CONFIDENTIAL OSMAN GROUP ONLY An Analysis of ... - Haller
CONFIDENTIAL OSMAN GROUP ONLY An Analysis of ... - Haller
CONFIDENTIAL OSMAN GROUP ONLY An Analysis of ... - Haller
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>CONFIDENTIAL</strong><br />
------------<br />
<strong>OSMAN</strong> <strong>GROUP</strong> <strong>ONLY</strong><br />
EI.. WAFAA FI.SH FAlM<br />
<strong>An</strong> <strong>An</strong>alysis <strong>of</strong> Performance with Recommendations for the Future Scope for<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> Intensive Tilapia Culture<br />
by.<br />
John D. Balarin<br />
Research and Development Consultant<br />
Tilapia culture Section<br />
Baobab Farm Limited<br />
P.O. Box 90202<br />
MOMBASA<br />
Kenya<br />
For and on Behalf <strong>of</strong><br />
El Wafaa Farm Co.<br />
P.O. Box 2655<br />
CAIRO<br />
Egypt<br />
BAOBAB FARM LTD.<br />
1 986
Copyright <strong>of</strong> this Document<br />
This review <strong>of</strong> EI Wafaa Fish Farm Egypt has been undertaken by<br />
Baobab Farm Ltd. on behalf <strong>of</strong> EI Wafaa Farm Co., Cairo. The contents<br />
mentioned herein and pertaining to the Baobab System are the property <strong>of</strong><br />
Baobab Farm and should not be released to a third person without the<br />
written consent <strong>of</strong> Baobab Farm.<br />
The conclusions drawn are those <strong>of</strong> the consultant and are founded<br />
on the details available to the mission at the time <strong>of</strong> study. These<br />
conclusions are liable to change as more information becomes available.<br />
Bibliographie Note<br />
For all future reference purposes this document should be cited as<br />
folIows:<br />
Balarin, J.D. (1986) EI Wafaa Fish Farm. <strong>An</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> performance<br />
with recommendations for the future scope for development <strong>of</strong> intensive<br />
tilapia culture. Baobab Farm PUbI., Mombasa, Kenya. p.<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
1.1 Origin <strong>of</strong> Mission<br />
On 6th August 1985 Eng. S. Hassan requested by telex to visit<br />
Baobab Farm. Subsequently in a telephone conversation <strong>of</strong> 11th November<br />
1985 Mr. Osman requested that J. D. Balarin, Research &Development<br />
Consultant to Baobab Farm, visit EI Wafaa Farm, Cairo, Egypt. Ensuing<br />
telex correspondence led to Mr. Balarin visiting Cairo from 8th to 15th<br />
January 1986.<br />
1.2 Terms <strong>of</strong> Reference<br />
No formal letter <strong>of</strong> agreement was received but in a telex <strong>of</strong> 12th<br />
and 14th November 1985, Eng. S. Hassan requested a 3 day consultancy<br />
visit to help improve a 2 million tilapia fry per year sex reversal<br />
hatchery system and 7 acre pond production unit.<br />
On arrival in Cairo however the following requests were put<br />
forward:<br />
a. Appraisal <strong>of</strong> the hatchery system and make recommendations for<br />
improvement .<br />
b. Study the farm production to develop potential maximum production<br />
from ponds.<br />
c. Examine the scope for introduction <strong>of</strong> an intensive Baobab Tank<br />
Culture system.<br />
d. Establish market scope and potential.<br />
e. Examine a 150 acre site and a tank culture project as potential<br />
areas for expansion.<br />
Within the above TOR item d was considered beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />
consultancy and item e was not possible as time did not permit.<br />
The report is presented as an appraisal <strong>of</strong> the seope for<br />
aquaculture development in Egypt with reference to the results <strong>of</strong> EI<br />
Wafaa.<br />
1.3 Organisation <strong>of</strong> Mission<br />
The persons met and interviewed during the mission are listed in<br />
Appendix 1 and the Itinerary described in Appendix H. The consultant<br />
arrived on 8th January and stayed at the Green Pyramids Hotel. Eng. S.<br />
Hassan escorted the mission to EI Wafaa Farm. Facilities were toured<br />
and on the spot advice given for improvement. Discussions were held<br />
with Drs. Ghoneim and EI Mashak on a technical level and economics were<br />
reviewed with Eng. Abou el Seoud and Eng. Gaafar.<br />
Prior to leaving an executive summary [Appendix IIIJ was left<br />
behind for reference purposes. Negotiated charges did not make<br />
allowance for a detailed report and it waS made clear that areport<br />
would be forthcoming provided payment was received within 10 days [telex<br />
15th January 1986J. <strong>An</strong>y delay in payment would be interpreted that such<br />
areport was not a priority and that if subsequent payment was received<br />
as the report was a bonus i t would only be ~ completed when time
"<br />
permitted. As payment was only received in May 1986 the final report<br />
preparation was considerably delayed due an already busy programmed work<br />
schedule for the rest <strong>of</strong> 1986.<br />
1.4 Acknowledgements<br />
The assistance and hospitality received from EI Wafaa Farm staff is<br />
gratefully appreciated and a special thanks to Eng. S. Hassan and Mr. M.<br />
Hassan. The final report was prepared by Baobab Farm and the services<br />
<strong>of</strong> Sarah for typing and Tina for the drawings are gratefully<br />
acknowledged.<br />
Baobab Farm apologises for the delay in finalising the report<br />
caused by an exceptionally busy work schedule, and the free time<br />
contributed by J. D. Balarin is greatly appreciated.<br />
2. EGYPTIAN AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT RATIONALE<br />
The following is an extract form Balarin (1986) to serve as an<br />
introduction to aquaculture development and problems in Egypt.<br />
In Egypt, a very arid country, most development is concentrated on<br />
the Nile River, its major water source. Maximum use is also made <strong>of</strong> all<br />
other water resources. Traditionally, the presence <strong>of</strong> saline waters and<br />
the need for reclaiming saline lands for agriculture has led to the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> unique aquaculture techniques. However, the closure <strong>of</strong><br />
the Aswan High Dam and the resulting flood control [Fig. lJ, with<br />
consequent deleterious effects on the fishery [Fig. 2 and Table lJ has<br />
led to renewed efforts to develop more intensive methods <strong>of</strong> fish<br />
production.<br />
Early in its history, Egypt has realised the importance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
efficient use <strong>of</strong> water and fish farming to supplement its fish<br />
requirements. If the present level <strong>of</strong> fish consumption <strong>of</strong> 5.4kg/cap/yr<br />
is to be sustained, by the year 2000 a population <strong>of</strong> 65 - 70 million<br />
will require 350 OOOt/yr <strong>of</strong> fish. Assuming that the M.S.Y. <strong>of</strong> the<br />
fishery can be achieved [Table 2J, this would still represent a deficit<br />
in supply <strong>of</strong> nearly 100 OOOt/yr. Further, if nutrition is to be<br />
improved to an optimum fish consumption level, demand might be as high<br />
as 450 OOOt/yr. It is eIear therefore that unless this demand is<br />
satisfied by imports, Egypt will have to look toward aquaculture. Its<br />
development will have to increase at a rate <strong>of</strong> 6700 - 30 OOOt/yr. A<br />
formidable task!<br />
The need to increase fish production is emphasized by the fact that<br />
fish is a relatively inexpensive source <strong>of</strong> protein [Table 3J. Increased<br />
demand is likely to increase market value dramatically, a feature<br />
already evident since the fishery collapsed in 1968 [Fig. 2J. More<br />
recently, Government subsidies have been introduced to regulate imported<br />
fish prices in order to maintain market values within the price range <strong>of</strong><br />
other economic groups. In 1983 however fish imports made up 37.4% <strong>of</strong><br />
the total consumption. Imports therefore represent a high national cost<br />
and it is unlikely that Egypt could continue to afford to supplement its<br />
needs in this way. A market therefore exists for aquaculture to lessen<br />
the burden <strong>of</strong> imports and to provide for the increase in demand. Before<br />
a strategy can be devised for aquaculture development, i t is necessary<br />
to examine the status <strong>of</strong> the country, to determine the best approach,<br />
and to decide on species choice cultural system type, and level <strong>of</strong><br />
intensification.<br />
The following section attempts to identify potential development<br />
approaches. Guidelines [Balarin, 1985 Table 4J are applied to a<br />
national macro-analysis. Potential zones are identified but more<br />
detailed feasibility studies on a micro-geographic scale are needed for<br />
particular site and project developments.<br />
2. 1 Site Selectioo<br />
2. 1• 1 Water Resources<br />
The absence <strong>of</strong> run-<strong>of</strong>f due to poor rainfall [Fig. 3J implj.es that
any fish production will have to be concentrated around the Nile River<br />
and i ts delta, as weIl as other near permanent water bodies such as the<br />
coastal lakes, Lake Quarun, Lake Nasser and various oases [Table 5,<br />
Fig.4]. The potential <strong>of</strong> other artificial lakes [Table 6, Fig. 5] and<br />
rice fields [Fig. 6, Table 6] is not to be overlooked. Perhaps equally<br />
as important is the potential <strong>of</strong> marine coastal sites along the<br />
Mediterranean Sea, the Red Sea and the Suez Gulf. The total area<br />
available varies from 534 374ha [Table 6] upto 861 173ha [Table 7]. If<br />
only 20% <strong>of</strong> this area were used for extensive or semi-intensive fish<br />
farming the present level <strong>of</strong> fish consumption could be sustained until<br />
the year 2000.<br />
Present trends in irrigation and land reclamation however could<br />
have far reaching consequences, changing the present approaches to<br />
aquaculture development. According to Sadek [1984], already 17.4% <strong>of</strong><br />
the coastal lakes have been reclaimed, with plans by the year 2000 to<br />
reduce their area to 41.4% <strong>of</strong> the original [Table 8J. This would<br />
represent a 58.6% loss for the fishery, a potential loss <strong>of</strong> 30 000 - 80<br />
OOOt/yr, according to Sadek's [1984] recalculated production estimates.<br />
Not only does this represent a loss in fishing grounds but also it would<br />
disrupt the howash activities in these lakes. The loss would therefore<br />
mean an additional burden on production. It might be possible that<br />
during the soil leaching period <strong>of</strong> land reclamation, aquaculture might<br />
provide some fish production. But this solution is only temporary and<br />
longer term aquaculture developments need to be considered.<br />
Over 98% <strong>of</strong> all available freshwater resources are being used in<br />
Egypt, 84% for irrigation alone. all future developments plan for the<br />
e~ficient use <strong>of</strong> all new water resources. In addition 16 3000 million<br />
m /yr currently wasted, are to be used for doubling the area <strong>of</strong><br />
irrigated lands. Therefore, all fish farms currently using drainage<br />
waters may soon find their ater source drying up. Such reliance should<br />
therefore be avoided, preference being given to "irrigated", "seepage",<br />
or "leveed pond" aquaculture.<br />
