30.12.2013 Views

THE COURAGE OF TURTLES - Central Washington University

THE COURAGE OF TURTLES - Central Washington University

THE COURAGE OF TURTLES - Central Washington University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Eisler 23<br />

sites is that they were structured along very different lines from what we have been<br />

taught is the divinely, or naturally, ordained human order.<br />

One of these ancient cradles of civilization is Catal Huyuk, the largest Neolithic<br />

site yet found. Located in the Anatolian plain of what is now Turkey, Catal Huyuk goes<br />

back approximately eight thousand years to about 6500 B.C.E. C three thousand years<br />

before Sumer. As Mellaart reports, this ancient civilization Ais remarkable for its<br />

wall-paintings and plaster reliefs, its sculpture in stone and clay . . ., its advanced<br />

technology in the crafts of weaving, woodwork, metallurgy . . ., its advanced religion . . .,<br />

its advanced practices in agriculture and stock breeding, and . . . a flourishing trade. .<br />

.@<br />

But undoubtedly the most remarkable thing about Catal Huyuk and other<br />

original sites for civilization is that they were not warlike, hierarchic, and<br />

male-dominated societies like ours. As Mellaart writes, over the many centuries of its<br />

existence, there were in Catal Huyuk no signs of violence or deliberate destruction, Ano<br />

evidence for any sack or massacre.@ Moreover, while there was evidence of some social<br />

inequality, Athis is never a glaring one.@ And most significantly C in the sharpest possible<br />

contrast to our type of social organization C@ the position of women was obviously an<br />

important one . . . with a fertility cult in which a goddess was the principal deity.@<br />

Now it is hardly possible to believe that in this kind of society, where, besides all<br />

their other advances, people clearly understood the principles of stock breeding, they<br />

would not have also had to understand that procreation involves the male. So the Big<br />

Discovery theory is not only founded on the fallacious assumption that men are<br />

naturally brutes, who were only deterred from forcefully enslaving women by fear of the<br />

female=s Amagical@ powers of procreation; the Big Discovery theory is also founded on<br />

assumptions about what happened in prehistory that are no longer tenable in light of the<br />

really big discoveries we are now making about our lost human heritageCabout societies<br />

that, while not ideal, were clearly more harmonious than ours.<br />

But if the replacement of a Divine Mother with a Divine Father was not due to<br />

men=s discovery of paternity, how did it come to pass that all our present world religions<br />

either have no female deity or generally present them as Aconsorts@ or subservient wives<br />

of male gods?<br />

To try to answer that question, let us look more carefully at the new archeological<br />

findings.<br />

3<br />

4<br />

J. Mellaart, Catal Huyuk (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), p. 11. [Au.]<br />

Ibid., pp. 69, 225, 553. [Au.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!