Jordan's Future Energy - Greenpeace

Executive summary
Jordan’s nuclear power programme is seriously misconceived on a number
of grounds: technology; economics; commercial arrangements; and
appropriateness for the Jordanian electricity system.
The two front-running technologies, the Sino-French Atmea1 and
the Russian AES92, are unproven in operation. The work on the Atmea1
detailed design has not been started yet, a thorough review of the safety of
the design has not been undertaken yet and, apart from Jordan, it has no
firm prospects for orders. The AES92 design has been built in India and at
the end of 2012 was reported to be ready to start operation, albeit after a
prolonged and problematic construction phase.
The economics of nuclear power are acknowledged to be poor even for
highly experienced nuclear countries. For example, the UK is negotiating to
build a nuclear plant expected to generate power at a cost of the order
£100-160/MWh ($160-250/MWh). Jordan’s lack of nuclear expertise, the
difficult siting issues (e.g., lack of cooling water, grid weakness and seismic
concerns) mean the cost of power in Jordan would be highly likely to be
higher.
From a commercial point of view, Jordan’s lack of experience with nuclear
power and its weak sovereign credit rating mean that it needs a foreign
partner to take a majority equity stake to provide the necessary expertise
in operations and maintenance and to obtain finance at an affordable cost.
There seems little interest from appropriately qualified foreign utilities to
take on this role.
28