30.12.2013 Views

codex alimentarius commission FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ...

codex alimentarius commission FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ...

codex alimentarius commission FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

guidelines and to evaluate the comments received from the Netherlands, Norway,<br />

Sweden, United Kingdom, United States, WHO and the International Diabetes<br />

Federation.<br />

The ad hoc Working Group met in Bonn-Bad Godesberg from 25 to 26<br />

September 1980 under the Chairmanship of Dr. W. Holzel, Regierungsdirektor, Ministry<br />

for Youth, Family and Health of the Federal Republic of Germany.<br />

The meeting was attended by representatives from the following countries and<br />

international organizations:<br />

Australia Switzerland ISDI<br />

Germany, Fed. Rep. of United Kingdom FAO<br />

Netherlands<br />

United states<br />

Sweden<br />

The List of Participants is contained in Annex I.<br />

CONSIDERATION OF FIRST DRAFT OF PROPOSED DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR<br />

<strong>FOOD</strong>S SPECIALLY MODIFIED FOR INCORPORATION IN A PRESCRIBED DIETARY<br />

REGIMEN FOR CERTAIN DIABETICS<br />

1. The Working Group had before it the above guidelines as contained in CX/FSDU<br />

80/5 and comments thereon in CX/FSDU 80/5, Addenda 1 and 2. The Working Group<br />

expressed its thanks to the delegation of Australia for the excellent paper which had<br />

succeeded in covering all important points discussed at the previous session of the<br />

group.<br />

2. The Working Group agreed with the delegate from Australia that (a) the<br />

regulations should deal with labelling aspects and claims only; (b) many of the provisions<br />

applicable to the foods for use for diabetics were contained in the General Standard for<br />

the Labelling of and Claims for Foods for Special Dietary Uses; (c) any additional<br />

provisions excluding compositional requirements for these products should be presented<br />

in the form of a standard.<br />

3. The Working Group therefore agreed with a proposal to continue the discussion<br />

on an appropriate proposed draft standard submitted by the United Kingdom and to use<br />

the Australian paper as a background document.<br />

CONSIDERATION OF A FIRST DRAFT OF A PROPOSED DRAFT ST<strong>AND</strong>ARD FOR<br />

THE LABELLING OF <strong>AND</strong> CLAIMS FOR PREPACKAGED <strong>FOOD</strong>S CLAIMED TO BE<br />

SUITABLE FOR INCORPORATION IN A PRESCRIBED DIETARY REGIMEN FOR<br />

CERTAIN DIABETICS (Pages 10-13 of CX/FSDU 80/5, Add. 1)<br />

4. The Working Group agreed that: it was possible to meet the nutritive needs of<br />

diabetics by proper selection from ordinary foods.<br />

5. It was further agreed that ordinary foods not suitable for diabetics might become<br />

suitable after appropriate modification. In this case they were special dietary foods<br />

covered by the General Labelling Standard for these foods. However, it was recognized<br />

that additional provisions were necessary to ensure proper consumer information and to<br />

provide for specific provisions on claims.<br />

6. The Working Group than proceeded to discuss the draft proposal in detail. The<br />

amended text is contained in Annex II.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!