The development <strong>of</strong> irrigation agriculture and indeed the actual<br />
existence <strong>of</strong> 47 OOOkm <strong>of</strong> drainage/navigational canals suggest an<br />
additional scope for aquaculture development in over 40 OOOha <strong>of</strong><br />
waterways. Enclosures for grass carp in such systems would not only<br />
yield fish protein but could effectively control weeds.<br />
Freshwater currently not being used for aquaculture has some form<br />
<strong>of</strong> pollution renderring it unusable. In addition, the reuse <strong>of</strong> surplus<br />
drainage water could bring with it the threat <strong>of</strong> pesticides from the<br />
cultivated lands. Other water resources available for fish farming are<br />
mainly saline waters unsuitable for crop irrigation and this will<br />
strongly influence the choice <strong>of</strong> fish species.<br />
2.1.2 Climatic Conditioos<br />
Although arid climatic condi tions restriet fish farming to<br />
available water resources, the likely high seasonal temperatures [Table<br />
9] favour fish growth. In Egypt, latitude has an overriding influence<br />
on temperatures, the increase in daily and seasonal amplitudes in the<br />
south, raises water temperatures. In the north the Mediterranean Sea<br />
has a tempering effect [Figs. 7&8] and the Red Sea has a warming effect.<br />
Therefore water temperatures in the north tend to drop below levelS<br />
considered optimum for warmwater fish. The fish farming zonation<br />
suggests that only the south eastern corner <strong>of</strong> Egypt [Fig. 9, Table 10]<br />
is suited to all year round intensive production <strong>of</strong> warmwater species.<br />
In general, climatic conditions are better suited to temperate fish<br />
species such as carp, mullet, and se~ ~ass. Shallow waters as found in<br />
seepage ponds, reclamation ponds and rlce paddies may benefit from the<br />
hot conditions. Pond design to maximise solar heating for tilapia<br />
production in winter should be usef~l. Alternatively, heated overwintering<br />
units may be an alternative'<br />
2. 1. 3 Topography and Soll<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the Nile Valley and the coastline near water sources are<br />
flat areas, good for fish farm layout. The low lying areas may benefit<br />
from gravity flow as in the case <strong>of</strong> pawash or fill by seepage. But this<br />
presents drainage problems. Most f~r'ms therefore require pumping and<br />
electricity cost amounts to 17% <strong>of</strong> operations cost [Fig. 10].<br />
Whereas topography is good f<strong>of</strong> conventional pond construction,<br />
unstable soils are a major drawback. Only the Maryut region is reported<br />
to have areas <strong>of</strong> clays suitable for Jeep pond design. It is probably<br />
for this reason that farmers have traditionally developed a range <strong>of</strong><br />
unconventional systems [Table 11] to compensate for poor dyke<br />
construction.<br />
Soils also tend to be saline due to poor rainfall. Site selection<br />
must consider the likely change in ;.rater salinity due to leaching as<br />
ponds fill and particularly when pl"rlning to farm fish species such as<br />
carps, little tolerant salinity.<br />
Competition with agriculture for land is clearly evident,<br />
relegating aquaculture to marginal "o,ils. Integrated development such<br />
as rizipisciculture or combined land use such as land reclamation<br />
aquaculture are likely to become i~portant as more and more land is<br />
turned to agriculture.<br />
Caution needs to be exercised in those areas where there is<br />
possible overlap between industry a(lJ aquaculture and where sites are<br />
likely to be exposed to pollutants.<br />
2.2 Speeies Seleetion<br />
Over 33 indigenous species [ToDle 12J and 10 exotics [Table 13]<br />
have been reported to be used in aquaculture. The most popular ones in<br />
the private sector are tilapia [70~] and mullets [30%]. In public<br />
farms, 10 _ 20% carp are included. Clarias lazera, sea bream and sea<br />
bass are <strong>of</strong> minor importance. More recently however there has been an<br />
increased interest in carps with the ~stablishment <strong>of</strong> several hatcheries<br />
[Table 14]. The choice <strong>of</strong> suitable species however varies with the<br />
location and same <strong>of</strong> the criteria for their selection are described<br />
below.
2.2.1 Bioeconomical Criteria<br />
Biological criteria for the selection <strong>of</strong> fish species have been<br />
restricted until now to temperature tolerance [Fig. 9J. When selecting<br />
a site it is important that the species performance falls within an<br />
economic rate, a favourable genetic capacity, and the ease <strong>of</strong><br />
reproduction. If a project is to be viable, in particular in marginal<br />
areas, these factors are <strong>of</strong> prime importance.<br />
As not much reference is made to subsistence fish farmers, it would<br />
appear that Egypt is viewing fish farming as an economic enterprise to<br />
provide food. Considerable efforts have thus been made to farm the<br />
highly prized mullets and more recently sea bass and sea bream [Table<br />
15J. However, despite the early history <strong>of</strong> mullet farming and its<br />
suitability to saline waters, there is as yet no active mullet hatchery.<br />
All seeds have to be collected from the wild [Table 14J. Survival rate<br />
is poor. Losses upto 80% implying a wasteful technique. This is a<br />
rather precarious, unreliable source <strong>of</strong> seeds upon which to build a<br />
major industry. any disaster affecting natural stock recruitment could<br />
result in the total loss <strong>of</strong> the fish farming production <strong>of</strong> those<br />
species. Conversely in the long term, overfishing <strong>of</strong> seeds could affect<br />
the fishery. It is therefore vital for mullet farms to succeed or for<br />
that matter any species which seeds are dependant upon natural stocks,<br />
that hatcheries be developed.<br />
From 1980, mullet fry distribution have risen from 42.4 million to<br />
138.9 million. Carp fry production has risen from 5.5 million to 50<br />
million. However <strong>of</strong> the latter, only 20% have been distributed,<br />
implying 80% hatchery losses. There is a great need to improve carp<br />
hatchery performance and to maximise survival during fry transports.<br />
There would appear to be no specific hatchery/nursery for tilapia<br />
other than the ''natural nurseries" described for Lake Nasser. A number<br />
<strong>of</strong> state farms operate nursery ponds to rear fry captured at harvest.<br />
Most tilapia seeds appear to be obtained from wild entry at the time <strong>of</strong><br />
filling, or wild spawning in ponds. No genetic stock control appears to<br />
be practiced. Because <strong>of</strong> tilapias' tendency to breed for smaller fish a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> the negati'e selection occurring in wild pond spawning and<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the unknown heredity <strong>of</strong> wild seeds, genetic improvement <strong>of</strong><br />
tilapia stocks should be considered to increase yields.<br />
2.2.2 Biotechnological Criteria<br />
In one way or another the cultural systems described in Table 11,<br />
are still all unique to Egypt, the technology having evolved through<br />
traditional fish farming. The species combination and stocking<br />
practices are age old, tried and tested operations which are successful<br />
under the prevailing conditions. From Fig. 11, it would appear that the<br />
howash system does not have a deleterious effect on the fishery even at<br />
high levels <strong>of</strong> harvesting. The use <strong>of</strong> wild stock is a relatively<br />
unsophisticated technique and clearly howash do exhibit some form <strong>of</strong><br />
production. It is possible however that this productivity might be<br />
increased by slective stocking, as could be all other systems utilising<br />
wild caught fish.<br />
Production <strong>of</strong> more expensive fish, such as shrimps and Sea Bass has<br />
only recently started in Egypt. The technology is in a very early stage<br />
<strong>of</strong> development and it is unclear as to when large scale production will<br />
become possible. Similarly, techriological for intensifying production<br />
is still in its infancy. Cage culture and pelleted feeds are at a more<br />
advanced pilot test stage [Table 16J. Recently, emphasis has been<br />
placed on integrated livestock and fish farrning.<br />
2.2.3 Pathological Criteria<br />
Reported disease outbreaks and parasites in farmed and wild fish<br />
are summarised in Table 17. This represents a vast pool <strong>of</strong> pathogens<br />
likely to affect farmed fish. Of particular concern are the Heterophyes<br />
pathogenic to man and are reported to occur in tilapia and mullet. The<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> exotic fish could bring with it a complement <strong>of</strong><br />
pathogens and upset the present apparent equilibrium. Careful<br />
sanitation measures are recommended to avoid this. Already it appears<br />
that Argulus spp have been introduced with carp from Europe. The cold<br />
winter conditions may cause Saprolegnia infections in less cold tolerant<br />
species, but this has not yet been described as a major problem.<br />
Handling <strong>of</strong> warrnwater fish in winter is not recommendable.<br />
Schistosomiasis [bilharziaJ is generally weIl established<br />
throughout Egyptian waterways. The risk <strong>of</strong> infection to farm workers is<br />
high. Precautions should be taken and regular medical check ups<br />
organised.<br />
2.2.4 Marketing<br />
Traditional nilotic fish and marine species are highly acceptable<br />
to the market. Mullets and tilapias are therefore favoured but there<br />
remains the question <strong>of</strong> exotic fish such as carps. Increased production<br />
suggests that there is a good outlet but the demand has not been<br />
quantified in any available report. Egypt has a strong tradition <strong>of</strong><br />
fish eating and there might be a strong preference for traditional<br />
species. This would need to be examined before embarking on any major<br />
venture involving non-traditional fish.<br />
FAO/WBCP [1977J reports that commercial fish dealers come to the<br />
farms to collect fish. It is perhaps for this reason that for the same<br />
species, farm gate prices [Table 15J are higher than beach prices as the<br />
commodity is nearer the market outlet. Strategie locations near markets<br />
is important to reduce transport costs and thereby to command a high<br />
price.<br />
2.3 Process Selection<br />
Depending upon availability <strong>of</strong> water the possible combinations <strong>of</strong><br />
species and system types compatible with site conditions are listed in<br />
Table 10. The options are given according to Table 18 which does not<br />
include the cult~ral systems peculiar to Egypt [Table 11J. As<br />
intensification will be necessary to increase fish production to meet<br />
demand, the same criteria for adopting intensive cage or tank systems<br />
apply to the selection <strong>of</strong> more intensive methods to enhance the output<br />
in these traditional systems. Considered bere are socio~economic<br />
constraints to develop intensive aquaculture.
