05.01.2014 Views

CONFIDENTIAL OSMAN GROUP ONLY An Analysis of ... - Haller

CONFIDENTIAL OSMAN GROUP ONLY An Analysis of ... - Haller

CONFIDENTIAL OSMAN GROUP ONLY An Analysis of ... - Haller

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CONFIDENTIAL</strong><br />

------------<br />

<strong>OSMAN</strong> <strong>GROUP</strong> <strong>ONLY</strong><br />

EI.. WAFAA FI.SH FAlM<br />

<strong>An</strong> <strong>An</strong>alysis <strong>of</strong> Performance with Recommendations for the Future Scope for<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> Intensive Tilapia Culture<br />

by.<br />

John D. Balarin<br />

Research and Development Consultant<br />

Tilapia culture Section<br />

Baobab Farm Limited<br />

P.O. Box 90202<br />

MOMBASA<br />

Kenya<br />

For and on Behalf <strong>of</strong><br />

El Wafaa Farm Co.<br />

P.O. Box 2655<br />

CAIRO<br />

Egypt<br />

BAOBAB FARM LTD.<br />

1 986


Copyright <strong>of</strong> this Document<br />

This review <strong>of</strong> EI Wafaa Fish Farm Egypt has been undertaken by<br />

Baobab Farm Ltd. on behalf <strong>of</strong> EI Wafaa Farm Co., Cairo. The contents<br />

mentioned herein and pertaining to the Baobab System are the property <strong>of</strong><br />

Baobab Farm and should not be released to a third person without the<br />

written consent <strong>of</strong> Baobab Farm.<br />

The conclusions drawn are those <strong>of</strong> the consultant and are founded<br />

on the details available to the mission at the time <strong>of</strong> study. These<br />

conclusions are liable to change as more information becomes available.<br />

Bibliographie Note<br />

For all future reference purposes this document should be cited as<br />

folIows:<br />

Balarin, J.D. (1986) EI Wafaa Fish Farm. <strong>An</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> performance<br />

with recommendations for the future scope for development <strong>of</strong> intensive<br />

tilapia culture. Baobab Farm PUbI., Mombasa, Kenya. p.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

1.1 Origin <strong>of</strong> Mission<br />

On 6th August 1985 Eng. S. Hassan requested by telex to visit<br />

Baobab Farm. Subsequently in a telephone conversation <strong>of</strong> 11th November<br />

1985 Mr. Osman requested that J. D. Balarin, Research &Development<br />

Consultant to Baobab Farm, visit EI Wafaa Farm, Cairo, Egypt. Ensuing<br />

telex correspondence led to Mr. Balarin visiting Cairo from 8th to 15th<br />

January 1986.<br />

1.2 Terms <strong>of</strong> Reference<br />

No formal letter <strong>of</strong> agreement was received but in a telex <strong>of</strong> 12th<br />

and 14th November 1985, Eng. S. Hassan requested a 3 day consultancy<br />

visit to help improve a 2 million tilapia fry per year sex reversal<br />

hatchery system and 7 acre pond production unit.<br />

On arrival in Cairo however the following requests were put<br />

forward:<br />

a. Appraisal <strong>of</strong> the hatchery system and make recommendations for<br />

improvement .<br />

b. Study the farm production to develop potential maximum production<br />

from ponds.<br />

c. Examine the scope for introduction <strong>of</strong> an intensive Baobab Tank<br />

Culture system.<br />

d. Establish market scope and potential.<br />

e. Examine a 150 acre site and a tank culture project as potential<br />

areas for expansion.<br />

Within the above TOR item d was considered beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />

consultancy and item e was not possible as time did not permit.<br />

The report is presented as an appraisal <strong>of</strong> the seope for<br />

aquaculture development in Egypt with reference to the results <strong>of</strong> EI<br />

Wafaa.<br />

1.3 Organisation <strong>of</strong> Mission<br />

The persons met and interviewed during the mission are listed in<br />

Appendix 1 and the Itinerary described in Appendix H. The consultant<br />

arrived on 8th January and stayed at the Green Pyramids Hotel. Eng. S.<br />

Hassan escorted the mission to EI Wafaa Farm. Facilities were toured<br />

and on the spot advice given for improvement. Discussions were held<br />

with Drs. Ghoneim and EI Mashak on a technical level and economics were<br />

reviewed with Eng. Abou el Seoud and Eng. Gaafar.<br />

Prior to leaving an executive summary [Appendix IIIJ was left<br />

behind for reference purposes. Negotiated charges did not make<br />

allowance for a detailed report and it waS made clear that areport<br />

would be forthcoming provided payment was received within 10 days [telex<br />

15th January 1986J. <strong>An</strong>y delay in payment would be interpreted that such<br />

areport was not a priority and that if subsequent payment was received<br />

as the report was a bonus i t would only be ~ completed when time


"<br />

permitted. As payment was only received in May 1986 the final report<br />

preparation was considerably delayed due an already busy programmed work<br />

schedule for the rest <strong>of</strong> 1986.<br />

1.4 Acknowledgements<br />

The assistance and hospitality received from EI Wafaa Farm staff is<br />

gratefully appreciated and a special thanks to Eng. S. Hassan and Mr. M.<br />

Hassan. The final report was prepared by Baobab Farm and the services<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sarah for typing and Tina for the drawings are gratefully<br />

acknowledged.<br />

Baobab Farm apologises for the delay in finalising the report<br />

caused by an exceptionally busy work schedule, and the free time<br />

contributed by J. D. Balarin is greatly appreciated.<br />

2. EGYPTIAN AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT RATIONALE<br />

The following is an extract form Balarin (1986) to serve as an<br />

introduction to aquaculture development and problems in Egypt.<br />

In Egypt, a very arid country, most development is concentrated on<br />

the Nile River, its major water source. Maximum use is also made <strong>of</strong> all<br />

other water resources. Traditionally, the presence <strong>of</strong> saline waters and<br />

the need for reclaiming saline lands for agriculture has led to the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> unique aquaculture techniques. However, the closure <strong>of</strong><br />

the Aswan High Dam and the resulting flood control [Fig. lJ, with<br />

consequent deleterious effects on the fishery [Fig. 2 and Table lJ has<br />

led to renewed efforts to develop more intensive methods <strong>of</strong> fish<br />

production.<br />

Early in its history, Egypt has realised the importance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

efficient use <strong>of</strong> water and fish farming to supplement its fish<br />

requirements. If the present level <strong>of</strong> fish consumption <strong>of</strong> 5.4kg/cap/yr<br />

is to be sustained, by the year 2000 a population <strong>of</strong> 65 - 70 million<br />

will require 350 OOOt/yr <strong>of</strong> fish. Assuming that the M.S.Y. <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fishery can be achieved [Table 2J, this would still represent a deficit<br />

in supply <strong>of</strong> nearly 100 OOOt/yr. Further, if nutrition is to be<br />

improved to an optimum fish consumption level, demand might be as high<br />

as 450 OOOt/yr. It is eIear therefore that unless this demand is<br />

satisfied by imports, Egypt will have to look toward aquaculture. Its<br />

development will have to increase at a rate <strong>of</strong> 6700 - 30 OOOt/yr. A<br />

formidable task!<br />

The need to increase fish production is emphasized by the fact that<br />

fish is a relatively inexpensive source <strong>of</strong> protein [Table 3J. Increased<br />

demand is likely to increase market value dramatically, a feature<br />

already evident since the fishery collapsed in 1968 [Fig. 2J. More<br />

recently, Government subsidies have been introduced to regulate imported<br />

fish prices in order to maintain market values within the price range <strong>of</strong><br />

other economic groups. In 1983 however fish imports made up 37.4% <strong>of</strong><br />

the total consumption. Imports therefore represent a high national cost<br />

and it is unlikely that Egypt could continue to afford to supplement its<br />

needs in this way. A market therefore exists for aquaculture to lessen<br />

the burden <strong>of</strong> imports and to provide for the increase in demand. Before<br />

a strategy can be devised for aquaculture development, i t is necessary<br />

to examine the status <strong>of</strong> the country, to determine the best approach,<br />

and to decide on species choice cultural system type, and level <strong>of</strong><br />

intensification.<br />

The following section attempts to identify potential development<br />

approaches. Guidelines [Balarin, 1985 Table 4J are applied to a<br />

national macro-analysis. Potential zones are identified but more<br />

detailed feasibility studies on a micro-geographic scale are needed for<br />

particular site and project developments.<br />

2. 1 Site Selectioo<br />

2. 1• 1 Water Resources<br />

The absence <strong>of</strong> run-<strong>of</strong>f due to poor rainfall [Fig. 3J implj.es that


any fish production will have to be concentrated around the Nile River<br />

and i ts delta, as weIl as other near permanent water bodies such as the<br />

coastal lakes, Lake Quarun, Lake Nasser and various oases [Table 5,<br />

Fig.4]. The potential <strong>of</strong> other artificial lakes [Table 6, Fig. 5] and<br />

rice fields [Fig. 6, Table 6] is not to be overlooked. Perhaps equally<br />

as important is the potential <strong>of</strong> marine coastal sites along the<br />

Mediterranean Sea, the Red Sea and the Suez Gulf. The total area<br />

available varies from 534 374ha [Table 6] upto 861 173ha [Table 7]. If<br />

only 20% <strong>of</strong> this area were used for extensive or semi-intensive fish<br />

farming the present level <strong>of</strong> fish consumption could be sustained until<br />

the year 2000.<br />

Present trends in irrigation and land reclamation however could<br />

have far reaching consequences, changing the present approaches to<br />

aquaculture development. According to Sadek [1984], already 17.4% <strong>of</strong><br />

the coastal lakes have been reclaimed, with plans by the year 2000 to<br />

reduce their area to 41.4% <strong>of</strong> the original [Table 8J. This would<br />

represent a 58.6% loss for the fishery, a potential loss <strong>of</strong> 30 000 - 80<br />

OOOt/yr, according to Sadek's [1984] recalculated production estimates.<br />

Not only does this represent a loss in fishing grounds but also it would<br />

disrupt the howash activities in these lakes. The loss would therefore<br />

mean an additional burden on production. It might be possible that<br />

during the soil leaching period <strong>of</strong> land reclamation, aquaculture might<br />

provide some fish production. But this solution is only temporary and<br />

longer term aquaculture developments need to be considered.<br />

Over 98% <strong>of</strong> all available freshwater resources are being used in<br />

