25.12.2013 Views

View Original - Middle East Technical University

View Original - Middle East Technical University

View Original - Middle East Technical University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hence, just before the start of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina the country<br />

was divided at the side of the three national parties, which were the Muslim Party of<br />

Democratic Action (SDA), the Serb Democratic Party (SDS) and the Croat<br />

Democratic Union (HDZ). Regardless of the delicate coalition preserved between<br />

the Croat and Muslim parties, the three parties then had different visions about<br />

the future of Bosnia and Herzegovina:<br />

The Muslim party advocated a united and centralized Bosnia and<br />

Herzegovina, independent from the remaining Yugoslav republics. The<br />

Serb party advocated the division of Bosnia along national lines, while the<br />

Croat party supported the independence of the country provided that its<br />

exclusive control over the Croat populated parts, primarily in west<br />

Herzegovina, remained uncontested. Each of the three positions was as the<br />

result of a mixture of ideological and pragmatic considerations. 5<br />

The Bosnian Muslims which composed the relative majority of the<br />

population were seen by the other two communities intending to have political<br />

dominance over the country. The Bosnian Serbs aspired to control the regions<br />

inhabited with Serbs. This aim later evolved to the creation of an independent state<br />

which could afterwards be merged to the Republic of Serbia. In response, the<br />

Bosnian Croats desired the separation of Croat regions to be united with the<br />

Republic of Croatia.<br />

Delegates of the three communities invited the Bosnian President “to propose<br />

a declaration of sovereignty that would reconcile differing views” but the war in<br />

Croatia hindered those efforts and a compromise was never reached. 6 Thus, Muslim<br />

and Croat parties passed a resolution without consent of the Serbs demanding<br />

sovereignty for Bosnia. 7 In response members of the SDP left the parliament.<br />

Consequently, Serbian districts were established and a plebiscite was organized to<br />

demonstrate Serbian opposition to Bosnia’s secession from Yugoslavia. In short,<br />

decision of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina to secede from the former<br />

Yugoslavia, during its dissolution process, led to an armed conflict over the control<br />

of territory and political dominance.<br />

5 Aleksandar Pavkovic, The Fragmentation of Yugoslavia Nationalism and War in the Balkans,<br />

London: MacMillan Press, (2 nd edition), 2000, pp. 157-158.<br />

6 Robert J. Donia, John V.A. Fine, JR., Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Tradition Betrayed , p. 229.<br />

7 Ibid., p. 229.<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!