26.12.2013 Views

From Disinterestedness to Engagement - OpenArchive@CBS

From Disinterestedness to Engagement - OpenArchive@CBS

From Disinterestedness to Engagement - OpenArchive@CBS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

meaning was grasped or “taken up” by a hearer and what determined that uptake’<br />

(Bruner, 1990:63) which would then allow us <strong>to</strong> establish a set of axiomatic properties<br />

required for a narrative <strong>to</strong> perform its functions, in the sense of being received with the<br />

same content as it was issued with by its sender.<br />

The relational view of narratives, on the other hand, embeds the narrative in its context on<br />

which it is dependent <strong>to</strong> acquire its meaning. Bruner (1990:63) 24 describes this context as<br />

‘felicity conditions’ which are<br />

rules not only about the propositional content of an utterance but about<br />

required contextual preconditions, about sincerity in the transaction, and<br />

about essential conditions defining the nature of the speech act. (ibid.)<br />

This points <strong>to</strong> context as a prerequisite both for understanding a narrative, and <strong>to</strong> further<br />

qualify narratives, Bruner (1990:77) points <strong>to</strong> four elements:<br />

1) ‘agentivity – action directed <strong>to</strong>ward goals controlled by agents’<br />

2) ‘that a sequential order be established and maintained – that events and states be<br />

“linearized” in a standard way’<br />

3) ‘a sensitivity <strong>to</strong> what is canonical and what violates canonicality in human<br />

interaction’<br />

4) ‘something approximating a narra<strong>to</strong>r’s perspective: it cannot, in the jargon of<br />

narra<strong>to</strong>logy, be “voiceless”’<br />

Bruner suggests the use of the Burkean pentad <strong>to</strong> qualify the dramaturgical elements of a<br />

narrative. According <strong>to</strong> this, ‘well-formed s<strong>to</strong>ries […] are composed of a pentad of an<br />

Ac<strong>to</strong>r, an Action, a Goal, a Scene, and an Instrument – plus Trouble’ (1990:50) 25 . But, as<br />

Bruner also points out (1990:150), this account may have an ethnocentric bias, it ‘may […]<br />

be <strong>to</strong>o “homeostatic” <strong>to</strong> be universal.’ (ibid.). In his note (ibid.), Bruner suggests further<br />

discussion of the issue, and I see this as an opening <strong>to</strong>wards revising the discrepancy<br />

24 Bruner (2002:34) uses narrative and s<strong>to</strong>ry interchangeably without any apparent semantic difference.<br />

25 The referred elements are Bruner’s adaptations of Burke’s equivalent elements: Act, Scene, Agent, Agency<br />

and Purpose (Burke, 1969:xv).<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!