Egypt, 84% for irrigation alone. all future developments plan for the<br />

e~ficient use <strong>of</strong> all new water resources. In addition 16 3000 million<br />

m /yr currently wasted, are to be used for doubling the area <strong>of</strong><br />

irrigated lands. Therefore, all fish farms currently using drainage<br />

waters may soon find their ater source drying up. Such reliance should<br />

therefore be avoided, preference being given to "irrigated", "seepage",<br />

or "leveed pond" aquaculture.<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> irrigation agriculture and indeed the actual<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> 47 OOOkm <strong>of</strong> drainage/navigational canals suggest an<br />

additional scope for aquaculture development in over 40 OOOha <strong>of</strong><br />

waterways. Enclosures for grass carp in such systems would not only<br />

yield fish protein but could effectively control weeds.<br />

Freshwater currently not being used for aquaculture has some form<br />

<strong>of</strong> pollution renderring it unusable. In addition, the reuse <strong>of</strong> surplus<br />

drainage water could bring with it the threat <strong>of</strong> pesticides from the<br />

cultivated lands. Other water resources available for fish farming are<br />

mainly saline waters unsuitable for crop irrigation and this will<br />

strongly influence the choice <strong>of</strong> fish species.<br />

2.1.2 Climatic Conditioos<br />

Although arid climatic condi tions restriet fish farming to<br />

available water resources, the likely high seasonal temperatures [Table<br />

9] favour fish growth. In Egypt, latitude has an overriding influence<br />

on temperatures, the increase in daily and seasonal amplitudes in the<br />

south, raises water temperatures. In the north the Mediterranean Sea<br />

has a tempering effect [Figs. 7&8] and the Red Sea has a warming effect.<br />

Therefore water temperatures in the north tend to drop below levelS<br />

considered optimum for warmwater fish. The fish farming zonation<br />

suggests that only the south eastern corner <strong>of</strong> Egypt [Fig. 9, Table 10]<br />

is suited to all year round intensive production <strong>of</strong> warmwater species.<br />

In general, climatic conditions are better suited to temperate fish<br />

species such as carp, mullet, and se~ ~ass. Shallow waters as found in<br />

seepage ponds, reclamation ponds and rlce paddies may benefit from the<br />

hot conditions. Pond design to maximise solar heating for tilapia<br />

production in winter should be usef~l. Alternatively, heated overwintering<br />

units may be an alternative'<br />

2. 1. 3 Topography and Soll<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the Nile Valley and the coastline near water sources are<br />

flat areas, good for fish farm layout. The low lying areas may benefit<br />

from gravity flow as in the case <strong>of</strong> pawash or fill by seepage. But this<br />

presents drainage problems. Most f~r'ms therefore require pumping and<br />

electricity cost amounts to 17% <strong>of</strong> operations cost [Fig. 10].<br />

Whereas topography is good f<strong>of</strong> conventional pond construction,<br />

unstable soils are a major drawback. Only the Maryut region is reported<br />

to have areas <strong>of</strong> clays suitable for Jeep pond design. It is probably<br />

for this reason that farmers have traditionally developed a range <strong>of</strong><br />

unconventional systems [Table 11] to compensate for poor dyke<br />

construction.<br />

Soils also tend to be saline due to poor rainfall. Site selection<br />

must consider the likely change in ;.rater salinity due to leaching as<br />

ponds fill and particularly when pl"rlning to farm fish species such as<br />

carps, little tolerant salinity.<br />

Competition with agriculture for land is clearly evident,<br />

relegating aquaculture to marginal "o,ils. Integrated development such<br />

as rizipisciculture or combined land use such as land reclamation<br />

aquaculture are likely to become i~portant as more and more land is<br />

turned to agriculture.<br />

Caution needs to be exercised in those areas where there is<br />

possible overlap between industry a(lJ aquaculture and where sites are<br />

likely to be exposed to pollutants.<br />

2.2 Speeies Seleetion<br />

Over 33 indigenous species [ToDle 12J and 10 exotics [Table 13]<br />

have been reported to be used in aquaculture. The most popular ones in<br />

the private sector are tilapia [70~] and mullets [30%]. In public<br />

farms, 10 _ 20% carp are included. Clarias lazera, sea bream and sea<br />

bass are <strong>of</strong> minor importance. More recently however there has been an<br />

increased interest in carps with the ~stablishment <strong>of</strong> several hatcheries<br />

[Table 14]. The choice <strong>of</strong> suitable species however varies with the<br />

location and same <strong>of</strong> the criteria for their selection are described<br />

below.


2.2.1 Bioeconomical Criteria<br />

Biological criteria for the selection <strong>of</strong> fish species have been<br />

restricted until now to temperature tolerance [Fig. 9J. When selecting<br />

a site it is important that the species performance falls within an<br />

economic rate, a favourable genetic capacity, and the ease <strong>of</strong><br />

reproduction. If a project is to be viable, in particular in marginal<br />

areas, these factors are <strong>of</strong> prime importance.<br />

As not much reference is made to subsistence fish farmers, it would<br />

appear that Egypt is viewing fish farming as an economic enterprise to<br />

provide food. Considerable efforts have thus been made to farm the<br />

highly prized mullets and more recently sea bass and sea bream [Table<br />

15J. However, despite the early history <strong>of</strong> mullet farming and its<br />

suitability to saline waters, there is as yet no active mullet hatchery.<br />

All seeds have to be collected from the wild [Table 14J. Survival rate<br />

is poor. Losses upto 80% implying a wasteful technique. This is a<br />

rather precarious, unreliable source <strong>of</strong> seeds upon which to build a<br />

major industry. any disaster affecting natural stock recruitment could<br />

result in the total loss <strong>of</strong> the fish farming production <strong>of</strong> those<br />

species. Conversely in the long term, overfishing <strong>of</strong> seeds could affect<br />

the fishery. It is therefore vital for mullet farms to succeed or for<br />

that matter any species which seeds are dependant upon natural stocks,<br />

that hatcheries be developed.<br />

From 1980, mullet fry distribution have risen from 42.4 million to<br />

138.9 million. Carp fry production has risen from 5.5 million to 50<br />

million. However <strong>of</strong> the latter, only 20% have been distributed,<br />

implying 80% hatchery losses. There is a great need to improve carp<br />

hatchery performance and to maximise survival during fry transports.<br />

There would appear to be no specific hatchery/nursery for tilapia<br />

other than the ''natural nurseries" described for Lake Nasser. A number<br />

<strong>of</strong> state farms operate nursery ponds to rear fry captured at harvest.<br />

Most tilapia seeds appear to be obtained from wild entry at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

filling, or wild spawning in ponds. No genetic stock control appears to<br />

be practiced. Because <strong>of</strong> tilapias' tendency to breed for smaller fish a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the negati'e selection occurring in wild pond spawning and<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the unknown heredity <strong>of</strong> wild seeds, genetic improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

tilapia stocks should be considered to increase yields.<br />

2.2.2 Biotechnological Criteria<br />

In one way or another the cultural systems described in Table 11,<br />

are still all unique to Egypt, the technology having evolved through<br />

traditional fish farming. The species combination and stocking<br />

practices are age old, tried and tested operations which are successful<br />

under the prevailing conditions. From Fig. 11, it would appear that the<br />

howash system does not have a deleterious effect on the fishery even at<br />

high levels <strong>of</strong> harvesting. The use <strong>of</strong> wild stock is a relatively<br />

unsophisticated technique and clearly howash do exhibit some form <strong>of</strong><br />

production. It is possible however that this productivity might be<br />

increased by slective stocking, as could be all other systems utilising<br />

wild caught fish.<br />

Production <strong>of</strong> more expensive fish, such as shrimps and Sea Bass has<br />

only recently started in Egypt. The technology is in a very early stage<br />

<strong>of</strong> development and it is unclear as to when large scale production will<br />

become possible. Similarly, techriological for intensifying production<br />

is still in its infancy. Cage culture and pelleted feeds are at a more<br />

advanced pilot test stage [Table 16J. Recently, emphasis has been<br />

placed on integrated livestock and fish farrning.<br />

2.2.3 Pathological Criteria<br />

Reported disease outbreaks and parasites in farmed and wild fish<br />

are summarised in Table 17. This represents a vast pool <strong>of</strong> pathogens<br />

likely to affect farmed fish. Of particular concern are the Heterophyes<br />

pathogenic to man and are reported to occur in tilapia and mullet. The<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> exotic fish could bring with it a complement <strong>of</strong><br />

pathogens and upset the present apparent equilibrium. Careful<br />

sanitation measures are recommended to avoid this. Already it appears<br />

that Argulus spp have been introduced with carp from Europe. The cold<br />

winter conditions may cause Saprolegnia infections in less cold tolerant<br />

species, but this has not yet been described as a major problem.<br />

Handling <strong>of</strong> warrnwater fish in winter is not recommendable.<br />

Schistosomiasis [bilharziaJ is generally weIl established<br />

throughout Egyptian waterways. The risk <strong>of</strong> infection to farm workers is<br />

high. Precautions should be taken and regular medical check ups<br />

organised.<br />

2.2.4 Marketing<br />

Traditional nilotic fish and marine species are highly acceptable<br />

to the market. Mullets and tilapias are therefore favoured but there<br />

remains the question <strong>of</strong> exotic fish such as carps. Increased production<br />

suggests that there is a good outlet but the demand has not been<br />

quantified in any available report. Egypt has a strong tradition <strong>of</strong><br />

fish eating and there might be a strong preference for traditional<br />

species. This would need to be examined before embarking on any major<br />

venture involving non-traditional fish.<br />

FAO/WBCP [1977J reports that commercial fish dealers come to the<br />

farms to collect fish. It is perhaps for this reason that for the same<br />

species, farm gate prices [Table 15J are higher than beach prices as the<br />

commodity is nearer the market outlet. Strategie locations near markets<br />

is important to reduce transport costs and thereby to command a high<br />

price.<br />

2.3 Process Selection<br />

Depending upon availability <strong>of</strong> water the possible combinations <strong>of</strong><br />

species and system types compatible with site conditions are listed in<br />

Table 10. The options are given according to Table 18 which does not<br />

include the cult~ral systems peculiar to Egypt [Table 11J. As<br />

intensification will be necessary to increase fish production to meet<br />

demand, the same criteria for adopting intensive cage or tank systems<br />

apply to the selection <strong>of</strong> more intensive methods to enhance the output<br />

in these traditional systems. Considered bere are socio~economic<br />

constraints to develop intensive aquaculture.


