Download

416 Notes to Pages 313–319
Effect on American Commerce of an Anglo- Continental War,” 550, 539, 545; [Godkin],
“Neutrals and Contraband,” 165; “Belligerents and Neutrals,” Nation (August 3,
1876), 70; Theodore Woolsey, “The Alabama Question,” NEYR 28 (July 1869), 619.
Given the situation, Godkin at one point suggested quick intervention on behalf of
one side or the other as a way of resolving the otherwise intolerable problems posed
by neutrality. See [Godkin], “Neutrals and Contraband,” 165.
38. [A. G. Sedgwick], “Our Position in Case of a War,” Nation (April 25, 1878),
271; “The Coast and the Navy,” Century 37 (April 1889), 952; [Horace White], “The
Uses of a Navy,” Nation (April 18, 1889), 319; “Miscellany,” Appleton’s 13 (January
30, 1875), 159.
39. S. W. Boardman, “Arbitration as a Substitute for War,” Princeton 30 (1874), 315;
“The Week,” Nation (February 5, 1880), 88; “The Week,” Nation (August 24, 1882), 145.
40. Henry Cabot Lodge, “Colonialism in the United States,” AM 51 (May 1883),
626; “American Diplomacy,” AM 22 (1868), 348; “The American Diplomatic Ser v-
ice,” Nation (February 27, 1868), 166; [E. L. Godkin], “Something More about Our
‘Case’,” Nation (March 21, 1872), 181.
41. T. R. Lounsbury, “The Two Locksley Halls,” Scribner’s 6 (1889), 252, 253; “The
Man Versus the State,” Nation (July 9, 1885), 40.
42. [E. L. Godkin], “What the United States Does for Eu rope,” Nation (January 6,
1881), 4; Charles H. Stockton, “The Reconstruction of the U.S. Navy,” OM 16 (October
1990), 382.
43. Edward Everett Hale, “The United States of Eu rope,” Old and New, III (March
1867), 260–267, reprinted in The Great Design of Henry IV and the United States of
Europe (Boston, 1909), 77–91; F. V. Greene, “Our Defenceless Coasts,” Scribner’s 1
(1887), 51; “The French Arms Investigation,” Nation (April 4, 1872), 212.
44. John Fiske, “Manifest Destiny,” Harper’s (March 1885), 578–590. On p. 581
Fiske, fearing the loss of republican purity, appeared to be leaning against an imperialist
future for the United States.
45. “Editor’s Easy Chair,” Harper’s 70 (1885), 972.
46. [E. L. Godkin], “What the United States Do for Eu rope,” Nation (January 6,
1881), 5; “National Strength and National Weakness,” Century 33 (February 1887),
650; Atkinson, “The Relative Strength and Weakness of Nations,” 430; Mann, “Intellectual
Basis of Civilized Peace,” 219; [W. C. Ford], “A Eu ro pe an Zollverein,” Nation
(June 30, 1887), 547.
47. I am thinking here of David Noble’s The End of American History: Democracy,
Capitalism, and the Meta phor of Two Worlds in Anglo- American Historical Writing
1880–1980 (Minneapolis, 1985), which argues that Americans “have thought and
written as if the United States was absolutely in de pen dent, standing apart in its
uniqueness from the rest of human experience” (p. 7).
48. James Anthony Froude, “En gland and Her Colonies,” PR 1 (1878), 918; “The
Week,” Nation (October 16, 1890), 299.
49. George R. Parkin, “The Reor ga ni za tion of the British Empire,” Century 37
(1888), 191–192; Soley, “The Effect on American Commerce of an Anglo- Continental