Download

Notes to Pages 187–189 387
40. Carl Schurz, “Present Aspects of the Indian Problem,” NAR 133 (July 1881),
1; Helen Hunt Jackson, A Century of Dishonor: The Early Crusade for Indian Reform
(New York, 1965), 341–342; [A. F. Bandelier], “Removal of the Apaches from Arizona,”
Nation (September 9, 1886), 208; “The Week,” Nation (June 16, 1870), 375;
Robert Patterson, “Our Indian Policy,” OM 11 (September 1873), 210; H. H. [Helen
Hunt Jackson?], “The Wards of the United States Government,” Scribner’s 19
(1879), 777–778; M. E. Strieby, “The Look Forward,” AmMiss 39 (1885), 353; [A. A.
Woodhull], “The Plains of the Great West,” Nation (February 8, 1877), 91. Jackson
was not making a case for preservation of the Indian way of life. She advocated only
the fulfillment of treaty commitments and a scrupulous regard for Indian property
rights, a solution that most reformers considered nearly as unsatisfactory as the existing
system. She seemed more interested in white peace of mind than in doing something
substantive about the problem of the Indian in white civilization.
41. [G. E. Pond], “The New Indian Hostilities,” Nation (January 17, 1867), 52;
[Cox], “A Century of Dishonor,” 152; Herbert Welsh, “The Past and Present Indian
Question,” NEM 9 (October 1990), 258; “The Two Indian Policies,” AmMiss 32
(1878), 102; [J. N. Pomeroy], “The Recent Change in the Indian Bureau,” Nation (August
17, 1871), 100; Thomas Williamson, “The Indian Question,” PR 50 (October
1876), 628; George E. Tinker, Missionary Conquest: The Gospel and Native American
Cultural Genocide (Minneapolis, 1993), 126n.
42. [Joseph Anderson], “Red Cloud Seen through Friendly Eyes,” Nation (July 28,
1870), 62; Vincent Colyer, “Shall the Red- Men Be Exterminated?” Putnam’s 14 (September
1869), 367–374; Joel Pfister, Individuality Incorporated: Indians and the Multicultural
Modern (Durham, NC, 2004), 70; “The Week,” Nation (June 16, 1870), 375;
L. Edwin Dudley, “How to Treat the Indians,” Scribner’s 10 (1875), 484; [Joseph Anderson],
“The Indian in Literature,” Nation (November 20, 1873), 342; J. Elliot, “Our
Indians and the Duty of the Presbyterian Church to Them,” PR 5 (1876), 77; John S.
Hittell, “The Doom of the Californian Aborigines,” OM 11 (June 1888), 614.
43. See the figures in “Indian Notes,” AmMiss 32 (1878), 41; [Garrick Mallery],
“Lessons of the Bannock War,” Nation (July 25, 1878), 51–52; Carl Schurz, “Aspects
of the Indian Problem,” AmMiss 37 (1883), 106; Carl Schurz, “Present Aspects of the
Indian Problem,” NAR 133 (1881), 6; [J. D. Cox], “The Army and the Indians,” Nation
(April 15, 1880), 292. Brian W. Dippie, The Vanishing American: White Attitudes
and U.S. Indian Policy (Middletown, CT, 1982), 122–129. The population
figures would continue to decline until they reached their nadir in the census of
1900. On the eigh teenth century, see Joseph S. Lucas, “Civilization or Extinction:
Citizens and Indians in the Early United States,” The Journal of the Historical Society
6:2 (2006), 235–249.
44. H. H., “The Wards of the United States Government,” Scribner’s 19 (1879),
782; “The Week,” Nation (July 16, 1874), 34.
45. “The Native Races of America,” Galaxy 19 (1875), 76; J. C. Cremony, “The
Apache Race,” OM 1 (September 1868), 201; “Among the Sioux of Dakota,” Nation