THE COURAGE OF TURTLES - Central Washington University
THE COURAGE OF TURTLES - Central Washington University
THE COURAGE OF TURTLES - Central Washington University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Eisler 23<br />
sites is that they were structured along very different lines from what we have been<br />
taught is the divinely, or naturally, ordained human order.<br />
One of these ancient cradles of civilization is Catal Huyuk, the largest Neolithic<br />
site yet found. Located in the Anatolian plain of what is now Turkey, Catal Huyuk goes<br />
back approximately eight thousand years to about 6500 B.C.E. C three thousand years<br />
before Sumer. As Mellaart reports, this ancient civilization Ais remarkable for its<br />
wall-paintings and plaster reliefs, its sculpture in stone and clay . . ., its advanced<br />
technology in the crafts of weaving, woodwork, metallurgy . . ., its advanced religion . . .,<br />
its advanced practices in agriculture and stock breeding, and . . . a flourishing trade. .<br />
.@<br />
But undoubtedly the most remarkable thing about Catal Huyuk and other<br />
original sites for civilization is that they were not warlike, hierarchic, and<br />
male-dominated societies like ours. As Mellaart writes, over the many centuries of its<br />
existence, there were in Catal Huyuk no signs of violence or deliberate destruction, Ano<br />
evidence for any sack or massacre.@ Moreover, while there was evidence of some social<br />
inequality, Athis is never a glaring one.@ And most significantly C in the sharpest possible<br />
contrast to our type of social organization C@ the position of women was obviously an<br />
important one . . . with a fertility cult in which a goddess was the principal deity.@<br />
Now it is hardly possible to believe that in this kind of society, where, besides all<br />
their other advances, people clearly understood the principles of stock breeding, they<br />
would not have also had to understand that procreation involves the male. So the Big<br />
Discovery theory is not only founded on the fallacious assumption that men are<br />
naturally brutes, who were only deterred from forcefully enslaving women by fear of the<br />
female=s Amagical@ powers of procreation; the Big Discovery theory is also founded on<br />
assumptions about what happened in prehistory that are no longer tenable in light of the<br />
really big discoveries we are now making about our lost human heritageCabout societies<br />
that, while not ideal, were clearly more harmonious than ours.<br />
But if the replacement of a Divine Mother with a Divine Father was not due to<br />
men=s discovery of paternity, how did it come to pass that all our present world religions<br />
either have no female deity or generally present them as Aconsorts@ or subservient wives<br />
of male gods?<br />
To try to answer that question, let us look more carefully at the new archeological<br />
findings.<br />
3<br />
4<br />
J. Mellaart, Catal Huyuk (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), p. 11. [Au.]<br />
Ibid., pp. 69, 225, 553. [Au.]