...<br />
2.3.1 Manpower Availability<br />
The recently trained 430 extension personnel represent a<br />
substantial resource <strong>of</strong> manpower to help develop the industry. As all<br />
have received training in the last four years it is likely that they are<br />
familiar with up todate technology. This does however raise the<br />
question <strong>of</strong> practical experience, for despite arecent training there is<br />
always a passage <strong>of</strong> time before the trainee appreciates the practical<br />
application <strong>of</strong> that training. Statistics suggest a production <strong>of</strong> 25 000<br />
to 60 OOOt/yr which for 430 agents represents a responsibility for 60 to<br />
140t/man/yr. This is an enormous task and for future expansions, Egypt<br />
will need to reduce this ratio to a fraction <strong>of</strong> its present level.<br />
As there is a long tradition <strong>of</strong> fish farming, farmers are using old<br />
methods which have been in use for generations. Appreciation <strong>of</strong><br />
techniques and experienced manpower must be high arnongst farmers. What<br />
is needed therefore is additional manpower to train farmers in methods<br />
<strong>of</strong> improving production. Trainees originating from traditional farming<br />
families should be given priority to become extension agents.<br />
2.3.2 Technological and Financial Assistance<br />
Current foreign aid inputs into Egypt represent a vast pool <strong>of</strong><br />
funds for development which includes credit facilities for farmers. As<br />
fish farming has always been considered as a business venture, loan<br />
fadlities are also likely to exist to support aquaculture enterprises.<br />
There is a considerable local input into aquaculture research<br />
spearheaded by IOf. With the establishment <strong>of</strong> the Abbasa National fry<br />
farming Centre and other Government Stations [Table 19, figs. 12 & 13],<br />
there will be even greater opportunities for research. It is apparent<br />
from Table 16, fig. 14 that considerable work is already underway in<br />
intensive cage culture technology. Improvement <strong>of</strong> the howash system<br />
also represents an area where long term trials should indicate the<br />
direction for future development.<br />
Egypt therefore has a vast pool <strong>of</strong> knowledge and the necessary<br />
facilities to conduct research to improve its fish farms. However,<br />
practical orientated research is too recent to have any significant<br />
effect on national production but trends are evident.<br />
2.3.3 Availability <strong>of</strong> Industrial Inputs<br />
Aquaculture sites are within developed agriculture areas and<br />
therefore by-products should be readily available for fish feeding<br />
[Table 20]. But there is a conflict in interest. Agricultural byproducts<br />
[Table 21] are vital to the livestock industry. Pressure on<br />
land use has caused stockfeed production to be increased to supplement<br />
the loss in grazing. This means that there is little surplus for use as<br />
fish feeds. Similarly manures are likely to find use on crop lands as<br />
fertilizers. Egypt however uses inorganic fertilizers at the rate <strong>of</strong><br />
2374kg/ha/yr. There might be scope for the use <strong>of</strong> inorganic fertilizers<br />
in fish ponds although a better approach would be integrated farming.<br />
This is already evident with the increase in rizipisciculture and<br />
integrated duck/fish farms.<br />
Industrial development in Egypt is weIl advanced. Equipment,<br />
spares and maintenance services are generally available to cater for<br />
most fish farmers needs.<br />
2.3.4 Existing Infrastrueture<br />
In 1981 energy use in Egypt was the equivalent <strong>of</strong> 595kg<br />
coal/cap/yr. This suggests a weH established distribution network.<br />
But, as fish farms are likely to be located in marginal areas, it is<br />
doubtful that they would have access to this grid. fuel pumps would be<br />
necessary. All major centres being served by road and rail, as weIl as<br />
water transport, the delivery <strong>of</strong> fish to market and the commodities to<br />
the farms are unlikely to be a problem. However it should be noted that<br />
prime areas for intensive warmwater fish production do tend to be remote<br />
[fig. 16] and development in these areas would be problematic.<br />
The existence <strong>of</strong> an important fishery from Lake Nasser to the Delta<br />
Region implies that refrigerated routes exist for fish transport.<br />
Projects located at a distance along these routes are likely to reach<br />
prime market centres.<br />
Widespread irrigation suggests a great scope for integration but<br />
"restrictions on water use may hamper such development.<br />
The networks <strong>of</strong> Government stations [Table 19, fig. 12], fry<br />
collection centres and hatcheries [Table 14, fig. 13] as well as other<br />
experimental sites [Table 16] show that the infrastructure to support<br />
the fish farm industry is weH developed and likely to assist greatly<br />
future projects.<br />
2.4 Conclusions<br />
In the last five years Egypt has made rapid advances to develop its<br />
fish farming industry. It also has a long established traditional<br />
aquaculture sector. The latter has adopted non-conventional<br />
technologies adopted to the peculiar conditions <strong>of</strong> unstable, highly<br />
saline soils and to make maximum use <strong>of</strong> all water resources available.<br />
Statistics are uncertain as to the categorisation <strong>of</strong> such traditional<br />
systems and the recent rapid developments are as yet not properly<br />
documented. They have not yet fully realised their potential. A clear<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> the present status <strong>of</strong> aquaculture is therefore not possible.<br />
But, if Egypt is to sustain its own fish production to satisfy its<br />
needs, there is a good possibility that aquaculture could meet most <strong>of</strong><br />
that demand. The immediate scope would be to intensify established<br />
tradi tional methods. However, there is only limited knowledge<br />
suggesting ways in which this could be implemented. Further, most areas<br />
are outside the optimum zone for maximum growth <strong>of</strong> the favoured<br />
tilapias. Mullet fry are in short supply due to high losses during<br />
transportation. Efforts need to be directed towards maximising survival<br />
<strong>of</strong> mullet and enhancing pond productivity. Carps have developed rapidly<br />
with numerous hatchery units, but as a non traditional species it is not<br />
yet clear to what extent it will be accepted on the market. Total<br />
integration with either irrigation or livestock, <strong>of</strong>fers great potential<br />
for the most economic development <strong>of</strong> aquaculture. Illustrated in fig.10<br />
is that greater than 600kg/ha/yr must be achieved for pr<strong>of</strong>it. Manpower<br />
'I-<br />
.-
and food representing over 60% <strong>of</strong> cost and economic returns depending<br />
upon situation can vary between 8 to 50%/yr [Table 22J. Manpower<br />
requirements for the extension <strong>of</strong> new concepts are high not only from<br />
the quantitative point <strong>of</strong> view but also qualitatively.<br />
In conclusion, Egypt may be considered as having an above average<br />
chance <strong>of</strong> success in aquaculture development [Table 23J. Positive<br />
points are suitability <strong>of</strong> land and water sites, Government support<br />
services, a tradition <strong>of</strong> fish farming, a business approach as weIl as a<br />
low fixed costs, high demand and good market. Negative points are the<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> technology for maximising production and for products handling.<br />
It is therefore only a question <strong>of</strong> time before Egypt obtains the<br />
required experienced in more intensive techniques and maximises<br />
aquaculture production.<br />
3. EI.. WAFAA FARM PROJECT<br />
3.1 History<br />
The Osman Group are involved in food security projects in Egypt.<br />
Fish was considered as <strong>of</strong> possible potential and research was planned to<br />
establish an appropriate technology for the region. In 1979 there was<br />
an interest to assist a project at Ismailya which had been established<br />
by Eng. Hassan. In 1981 3 ponds were built at EI Wafaa, increased by 3<br />
in 1982 and 3 again in 1983. Carp/mullet and wild tilapia were farmed<br />
but in 1984 imported tilapia strains were obtained from Israel. In 1985<br />
2 ponds <strong>of</strong> 1.5 acres and a M.T. hatchery were established valued at LE<br />
120 000. Mike Sipe [Florida J, Marsdan [Jodan J and Aquaculture<br />
Production Technology [IsraelJ have all been consulted for economic<br />
inputs as it is planned to expand the project to 50 acres at a site near<br />
Ismailya.<br />
3.2 Description<br />
The layout <strong>of</strong> the farm is illustrated in Fig. 15. The objective is<br />
to produce 2 to 5 million sex-reversed fry and 25t fish from 9 acres <strong>of</strong><br />
ponds and a hatchery unit. The site is located 20 km from Cairo Centre,<br />
opposite Tura. The farm also has a duck production unit capable <strong>of</strong> 250<br />
000 ducklings per year, now set to expand to 10 000 breeders and 1.5<br />
million ducklings.<br />
A new hatchery for tilapia sex-reversal has been built on site,<br />
consists <strong>of</strong> 8 x 2.6m diameter hexagonal concrete tanks. Fry once<br />
treated are grown-out in the ponds receiving pumped water from the<br />
nearby Nile River. Breeding takes place in ponds and are transferred<br />
