25.12.2013 Views

BETWEEN BEDROOMS AND BALLOTS: THE POLITICS OF HIV'S ...

BETWEEN BEDROOMS AND BALLOTS: THE POLITICS OF HIV'S ...

BETWEEN BEDROOMS AND BALLOTS: THE POLITICS OF HIV'S ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HIV/AIDS. Protest and collective action around the disease have been prevalent in these two<br />

countries (in the 1990s in the U.S. and more recently in South Africa) and have been shaped by<br />

openings in the political institutions, opportunities for participation and contestation, and the<br />

framing of the disease as a human rights issue. But what occurs in countries with weak states<br />

and civil societies; where a strong history of repression, fear and violence exists; and where<br />

opportunities to free-ride may in fact outnumber those to engage? As Campbell notes in one of<br />

the first detailed studies to highlight the political failure of AIDS programs:<br />

community mobilization, and the associated concepts of grassroots participation and<br />

representation, and of multi-stakeholder partnerships…form the cornerstone of HIV<br />

prevention programmes the world over, and are…key strategies for building healthy<br />

communities. Participation and representation are also the foundations of democracy, so<br />

this is a research question that has relevance way beyond the health and development<br />

arenas. (Campbell 2003: 11)<br />

Yet political science in general, and the subfield of comparative politics in particular, has<br />

failed to incorporate this into the mainstream agenda, as the topic has traditionally been relegated<br />

to the fields of medical anthropology and public health. The AIDS crisis, however, “demands<br />

political as well as technical solutions because it is deeply associated with national priority<br />

setting and because it often involves overcoming conflicting interests at the core of national and<br />

international political processes.” (WHO 2005: 35) By overlooking the AIDS domain, we who<br />

are comparativists have been missing out on a grave situation that impacts how democracy is<br />

unfolding (particularly in developing countries with an authoritarian past) and crucial strategies<br />

employed by those on the ground with little access to resources to fill in the gaps, which has<br />

implications for governance and the manner by which we try and explain the ‘development’ of<br />

poor nations.<br />

This study thus aims to change the neglect of AIDS by juxtaposing various topics within<br />

comparative politics: access to resources and influences from both formal and informal<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!