26.12.2013 Views

Nominal Compounding as a Productive Word-formation Process in ...

Nominal Compounding as a Productive Word-formation Process in ...

Nominal Compounding as a Productive Word-formation Process in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Compound<strong>in</strong>g</strong>: Phonology<br />

• Compounds differ from phr<strong>as</strong>es b<strong>as</strong>ed on<br />

• Obstruent voic<strong>in</strong>g only with<strong>in</strong> words (Jany 2010)<br />

• nëëkopk ‘founta<strong>in</strong>’ (nëëj ‘water’ + kopk ‘mounta<strong>in</strong>’)<br />

• kë’ëxooky ‘f<strong>in</strong>gernail’ (kë’ë ‘hand’ + xooky ‘nail’)<br />

But: mëk uky ‘strong purple’ (mëk ‘strong’ + uky ‘purple’)<br />

• Sonorant devoic<strong>in</strong>g only at word boundary (Jany 2010)<br />

• kaajpn ‘village’, But: kaajpnkopk ‘capital’<br />

• N<strong>as</strong>al place <strong>as</strong>similation only with<strong>in</strong> words (Jany 2010)<br />

• wiimpo’k ‘forehead’ (wi<strong>in</strong> ‘eye’ + po’k ‘b<strong>as</strong>ket’)<br />

But: wi<strong>in</strong> poop ‘sclera’ (wi<strong>in</strong> ‘eye’ + poop ‘white’)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!