29.12.2013 Views

tOMOrrOW's AnsWers tODAY - AkzoNobel

tOMOrrOW's AnsWers tODAY - AkzoNobel

tOMOrrOW's AnsWers tODAY - AkzoNobel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

21<br />

The early history of paint and painting<br />

No one knows exactly when paint was<br />

used for the first time, but the earliest<br />

evidence of paint comes from South<br />

Africa, where traces of mineral-based<br />

ochre pigments – oxides of iron that<br />

are still used as pigment to this day –<br />

have been dated to around 100,000<br />

years ago.<br />

There’s an inherent problem with<br />

dating paint, however, because<br />

radiocarbon dating, which is used to<br />

estimate the age of organic matter, can<br />

only date back to about 62,000 years, so<br />

any organic pigments that may have<br />

been used – blood or berries or tree<br />

bark, for example – cannot be dated.<br />

According to Alistair Pike, the ochre<br />

pigments on the walls of European caves<br />

that he has dated to at least 40,000<br />

years old were almost certainly mixed<br />

with water. While those first cave<br />

paintings are simply dots, hand prints<br />

and squiggles, over many thousands of<br />

years, the caves were re-visited by<br />

succeeding generations of increasingly<br />

sophisticated artists.<br />

The caves of Northern Spain reveal<br />

outlines of bison and horses, some in<br />

black or yellow, and then truly phenomenal<br />

polychrome bison and other<br />

animals dating to around 15,000 years<br />

ago. During this period, modern humans<br />

started using charcoal and organic<br />

pigments, while some later paints were<br />

based on plant resins, and possibly<br />

blood, though that view is disputed.<br />

Pike’s specialty is the technical<br />

analysis of these traces of early art, but<br />

that doesn’t preclude speculation on just<br />

what they mean. Some of the paintings,<br />

he notes, bring out forms in the rock that<br />

resembled the animals that were<br />

painted. “It could be that the cave is<br />

another world, and it’s inhabited by<br />

these mythical versions of real<br />

creatures that they see in the hunt. What<br />

they do brings them to life by drawing<br />

around them.”<br />

Curiously, in some cases, the<br />

paintings are so remotely placed that it<br />

seems as if they were intended not to be<br />

seen, or only with great effort. “It may<br />

have been the act of painting that was<br />

important – not the painting itself – because<br />

the painting resides in the dark in<br />

the other world. Or that other people are<br />

brought to see it, and that journey might<br />

have been part of whatever meaning the<br />

painting had.”<br />

Look beyond: bristol.ac.uk/news/2012/8560.html

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!