02.01.2014 Views

Risky Business - Greenpeace

Risky Business - Greenpeace

Risky Business - Greenpeace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Economic and regulatory impacts<br />

from the unintended release of genetically<br />

engineered rice varieties into the rice<br />

merchandising system of the US<br />

5.2 Grain Elevator/Processor Impacts<br />

Including Testing Costs<br />

Rice processors and handlers had to engage in a testing and<br />

cleaning regime to ensure that all incoming rice was GE-free<br />

for the 2007 harvest. As previously mentioned the US Rice<br />

Federation issued a document US Rice Industry<br />

Recommendations to Reestablish Supply and Marketability<br />

of US Rice. This document requested state authorities in each<br />

rice state to implement a series of regulatory provisions to<br />

restore customer confidence in the rice industry. The<br />

recommendations included a) seed testing protocols, b)<br />

certified seed sampling, c) banning the planting of Cheniere<br />

seed, d) crop producer certifications and e) establishing an<br />

industry/landgrant university task force to educate rice<br />

producers. Given that the tone of the document was basically<br />

to have the industry GE-free, processors and handlers had to<br />

engage in extra paperwork to ensure that producers were<br />

delivering GE-free crops. In order to estimate the cost of this<br />

regime, cost estimates were derived from the grain<br />

merchandising literature dealing with identity preserved<br />

segregation. Even though the rice production coming off the<br />

farms in 2007 is not segregated per se, the costs of<br />

paperwork and grain testing make the protocols associated<br />

with rice handling analogous to an identity preservation<br />

system. The extra costs arising from cleaning out and<br />

ensuring GE-free rice grain storage and processessing arise<br />

from a) sampling and testing, b) maintenance, c) mistakes or<br />

misgrades in rice sampling, d) disputes, e) labour, f) other<br />

costs. Maltsbarger and Kalaitzandonakes 49 estimated the<br />

identity segregation costs for a range of elevator sizes for<br />

identity preserved high-oil corn. Depending on the elevator<br />

size the segregation costs range from $0.021 to $0.049 per<br />

bushel. Of this, the sample testing analysis costs ranged from<br />

$0.011 to $0.031 per bushel.<br />

For LL601 detection the testing costs will be much higher.<br />

In 2007 many processors including the two major rice<br />

cooperatives Riceland Foods and Producers Rice Mill are<br />

testing every truckload of rice for LL601 50 . A standard<br />

truckload contains 910 bushels 51 . Genescan 52 a GMO<br />

testing lab charges $180 for a bar 35S test that meets EU's<br />

GE regulations. If every truckload of rice is getting tested this<br />

means that the cost of LL601 testing is $0.197 per bushel<br />

($0.197 = $180/910 bushels). Using this testing cost and<br />

the other segregation costs from Maltsbarger and<br />

Kalaitzandonakes (misgrades, maintenance, disputes/labour<br />

and other) the range of segregation costs for LL601 is $0.207<br />

to $0.215 per bushel. Assuming these costs are applied to<br />

the expected total US rice production in 2007, Table 5.2.1<br />

lays out the estimated total costs.<br />

The total cost to the US rice industry to clean up and<br />

maintain GE-free status for 2007 ranges from $88 million to<br />

$91 million. These costs include the sum of all long grain and<br />

medium/short grain production in the US.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!