codex alimentarius commission FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

"physical and physiological conditions" and amended the definition accordingly. 18. There was an extensive discussion about whether foods for special dietary uses should be specially processed or formulated and should differ singificantly from the comparable normal foods. Some delegations held the view that such modifications were essential to justify the classification of these foods as Foods for Special Dietary Uses. The delegation of the United States expressed the view that certain ordinary foods were, by their nature, suitable for inclusion in special diets. It was pointed out that the appropriate claims and labelling information to be permitted for these foods was set out in section 6.1.3 of the draft standard. The Committee did not amend the second sentence of section 2.1 except that the word "ordinary" was substituted for "normal" as a more suitable adjective for the description of those foods which were not Foods for Special Dietary Uses. 19. The delegation of the United States also drew attention to the need for a definition of "medical foods". A discussion on this matter had taken place at the previous session of the Committee. The delegation provided a slightly amended text 1 to that contained in para. 75 of ALINORM 79/26 and reiterated the view that it was important to permit special provisions to be made for these foods. The Committee noted the proposal but decided, however, not to include a definition of medical foods. Further consideration of "medical foods" could occur during the discussions of sections 4 and 6.1.4. 1 Medical Foods: "This is a category of Foods for Special Dietary Uses that includes all foods which are intended for use under medical supervision in the dietary management of individuals with specific diseases or disorders or medical conditions where the existence of special nutritional requirements related thereto are established by medical diagnosis". 20. Attention was drawn to a suggestion by the Codex Committee on Food Labelling that the definitions contained in sections 2.2 to 2.9 of the draft standard be deleted so that a reference to the relevant definitions in the General Standard for the Labelling of Prepackaged Foods (CAC/RS 1-1969) and the General Guidelines on Claims could be introduced. The Committee, however, decided to retain the definition 2.2 to 2.9 in extenso. Members agreed that it was preferable to have a complete document since this would be easier to understand, and would facilitate the work of governments in deciding whether to accept the standard. Furthermore, the Committee felt that to refer to the documents quoted above might also include amendments to those documents which would not be appropriate to this standard in all cases. Section 3 - General Principles 21. The Committee recognized that Section 3.2 of the General Principles, which had been taken from the General Standard, was not applicable to foods for specific dietary uses and decided therefore to delete this section. 22. The Committee was reminded that it had considered, at its last session, a proposal from the United States to introduce two new provisions under this section but had deferred any decision on the proposed text and its inclusion in the standard (see para. 79 of ALINORM 79/26). No written comments had been received on this matter and the delegation of the United States was of the opinion that the Committee might limit its considerations to the proposed section 3.4 which would read as follows: "3.4 Nothing in the labelling and advertizing of the foods to which this standard applies shall imply that the food, because of the presence or absence of certain vitamins and/or minerals, is adequate or effective in the prevention, cure, mitigation, or treatment of any disease or symptoms, although the label may state that the food is a source of an essential nutrient which is important for good
nutrition and health. This prohibition does not apply to "Medical Foods" represented for use solely under medical supervision in the dietary management of specific diseases or disorders." 23. The delegation of the United States supported the proposed exemption from the general prohibition of certain claims, as indicated in the first sentence of the text 3.4, by giving details about the specific characteristics of "medical foods" such as: (a) indiscriminate use of these products might be a hazard to health; (b) they should be administered therefore under strict medical supervision; advertisement and information about these foods should be permitted only to the medical profession. Detailed additional labelling provisions would be required to ensure proper use of these foods. 24. Several other delegations agreed that such foods existed, for example specific foods for renal insufficiency, for phenylketonuria and other abnormal metabolic conditions. It was also noted that these specially prepared "medical foods" could either provide the whole or a part of a complete diet. 25. The Committee agreed with the view expressed by several delegations that it would be more appropriate to elaborate an entirely new standard or preferably guidelines to cover these products in more detail. If desired, the guidelines could be annexed to this standard in due course. 26. The delegation of the United States was asked to prepare a first draft of suitable guidelines, which would be limited to aspects of labelling and claims for "medical foods" for consideration by the Committee at its next session. 27. In view of the foregoing the Committee decided not to include the proposed section 3.4 (see para. 22) into the standard. Section 4 - Mandatory Labelling of Prepackaged Foods for Special Dietary Uses 28. The Committee agreed to amend editorially the preamble to this section, to make it clear that the reference to specific Codex Standards for Foods for Special Dietary Uses applied to those standards which had already been elaborated by this Committee. The list of Codex Standards for Foods for Special Dietary Uses will be included in the final version of this Report. The list would be up-dated periodically as new standards were formulated. 29. The Committee did not change any of the provisions contained in section 4.1 "The Name of the Food" except that section 4.1.2 was amended to permit the use of an "appropriate equivalent term", and in section 4.1.3 "may" was altered to "shall" because it was agreed that the declaration of the essential features which characterize the food should be mandatory. 30. Several delegations indicated that they had difficulties in understanding exactly what was meant by the term "component" in section 4.2.2 (List of Ingredients). The secretariat pointed out that similar difficulties had arisen in Codex Commodity Committees when they had considered the labelling requirements for many foods under their jurisdiction. It had therefore been proposed in the working paper on the "Revision of the General Standard for the Labelling of Prepackaged Foods (CAC/RS 1-1969)" submitted for consideration to the forthcoming session of the Codex Committee on Labelling, to reword this provision. In reality the provision was meant to require declaration of individual ingredients of a composite food which was used as an
Page 1 and 2: FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION O
Page 3: also drawn to the on-going work of
Page 7 and 8: Section 6 - Additional Requirements
Page 9 and 10: necessary for the Committee to comm
Page 11 and 12: naming of "low calorie" and "reduce
Page 13 and 14: new paragraph 3(i)d adopted by the
Page 15 and 16: (e) (f) Determination of Vitamin K
Page 17 and 18: (a) General Standard for the Labell
Page 19 and 20: and Sampling Plans Proposed Draft S
Page 21 and 22: Dr. Kari Kiuru Head of Research and
Page 23 and 24: Dr. A.M.M. Abdellatif Ministry of P
Page 25 and 26: Victor Staniforth Manager Food Stan
Page 27 and 28: WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (MHO) Dr.
Page 29 and 30: 4. MANDATORY LABELLING OF PREPACKAG
Page 31 and 32: whole-someness and nutritive value.
Page 33 and 34: guidelines and to evaluate the comm
Page 35 and 36: These substances would also have to
Page 37 and 38: A.F. Onneweer Ministry of Agricultu
Page 39 and 40: APPENDIX III ANNEX II PROPOSED DRAF
Page 41 and 42: ALINORM 81/26 APPENDIX IV ADVISORY
Page 43 and 44: Vitamin B 6 Pantothenic Acid Vitami
Page 45 and 46: and protein hydrolysate formulae 2.
Page 47 and 48: 8. Source of Copper (Cu) 8.1 Copper
Page 49 and 50: ALINORM 81/26 APPENDIX V PAG - GUID
Page 51 and 52: * Calculated on the basis of 370 ca

codex alimentarius commission FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?