26.12.2013 Views

Full Text PDF

Full Text PDF

Full Text PDF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Optical Sensor to Monitor Pupillary Light Reex 559<br />

contraction interval (2/3CI), which is the time for which<br />

the amplitude reaches 1/3 of the contraction phase value,<br />

1/3 redilatation interval (1/3RI), which represents the<br />

time for which the amplitude reaches 1/3 of the redilatation<br />

phase value, and nally amplitude (A), which represents<br />

the dierence between the maximum and minimum<br />

values of the diameter.<br />

2. Description of the experimental model<br />

and the test stand<br />

Design of the sensor for measuring PLR and PST as<br />

well parameters of the eyelid covering the eyeball were<br />

preceded by laboratory tests. The purpose of the research<br />

was to verify the possibility of identication of<br />

time-varying PLR behavior in relation to the PUI factor<br />

described in the literature. At the same time, the requirements<br />

for the designed optical sensor were collected. The<br />

resolution of the converter, frequency of image acquisition<br />

and required speed of the pupil detection algorithm<br />

were taken into account.<br />

The study was conducted in two stages. The rst step<br />

was research where assumptions were veried. The second<br />

stage consisted of a study of the designed PLR sensor.<br />

The rst phase of the study was preceded with a<br />

series of experimental research of the commercially available<br />

F 2 D Fit-For-Duty device by AMTech. The experimental<br />

model assumed verication of PLR parameter<br />

usability in correlation with results of the pupillography<br />

sleepiness test PST. Research was performed on a group<br />

of 10 volunteers in a laboratory environment during at<br />

night. The average age of participants was 34.8 ± 6.5<br />

years. Each participant was familiarized with the description<br />

of the experiment and agreed to participate in<br />

the study. The PLR measurements were taken on both<br />

eyeballs, which were exposed to a series of ve ashes<br />

with the interval of 30 s. The second phase of the experiment<br />

involved testing the constructed PLR sensor.<br />

Functional tests were also carried out on a group of 10<br />

volunteers. The study took place in an ophthalmology<br />

darkroom, which provided necessary conditions for testing.<br />

Measurements were performed in the identical measurement<br />

workow, as in the case of pilot studies [13].<br />

3. Test results<br />

Initial results showed high usability of the dedicated<br />

parameters characteristic for the PLR in estimating the<br />

level of fatigue and lowered concentration, as well as<br />

high correlation with the PUI index (Table I). Statistical<br />

analysis was performed using conventional statistical<br />

methods based on variance analysis. They were multi-<br />

-dimensional, multi-factor analyses of identiable variables<br />

from the pupillary reex signal, categorized by Person,<br />

Task, Eye variables and the light excitation sequence<br />

(Prole). In the subsequent measurement times, parameters<br />

were estimated that described the relative amplitude<br />

and contraction velocity of the pupillary reex (Table II).<br />

Measurements for each person were made four times with<br />

the average interval of 2 h between hours 11.00 PM and<br />

6.30 AM. These changes proved to be statistically significant.<br />

Investigations shown that the dierence between the<br />

rst and last measurement point is 3.07%. With the average<br />

value of the observed changes in pupil width of<br />

1.77 mm, the required measurement accuracy could not<br />

be less than 0.09 mm. This value is necessary to design<br />

the sensor in order to observe the changes in the work<br />

of the ANS for the experimental model adopted. It was<br />

necessary to analyze the behavior of the contraction velocity<br />

parameter in order to determine the required speed<br />

of the optical system. The scope of averaged parameter<br />

values for the rst and last measurement was 0.5 mm/s.<br />

It means that the measurement resolution cannot be less<br />

than 0.25 mm/s. These assumptions were adopted in the<br />

design of the PLR optical sensor.<br />

TABLE I<br />

Table showing the values of the rPUI and rPUI rel parameters<br />

in successive measurement points.<br />

rPUI<br />

rPUI rel<br />

task N mean st.d. mean st.d.<br />

All 398 0.83 0.42 0.20 0.29<br />

0 99 0.62 0.25 0.00 0.00<br />

1 102 0.76 0.35 0.13 0.15<br />

2 98 0.91 0.40 0.28 0.17<br />

3 99 1.02 0.55 0.39 0.45<br />

TABLE II<br />

Table showing the values of the relative amplitude<br />

and contraction velocity indicators in successive<br />

measurement points.<br />

Rel. amplitude Contr. velocity<br />

Task N mean st.d. mean st.d.<br />

0 79 24.21 5.11 3.98 0.82<br />

1 76 25.53 5.28 4.21 0.89<br />

2 80 26.22 5.36 4.29 0.83<br />

3 79 27.28 5.47 4.49 0.87<br />

4. Optical sensor to monitor pupillary<br />

light reex<br />

In pupillary light reex testing, it is most important<br />

to determine the parameters of pupil response to light<br />

stimulation with a specic duration (t = 250 ms). The<br />

measurement method for PLR determines the design of<br />

the illuminator control system, image acquisition system<br />

and software. In the adopted implementation the change<br />

of pupil size in time is determined by analyzing the motion<br />

camera image. The acquired image is recorded in the<br />

near-infrared band (λ = 850 nm) by the Optitrack V120<br />

camera. The red KPTD-3216SURC LED with the wavelength<br />

of λ = 640 nm was used as an excitation source.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!