...<br />

2.3.1 Manpower Availability<br />

The recently trained 430 extension personnel represent a<br />

substantial resource <strong>of</strong> manpower to help develop the industry. As all<br />

have received training in the last four years it is likely that they are<br />

familiar with up todate technology. This does however raise the<br />

question <strong>of</strong> practical experience, for despite arecent training there is<br />

always a passage <strong>of</strong> time before the trainee appreciates the practical<br />

application <strong>of</strong> that training. Statistics suggest a production <strong>of</strong> 25 000<br />

to 60 OOOt/yr which for 430 agents represents a responsibility for 60 to<br />

140t/man/yr. This is an enormous task and for future expansions, Egypt<br />

will need to reduce this ratio to a fraction <strong>of</strong> its present level.<br />

As there is a long tradition <strong>of</strong> fish farming, farmers are using old<br />

methods which have been in use for generations. Appreciation <strong>of</strong><br />

techniques and experienced manpower must be high arnongst farmers. What<br />

is needed therefore is additional manpower to train farmers in methods<br />

<strong>of</strong> improving production. Trainees originating from traditional farming<br />

families should be given priority to become extension agents.<br />

2.3.2 Technological and Financial Assistance<br />

Current foreign aid inputs into Egypt represent a vast pool <strong>of</strong><br />

funds for development which includes credit facilities for farmers. As<br />

fish farming has always been considered as a business venture, loan<br />

fadlities are also likely to exist to support aquaculture enterprises.<br />

There is a considerable local input into aquaculture research<br />

spearheaded by IOf. With the establishment <strong>of</strong> the Abbasa National fry<br />

farming Centre and other Government Stations [Table 19, figs. 12 & 13],<br />

there will be even greater opportunities for research. It is apparent<br />

from Table 16, fig. 14 that considerable work is already underway in<br />

intensive cage culture technology. Improvement <strong>of</strong> the howash system<br />

also represents an area where long term trials should indicate the<br />

direction for future development.<br />

Egypt therefore has a vast pool <strong>of</strong> knowledge and the necessary<br />

facilities to conduct research to improve its fish farms. However,<br />

practical orientated research is too recent to have any significant<br />

effect on national production but trends are evident.<br />

2.3.3 Availability <strong>of</strong> Industrial Inputs<br />

Aquaculture sites are within developed agriculture areas and<br />

therefore by-products should be readily available for fish feeding<br />

[Table 20]. But there is a conflict in interest. Agricultural byproducts<br />

[Table 21] are vital to the livestock industry. Pressure on<br />

land use has caused stockfeed production to be increased to supplement<br />

the loss in grazing. This means that there is little surplus for use as<br />

fish feeds. Similarly manures are likely to find use on crop lands as<br />

fertilizers. Egypt however uses inorganic fertilizers at the rate <strong>of</strong><br />

2374kg/ha/yr. There might be scope for the use <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers<br />

in fish ponds although a better approach would be integrated farming.<br />

This is already evident with the increase in rizipisciculture and<br />

integrated duck/fish farms.<br />

Industrial development in Egypt is weIl advanced. Equipment,<br />

spares and maintenance services are generally available to cater for<br />

most fish farmers needs.<br />

2.3.4 Existing Infrastrueture<br />

In 1981 energy use in Egypt was the equivalent <strong>of</strong> 595kg<br />

coal/cap/yr. This suggests a weH established distribution network.<br />

But, as fish farms are likely to be located in marginal areas, it is<br />

doubtful that they would have access to this grid. fuel pumps would be<br />

necessary. All major centres being served by road and rail, as weIl as<br />

water transport, the delivery <strong>of</strong> fish to market and the commodities to<br />

the farms are unlikely to be a problem. However it should be noted that<br />

prime areas for intensive warmwater fish production do tend to be remote<br />

[fig. 16] and development in these areas would be problematic.<br />

The existence <strong>of</strong> an important fishery from Lake Nasser to the Delta<br />

Region implies that refrigerated routes exist for fish transport.<br />

Projects located at a distance along these routes are likely to reach<br />

prime market centres.<br />

Widespread irrigation suggests a great scope for integration but<br />

"restrictions on water use may hamper such development.<br />

The networks <strong>of</strong> Government stations [Table 19, fig. 12], fry<br />

collection centres and hatcheries [Table 14, fig. 13] as well as other<br />

experimental sites [Table 16] show that the infrastructure to support<br />

the fish farm industry is weH developed and likely to assist greatly<br />

future projects.<br />

2.4 Conclusions<br />

In the last five years Egypt has made rapid advances to develop its<br />

fish farming industry. It also has a long established traditional<br />

aquaculture sector. The latter has adopted non-conventional<br />

technologies adopted to the peculiar conditions <strong>of</strong> unstable, highly<br />

saline soils and to make maximum use <strong>of</strong> all water resources available.<br />

Statistics are uncertain as to the categorisation <strong>of</strong> such traditional<br />

systems and the recent rapid developments are as yet not properly<br />

documented. They have not yet fully realised their potential. A clear<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the present status <strong>of</strong> aquaculture is therefore not possible.<br />

But, if Egypt is to sustain its own fish production to satisfy its<br />

needs, there is a good possibility that aquaculture could meet most <strong>of</strong><br />

that demand. The immediate scope would be to intensify established<br />

tradi tional methods. However, there is only limited knowledge<br />

suggesting ways in which this could be implemented. Further, most areas<br />

are outside the optimum zone for maximum growth <strong>of</strong> the favoured<br />

tilapias. Mullet fry are in short supply due to high losses during<br />

transportation. Efforts need to be directed towards maximising survival<br />

<strong>of</strong> mullet and enhancing pond productivity. Carps have developed rapidly<br />

with numerous hatchery units, but as a non traditional species it is not<br />

yet clear to what extent it will be accepted on the market. Total<br />

integration with either irrigation or livestock, <strong>of</strong>fers great potential<br />

for the most economic development <strong>of</strong> aquaculture. Illustrated in fig.10<br />

is that greater than 600kg/ha/yr must be achieved for pr<strong>of</strong>it. Manpower<br />

'I-<br />

.-


and food representing over 60% <strong>of</strong> cost and economic returns depending<br />

upon situation can vary between 8 to 50%/yr [Table 22J. Manpower<br />

requirements for the extension <strong>of</strong> new concepts are high not only from<br />

the quantitative point <strong>of</strong> view but also qualitatively.<br />

In conclusion, Egypt may be considered as having an above average<br />

chance <strong>of</strong> success in aquaculture development [Table 23J. Positive<br />

points are suitability <strong>of</strong> land and water sites, Government support<br />

services, a tradition <strong>of</strong> fish farming, a business approach as weIl as a<br />

low fixed costs, high demand and good market. Negative points are the<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> technology for maximising production and for products handling.<br />

It is therefore only a question <strong>of</strong> time before Egypt obtains the<br />

required experienced in more intensive techniques and maximises<br />

aquaculture production.<br />

3. EI.. WAFAA FARM PROJECT<br />

3.1 History<br />

The Osman Group are involved in food security projects in Egypt.<br />

Fish was considered as <strong>of</strong> possible potential and research was planned to<br />

establish an appropriate technology for the region. In 1979 there was<br />

an interest to assist a project at Ismailya which had been established<br />

by Eng. Hassan. In 1981 3 ponds were built at EI Wafaa, increased by 3<br />

in 1982 and 3 again in 1983. Carp/mullet and wild tilapia were farmed<br />

but in 1984 imported tilapia strains were obtained from Israel. In 1985<br />

2 ponds <strong>of</strong> 1.5 acres and a M.T. hatchery were established valued at LE<br />

120 000. Mike Sipe [Florida J, Marsdan [Jodan J and Aquaculture<br />

Production Technology [IsraelJ have all been consulted for economic<br />

inputs as it is planned to expand the project to 50 acres at a site near<br />

Ismailya.<br />

3.2 Description<br />

The layout <strong>of</strong> the farm is illustrated in Fig. 15. The objective is<br />

to produce 2 to 5 million sex-reversed fry and 25t fish from 9 acres <strong>of</strong><br />

ponds and a hatchery unit. The site is located 20 km from Cairo Centre,<br />

opposite Tura. The farm also has a duck production unit capable <strong>of</strong> 250<br />

000 ducklings per year, now set to expand to 10 000 breeders and 1.5<br />

million ducklings.<br />

A new hatchery for tilapia sex-reversal has been built on site,<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> 8 x 2.6m diameter hexagonal concrete tanks. Fry once<br />

treated are grown-out in the ponds receiving pumped water from the<br />

nearby Nile River. Breeding takes place in ponds and are transferred<br />

within one week <strong>of</strong> ernerging.<br />

3.3 Production Perfonnance<br />

3.3.1 Hatchery<br />

A summary <strong>of</strong> the first production <strong>of</strong> the newly constructed Sex<br />

Reversal Process [SRPJ hatchery is given in Table 24.<br />

Six SRP cycles were carried out during 1985 using 300 female<br />

O.niloticus: 150 male fish. A total <strong>of</strong> 474 000 fry were produced, 79<br />