within one week <strong>of</strong> ernerging.<br />
3.3 Production Perfonnance<br />
3.3.1 Hatchery<br />
A summary <strong>of</strong> the first production <strong>of</strong> the newly constructed Sex<br />
Reversal Process [SRPJ hatchery is given in Table 24.<br />
Six SRP cycles were carried out during 1985 using 300 female<br />
O.niloticus: 150 male fish. A total <strong>of</strong> 474 000 fry were produced, 79<br />
000 per cycle approximatesly 260 fry/female/month. This closely<br />
approximates that achieved in Baobab Tilapia Arena systems and is<br />
acceptable. However problems arose in the sex reverse process. Only<br />
65$ <strong>of</strong> stocks survived [= 56% if cycle 6 which was aborted half way is<br />
includedJ. This is less than the expected rate <strong>of</strong> 75%.<br />
Stocking <strong>of</strong> SRP tank~ was at an average <strong>of</strong> 6045/m 3 <strong>of</strong> which harvest<br />
was a low 3900 fry/m. This is at a rate 2.5 fold less than<br />
recol!lllended.<br />
Fry grew from 25mg to 343mg which is a good SGR <strong>of</strong> 8.7%/ind/dy but<br />
considerably lower than that postulated in the manual.<br />
Observed during the SRP was that after day 10, fry began to die and<br />
exhibited severe deformaties, particularly <strong>of</strong> the head. Increased<br />
feeding and transfer <strong>of</strong> water use from weIl 11 to weIl 111 between<br />
cycles 3 and 4 did not improve condition. Food initially was 45%<br />
protein diet imported from Israel on 1st April and 8th May which was<br />
fully used up by 17th July. After this new food was purchased from<br />
Norway and used for the rest <strong>of</strong> the cycles. This would mean that food<br />
was being stored for 2 to 3 months before final use and could suggest<br />
that aflatoxin or rancidity may be the cause <strong>of</strong> deaths.<br />
3.3.2 Ponds<br />
The ponds were put to full production for the first time on 2nd<br />
April 1984 using 56 000 x 4-5g all male tilapia hybrids imported from<br />
Israel. Mullet, prawn and carp were used in polyculture. The overall<br />
performance analysis is presented in Table 25, Fig. 16 and 17. Details<br />
<strong>of</strong> select pond water quality and performance is given in Fig. 18 and<br />
select water temperature data in Fig. 19. Table 26 and 27 present<br />
greater detail <strong>of</strong> the performance <strong>of</strong> tilapia in the systems during 1984<br />
and 1985 respectively and this is illustrated in Figs. 20 and 21.<br />
3.3.2.1 Pond Performance Data<br />
From Table 25 and 26 it is possible to summarise pond performance<br />
in 1984 as foliows:<br />
At a total stocking rate <strong>of</strong> 62 500/ha [+ 18 500 J <strong>of</strong> which tilapia<br />
comprised 44.3% [24 150/ha + 13 000 J the yield amounted to 9.4 t/ha/yr<br />
[+2.9J <strong>of</strong> which 67.9% was tilapia at a yield <strong>of</strong> 6.96 [+2.5Jt/ha/yr.<br />
Tilapia survival amounted to 62.4% [+34.1 J but mullet prawn and carp<br />
overall survival was a low 33.3% [+6.6J primarily due to a loss <strong>of</strong><br />
prawns and mullets. Feeding at a rate <strong>of</strong> 73.5kg/ha/dy [+31.6J pelleted<br />
feed or between 1.7 to 10% biomass per day a food conversion rate <strong>of</strong><br />
3.31 [+1.62J was achieved. Tilapia grew at an overall SGR <strong>of</strong> 2.32%1dy<br />
[+O.33J attaining an average size <strong>of</strong> 261.3g [+45.9J in 190 days.<br />
In 1985 the results are not complete but from sampIe data [Table<br />
27J performance can be sUl!lllarised as foliows:
Stocking at between 20 to 737 thousand tilapia per hectare a<br />
production <strong>of</strong> 10.7t/ha/yr [+7.8] was achieved at a SGR <strong>of</strong> 3.5%1dy<br />
[+0.51]. The F.G.R. <strong>of</strong> 2.11 [+0.77] was obtained for a feeding rate <strong>of</strong><br />
64.4kg/ha/dy.<br />
3.3.2~2 Pond Performance <strong>An</strong>alysed<br />
The values achieved in production were not performed under any<br />
experimental control. Stocking rates varied between 26 000 to 740<br />
OOO/ha, feeding rate also was variable, as were polyculture ratios, pond<br />
size, aeration, starting size, starting date, harvest date, etc. In<br />
addition unexplained losses as well as wild entry masked any consistency<br />
in stock control.<br />
It is difficult given the above conditions to draw accurate<br />
conclusions from the data nevertheless results show system potential and<br />
general trends are apparent. The variation in stock rate and feeding is<br />
apparent in Fig. 16. Increased stocking rate gives rise to increased<br />
production [Figs. 17b, 20e & 21d]. From Fig. 17d it appears that<br />
feeding at 50kg/ha/yr can sustain a biomass <strong>of</strong> 8 to lOt/ha. The F.G.R.<br />
<strong>of</strong> less than 2:1 [Fig, 17c] suggests this to be on optimum feeding level<br />
although there does appear to be a possible loss in growth performance<br />
[Fig. 17a] but due to the variation in the data this may not be<br />
significant. From Fig. 2Ob, the implication is that S.G.R. is affected<br />
by increased density and that smaller average harvest size [Fig. 2Oc] is<br />
correlated with increased stocking despite an increase in feeding rate<br />
[Fig. 20a]. This affect on S.G.R. is also apparent from Fig. 21c for<br />
1985 data.<br />
From Fig. 18, fish growth [tÜapia] appears not to be affected by<br />
time in the system and does not suggest that crowding may be to blame.<br />
The trend is apparent at onset implying factors within the system or<br />
stock interaction are to blame. Of interest however is that temperature<br />
has a significant influence. Both ponds 4 and 9 start <strong>of</strong> slower than<br />
the others can be correlated to lower water temperature condition [Fig.<br />
18]. Unfortunately no complete seasonal water temperature record for<br />
all ponds was available but what data was, is given in Fig. 19. Glearly<br />
evident is that for 6 months <strong>of</strong> the year from November through to the<br />
end <strong>of</strong> April pond conditions are below optimum for tilapia growth.<br />
Dramatic temperature rise is evident"in May which stabalises until<br />
October when temperatures begin to drop. Effectively therefore only for<br />
4 months <strong>of</strong> the year at El Wafaa are pond temperatures suitable for<br />
maximum tilapia growth. Ponds conditions under a greenhouse [fig. 19c]<br />
appear better with sub-optimum conditions for less than 2 months in<br />
December and January.<br />
3.4 RecCllllleDded Mode <strong>of</strong> Operation<br />
From the trends apparent above it is possible to arrive at a nurnber<br />
<strong>of</strong> conclusions and predict the expected stock rate, survival and likely<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> the El Wafaa Farm. These projections are sumrnarised in<br />
Table 28 and an operation schedule suggested in Table 29.<br />
3.4.1 Hatchery System<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> low temperature condition breeding is unlikely to take<br />
place until April. Broodstock should therefore be safeguarded during<br />
winter by overwintering in the greenhouse and transferring to broodponds<br />
only in April as water conditions warm up. The first seasons spawn<br />
would therefore only be ready for transfer to the SRP system in May and<br />
into nursery ponds in June. This implies that only 6 cycles are<br />
possible per year [Table 29] and that the first seasonal SR fry would<br />
only be ready for on-growing by late June. Effectively 3 months<br />
production time would be lost if the operation was dependant upon the<br />
first seasonal SR fry for on-growing. In other words, at the onset <strong>of</strong><br />
the season in order to maximise production through utilising the full 6<br />
months potential growing period for tilapia, the El Wafaa Farm would<br />
have to overwinter SR fry so as to be in a position to stock the<br />
production ponds in April.<br />
3.4.2 Production Ponds<br />
The extent to which the ponds are used for overwintering very much<br />
depends on any possible seasonal variation in the price <strong>of</strong> SR seed. It<br />
is very likely that seed sales early in the season would fetch a<br />
premium. Table 29 illustrates an option whereby half <strong>of</strong> the SR fry are<br />
overwintered and half sold mid-season. At the end <strong>of</strong> winter SR fry are<br />
sorted and stocked into production ponds and any surplus is sold.<br />
Should sales exhibit a premium price all SR fry could be overwintered.<br />
It is anticipated therefore that all ponds would be brought into<br />
production as early in the season as is practically possible thereby<br />
maximising on the warm months. The main sales <strong>of</strong> table fish would be in<br />
September/October. However if market surveys suggest aperiod when fish<br />
are at a premium, certain stocks could be overwintered to cater for that<br />
market.<br />
The stock programmes adopted are all explained in the notes<br />
accornpanying Table 28 and are derived from Table 25, 1984 results.<br />
4. APPRAISAL OF EL WAFAA FARM<br />
The following points were discussed in detail during the mission<br />
and are surnmarised here for future reference.<br />
4. 1 Hatetlery<br />
4.1.1 S. R. P. Manual<br />
The manual appears over-ambitious and over-designed and in the<br />
light <strong>of</strong> the first year <strong>of</strong> operation a number <strong>of</strong> changes are apparent.<br />
Discussed below or suggestions which appear in the order in which they<br />
are given in the manual.<br />
Item 1.1: The operating period is given as April to September. Frorn<br />
Fig. 19, conditions are still too cold in April and production will only<br />
be between mid-May to mid-October as shown in Ta~le 29.
