Risky Business - Greenpeace
Risky Business - Greenpeace
Risky Business - Greenpeace
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Economic and regulatory impacts<br />
from the unintended release of genetically<br />
engineered rice varieties into the rice<br />
merchandising system of the US<br />
5.2 Grain Elevator/Processor Impacts<br />
Including Testing Costs<br />
Rice processors and handlers had to engage in a testing and<br />
cleaning regime to ensure that all incoming rice was GE-free<br />
for the 2007 harvest. As previously mentioned the US Rice<br />
Federation issued a document US Rice Industry<br />
Recommendations to Reestablish Supply and Marketability<br />
of US Rice. This document requested state authorities in each<br />
rice state to implement a series of regulatory provisions to<br />
restore customer confidence in the rice industry. The<br />
recommendations included a) seed testing protocols, b)<br />
certified seed sampling, c) banning the planting of Cheniere<br />
seed, d) crop producer certifications and e) establishing an<br />
industry/landgrant university task force to educate rice<br />
producers. Given that the tone of the document was basically<br />
to have the industry GE-free, processors and handlers had to<br />
engage in extra paperwork to ensure that producers were<br />
delivering GE-free crops. In order to estimate the cost of this<br />
regime, cost estimates were derived from the grain<br />
merchandising literature dealing with identity preserved<br />
segregation. Even though the rice production coming off the<br />
farms in 2007 is not segregated per se, the costs of<br />
paperwork and grain testing make the protocols associated<br />
with rice handling analogous to an identity preservation<br />
system. The extra costs arising from cleaning out and<br />
ensuring GE-free rice grain storage and processessing arise<br />
from a) sampling and testing, b) maintenance, c) mistakes or<br />
misgrades in rice sampling, d) disputes, e) labour, f) other<br />
costs. Maltsbarger and Kalaitzandonakes 49 estimated the<br />
identity segregation costs for a range of elevator sizes for<br />
identity preserved high-oil corn. Depending on the elevator<br />
size the segregation costs range from $0.021 to $0.049 per<br />
bushel. Of this, the sample testing analysis costs ranged from<br />
$0.011 to $0.031 per bushel.<br />
For LL601 detection the testing costs will be much higher.<br />
In 2007 many processors including the two major rice<br />
cooperatives Riceland Foods and Producers Rice Mill are<br />
testing every truckload of rice for LL601 50 . A standard<br />
truckload contains 910 bushels 51 . Genescan 52 a GMO<br />
testing lab charges $180 for a bar 35S test that meets EU's<br />
GE regulations. If every truckload of rice is getting tested this<br />
means that the cost of LL601 testing is $0.197 per bushel<br />
($0.197 = $180/910 bushels). Using this testing cost and<br />
the other segregation costs from Maltsbarger and<br />
Kalaitzandonakes (misgrades, maintenance, disputes/labour<br />
and other) the range of segregation costs for LL601 is $0.207<br />
to $0.215 per bushel. Assuming these costs are applied to<br />
the expected total US rice production in 2007, Table 5.2.1<br />
lays out the estimated total costs.<br />
The total cost to the US rice industry to clean up and<br />
maintain GE-free status for 2007 ranges from $88 million to<br />
$91 million. These costs include the sum of all long grain and<br />
medium/short grain production in the US.<br />
16