000 per cycle approximatesly 260 fry/female/month. This closely<br />

approximates that achieved in Baobab Tilapia Arena systems and is<br />

acceptable. However problems arose in the sex reverse process. Only<br />

65$ <strong>of</strong> stocks survived [= 56% if cycle 6 which was aborted half way is<br />

includedJ. This is less than the expected rate <strong>of</strong> 75%.<br />

Stocking <strong>of</strong> SRP tank~ was at an average <strong>of</strong> 6045/m 3 <strong>of</strong> which harvest<br />

was a low 3900 fry/m. This is at a rate 2.5 fold less than<br />

recol!lllended.<br />

Fry grew from 25mg to 343mg which is a good SGR <strong>of</strong> 8.7%/ind/dy but<br />

considerably lower than that postulated in the manual.<br />

Observed during the SRP was that after day 10, fry began to die and<br />

exhibited severe deformaties, particularly <strong>of</strong> the head. Increased<br />

feeding and transfer <strong>of</strong> water use from weIl 11 to weIl 111 between<br />

cycles 3 and 4 did not improve condition. Food initially was 45%<br />

protein diet imported from Israel on 1st April and 8th May which was<br />

fully used up by 17th July. After this new food was purchased from<br />

Norway and used for the rest <strong>of</strong> the cycles. This would mean that food<br />

was being stored for 2 to 3 months before final use and could suggest<br />

that aflatoxin or rancidity may be the cause <strong>of</strong> deaths.<br />

3.3.2 Ponds<br />

The ponds were put to full production for the first time on 2nd<br />

April 1984 using 56 000 x 4-5g all male tilapia hybrids imported from<br />

Israel. Mullet, prawn and carp were used in polyculture. The overall<br />

performance analysis is presented in Table 25, Fig. 16 and 17. Details<br />

<strong>of</strong> select pond water quality and performance is given in Fig. 18 and<br />

select water temperature data in Fig. 19. Table 26 and 27 present<br />

greater detail <strong>of</strong> the performance <strong>of</strong> tilapia in the systems during 1984<br />

and 1985 respectively and this is illustrated in Figs. 20 and 21.<br />

3.3.2.1 Pond Performance Data<br />

From Table 25 and 26 it is possible to summarise pond performance<br />

in 1984 as foliows:<br />

At a total stocking rate <strong>of</strong> 62 500/ha [+ 18 500 J <strong>of</strong> which tilapia<br />

comprised 44.3% [24 150/ha + 13 000 J the yield amounted to 9.4 t/ha/yr<br />

[+2.9J <strong>of</strong> which 67.9% was tilapia at a yield <strong>of</strong> 6.96 [+2.5Jt/ha/yr.<br />

Tilapia survival amounted to 62.4% [+34.1 J but mullet prawn and carp<br />

overall survival was a low 33.3% [+6.6J primarily due to a loss <strong>of</strong><br />

prawns and mullets. Feeding at a rate <strong>of</strong> 73.5kg/ha/dy [+31.6J pelleted<br />

feed or between 1.7 to 10% biomass per day a food conversion rate <strong>of</strong><br />

3.31 [+1.62J was achieved. Tilapia grew at an overall SGR <strong>of</strong> 2.32%1dy<br />

[+O.33J attaining an average size <strong>of</strong> 261.3g [+45.9J in 190 days.<br />

In 1985 the results are not complete but from sampIe data [Table<br />

27J performance can be sUl!lllarised as foliows:


Stocking at between 20 to 737 thousand tilapia per hectare a<br />

production <strong>of</strong> 10.7t/ha/yr [+7.8] was achieved at a SGR <strong>of</strong> 3.5%1dy<br />

[+0.51]. The F.G.R. <strong>of</strong> 2.11 [+0.77] was obtained for a feeding rate <strong>of</strong><br />

64.4kg/ha/dy.<br />

3.3.2~2 Pond Performance <strong>An</strong>alysed<br />

The values achieved in production were not performed under any<br />

experimental control. Stocking rates varied between 26 000 to 740<br />

OOO/ha, feeding rate also was variable, as were polyculture ratios, pond<br />

size, aeration, starting size, starting date, harvest date, etc. In<br />

addition unexplained losses as well as wild entry masked any consistency<br />

in stock control.<br />

It is difficult given the above conditions to draw accurate<br />

conclusions from the data nevertheless results show system potential and<br />

general trends are apparent. The variation in stock rate and feeding is<br />

apparent in Fig. 16. Increased stocking rate gives rise to increased<br />

production [Figs. 17b, 20e & 21d]. From Fig. 17d it appears that<br />

feeding at 50kg/ha/yr can sustain a biomass <strong>of</strong> 8 to lOt/ha. The F.G.R.<br />

<strong>of</strong> less than 2:1 [Fig, 17c] suggests this to be on optimum feeding level<br />

although there does appear to be a possible loss in growth performance<br />

[Fig. 17a] but due to the variation in the data this may not be<br />

significant. From Fig. 2Ob, the implication is that S.G.R. is affected<br />

by increased density and that smaller average harvest size [Fig. 2Oc] is<br />

correlated with increased stocking despite an increase in feeding rate<br />

[Fig. 20a]. This affect on S.G.R. is also apparent from Fig. 21c for<br />

1985 data.<br />

From Fig. 18, fish growth [tÜapia] appears not to be affected by<br />

time in the system and does not suggest that crowding may be to blame.<br />

The trend is apparent at onset implying factors within the system or<br />

stock interaction are to blame. Of interest however is that temperature<br />

has a significant influence. Both ponds 4 and 9 start <strong>of</strong> slower than<br />

the others can be correlated to lower water temperature condition [Fig.<br />

18]. Unfortunately no complete seasonal water temperature record for<br />

all ponds was available but what data was, is given in Fig. 19. Glearly<br />

evident is that for 6 months <strong>of</strong> the year from November through to the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> April pond conditions are below optimum for tilapia growth.<br />

Dramatic temperature rise is evident"in May which stabalises until<br />

October when temperatures begin to drop. Effectively therefore only for<br />

4 months <strong>of</strong> the year at El Wafaa are pond temperatures suitable for<br />

maximum tilapia growth. Ponds conditions under a greenhouse [fig. 19c]<br />

appear better with sub-optimum conditions for less than 2 months in<br />

December and January.<br />

3.4 RecCllllleDded Mode <strong>of</strong> Operation<br />

From the trends apparent above it is possible to arrive at a nurnber<br />

<strong>of</strong> conclusions and predict the expected stock rate, survival and likely<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> the El Wafaa Farm. These projections are sumrnarised in<br />

Table 28 and an operation schedule suggested in Table 29.<br />

3.4.1 Hatchery System<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> low temperature condition breeding is unlikely to take<br />

place until April. Broodstock should therefore be safeguarded during<br />

winter by overwintering in the greenhouse and transferring to broodponds<br />

only in April as water conditions warm up. The first seasons spawn<br />

would therefore only be ready for transfer to the SRP system in May and<br />

into nursery ponds in June. This implies that only 6 cycles are<br />

possible per year [Table 29] and that the first seasonal SR fry would<br />

only be ready for on-growing by late June. Effectively 3 months<br />

production time would be lost if the operation was dependant upon the<br />

first seasonal SR fry for on-growing. In other words, at the onset <strong>of</strong><br />

the season in order to maximise production through utilising the full 6<br />

months potential growing period for tilapia, the El Wafaa Farm would<br />

have to overwinter SR fry so as to be in a position to stock the<br />

production ponds in April.<br />

3.4.2 Production Ponds<br />

The extent to which the ponds are used for overwintering very much<br />

depends on any possible seasonal variation in the price <strong>of</strong> SR seed. It<br />

is very likely that seed sales early in the season would fetch a<br />

premium. Table 29 illustrates an option whereby half <strong>of</strong> the SR fry are<br />

overwintered and half sold mid-season. At the end <strong>of</strong> winter SR fry are<br />

sorted and stocked into production ponds and any surplus is sold.<br />

Should sales exhibit a premium price all SR fry could be overwintered.<br />

It is anticipated therefore that all ponds would be brought into<br />

production as early in the season as is practically possible thereby<br />

maximising on the warm months. The main sales <strong>of</strong> table fish would be in<br />

September/October. However if market surveys suggest aperiod when fish<br />

are at a premium, certain stocks could be overwintered to cater for that<br />

market.<br />

The stock programmes adopted are all explained in the notes<br />

accornpanying Table 28 and are derived from Table 25, 1984 results.<br />

4. APPRAISAL OF EL WAFAA FARM<br />

The following points were discussed in detail during the mission<br />

and are surnmarised here for future reference.<br />

4. 1 Hatetlery<br />

4.1.1 S. R. P. Manual<br />

The manual appears over-ambitious and over-designed and in the<br />

light <strong>of</strong> the first year <strong>of</strong> operation a number <strong>of</strong> changes are apparent.<br />

Discussed below or suggestions which appear in the order in which they<br />

are given in the manual.<br />

Item 1.1: The operating period is given as April to September. Frorn<br />

Fig. 19, conditions are still too cold in April and production will only<br />

be between mid-May to mid-October as shown in Ta~le 29.


The stock density in SRP tank <strong>of</strong> 10 000 to 13000 fry per sq.m. is<br />

excessive for at a rate <strong>of</strong> 27% <strong>of</strong> this, mortality was 44.3%. Factors<br />

causing loss were not clear and therefore it is suggested that the<br />

system be tested experimentally over a range <strong>of</strong> densities to confirm the<br />

optim~ level. Su~gested is a duplicate trial <strong>of</strong> 4 densities from<br />

1500/m to 13 OOO/m. The result would establish the potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />

system.<br />

Item 1.2: The basis <strong>of</strong> estimating 5000 fry per female in 6 cycles is<br />

high i.e. 833 fry per female per cycle. In fact the manual implies only<br />

one third breed at any one time equivalent to 277 fry per female per<br />

cycle. This was in effect achieved during 1985 as 260 fry/female/cycle<br />

[Table 28J. Stock calculations should therefore be based on this rate.<br />

The required use <strong>of</strong> 500g fernale fish is not all together practical.<br />