The stock density in SRP tank <strong>of</strong> 10 000 to 13000 fry per sq.m. is<br />
excessive for at a rate <strong>of</strong> 27% <strong>of</strong> this, mortality was 44.3%. Factors<br />
causing loss were not clear and therefore it is suggested that the<br />
system be tested experimentally over a range <strong>of</strong> densities to confirm the<br />
optim~ level. Su~gested is a duplicate trial <strong>of</strong> 4 densities from<br />
1500/m to 13 OOO/m. The result would establish the potential <strong>of</strong> the<br />
system.<br />
Item 1.2: The basis <strong>of</strong> estimating 5000 fry per female in 6 cycles is<br />
high i.e. 833 fry per female per cycle. In fact the manual implies only<br />
one third breed at any one time equivalent to 277 fry per female per<br />
cycle. This was in effect achieved during 1985 as 260 fry/female/cycle<br />
[Table 28J. Stock calculations should therefore be based on this rate.<br />
The required use <strong>of</strong> 500g fernale fish is not all together practical.<br />
Although perhaps likely to yield more fry per female, larger fish are<br />
not as efficient in fry production per uni t body weight. Further, in<br />
view <strong>of</strong> the handling involved [i.e. twice per cycleJ it may be better to<br />
use smaller stocks as large fish tend to be more violent and liable to<br />
damage themselves at each handling. A smaller fish <strong>of</strong> 150g - 200g is<br />
more advisable and infact approaches the size used in the first year.<br />
From Table 29, a 28% mortali ty <strong>of</strong> broodstock or 5% per cycle was<br />
experienced. This implies there is a high stress due to handling.<br />
Whereas the manual only allows 20% replenishment <strong>of</strong> brood after every<br />
season, this should be increased to 50% to 'allow for losses.<br />
, No schedule is provided allowing for broodstock development. It is<br />
suggested that one tank in the SRP be untreated every season during<br />
cycle 6 and overwintered in p:6 and grow-out in P.6 to replenish brood<br />
fish [Table 29 J.<br />
At a broodstock density <strong>of</strong> 1/m 2 , P.5 the breeding pond could hold<br />
all brood fish to realise 2 million fry but the limiting feature is that<br />
brood are to be overwintered. The greenhouse can only hold half <strong>of</strong> the<br />
required total. Table28 and 29 has therefore been calculated on this<br />
basis. Either a second overwintering greenhouse unit is considered or<br />
alternatively overwintering is done in the P ponds. As Table 29 shows P<br />
ponds have limited use in winter it is suggested that they are first<br />
tested for brood overwintering as it is not clear what portion <strong>of</strong> stock<br />
will survive.<br />
'<br />
Item 2.1: The expected size <strong>of</strong> 0.5 to 1.5g in 30 days <strong>of</strong> hormone<br />
treatment is excessive. During the first year EI Wafaa achieved 0.34g.<br />
Given the crowded conditions ~13 000/m 2 J expected <strong>of</strong> the system it is<br />
unlikely that fry would more than double or tripIe in size during the<br />
SRP Ci.e 0.3 - 0.5g].<br />
Item 2.3: No feed quality is mentioned. Generally tilapia brood fish<br />
require 25 - 30% protein and fry between 40 - 50% protein. Feeding <strong>of</strong><br />
broodstock for only 5 days in a 30 day cycle may not be enough. In<br />
other words fish are fed for only 15% <strong>of</strong> the time. Further, as fish are<br />
only to be fed while in the holding tank this does not take into account<br />
that these fish have been recently handled and transferred some distance<br />
to be stocked at a higher density in a confined space. Undoubtablya<br />
large number will be stressed by this experience and are not likely to<br />
be physiologically in astate to feed or digest this food.<br />
Suggested is that a minimal ration [+ 1%] be fed occasionally while<br />
fish are in P.5.<br />
Item 2.4: Flow through at 5-6 m3/dy per 2.5m 3 tank represents a daily<br />
exchange <strong>of</strong> 2/dy or 8%/hr. This is exceptionally low given the high<br />
density, high feed input. Low oxygen was experienced in the system<br />
possibly as a feature <strong>of</strong> the inefficiency <strong>of</strong> the aeration method as weIl<br />
as a build up <strong>of</strong> organics.<br />
Suggested is that the system be operated on aeration on a regular<br />
flow <strong>of</strong> at least one exchange rate per hour or 20m 3/hr for the current 8<br />
tank system.<br />
Item 3: Stocking in March as recommended may be too early in the season<br />
as temperatures are still below 20 0 C[Fig. 19] this would be stressful<br />
and fish are unlikely to breed until conditions warm up in May.<br />
The transfer <strong>of</strong> brood to the concrete pond [T-21] over a distance<br />
<strong>of</strong> 150m is stressful and could account for the mortality. Ideally this<br />
Tank should be adjacent the handling point. Alternatively P1 could be<br />
modified for spawning or a cage system [i.e Hapa] could be used in<br />
either P4 or p6 to hold the brood for the 4 - 5 days that i t takes to<br />
reactivate the cycle.<br />
Screens need to be placed over the supply inlet to P5 to prevent<br />
wild fish entry. No mention is made <strong>of</strong> the treatment to clear the pond<br />
<strong>of</strong> wild spawning. Drying out is the cheapest but if not feasible use <strong>of</strong><br />
lime or a bio-degradable fish toxin e.g. Tobacco leaf wastes.<br />
Item 3.3: Fry sorting is not described. The best option is to use a<br />
series <strong>of</strong> large bags made <strong>of</strong> netting materials mounted on a steel hoop<br />
much like a handling net. However the net size determines the size <strong>of</strong><br />
fry to be graded and can be effectively carried out in the first SRP<br />
tank.<br />
The holding over <strong>of</strong> 10 S.R fry in cages after each treatment is an<br />
unnecessary and costly exercise and it is unlikely that such a small<br />
sampIe as 10 fish would have 30Y statistical bearing on the population.<br />
This set should be done away with. Instead, sampIes can be taken from<br />
the pond if sex ratios wish to be determined.<br />
The water temperature recommended 25 - 28°C was never achieved<br />
during the first year [Fig. 19d]. Infact the SRP room had a much lower<br />
temperature condition th30 the ponds [Fig. 193]. This can be attributed<br />
to the heavy concrete structure <strong>of</strong> the building acting as an insulation.<br />
Essentially a greenhouse effect needs to be created. Suggested are use<br />
<strong>of</strong> Nile or pond water instead <strong>of</strong> borehole water as the latter is<br />
considerably cooler; Some form <strong>of</strong> recycling system to store heat<br />
perhaps by using the adjacent greenhouse pond or solar heater panels on<br />
the ro<strong>of</strong>. With recycling filtration and screening <strong>of</strong> incoming water<br />
would be necessary. Transparent ro<strong>of</strong>ing panels could be used to permit<br />
further solar heating as weIl as pruning <strong>of</strong> s~rrounding trees which
shade the building.<br />
Item 6.1: Ose <strong>of</strong> a~onia solution sounds expensive and hazardous.<br />
Spraying <strong>of</strong> diesel oil should be exercised with extreme caution as<br />
fish and oil do not mix. Paraffin has been used successfully in Asian<br />
fish ponds but both methods remain to be evaluated for toxicity to fish.<br />
As an alternative to pond draining to retrieve fry, it is feasible<br />
that an intermediate step could be introduced. Two weeks after stocking<br />
"swim-up" fry should appear along the banks in the shallows <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ponds. This is a classical behaviour pattern <strong>of</strong> tilapia exploited in<br />
the Far East. These fry are scooped up in a large hand net fitted with<br />
a mosquito net bag. Carried out at regular intervals throughout the day<br />
upto 70% <strong>of</strong> fry can be collected in this way. The remaining fry can<br />
then be removed by draining. Fry collected in the hand net by this<br />
method can either be held in a 2 x 3m hapa [cage <strong>of</strong> mosquito netting]<br />
held in the pond [P.5] or transferred directly to a S.R tank and are fed<br />
treated M.T. food. This minimises handling, for draining and collection<br />
<strong>of</strong> fry from the pond bottom is a very cumbersome process and liable to<br />
result in high mortality from injuries.<br />
Item 6.2: Broodstock are perhaps better treated by dipping in<br />
prophylactics during the transfer from P4 to T-21.<br />
When brood are again removed from holding tank to P4 it may be wise<br />
to recheck the mouth'<strong>of</strong> female for any incidental breeding which may<br />
have taken place while in the holding tank.<br />
Item 6.3: It is not clear why fry <strong>of</strong> greater than 9 - 11mm are to be<br />
destroyed if the system has been cleared <strong>of</strong> wild spawn and is<br />
efficiently screened. These fish could represent a genetically faster<br />
growing stock. Depending upon the numbers involved it may be advisable<br />
to set up a system to select for these larger fry and on-grow them as<br />
future broodstock.<br />
Fry entering the SRP tanks do not appear to und ergo any form <strong>of</strong><br />
prophylactic treatment other than to use diesel in the tanks to kill<br />
bugs. It is feH that all fry sortin,g, treatment and removal <strong>of</strong> bugs<br />
should be done outside the SRP room. Aseparate sorting tank system<br />
should be set up outside. The fry coming in should undergo a<br />
prophlactic treatment similar to that described for the broodstock. In<br />
addition a foot bath should be placed at the entrance to the SRP room so<br />
as to maintain a sterile environment. Water used in the SRP room should<br />
also be pretreated either by·U.V. or ozone sterilisation to counter any<br />
possible pathogen build up in the system. The use <strong>of</strong> borehole water<br />
for this purpose was commendable but it appears that the tanks are<br />
covered in a ferric deposit. Groundwater quality is therefore<br />
questionable and may not be advisable to use for fry production until<br />
fully analysed to verify that no likely fish toxins are present.<br />
The mention that daily removal <strong>of</strong> accumulated dirt suggests the<br />
tank system is not self-cleaning. Daily cleaning <strong>of</strong> the tanks is<br />
therefore likely to be stressful to the fry. <strong>An</strong> increased water flow is<br />
recommended [see Item 2.4 above]. Further the screen mechanism on the<br />
drains outlet is very cumbersome and expensive. A modification is<br />
suggested and illustrated in Fig. 22. A was te water P. V.C. pipe is used<br />
as the draining unit covered in micro-screen material providing a,<br />
simpler easy to manage screening system and the water level is<br />
controlled by the outside drainage stand pipe. When cleaning aspare<br />
pipe unit can easily be supplemented while the screens are taken for<br />
cleaning.<br />
The air loop is perhaps an inefficient way <strong>of</strong> aeration as the air<br />
bubbles are large. To improve aeration smaller bubbles are necessary.<br />
Either use special perforated pipes or place sand bags over the existing<br />
system to create an air stone effect.<br />
The paragraph [pg. 12] describing net covers to the tanks is<br />
confusing. The implications are that originally the design was for<br />
outdoor use hence net covers are necessary against predatory birds. It<br />
is not clear therefore why this is mentioned for El Wafaa where the SRP<br />
tanks are housed inside a bUilding. If the use <strong>of</strong> the building was<br />
intended to act as a greenhouse it failed and this leads to cautioning<br />
against any modifications to designs without due consideration. Had the<br />
building been open sided or had the tanks been outdoors, water<br />
temperature conditions would be considerably warmer.<br />
Item 7.1: Feed quantity appears under-estimated according to the data<br />
provided e.g.<br />
- 2 million fry if achieve 0.5 to 1.5g in day 30 = 2000kg biomass<br />
- Therefore 2000kg <strong>of</strong> fry <strong>of</strong> 19 average size at an average F.C.R. <strong>of</strong> 2:1<br />
= 4000kg feed requirement.<br />
The estimated one tonne <strong>of</strong> feed for 2 million fry implies at a 2: 1<br />
FCR that fry only average O.25g after 30 days <strong>of</strong> feeding. Thus either<br />
item 7.1 is under-estimated or expected growth, item 2.1 is overestimated.<br />
There is no consistency in the calculation.<br />
Item 7.2: The level <strong>of</strong> M.T. is slightly on the high side and can be<br />
anywhere between 30 - 60mg/l average 45mg/l. The use <strong>of</strong> ethyl-alcohol<br />
is expensive. The ratio <strong>of</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> food to alcohol can be lowered to<br />
2:1 and even less by experimenting. Drying <strong>of</strong> food under a distillation<br />
process to retrieve the alcohol is technically feasible and perhaps<br />
economic for a large scale operations.<br />
What appears to be neglected however is feed storage. El Wafaa<br />
have been purchasing feed at great expense due to the necessity to<br />
import and stock piling before use for M.T. treatment. It must be<br />
cautioned that under the tropical humid conditions experienced in summer<br />
this feed is unlikely to have a shelf life <strong>of</strong> more than 3 - 4 weeks.<br />
Fungal moulds tend to develop quickly under such conditions and<br />
aflatoxins poisoning may be a dominant feature <strong>of</strong> the mortality<br />
experienced. Further high temperatures lead to rancid conditions if<br />
diets are high in fats, an additional toxic response.<br />
Food therefore should be stored at below 15 to 20 0 C and especially<br />
M.T. treated feed should be held in a fridge. Unless feed can be<br />
manufactured locally every effort should be made to shorten the shelf<br />
~ ..-... ~ -,~,!
