

eigenstates <strong>of</strong> γ 5 . Since (γ 5 ) 2 = 1 eigenvalues <strong>of</strong> γ 5 are ±1. We define ± chirality <strong>of</strong><br />

zero modes as γ 5 Ψ ± 0<br />

= ±Ψ ± 0 . The analytical index <strong>of</strong> H D is defined as<br />

ind H D = n + − n − , (3.36)<br />

where n ± are number <strong>of</strong> zero modes with ± chirality.<br />

The index theorem for the Hamiltonian H D states that the analytical index is<br />

identical to the winding number <strong>of</strong> the background scalar field in the two-dimensional<br />

space [84]:<br />

ind H D = − 1 ∫<br />

2π<br />

d i x ɛ abˆn a ∂ iˆn b , (3.37)<br />

where ˆn = n/|n|. According to the index theorem, the number <strong>of</strong> zero modes is<br />

determined by the topology <strong>of</strong> order parameter at infinity. The right hand side is<br />

ensured to be an integer by the fact that the homotopy group π 1 (S 1 ) = Z. If we<br />

have a vortex in the system with vorticity l, the right hand side <strong>of</strong> (3.37) evaluates<br />

exactly to l. Thus the index theorem implies that the Dirac Hamiltonian has at least<br />

l zero modes which agrees with explicit solution obtained by Jackiw and Rossi [82].<br />

Our explicit solutions for a single vortex in the previous section also agrees perfectly.<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!