Although perhaps likely to yield more fry per female, larger fish are<br />

not as efficient in fry production per uni t body weight. Further, in<br />

view <strong>of</strong> the handling involved [i.e. twice per cycleJ it may be better to<br />

use smaller stocks as large fish tend to be more violent and liable to<br />

damage themselves at each handling. A smaller fish <strong>of</strong> 150g - 200g is<br />

more advisable and infact approaches the size used in the first year.<br />

From Table 29, a 28% mortali ty <strong>of</strong> broodstock or 5% per cycle was<br />

experienced. This implies there is a high stress due to handling.<br />

Whereas the manual only allows 20% replenishment <strong>of</strong> brood after every<br />

season, this should be increased to 50% to 'allow for losses.<br />

, No schedule is provided allowing for broodstock development. It is<br />

suggested that one tank in the SRP be untreated every season during<br />

cycle 6 and overwintered in p:6 and grow-out in P.6 to replenish brood<br />

fish [Table 29 J.<br />

At a broodstock density <strong>of</strong> 1/m 2 , P.5 the breeding pond could hold<br />

all brood fish to realise 2 million fry but the limiting feature is that<br />

brood are to be overwintered. The greenhouse can only hold half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

required total. Table28 and 29 has therefore been calculated on this<br />

basis. Either a second overwintering greenhouse unit is considered or<br />

alternatively overwintering is done in the P ponds. As Table 29 shows P<br />

ponds have limited use in winter it is suggested that they are first<br />

tested for brood overwintering as it is not clear what portion <strong>of</strong> stock<br />

will survive.<br />

'<br />

Item 2.1: The expected size <strong>of</strong> 0.5 to 1.5g in 30 days <strong>of</strong> hormone<br />

treatment is excessive. During the first year EI Wafaa achieved 0.34g.<br />

Given the crowded conditions ~13 000/m 2 J expected <strong>of</strong> the system it is<br />

unlikely that fry would more than double or tripIe in size during the<br />

SRP Ci.e 0.3 - 0.5g].<br />

Item 2.3: No feed quality is mentioned. Generally tilapia brood fish<br />

require 25 - 30% protein and fry between 40 - 50% protein. Feeding <strong>of</strong><br />

broodstock for only 5 days in a 30 day cycle may not be enough. In<br />

other words fish are fed for only 15% <strong>of</strong> the time. Further, as fish are<br />

only to be fed while in the holding tank this does not take into account<br />

that these fish have been recently handled and transferred some distance<br />

to be stocked at a higher density in a confined space. Undoubtablya<br />

large number will be stressed by this experience and are not likely to<br />

be physiologically in astate to feed or digest this food.<br />

Suggested is that a minimal ration [+ 1%] be fed occasionally while<br />

fish are in P.5.<br />

Item 2.4: Flow through at 5-6 m3/dy per 2.5m 3 tank represents a daily<br />

exchange <strong>of</strong> 2/dy or 8%/hr. This is exceptionally low given the high<br />

density, high feed input. Low oxygen was experienced in the system<br />

possibly as a feature <strong>of</strong> the inefficiency <strong>of</strong> the aeration method as weIl<br />

as a build up <strong>of</strong> organics.<br />

Suggested is that the system be operated on aeration on a regular<br />

flow <strong>of</strong> at least one exchange rate per hour or 20m 3/hr for the current 8<br />

tank system.<br />

Item 3: Stocking in March as recommended may be too early in the season<br />

as temperatures are still below 20 0 C[Fig. 19] this would be stressful<br />

and fish are unlikely to breed until conditions warm up in May.<br />

The transfer <strong>of</strong> brood to the concrete pond [T-21] over a distance<br />

<strong>of</strong> 150m is stressful and could account for the mortality. Ideally this<br />

Tank should be adjacent the handling point. Alternatively P1 could be<br />

modified for spawning or a cage system [i.e Hapa] could be used in<br />

either P4 or p6 to hold the brood for the 4 - 5 days that i t takes to<br />

reactivate the cycle.<br />

Screens need to be placed over the supply inlet to P5 to prevent<br />

wild fish entry. No mention is made <strong>of</strong> the treatment to clear the pond<br />

<strong>of</strong> wild spawning. Drying out is the cheapest but if not feasible use <strong>of</strong><br />

lime or a bio-degradable fish toxin e.g. Tobacco leaf wastes.<br />

Item 3.3: Fry sorting is not described. The best option is to use a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> large bags made <strong>of</strong> netting materials mounted on a steel hoop<br />

much like a handling net. However the net size determines the size <strong>of</strong><br />

fry to be graded and can be effectively carried out in the first SRP<br />

tank.<br />

The holding over <strong>of</strong> 10 S.R fry in cages after each treatment is an<br />

unnecessary and costly exercise and it is unlikely that such a small<br />

sampIe as 10 fish would have 30Y statistical bearing on the population.<br />

This set should be done away with. Instead, sampIes can be taken from<br />

the pond if sex ratios wish to be determined.<br />

The water temperature recommended 25 - 28°C was never achieved<br />

during the first year [Fig. 19d]. Infact the SRP room had a much lower<br />

temperature condition th30 the ponds [Fig. 193]. This can be attributed<br />

to the heavy concrete structure <strong>of</strong> the building acting as an insulation.<br />

Essentially a greenhouse effect needs to be created. Suggested are use<br />

<strong>of</strong> Nile or pond water instead <strong>of</strong> borehole water as the latter is<br />

considerably cooler; Some form <strong>of</strong> recycling system to store heat<br />

perhaps by using the adjacent greenhouse pond or solar heater panels on<br />

the ro<strong>of</strong>. With recycling filtration and screening <strong>of</strong> incoming water<br />

would be necessary. Transparent ro<strong>of</strong>ing panels could be used to permit<br />

further solar heating as weIl as pruning <strong>of</strong> s~rrounding trees which


shade the building.<br />

Item 6.1: Ose <strong>of</strong> a~onia solution sounds expensive and hazardous.<br />

Spraying <strong>of</strong> diesel oil should be exercised with extreme caution as<br />

fish and oil do not mix. Paraffin has been used successfully in Asian<br />

fish ponds but both methods remain to be evaluated for toxicity to fish.<br />

As an alternative to pond draining to retrieve fry, it is feasible<br />

that an intermediate step could be introduced. Two weeks after stocking<br />

"swim-up" fry should appear along the banks in the shallows <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ponds. This is a classical behaviour pattern <strong>of</strong> tilapia exploited in<br />

the Far East. These fry are scooped up in a large hand net fitted with<br />

a mosquito net bag. Carried out at regular intervals throughout the day<br />

upto 70% <strong>of</strong> fry can be collected in this way. The remaining fry can<br />

then be removed by draining. Fry collected in the hand net by this<br />

method can either be held in a 2 x 3m hapa [cage <strong>of</strong> mosquito netting]<br />

held in the pond [P.5] or transferred directly to a S.R tank and are fed<br />

treated M.T. food. This minimises handling, for draining and collection<br />

<strong>of</strong> fry from the pond bottom is a very cumbersome process and liable to<br />

result in high mortality from injuries.<br />

Item 6.2: Broodstock are perhaps better treated by dipping in<br />

prophylactics during the transfer from P4 to T-21.<br />

When brood are again removed from holding tank to P4 it may be wise<br />

to recheck the mouth'<strong>of</strong> female for any incidental breeding which may<br />

have taken place while in the holding tank.<br />

Item 6.3: It is not clear why fry <strong>of</strong> greater than 9 - 11mm are to be<br />

destroyed if the system has been cleared <strong>of</strong> wild spawn and is<br />

efficiently screened. These fish could represent a genetically faster<br />

growing stock. Depending upon the numbers involved it may be advisable<br />

to set up a system to select for these larger fry and on-grow them as<br />

future broodstock.<br />

Fry entering the SRP tanks do not appear to und ergo any form <strong>of</strong><br />

prophylactic treatment other than to use diesel in the tanks to kill<br />

bugs. It is feH that all fry sortin,g, treatment and removal <strong>of</strong> bugs<br />

should be done outside the SRP room. Aseparate sorting tank system<br />

should be set up outside. The fry coming in should undergo a<br />

prophlactic treatment similar to that described for the broodstock. In<br />

addition a foot bath should be placed at the entrance to the SRP room so<br />

as to maintain a sterile environment. Water used in the SRP room should<br />

also be pretreated either by·U.V. or ozone sterilisation to counter any<br />

possible pathogen build up in the system. The use <strong>of</strong> borehole water<br />

for this purpose was commendable but it appears that the tanks are<br />

covered in a ferric deposit. Groundwater quality is therefore<br />

questionable and may not be advisable to use for fry production until<br />

fully analysed to verify that no likely fish toxins are present.<br />

The mention that daily removal <strong>of</strong> accumulated dirt suggests the<br />

tank system is not self-cleaning. Daily cleaning <strong>of</strong> the tanks is<br />

therefore likely to be stressful to the fry. <strong>An</strong> increased water flow is<br />

recommended [see Item 2.4 above]. Further the screen mechanism on the<br />

drains outlet is very cumbersome and expensive. A modification is<br />

suggested and illustrated in Fig. 22. A was te water P. V.C. pipe is used<br />

as the draining unit covered in micro-screen material providing a,<br />

simpler easy to manage screening system and the water level is<br />

controlled by the outside drainage stand pipe. When cleaning aspare<br />

pipe unit can easily be supplemented while the screens are taken for<br />

cleaning.<br />

The air loop is perhaps an inefficient way <strong>of</strong> aeration as the air<br />

bubbles are large. To improve aeration smaller bubbles are necessary.<br />

Either use special perforated pipes or place sand bags over the existing<br />

system to create an air stone effect.<br />

The paragraph [pg. 12] describing net covers to the tanks is<br />

confusing. The implications are that originally the design was for<br />

outdoor use hence net covers are necessary against predatory birds. It<br />

is not clear therefore why this is mentioned for El Wafaa where the SRP<br />

tanks are housed inside a bUilding. If the use <strong>of</strong> the building was<br />

intended to act as a greenhouse it failed and this leads to cautioning<br />

against any modifications to designs without due consideration. Had the<br />

building been open sided or had the tanks been outdoors, water<br />

temperature conditions would be considerably warmer.<br />

Item 7.1: Feed quantity appears under-estimated according to the data<br />

provided e.g.<br />

- 2 million fry if achieve 0.5 to 1.5g in day 30 = 2000kg biomass<br />

- Therefore 2000kg <strong>of</strong> fry <strong>of</strong> 19 average size at an average F.C.R. <strong>of</strong> 2:1<br />

= 4000kg feed requirement.<br />

The estimated one tonne <strong>of</strong> feed for 2 million fry implies at a 2: 1<br />

FCR that fry only average O.25g after 30 days <strong>of</strong> feeding. Thus either<br />

item 7.1 is under-estimated or expected growth, item 2.1 is overestimated.<br />

There is no consistency in the calculation.<br />

Item 7.2: The level <strong>of</strong> M.T. is slightly on the high side and can be<br />

anywhere between 30 - 60mg/l average 45mg/l. The use <strong>of</strong> ethyl-alcohol<br />

is expensive. The ratio <strong>of</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> food to alcohol can be lowered to<br />

2:1 and even less by experimenting. Drying <strong>of</strong> food under a distillation<br />

process to retrieve the alcohol is technically feasible and perhaps<br />

economic for a large scale operations.<br />

What appears to be neglected however is feed storage. El Wafaa<br />

have been purchasing feed at great expense due to the necessity to<br />

import and stock piling before use for M.T. treatment. It must be<br />

cautioned that under the tropical humid conditions experienced in summer<br />

this feed is unlikely to have a shelf life <strong>of</strong> more than 3 - 4 weeks.<br />