life or improve storage conditions.<br />
Item 7.3: Feeding at 10 - 12% <strong>of</strong> biomass to fry <strong>of</strong> 10 - 15mg starting<br />
size is too low. Fig. 23 is provided to indicate the required levels<br />
and Fig. 24 shows the required protein component. Particle size also<br />
needs careful attention [Fig. 23J.<br />
Item 8.0: Examinations for parasites is important for eure but even<br />
more essential is to prevent infections entering the system through<br />
prophalactic measures as described above under Item 6.3.<br />
The items discussed above may already have been covered in other<br />
sectors <strong>of</strong> the SRP manual for the section given to the consultant<br />
appears incomplete. Reference is made to other manual procedures not<br />
enclosed. Nevertheless the above serves as a suggested improvement to<br />
operations.<br />
4.1.2 General Impression<br />
The following are comments <strong>of</strong> a general nature not discussed above.<br />
Tank Design: The tanks with a 20cm wall are overdesigned. To retain<br />
3.0m 3 <strong>of</strong> water 10cm reinforced block work is cheaper and more than<br />
adequate. Further for M.~ treatment it is common practice in the Far<br />
East to use even shallower units.<br />
Drainage: The drain systems are outsized. A 5 - 10cm pipe would have<br />
been adequate elliminating the need for such deep draining trenches<br />
which are hazardous. Planking or grills should be considerd to protect<br />
the open drains.<br />
Water Supply: Use <strong>of</strong> small pipe diameter and pressure pumping is<br />
limiting to water flow. The system could have used larger pipe units<br />
and on a supply channel principle elliminating expensive taps and<br />
valves.<br />
Office: The <strong>of</strong>fice should be accessable from outside the SRP room.<br />
Currently workers wishing to see the management pass through SRP room<br />
potentially bring pathogens into the system. Separate doors should be<br />
considered.<br />
4.1.3 Conclusions<br />
As the SRP system was not actually operative during the visit,<br />
comments are restricted to personal observation and from discussions<br />
with staff. In summary the high losses during the rirst year can be<br />
attributed to:<br />
- Poor quality <strong>of</strong> borehole water i.e ferric deposits evident.<br />
- Low water temperature conditions.<br />
- deteriorating food quality due to length <strong>of</strong> storage.<br />
- Poor aeration and low water exchange.<br />
- Lack <strong>of</strong> staff experience.<br />
- Potential pathogen risk.<br />
- Over-estimates for the design <strong>of</strong> the system.<br />
4.2 Pond Production<br />
Pond performance in 1984 achieved a level <strong>of</strong> production equivalent.<br />
to 9.4t/ha/yr. This is exceptionally good and there is little that can<br />
be done to improve this condition. Survival was low but there does not<br />
appear to be an explanation for the losses except perhaps: predation.<br />
The only improvement to pond production would be management to<br />
ensure fingerlings overwinter so as to get early stocking in the warm<br />
season. This is adequately described in Table 29.<br />
5. SCOPE FOR INTENSIVE TILAPIA TANK CULTURE<br />
From section 2.0 it is apparent that Egypt is in a marginal<br />
situation for intensive tilapia culture. From Fig. 9, Table 10 only the<br />
South East corner <strong>of</strong> Egypt [Zone AJ experiences all year round warm<br />
conditions suitable for continuous production <strong>of</strong> tilapia. EI Wafaa Farm<br />
is located in Zone C, and it is likely that for 6 months <strong>of</strong> the year<br />
intensive production <strong>of</strong> tilapia is not possible. Nevertheless, EI Wafaa<br />
requested that the consultant examine that given this condition whether<br />
intensive tank culture was economically feasible. Considered therefore<br />
is the use <strong>of</strong> ponds to overwinter tilapia fingerlings to be stocked into<br />
tanks for fattening in Mayas soon as temperatures warm up [Fig. 19].<br />
The system considered does not cater for the overwintering in ponds but<br />
the cost <strong>of</strong> this is <strong>of</strong>fset against the expected cost <strong>of</strong> purchasing seed<br />
at LE 60/1000 [after Gaafar pers. comm.J.<br />
5.1 A Pilot Baobab Tilapia Farm Described<br />
The system described in the following text considers a complete<br />
model Baobab Tilapia Farm as illustrated in Fig. 25. Modifications to<br />
suit EI Wafaa conditions are considered later.
