tOMOrrOW's AnsWers tODAY - AkzoNobel
tOMOrrOW's AnsWers tODAY - AkzoNobel
tOMOrrOW's AnsWers tODAY - AkzoNobel
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
21<br />
The early history of paint and painting<br />
No one knows exactly when paint was<br />
used for the first time, but the earliest<br />
evidence of paint comes from South<br />
Africa, where traces of mineral-based<br />
ochre pigments – oxides of iron that<br />
are still used as pigment to this day –<br />
have been dated to around 100,000<br />
years ago.<br />
There’s an inherent problem with<br />
dating paint, however, because<br />
radiocarbon dating, which is used to<br />
estimate the age of organic matter, can<br />
only date back to about 62,000 years, so<br />
any organic pigments that may have<br />
been used – blood or berries or tree<br />
bark, for example – cannot be dated.<br />
According to Alistair Pike, the ochre<br />
pigments on the walls of European caves<br />
that he has dated to at least 40,000<br />
years old were almost certainly mixed<br />
with water. While those first cave<br />
paintings are simply dots, hand prints<br />
and squiggles, over many thousands of<br />
years, the caves were re-visited by<br />
succeeding generations of increasingly<br />
sophisticated artists.<br />
The caves of Northern Spain reveal<br />
outlines of bison and horses, some in<br />
black or yellow, and then truly phenomenal<br />
polychrome bison and other<br />
animals dating to around 15,000 years<br />
ago. During this period, modern humans<br />
started using charcoal and organic<br />
pigments, while some later paints were<br />
based on plant resins, and possibly<br />
blood, though that view is disputed.<br />
Pike’s specialty is the technical<br />
analysis of these traces of early art, but<br />
that doesn’t preclude speculation on just<br />
what they mean. Some of the paintings,<br />
he notes, bring out forms in the rock that<br />
resembled the animals that were<br />
painted. “It could be that the cave is<br />
another world, and it’s inhabited by<br />
these mythical versions of real<br />
creatures that they see in the hunt. What<br />
they do brings them to life by drawing<br />
around them.”<br />
Curiously, in some cases, the<br />
paintings are so remotely placed that it<br />
seems as if they were intended not to be<br />
seen, or only with great effort. “It may<br />
have been the act of painting that was<br />
important – not the painting itself – because<br />
the painting resides in the dark in<br />
the other world. Or that other people are<br />
brought to see it, and that journey might<br />
have been part of whatever meaning the<br />
painting had.”<br />
Look beyond: bristol.ac.uk/news/2012/8560.html