Fungal moulds tend to develop quickly under such conditions and<br />

aflatoxins poisoning may be a dominant feature <strong>of</strong> the mortality<br />

experienced. Further high temperatures lead to rancid conditions if<br />

diets are high in fats, an additional toxic response.<br />

Food therefore should be stored at below 15 to 20 0 C and especially<br />

M.T. treated feed should be held in a fridge. Unless feed can be<br />

manufactured locally every effort should be made to shorten the shelf<br />

~ ..-... ~ -,~,!


life or improve storage conditions.<br />

Item 7.3: Feeding at 10 - 12% <strong>of</strong> biomass to fry <strong>of</strong> 10 - 15mg starting<br />

size is too low. Fig. 23 is provided to indicate the required levels<br />

and Fig. 24 shows the required protein component. Particle size also<br />

needs careful attention [Fig. 23J.<br />

Item 8.0: Examinations for parasites is important for eure but even<br />

more essential is to prevent infections entering the system through<br />

prophalactic measures as described above under Item 6.3.<br />

The items discussed above may already have been covered in other<br />

sectors <strong>of</strong> the SRP manual for the section given to the consultant<br />

appears incomplete. Reference is made to other manual procedures not<br />

enclosed. Nevertheless the above serves as a suggested improvement to<br />

operations.<br />

4.1.2 General Impression<br />

The following are comments <strong>of</strong> a general nature not discussed above.<br />

Tank Design: The tanks with a 20cm wall are overdesigned. To retain<br />

3.0m 3 <strong>of</strong> water 10cm reinforced block work is cheaper and more than<br />

adequate. Further for M.~ treatment it is common practice in the Far<br />

East to use even shallower units.<br />

Drainage: The drain systems are outsized. A 5 - 10cm pipe would have<br />

been adequate elliminating the need for such deep draining trenches<br />

which are hazardous. Planking or grills should be considerd to protect<br />

the open drains.<br />

Water Supply: Use <strong>of</strong> small pipe diameter and pressure pumping is<br />

limiting to water flow. The system could have used larger pipe units<br />

and on a supply channel principle elliminating expensive taps and<br />

valves.<br />

Office: The <strong>of</strong>fice should be accessable from outside the SRP room.<br />

Currently workers wishing to see the management pass through SRP room<br />

potentially bring pathogens into the system. Separate doors should be<br />

considered.<br />

4.1.3 Conclusions<br />

As the SRP system was not actually operative during the visit,<br />

comments are restricted to personal observation and from discussions<br />

with staff. In summary the high losses during the rirst year can be<br />

attributed to:<br />

- Poor quality <strong>of</strong> borehole water i.e ferric deposits evident.<br />

- Low water temperature conditions.<br />

- deteriorating food quality due to length <strong>of</strong> storage.<br />

- Poor aeration and low water exchange.<br />

- Lack <strong>of</strong> staff experience.<br />

- Potential pathogen risk.<br />

- Over-estimates for the design <strong>of</strong> the system.<br />

4.2 Pond Production<br />

Pond performance in 1984 achieved a level <strong>of</strong> production equivalent.<br />

to 9.4t/ha/yr. This is exceptionally good and there is little that can<br />

be done to improve this condition. Survival was low but there does not<br />

appear to be an explanation for the losses except perhaps: predation.<br />

The only improvement to pond production would be management to<br />

ensure fingerlings overwinter so as to get early stocking in the warm<br />

season. This is adequately described in Table 29.<br />

5. SCOPE FOR INTENSIVE TILAPIA TANK CULTURE<br />

From section 2.0 it is apparent that Egypt is in a marginal<br />

situation for intensive tilapia culture. From Fig. 9, Table 10 only the<br />

South East corner <strong>of</strong> Egypt [Zone AJ experiences all year round warm<br />

conditions suitable for continuous production <strong>of</strong> tilapia. EI Wafaa Farm<br />

is located in Zone C, and it is likely that for 6 months <strong>of</strong> the year<br />

intensive production <strong>of</strong> tilapia is not possible. Nevertheless, EI Wafaa<br />

requested that the consultant examine that given this condition whether<br />

intensive tank culture was economically feasible. Considered therefore<br />

is the use <strong>of</strong> ponds to overwinter tilapia fingerlings to be stocked into<br />

tanks for fattening in Mayas soon as temperatures warm up [Fig. 19].<br />

The system considered does not cater for the overwintering in ponds but<br />

the cost <strong>of</strong> this is <strong>of</strong>fset against the expected cost <strong>of</strong> purchasing seed<br />

at LE 60/1000 [after Gaafar pers. comm.J.<br />

5.1 A Pilot Baobab Tilapia Farm Described<br />

The system described in the following text considers a complete<br />

model Baobab Tilapia Farm as illustrated in Fig. 25. Modifications to<br />

suit EI Wafaa conditions are considered later.


5.1.1 Site Organisation<br />

The Baobab Facility is to receive a supply <strong>of</strong> freshwater pumped<br />

from the river [No. 4, Fig. 25J to a raised flume. The water first<br />

paSses through two tiers <strong>of</strong> 20 fry on-growing raceways, each 10 x 1.5m<br />

and only 0.5m deep [No.10 Fig. 25 & 26 J. Wooden flashboards are used to<br />

check the rate <strong>of</strong> water flow gauged at between 125 - 250m3/hr, depending<br />

upon stocking density. The drop between raceways is to facilitate<br />

reaeration and a sediment trap [No.13, Fig. 25] is also positioned at<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> the second series <strong>of</strong> raceways. Sedimentation <strong>of</strong> large<br />

particulate wastes occurs here before the water enters a raised supply<br />

channel [No. 14, Fig. 25J and is reused a third time in the 10 fattening<br />

tanks [Fig. 27J. Water reuse in this fashion is not deleterious to<br />

growth, provided oxygenation is good. It does represent a reduction in<br />

pumping cost. To facilitate this reuse, the raceways need to be<br />

elevated above ground to achieve sufficient head for gravity supply.<br />

Considering the relatively low cost <strong>of</strong> energy in the country, pumping<br />

may not necessarily be expensive and the option is available that water<br />

reuse in this fashion could be restricted to the second raceway only.<br />

Raceways are then built on the same grade as the tanks. The tanks then<br />

receive first-hand water but the volume required would be increased by a<br />

factor <strong>of</strong> 2.<br />

The hatchery based on the "Baobab Arena" [No.17, Fig. 25J and<br />

nursery facilities are located ad jacent the' on-growi ng raceways. The<br />

distance over which fish have to be transferred is small and therefore<br />

un).ikely to be stressful. Overall, the Baobab Facility measures 65 x<br />

40I1l, covering only 2 600m 2 and is capable <strong>of</strong> a minimum production <strong>of</strong><br />

10t/yr, with a potential maximum <strong>of</strong> 2Ot/yr through skillful management<br />

and provided environmental parameters permit all year round production.<br />

Construction detail <strong>of</strong> the hatchery is given in Balarin [1983J and<br />

design <strong>of</strong> raceways presented in Fig. 26 and tank design Fig. 27. Basic<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice, food store and pump house plus perimeter security fence is also<br />

coosidered.<br />

5.1.2 Operations Strategy<br />

The proposed mode <strong>of</strong> operation is Qutlined in the model shown in<br />

Fi~. 28. This model, based on the production cycle described in Fig.<br />

29, allows for a twelve month growing period between hatchling and 250g<br />

marketable size.<br />

•<br />

The recommended strategy, therefore, is that fry produced in the<br />

hatchery are reared for 10 weeks in nursery units, feeding on a high<br />

protein diet. Mortality is normally high, as much as 20% <strong>of</strong> the fry<br />

dying at this stage. Selected fish are then moved on at between 1 - 5g<br />

size. They are transferred to the fry on-growing raceways and und ergo a<br />

ri~orous grading programme selecting for 50% <strong>of</strong> stocks. Generally<br />

fas ter growing are male fish [70 - 90% J. Fry graded out as undersized<br />

ma1 be sold or used as food minced and used in diet trials. The<br />

remaining stocks at 25g size are suitable for stocking into the circular<br />

fattening tanks. Six months would then have passed and it will take the<br />

fish a further six months to reach harvest size. The process is<br />

continuous and each tank is stocked in sequence.<br />

In theory therefore, the circular fattening tanks should und ergo<br />

two production cycles per year. With 10 such tanks, the unit should<br />

produce 20t <strong>of</strong> fish per year plus trash and seed fish. However for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> a pilot unit this model is overdesigned, six tanks and 12 ongrowing<br />

raceways would have been adequate, a potential 10t/yr<br />

production.<br />

The system is capable, through better managemen t, <strong>of</strong> undergoing<br />

four production cycles per year. This is achieved by stocking at a<br />

larger initial size. Although this provision has been allowed for, i t<br />

is anticipated that the system would never reach its maximum potential<br />

capacity primarily because <strong>of</strong>:<br />

_ Temperature extremes - cool winter [i.e loss <strong>of</strong> 6 months production in<br />

EgyptJ<br />

- Requirement for skillful management.<br />

- Possible food quality problems.<br />

Therefore, 10t has been set as the maximum achievable yield for a<br />

pilot unit and the system can be considered aS being <strong>of</strong> a production<br />

range <strong>of</strong> 10 to 12t/yr.<br />

5. 1.3 Technical Detail <strong>of</strong> Proeess<br />

The technical details <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> intensive tank culture <strong>of</strong><br />

tilapia have recently been reviewed by Balarin and <strong>Haller</strong> [1982J.<br />

Relevant data pertinent to this project are discussed below [after<br />

Balarin, 1979J. The basic concept <strong>of</strong> operation involves models:<br />

- Stocking programme<br />

- Growth rate<br />

- Feeding rate<br />

- Water flow requirement.<br />

Sophisticated technology has been kept to amInImum. Graphic<br />

models have been developed for ease <strong>of</strong> understanding yet with the<br />

potential to be computerised and automated.<br />

5.1.3.1 Stocking programme<br />

<strong>An</strong> example <strong>of</strong> a stocking programme model is given in Fig. 28.<br />

Different rates for stocking density are set for each stage, varying<br />

with unit type, unit size and prevailing environmental and water quality<br />

conditions. Allowances are made for mortalities, stock removal due to<br />

growth differentials and sales <strong>of</strong> seed or market size fish. The values<br />

for each stage can be calculated, given known conditions.<br />

High density stocking also prevents reproduction. Males in defence<br />

<strong>of</strong> territory at high densities <strong>of</strong>ten become exhausted at the number <strong>of</strong><br />

intruders which have to be kept out <strong>of</strong> a chosen "nesting" site.<br />

Territorial behaviour therefore falls away. Should successful mating<br />

occur, however, cannibalism <strong>of</strong> eggs and fry by the surrounding stock<br />

results in a poor success rate.