5.1.1 Site Organisation<br />
The Baobab Facility is to receive a supply <strong>of</strong> freshwater pumped<br />
from the river [No. 4, Fig. 25J to a raised flume. The water first<br />
paSses through two tiers <strong>of</strong> 20 fry on-growing raceways, each 10 x 1.5m<br />
and only 0.5m deep [No.10 Fig. 25 & 26 J. Wooden flashboards are used to<br />
check the rate <strong>of</strong> water flow gauged at between 125 - 250m3/hr, depending<br />
upon stocking density. The drop between raceways is to facilitate<br />
reaeration and a sediment trap [No.13, Fig. 25] is also positioned at<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> the second series <strong>of</strong> raceways. Sedimentation <strong>of</strong> large<br />
particulate wastes occurs here before the water enters a raised supply<br />
channel [No. 14, Fig. 25J and is reused a third time in the 10 fattening<br />
tanks [Fig. 27J. Water reuse in this fashion is not deleterious to<br />
growth, provided oxygenation is good. It does represent a reduction in<br />
pumping cost. To facilitate this reuse, the raceways need to be<br />
elevated above ground to achieve sufficient head for gravity supply.<br />
Considering the relatively low cost <strong>of</strong> energy in the country, pumping<br />
may not necessarily be expensive and the option is available that water<br />
reuse in this fashion could be restricted to the second raceway only.<br />
Raceways are then built on the same grade as the tanks. The tanks then<br />
receive first-hand water but the volume required would be increased by a<br />
factor <strong>of</strong> 2.<br />
The hatchery based on the "Baobab Arena" [No.17, Fig. 25J and<br />
nursery facilities are located ad jacent the' on-growi ng raceways. The<br />
distance over which fish have to be transferred is small and therefore<br />
un).ikely to be stressful. Overall, the Baobab Facility measures 65 x<br />
40I1l, covering only 2 600m 2 and is capable <strong>of</strong> a minimum production <strong>of</strong><br />
10t/yr, with a potential maximum <strong>of</strong> 2Ot/yr through skillful management<br />
and provided environmental parameters permit all year round production.<br />
Construction detail <strong>of</strong> the hatchery is given in Balarin [1983J and<br />
design <strong>of</strong> raceways presented in Fig. 26 and tank design Fig. 27. Basic<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice, food store and pump house plus perimeter security fence is also<br />
coosidered.<br />
5.1.2 Operations Strategy<br />
The proposed mode <strong>of</strong> operation is Qutlined in the model shown in<br />
Fi~. 28. This model, based on the production cycle described in Fig.<br />
29, allows for a twelve month growing period between hatchling and 250g<br />
marketable size.<br />
•<br />
The recommended strategy, therefore, is that fry produced in the<br />
hatchery are reared for 10 weeks in nursery units, feeding on a high<br />
protein diet. Mortality is normally high, as much as 20% <strong>of</strong> the fry<br />
dying at this stage. Selected fish are then moved on at between 1 - 5g<br />
size. They are transferred to the fry on-growing raceways and und ergo a<br />
ri~orous grading programme selecting for 50% <strong>of</strong> stocks. Generally<br />
fas ter growing are male fish [70 - 90% J. Fry graded out as undersized<br />
ma1 be sold or used as food minced and used in diet trials. The<br />
remaining stocks at 25g size are suitable for stocking into the circular<br />
fattening tanks. Six months would then have passed and it will take the<br />
fish a further six months to reach harvest size. The process is<br />
continuous and each tank is stocked in sequence.<br />
In theory therefore, the circular fattening tanks should und ergo<br />
two production cycles per year. With 10 such tanks, the unit should<br />
produce 20t <strong>of</strong> fish per year plus trash and seed fish. However for the<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> a pilot unit this model is overdesigned, six tanks and 12 ongrowing<br />
raceways would have been adequate, a potential 10t/yr<br />
production.<br />
The system is capable, through better managemen t, <strong>of</strong> undergoing<br />
four production cycles per year. This is achieved by stocking at a<br />
larger initial size. Although this provision has been allowed for, i t<br />
is anticipated that the system would never reach its maximum potential<br />
capacity primarily because <strong>of</strong>:<br />
_ Temperature extremes - cool winter [i.e loss <strong>of</strong> 6 months production in<br />
EgyptJ<br />
- Requirement for skillful management.<br />
- Possible food quality problems.<br />
Therefore, 10t has been set as the maximum achievable yield for a<br />
pilot unit and the system can be considered aS being <strong>of</strong> a production<br />
range <strong>of</strong> 10 to 12t/yr.<br />
5. 1.3 Technical Detail <strong>of</strong> Proeess<br />
The technical details <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> intensive tank culture <strong>of</strong><br />
tilapia have recently been reviewed by Balarin and <strong>Haller</strong> [1982J.<br />
Relevant data pertinent to this project are discussed below [after<br />
Balarin, 1979J. The basic concept <strong>of</strong> operation involves models:<br />
- Stocking programme<br />
- Growth rate<br />
- Feeding rate<br />
- Water flow requirement.<br />
Sophisticated technology has been kept to amInImum. Graphic<br />
models have been developed for ease <strong>of</strong> understanding yet with the<br />
potential to be computerised and automated.<br />
5.1.3.1 Stocking programme<br />
<strong>An</strong> example <strong>of</strong> a stocking programme model is given in Fig. 28.<br />
Different rates for stocking density are set for each stage, varying<br />
with unit type, unit size and prevailing environmental and water quality<br />
conditions. Allowances are made for mortalities, stock removal due to<br />
growth differentials and sales <strong>of</strong> seed or market size fish. The values<br />
for each stage can be calculated, given known conditions.<br />
High density stocking also prevents reproduction. Males in defence<br />
<strong>of</strong> territory at high densities <strong>of</strong>ten become exhausted at the number <strong>of</strong><br />
intruders which have to be kept out <strong>of</strong> a chosen "nesting" site.<br />
Territorial behaviour therefore falls away. Should successful mating<br />
occur, however, cannibalism <strong>of</strong> eggs and fry by the surrounding stock<br />
results in a poor success rate.
Set stocking rates are therefore laid down wi th some flexibility<br />
for stock manipulation depending upon ultimate market size. Baobab Farm<br />
employs the following rates:<br />
Fingerlings [1 - 25gJ 1000 2000/l]l3<br />
Adults [25-250gJ = 200 500/m5<br />
5.1.3.2 Growth rate<br />
Given prevailing seasonal water temperature conditions, it is<br />
possible to calculate a model growth curve. This may vary according to<br />
diet, water quality and species and can be determined empirically during<br />
pilot scale developments. Regular random sampIe weighings then become<br />
the management tool to assess performance against that expected.<br />
This permits early detection <strong>of</strong> any deviation from the norm and<br />
corrective measures can be initiated. <strong>An</strong> overall specific growth rate<br />
[SGRJ expected under the prevailing conditions at the site is about<br />
1.5%/d. A market size <strong>of</strong> 250g can therefore be expected six months<br />
after starting with a 25 - 30g fish. This is a conservative estimate as<br />
the project should aim for a production cycle <strong>of</strong> six months [SGR = 2%/dJ<br />
as climate permits only a 6 month growing season [Fig. 19 J.<br />
5.1.3.3 Feeding rate<br />
Feeds are generally formulated from locally available ingredients.<br />
Were the tilapia project attached to an irrigation project, the bulk<br />
feed ingredient could be from crop byproducts, such as brans, broken<br />
grain or oil seed expeller cakes. These are incorporated into a mix<br />
with animal and plant protein ingredients. Where no such waste products<br />
are available, diets are formulated from recognised suitable ingredients<br />
[Table 20 & 21]. The proportions vary according to the protein content<br />
required for each stage <strong>of</strong> on-growing and consideration is also given to<br />
achieve aleast cost formulation. Mineral and vitamin supplements are<br />
added to achieve a nutritional balance. Recent developments in feed<br />
formulation have been reviewed by Jauncey and Ross [1982J. Generally for<br />
tilapia a 25 - 30% protein, low fibre pellet is required. Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
poultry feeds in use in Egypt may suffice.<br />
From the protein and digestible portion <strong>of</strong> a ration, it is possible<br />
to calculate, for given temperatures, the required rate <strong>of</strong> feeding for<br />
optimum growth. <strong>An</strong> attempt is made to achieve an economic food<br />
conversion ratio [FCR] approximating 2: 1. A conservative FCR '<strong>of</strong> 2.5: 1<br />
is assumed for this project. After each random sampie, feed rates are<br />
adjusted accordingly to optimize growth and maintain an economic FCR.<br />
Under Baobab Farm conditions the following formulae applies:<br />
Log Y = 1.3-0.46 log X [b = 0.46+ 0.39J<br />
Where: Y feeding rate as percent body weight/day<br />
X mean body weight [gJ<br />
5.1.3.4 Water flow requirement<br />
A continuous water exchange is preferred to aeration by<br />
oxygenation. This flow provides all the fish's oxygen requirements and<br />
flushes excretory waste products from the system. System design<br />
facilitates cleaning. In a circular tank, the inflow is set at a<br />
tangental angle creating a spiral ebb to the central drain. Solids are<br />
carried out in the current thus created. By manipulation <strong>of</strong> water flow<br />
and angle <strong>of</strong> inlet pipe, it is possible to vary the velocity <strong>of</strong> the tank<br />
current. This is important to create a current fast enough to move<br />
large faecal particles but not to cause excessive swimming <strong>of</strong> the fish.<br />
High velocities result in energy expenditure at the expense <strong>of</strong> growth.<br />
If the current were too slow, it may not only result in faecal build up<br />
but can lead to successful reproduction. Generally in tanks where male<br />
tilapia can hold station and defend a nesting territory, breeding<br />
occurs. In the tank there are no reference marks, Le. stones,<br />
vegetation or depressions. In defence <strong>of</strong> territory, whenever a male<br />
pursues an intruder, he is carried some distance from the nest by the<br />
current. Disorientation results. The male therefore finds difficulty<br />
in recognising his nest and gives up any thought <strong>of</strong> breeding. High<br />
flow, therefore and high density stocking prevent successful<br />
reproduction in tanks.<br />
A flow rate <strong>of</strong> between 0.5 - 1.0Llmin/kg,<br />
is generally adequate at Baobab Farm.<br />
5.1.4 Production technique<br />
varying with size range,<br />
This section elaborates on the production process with reference to<br />
choice <strong>of</strong> systems design and techniques as recommended for Egyptian<br />
conditions.<br />
5.1. 4.1 Breeding<br />
The proposed technique will be initially to produce fry <strong>of</strong><br />
O.niloticus and select for faster growth. As the system develops, i t<br />
might be envisaged that all male fry will be produced either by male<br />
hormone treatment or hybrid crosses. The surplus seed produced could be<br />
available for sale as seed.<br />
The Baobab Breeding Arena described by Balarin [1983J exploits the<br />
natural breeding behaviour <strong>of</strong> the mouth brooding group <strong>of</strong> tilapia. The<br />
unit comprises three concentric zones. The male fish are permitted to<br />
set up territory in a centrally located arena the floor <strong>of</strong> which is<br />
covered in sand [nesting materialJ. Fernales can pass through a<br />
selective screen and have freedom <strong>of</strong> movement over the whole tank while<br />
males cannot enter the outer fernale breeding area. Fernales, once mated<br />
swim to this area to brood the young. Fry, when ready for release, are<br />
deposited by the parent in the shallows from where they enter the<br />
outermost ring. This ring, designated as a fry collection ring, is<br />
drained daily and fry transferred to nursery raceways.
