29.12.2013 Views

16 + GUIDE - British Film Institute

16 + GUIDE - British Film Institute

16 + GUIDE - British Film Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE GUARDIAN<br />

<strong>16</strong> th October 1997, pp.9<br />

Total recall, nearly, by Steven Severin<br />

An interview with Anita Pallenberg (Pherber) about the making of PERFORMANCE and her life<br />

subsequently. Severin and Pallenberg make many interesting reflections on the film and the<br />

1960’s.<br />

DAILY TELEGRAPH<br />

3 rd June 1998, pp.24, 27-28, 30<br />

Performance was the film that blew the minds of everyone who saw it…,by Mick Brown<br />

An exhaustive and compelling account of the making of PERFORMANCE; the people involved<br />

and its aftermath. Thoroughly recommended for anyone studying the film.<br />

EVENING STANDARD<br />

13 th October 1997, p.50<br />

Sympathy for the devilish, by Max Bell<br />

A brief preview of a screening of PERFORMANCE at the ICA. Covers a lot of the same ground<br />

as many other articles.<br />

THE GUARDIAN<br />

9 th September 1993, p.6<br />

The intruders within, by Richard Combs<br />

Combs describes PERFORMANCE as a “singular event in <strong>British</strong> cinema” and goes on to<br />

compare the film with other <strong>British</strong> films, including THE LADYKILLERS and THE SERVANT.<br />

Provides an interesting perspective of the film and post-war <strong>British</strong> cinema.<br />

THE SUNDAY EXPRESS<br />

3 rd January 1971<br />

Performance, by Richard Barkley<br />

A review that actually focuses for the main part on the gangsters and criminals of the film<br />

rather than on the events in Turner’s (Mick Jagger’s) flat. While not applauding the style of<br />

the film Barkley contends that the film is an ambitious contrast between “the assertive criminal<br />

and the passive drop-out”.<br />

NEW SOCIETY<br />

21 st January 1971<br />

Jugglers, by Michael Wood<br />

Describing the film as a “mishmash…of fashionable and uncontrolled ideas about sex, art,<br />

music and violence”; this critical review of the film ends with Wood stating, “What is wrong<br />

with Performance is not its loving attention to a gangster, but the lofty and literary and<br />

metaphysical nature of that attention”.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!