Set stocking rates are therefore laid down wi th some flexibility<br />

for stock manipulation depending upon ultimate market size. Baobab Farm<br />

employs the following rates:<br />

Fingerlings [1 - 25gJ 1000 2000/l]l3<br />

Adults [25-250gJ = 200 500/m5<br />

5.1.3.2 Growth rate<br />

Given prevailing seasonal water temperature conditions, it is<br />

possible to calculate a model growth curve. This may vary according to<br />

diet, water quality and species and can be determined empirically during<br />

pilot scale developments. Regular random sampIe weighings then become<br />

the management tool to assess performance against that expected.<br />

This permits early detection <strong>of</strong> any deviation from the norm and<br />

corrective measures can be initiated. <strong>An</strong> overall specific growth rate<br />

[SGRJ expected under the prevailing conditions at the site is about<br />

1.5%/d. A market size <strong>of</strong> 250g can therefore be expected six months<br />

after starting with a 25 - 30g fish. This is a conservative estimate as<br />

the project should aim for a production cycle <strong>of</strong> six months [SGR = 2%/dJ<br />

as climate permits only a 6 month growing season [Fig. 19 J.<br />

5.1.3.3 Feeding rate<br />

Feeds are generally formulated from locally available ingredients.<br />

Were the tilapia project attached to an irrigation project, the bulk<br />

feed ingredient could be from crop byproducts, such as brans, broken<br />

grain or oil seed expeller cakes. These are incorporated into a mix<br />

with animal and plant protein ingredients. Where no such waste products<br />

are available, diets are formulated from recognised suitable ingredients<br />

[Table 20 & 21]. The proportions vary according to the protein content<br />

required for each stage <strong>of</strong> on-growing and consideration is also given to<br />

achieve aleast cost formulation. Mineral and vitamin supplements are<br />

added to achieve a nutritional balance. Recent developments in feed<br />

formulation have been reviewed by Jauncey and Ross [1982J. Generally for<br />

tilapia a 25 - 30% protein, low fibre pellet is required. Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

poultry feeds in use in Egypt may suffice.<br />

From the protein and digestible portion <strong>of</strong> a ration, it is possible<br />

to calculate, for given temperatures, the required rate <strong>of</strong> feeding for<br />

optimum growth. <strong>An</strong> attempt is made to achieve an economic food<br />

conversion ratio [FCR] approximating 2: 1. A conservative FCR '<strong>of</strong> 2.5: 1<br />

is assumed for this project. After each random sampie, feed rates are<br />

adjusted accordingly to optimize growth and maintain an economic FCR.<br />

Under Baobab Farm conditions the following formulae applies:<br />

Log Y = 1.3-0.46 log X [b = 0.46+ 0.39J<br />

Where: Y feeding rate as percent body weight/day<br />

X mean body weight [gJ<br />

5.1.3.4 Water flow requirement<br />

A continuous water exchange is preferred to aeration by<br />

oxygenation. This flow provides all the fish's oxygen requirements and<br />

flushes excretory waste products from the system. System design<br />

facilitates cleaning. In a circular tank, the inflow is set at a<br />

tangental angle creating a spiral ebb to the central drain. Solids are<br />

carried out in the current thus created. By manipulation <strong>of</strong> water flow<br />

and angle <strong>of</strong> inlet pipe, it is possible to vary the velocity <strong>of</strong> the tank<br />

current. This is important to create a current fast enough to move<br />

large faecal particles but not to cause excessive swimming <strong>of</strong> the fish.<br />

High velocities result in energy expenditure at the expense <strong>of</strong> growth.<br />

If the current were too slow, it may not only result in faecal build up<br />

but can lead to successful reproduction. Generally in tanks where male<br />

tilapia can hold station and defend a nesting territory, breeding<br />

occurs. In the tank there are no reference marks, Le. stones,<br />

vegetation or depressions. In defence <strong>of</strong> territory, whenever a male<br />

pursues an intruder, he is carried some distance from the nest by the<br />

current. Disorientation results. The male therefore finds difficulty<br />

in recognising his nest and gives up any thought <strong>of</strong> breeding. High<br />

flow, therefore and high density stocking prevent successful<br />

reproduction in tanks.<br />

A flow rate <strong>of</strong> between 0.5 - 1.0Llmin/kg,<br />

is generally adequate at Baobab Farm.<br />

5.1.4 Production technique<br />

varying with size range,<br />

This section elaborates on the production process with reference to<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> systems design and techniques as recommended for Egyptian<br />

conditions.<br />

5.1. 4.1 Breeding<br />

The proposed technique will be initially to produce fry <strong>of</strong><br />

O.niloticus and select for faster growth. As the system develops, i t<br />

might be envisaged that all male fry will be produced either by male<br />

hormone treatment or hybrid crosses. The surplus seed produced could be<br />

available for sale as seed.<br />

The Baobab Breeding Arena described by Balarin [1983J exploits the<br />

natural breeding behaviour <strong>of</strong> the mouth brooding group <strong>of</strong> tilapia. The<br />

unit comprises three concentric zones. The male fish are permitted to<br />

set up territory in a centrally located arena the floor <strong>of</strong> which is<br />

covered in sand [nesting materialJ. Fernales can pass through a<br />

selective screen and have freedom <strong>of</strong> movement over the whole tank while<br />

males cannot enter the outer fernale breeding area. Fernales, once mated<br />

swim to this area to brood the young. Fry, when ready for release, are<br />

deposited by the parent in the shallows from where they enter the<br />

outermost ring. This ring, designated as a fry collection ring, is<br />

drained daily and fry transferred to nursery raceways.


The unit proposed is capable <strong>of</strong> producing 250 000 fry per year.<br />

Allowing for 50-60% mortality or grade-out, this is over 40-50% more<br />

than that needed for production <strong>of</strong> lOt <strong>of</strong> market size fish. The surplus<br />

caters for research needs, optional sale as fingerlings, or future<br />

expansion in production. It is doubtful however that such a system would<br />

be functional for more than 6 months in Egypt. Water temperatures are<br />

restrictive. It is considered therefore in this study that fry for a<br />

tank system would have to be bred and raised in ponds. Sex reversal is<br />

optional but overwintering for outgrow next season is a must.<br />

5.1.4.2 Hearing<br />

Three basic systems approaches are proposed for the growing <strong>of</strong> fry<br />

to market size.<br />

[a] Nursery [from hatching to 5g]:<br />

Shallow concrete raceways units [Fig. 26] are designed so that<br />

there is ereated a warm shallow area in which the thermophilie fry<br />

eongregate to feed on epilithic algae and powdered artificial feeds.<br />

The fry benefit from the elevated temperature created by this design.<br />

Provision is also made for a deep water retreat in the event <strong>of</strong> climatic<br />

extremes.<br />

[b] On-growing raceways [from 5 - 25g]<br />

Similar in appearance to the nursery raceways [Fig. 26] these units<br />

are much deeper in order to accommodate larger fish and are <strong>of</strong> a design<br />

which can facilitate grading. It is for this latter reason and for<br />

better management that smail raceways are preferred for fry rearing.<br />

Also, as numerous units are needed for different size stocking, it is<br />

costly to construct round tanks. Raceways share a common wall and are<br />

therefore less expensive.<br />

[e] Fattening tanks [from 25 - over 200g]<br />

Circular concrete tanks are seleeted for rearing tilapia to a<br />

saleable size. The design makes for efficient removal <strong>of</strong> wastes. The<br />

continuous current prevents reproduction and forces the fish to swim,<br />

the exercise leading to good quality f~esh. The water inlet is directed<br />

at a tangental angle so as to create a spiral current, carrying wastes<br />

toward a eentrally located drain [Fig. 27]. Tanks <strong>of</strong> this design are<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> holding 50kg/m3. At a possible two to four prod~otion cycles<br />

per year, yields can be in the order <strong>of</strong> 100 - 200kg/m Iyr. Under<br />

Egyptian climatieconditions it is unlikely that raceways would be<br />

feasible for fry ongrowing. Raceway use for grading is possible.<br />

Fattening in tanks would be restricted to 6 months in Summer only.<br />

5.1.4.3 Harvest and marketing<br />

When a tank <strong>of</strong> fish comes <strong>of</strong> size, or before-hand, depending upon<br />

demand, fish are netted and a saleable size selected out by sorting or<br />

grader-box. It is advisable to keep an excess <strong>of</strong> saleable size fish in<br />

storage tanks to act as a dispatch point and reserve for oceasional<br />

sales. Undersized fish may be on-grown or sold, depending on available<br />

tank space and their size category, i.e. whether they are near a size<br />

that will fetch a premium price or not.<br />

Marketing is to be the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the manager. Once a<br />

customer is identified, fish can be harvested and dispatched fresh. It<br />

is preferable, however, if fish, or the larger portion, can be sold at<br />

the gate. Sales promotion, transport costs and man-time are then<br />

minimal.<br />

5.1.5. Plan <strong>of</strong> Implementation and Production<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> the Baobab Tilapia Culture Facility is envisaged<br />

in two phases:<br />

Phase 1<br />

Phase 2<br />

10 - 12t/yr [pilot scale]<br />

scale up to optimum scale <strong>of</strong> economics.<br />

The stages in eonstruction and management <strong>of</strong> Phase 1 are aecording<br />

to the following plan:<br />

5.1.5.1. Stage 1: Preliminaries<br />

With the completion <strong>of</strong> the present mission, this stage can be<br />

considered as complete. Following the realisation <strong>of</strong> the need for a<br />

pilot Fish Farm Centre, the allocation <strong>of</strong> a site and acceptance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

detailed projeet draft all that remain are for specific detail and<br />

design specifieations <strong>of</strong> the Baobab Facility. The present mission only<br />

appraises the viability <strong>of</strong> establishing such a faeility. Detail design<br />

and tender doeuments would have to constitute aseparate item.<br />

5.1.5.2. Stage 2: Construction<br />

It is antieipated that the eontractor should begin work on other<br />

aspeets <strong>of</strong> the Fish Farm at the same time as starting on the produetion<br />

facility. It is recommended that the first priority is to be the<br />

construetion <strong>of</strong> water supply and installation <strong>of</strong> pumps so that water is<br />

readily available for ground eompaetion and the curing <strong>of</strong> concrete<br />

struetures.<br />

The order <strong>of</strong> construetion <strong>of</strong> the Facility is as folIows:<br />

Ca] Water supply and drainage [10 weeks]<br />

[b] Breeding arena [6 weeks]<br />

[c] Fry rearing raeeways [6 weeksJ<br />

Cd] Fry on-growing raeeways [8 weeks]<br />

Ce] Fattening tanks [8 weeks]<br />

5.1.5.3. Stage 3: Produetion<br />

As soon as the hatchery is complete and the cement cured, it is<br />

anticipated that stoeking can eommence by introducing brood fish to<br />

start up the production cycle. These fish should be imported as fry some<br />

months before and reared to size in the existing fish farm facilities.<br />

A stock <strong>of</strong> O. niloticus, estimated at a few hundred, is already held in<br />

the eentre. Arrangements eould be made to purchase or otherwise use<br />

these fish for initial stock production until suf~icient brood stock can


e imported. The purity <strong>of</strong> the stocks requires verification. It is not<br />

recommended that their use be prolonged, but only as an initial carryover<br />

until better stocks are available.<br />

Initiating start-up as soon as is practicably possible will mean an<br />

early production turnover. The construction period <strong>of</strong> operation is not<br />

expected to yield much production. A conservative minimum 50%<br />

production is expected in the first year with 100% in the next year,<br />

eventually reaching a maximum as the project is scaled up. Low initial<br />

production is expected in order to account for start-up problems,<br />

inexperience, research needs and general plant organisation. The<br />

realisation <strong>of</strong> production potential depends upon management and staff<br />

quality as weIl as research demands.<br />

5.1.5.4. Stage 4: Technical Assistance<br />

<strong>An</strong> engineer is <strong>of</strong> particular importance during construction and<br />

should be on site at least one month before the project is due to start.<br />

A biologist should be responsible for operations and it is recommended<br />

that he undertake a visit to Baobab Farm, Kenya, for a preliminary<br />

introduction to the system before construction starts.<br />

Technical consultations will be required at project start-up, first<br />

stocking and at harvest. These consult~ncy missions should also be<br />

considered as sessions for project appraisal, progress reporting and for<br />

on site staff training. Addi tional annual project reviews or trouble<br />

shooting services are advisable. After at least two years <strong>of</strong> operation,<br />

it is considered that the staff can begin to <strong>of</strong>fer assistance to other<br />

projects in Egypt.<br />

5.2 Modifi~tions to Suit Egyptian Conditions<br />

From the rationale described in Section 2.0, it is feasible that .<br />

intensive Systems could technically be developed in Egypt however there<br />

is one majo~ drawback, climatic conditions are marginal. Modifications<br />

to the operqtions are necessary.<br />

5.2.1 Hatcnery Operation Modifications<br />

As proposed in Section 3.4, it is feasible that the cycle described<br />

in Table 29 could equally apply to intensive tank systems. Fry are bred<br />

in ponds, ~ex reversal or otherwise treated and on-grown in ponds<br />

achieving 25 - 50g in the first season. Fish <strong>of</strong> this size are then<br />

overwinter€!d and in May <strong>of</strong> the next year as condi tions warm up can be<br />

transferred to the tanks for on-growing to market size.<br />

<strong>An</strong><br />

intermediate grading stage using raceways should be considered.<br />

5.2.2 Tank Operation Modificatioos<br />

Given that water conditions are only suitable for tilapia growth<br />

between May to October [Fig. 19J, this is the likely period when tank<br />

culture systems can operate. Management must therefore be geared to<br />

produce fing~rlings <strong>of</strong> a size suitable to reach a marketable size within<br />

3 or 6 months from stocking in the tanks.<br />

From Fig. 30 it is apparent that tilapia <strong>of</strong> 200 to 750g fetch a<br />

premium price <strong>of</strong> LE 2.00/kg. The minimum target size <strong>of</strong> 200g can be<br />

aChieved in 90 days from a starting size <strong>of</strong> 50g. Thus the hatchery and<br />

on-growing overwinter must be geared to produce fish <strong>of</strong> 25 and 50g by<br />

May <strong>of</strong> the next season. All tanks should then be s tocked wi th the 50g<br />

fish at the start <strong>of</strong> the season by end <strong>of</strong> July these would be saleable.<br />

The 25g fish can in the meantime be grown on ready for stocking into<br />

tanks in June and would be saleable by end <strong>of</strong> October. Two cycles a<br />

year are therefore permissable at EI Wafaa using a combination <strong>of</strong> tank<br />

system, overwintering ponds and the S.R.P. hatchery. These would mean<br />

peak sales b~tween July and October aperiod when there is generally a<br />

shortage <strong>of</strong> tish due to high water levels in the Nile. The only benefit<br />

to using a tqnk system is the saving <strong>of</strong> space. Production per unit area<br />

would increa~e 10 fold in efficiency <strong>of</strong> space.<br />

5.3 Modelli4g Economies <strong>of</strong> Sca1e<br />

This final section is presented as a financial analysis <strong>of</strong> cost<br />

parameters a.ffecting economic viability and determining the optimum<br />

economics. the mode <strong>of</strong> operation is as described above in Section 5.2.<br />

such that the systems are only in operation for 6 months <strong>of</strong> the year.<br />

Production is therefore 50% <strong>of</strong> potential and as a safety factor upto 30%<br />

allowance ha~ been made for variation in production. A range is used in<br />

calculation which represents possible losses due to uncontrolled<br />

conditions o~ poor management. The technical aspects adopted are those<br />

as described by Balarin and <strong>Haller</strong> [1982J. Costs are derived from<br />

estimates a:s provided by Engs. Hassan, Abou el Seoud and Gaafar.<br />

Economic fa.ctors as employed by accountants at EI Wafaa were<br />

incorporated. Other notes wi th respect to economic calculations are


......<br />

attached to the respective tables.<br />

5.3.1 Capital Cost<br />

The cost <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the 5 model units is given in Table 30<br />

and illustrated in Fig. 31 with a detail <strong>of</strong> proportionate distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> costs shown in Fig. 32. From Fig. 31 it is apparent that units <strong>of</strong> a<br />

size below 50t/yr are disproportionately more costly to construct<br />

relative to the tonnage output. Larger uni ts cost between LE 4000 to<br />

5500 per tonne fish per year. It should be borne in mind that climate<br />

permitting these units could achieve double this output representing a<br />

halving <strong>of</strong> capital item. From Table 22 it can be calculated that at<br />

1977 - 1980 prices a hectare <strong>of</strong> pond cost approx. LE 2014/ha capable <strong>of</strong><br />

an average 2.3t/ha/yr yield. This gives a capital item <strong>of</strong> LE 875/t/yr.<br />

Allowing for 15%/yr inflation, at current prices this would represent<br />

approx. LE 2000 to 2675/t/yr which equalls that calculated in Table 30.<br />

In other words tank systems per tonnage production represent the same<br />

capital expenditure as per pond systems.<br />

The greatest expenditure in tank systems is the construction <strong>of</strong><br />

tanks [Fig. 31J. Bearing in mind that safety factors were taken into<br />

account during costing and further that the Osman Group has its own<br />

construction company it is very likely that this construction item could<br />

be substantially reduced if built inhouse. Further reduction is<br />

possible in pump costs if the pump head could be maintained at a<br />

minimum, an important feature in site selection.<br />

5.3.2 Operation Costs<br />

A detailed operation cost analysis accounting for the given<br />

potential range <strong>of</strong> operation is given in Table 31, illustrated in Fig.<br />

33 with detail <strong>of</strong> cost distribution shown in Fig. 34.<br />

It is evident that the economics <strong>of</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> operation indicates<br />

that for systems above 50t/yr there is a considerably reduction in cost<br />

per unit weight <strong>of</strong> fish produced and ranges between LE 1.75 to 2.5/kg<br />

production. From Fig. 33 it is clearly evident that at the prices for<br />

tilapia given in Fig. 30, for good management the break-even point<br />

approaches a 100t/yr unit and for poor management is a unit over<br />

300tlyr. The average size uni t therefore is about 200t/yr. However<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it margins are very small. This is contrary to that reported in the<br />

summary report [Appendix IIIJ as greater safety factors have been<br />

incorporated both in construction cost and operation costings. For<br />

example depreciation [10%] and overheads [20%J add considerably to cost<br />

factors such that miscellaneous costs range between 30 to 38% [Fig. 34].<br />

In addition fingerlings make up 10 to 18% <strong>of</strong> operations. It should be<br />

noted that these have been costed at LE 60/1000 which is almost double<br />

the estimated production cost and therefore also includes pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

allocated to the hatchery operations <strong>of</strong> the farm. Making allowances for<br />

these inclusions it is feasible that the tank systems could realise<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it but it is doubtful that this will be anywhere near substantial.<br />

From Table 22 pond production costs 1977 - 1980 prices averaged LE<br />

253/kg which at current rates would approximate LE 585 - 890/kg,<br />

substantially lower than the tank unit and yielding areturn to capital<br />

<strong>of</strong> 26%. More recent data, [Fig. 10] indicates that for larger pond<br />

farms compared to Fig. 31 for tanks, the most striking difference is<br />

that tank systems as costed have a disproportionately higher cost <strong>of</strong><br />

over 50% attributed to miscellaneouS items and seed purchase. This<br />

emphasises the statement above that these items have been oversubscribed<br />

in the budgets put forward in Table 31.<br />

5.3.3 Conclusions<br />

It is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this consultancy to consider cost<br />

sensitivity and arrive at a working model for implementation. The<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> this mission have been met in that economic parameters<br />

have been used to indicate potential. <strong>An</strong>y further calculations need<br />

more detailed and accurate cost estimates which were not available<br />

during this mission and would have to be the subject <strong>of</strong> aseparate<br />

study.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!