The unit proposed is capable <strong>of</strong> producing 250 000 fry per year.<br />
Allowing for 50-60% mortality or grade-out, this is over 40-50% more<br />
than that needed for production <strong>of</strong> lOt <strong>of</strong> market size fish. The surplus<br />
caters for research needs, optional sale as fingerlings, or future<br />
expansion in production. It is doubtful however that such a system would<br />
be functional for more than 6 months in Egypt. Water temperatures are<br />
restrictive. It is considered therefore in this study that fry for a<br />
tank system would have to be bred and raised in ponds. Sex reversal is<br />
optional but overwintering for outgrow next season is a must.<br />
5.1.4.2 Hearing<br />
Three basic systems approaches are proposed for the growing <strong>of</strong> fry<br />
to market size.<br />
[a] Nursery [from hatching to 5g]:<br />
Shallow concrete raceways units [Fig. 26] are designed so that<br />
there is ereated a warm shallow area in which the thermophilie fry<br />
eongregate to feed on epilithic algae and powdered artificial feeds.<br />
The fry benefit from the elevated temperature created by this design.<br />
Provision is also made for a deep water retreat in the event <strong>of</strong> climatic<br />
extremes.<br />
[b] On-growing raceways [from 5 - 25g]<br />
Similar in appearance to the nursery raceways [Fig. 26] these units<br />
are much deeper in order to accommodate larger fish and are <strong>of</strong> a design<br />
which can facilitate grading. It is for this latter reason and for<br />
better management that smail raceways are preferred for fry rearing.<br />
Also, as numerous units are needed for different size stocking, it is<br />
costly to construct round tanks. Raceways share a common wall and are<br />
therefore less expensive.<br />
[e] Fattening tanks [from 25 - over 200g]<br />
Circular concrete tanks are seleeted for rearing tilapia to a<br />
saleable size. The design makes for efficient removal <strong>of</strong> wastes. The<br />
continuous current prevents reproduction and forces the fish to swim,<br />
the exercise leading to good quality f~esh. The water inlet is directed<br />
at a tangental angle so as to create a spiral current, carrying wastes<br />
toward a eentrally located drain [Fig. 27]. Tanks <strong>of</strong> this design are<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> holding 50kg/m3. At a possible two to four prod~otion cycles<br />
per year, yields can be in the order <strong>of</strong> 100 - 200kg/m Iyr. Under<br />
Egyptian climatieconditions it is unlikely that raceways would be<br />
feasible for fry ongrowing. Raceway use for grading is possible.<br />
Fattening in tanks would be restricted to 6 months in Summer only.<br />
5.1.4.3 Harvest and marketing<br />
When a tank <strong>of</strong> fish comes <strong>of</strong> size, or before-hand, depending upon<br />
demand, fish are netted and a saleable size selected out by sorting or<br />
grader-box. It is advisable to keep an excess <strong>of</strong> saleable size fish in<br />
storage tanks to act as a dispatch point and reserve for oceasional<br />
sales. Undersized fish may be on-grown or sold, depending on available<br />
tank space and their size category, i.e. whether they are near a size<br />
that will fetch a premium price or not.<br />
Marketing is to be the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the manager. Once a<br />
customer is identified, fish can be harvested and dispatched fresh. It<br />
is preferable, however, if fish, or the larger portion, can be sold at<br />
the gate. Sales promotion, transport costs and man-time are then<br />
minimal.<br />
5.1.5. Plan <strong>of</strong> Implementation and Production<br />
The development <strong>of</strong> the Baobab Tilapia Culture Facility is envisaged<br />
in two phases:<br />
Phase 1<br />
Phase 2<br />
10 - 12t/yr [pilot scale]<br />
scale up to optimum scale <strong>of</strong> economics.<br />
The stages in eonstruction and management <strong>of</strong> Phase 1 are aecording<br />
to the following plan:<br />
5.1.5.1. Stage 1: Preliminaries<br />
With the completion <strong>of</strong> the present mission, this stage can be<br />
considered as complete. Following the realisation <strong>of</strong> the need for a<br />
pilot Fish Farm Centre, the allocation <strong>of</strong> a site and acceptance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
detailed projeet draft all that remain are for specific detail and<br />
design specifieations <strong>of</strong> the Baobab Facility. The present mission only<br />
appraises the viability <strong>of</strong> establishing such a faeility. Detail design<br />
and tender doeuments would have to constitute aseparate item.<br />
5.1.5.2. Stage 2: Construction<br />
It is antieipated that the eontractor should begin work on other<br />
aspeets <strong>of</strong> the Fish Farm at the same time as starting on the produetion<br />
facility. It is recommended that the first priority is to be the<br />
construetion <strong>of</strong> water supply and installation <strong>of</strong> pumps so that water is<br />
readily available for ground eompaetion and the curing <strong>of</strong> concrete<br />
struetures.<br />
The order <strong>of</strong> construetion <strong>of</strong> the Facility is as folIows:<br />
Ca] Water supply and drainage [10 weeks]<br />
[b] Breeding arena [6 weeks]<br />
[c] Fry rearing raeeways [6 weeksJ<br />
Cd] Fry on-growing raeeways [8 weeks]<br />
Ce] Fattening tanks [8 weeks]<br />
5.1.5.3. Stage 3: Produetion<br />
As soon as the hatchery is complete and the cement cured, it is<br />
anticipated that stoeking can eommence by introducing brood fish to<br />
start up the production cycle. These fish should be imported as fry some<br />
months before and reared to size in the existing fish farm facilities.<br />
A stock <strong>of</strong> O. niloticus, estimated at a few hundred, is already held in<br />
the eentre. Arrangements eould be made to purchase or otherwise use<br />
these fish for initial stock production until suf~icient brood stock can
e imported. The purity <strong>of</strong> the stocks requires verification. It is not<br />
recommended that their use be prolonged, but only as an initial carryover<br />
until better stocks are available.<br />
Initiating start-up as soon as is practicably possible will mean an<br />
early production turnover. The construction period <strong>of</strong> operation is not<br />
expected to yield much production. A conservative minimum 50%<br />
production is expected in the first year with 100% in the next year,<br />
eventually reaching a maximum as the project is scaled up. Low initial<br />
production is expected in order to account for start-up problems,<br />
inexperience, research needs and general plant organisation. The<br />
realisation <strong>of</strong> production potential depends upon management and staff<br />
quality as weIl as research demands.<br />
5.1.5.4. Stage 4: Technical Assistance<br />
<strong>An</strong> engineer is <strong>of</strong> particular importance during construction and<br />
should be on site at least one month before the project is due to start.<br />
A biologist should be responsible for operations and it is recommended<br />
that he undertake a visit to Baobab Farm, Kenya, for a preliminary<br />
introduction to the system before construction starts.<br />
Technical consultations will be required at project start-up, first<br />
stocking and at harvest. These consult~ncy missions should also be<br />
considered as sessions for project appraisal, progress reporting and for<br />
on site staff training. Addi tional annual project reviews or trouble<br />
shooting services are advisable. After at least two years <strong>of</strong> operation,<br />
it is considered that the staff can begin to <strong>of</strong>fer assistance to other<br />
projects in Egypt.<br />
5.2 Modifi~tions to Suit Egyptian Conditions<br />
From the rationale described in Section 2.0, it is feasible that .<br />
intensive Systems could technically be developed in Egypt however there<br />
is one majo~ drawback, climatic conditions are marginal. Modifications<br />
to the operqtions are necessary.<br />
5.2.1 Hatcnery Operation Modifications<br />
As proposed in Section 3.4, it is feasible that the cycle described<br />
in Table 29 could equally apply to intensive tank systems. Fry are bred<br />
in ponds, ~ex reversal or otherwise treated and on-grown in ponds<br />
achieving 25 - 50g in the first season. Fish <strong>of</strong> this size are then<br />
overwinter€!d and in May <strong>of</strong> the next year as condi tions warm up can be<br />
transferred to the tanks for on-growing to market size.<br />
<strong>An</strong><br />
intermediate grading stage using raceways should be considered.<br />
5.2.2 Tank Operation Modificatioos<br />
Given that water conditions are only suitable for tilapia growth<br />
between May to October [Fig. 19J, this is the likely period when tank<br />
culture systems can operate. Management must therefore be geared to<br />
produce fing~rlings <strong>of</strong> a size suitable to reach a marketable size within<br />
3 or 6 months from stocking in the tanks.<br />
From Fig. 30 it is apparent that tilapia <strong>of</strong> 200 to 750g fetch a<br />
premium price <strong>of</strong> LE 2.00/kg. The minimum target size <strong>of</strong> 200g can be<br />
aChieved in 90 days from a starting size <strong>of</strong> 50g. Thus the hatchery and<br />
on-growing overwinter must be geared to produce fish <strong>of</strong> 25 and 50g by<br />
May <strong>of</strong> the next season. All tanks should then be s tocked wi th the 50g<br />
fish at the start <strong>of</strong> the season by end <strong>of</strong> July these would be saleable.<br />
The 25g fish can in the meantime be grown on ready for stocking into<br />
tanks in June and would be saleable by end <strong>of</strong> October. Two cycles a<br />
year are therefore permissable at EI Wafaa using a combination <strong>of</strong> tank<br />
system, overwintering ponds and the S.R.P. hatchery. These would mean<br />
peak sales b~tween July and October aperiod when there is generally a<br />
shortage <strong>of</strong> tish due to high water levels in the Nile. The only benefit<br />
to using a tqnk system is the saving <strong>of</strong> space. Production per unit area<br />
would increa~e 10 fold in efficiency <strong>of</strong> space.<br />
5.3 Modelli4g Economies <strong>of</strong> Sca1e<br />
This final section is presented as a financial analysis <strong>of</strong> cost<br />
parameters a.ffecting economic viability and determining the optimum<br />
economics. the mode <strong>of</strong> operation is as described above in Section 5.2.<br />
such that the systems are only in operation for 6 months <strong>of</strong> the year.<br />
Production is therefore 50% <strong>of</strong> potential and as a safety factor upto 30%<br />
allowance ha~ been made for variation in production. A range is used in<br />
calculation which represents possible losses due to uncontrolled<br />
conditions o~ poor management. The technical aspects adopted are those<br />
as described by Balarin and <strong>Haller</strong> [1982J. Costs are derived from<br />
estimates a:s provided by Engs. Hassan, Abou el Seoud and Gaafar.<br />
Economic fa.ctors as employed by accountants at EI Wafaa were<br />
incorporated. Other notes wi th respect to economic calculations are
......<br />
attached to the respective tables.<br />
5.3.1 Capital Cost<br />
The cost <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the 5 model units is given in Table 30<br />
and illustrated in Fig. 31 with a detail <strong>of</strong> proportionate distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> costs shown in Fig. 32. From Fig. 31 it is apparent that units <strong>of</strong> a<br />
size below 50t/yr are disproportionately more costly to construct<br />
relative to the tonnage output. Larger uni ts cost between LE 4000 to<br />
5500 per tonne fish per year. It should be borne in mind that climate<br />
permitting these units could achieve double this output representing a<br />
halving <strong>of</strong> capital item. From Table 22 it can be calculated that at<br />
1977 - 1980 prices a hectare <strong>of</strong> pond cost approx. LE 2014/ha capable <strong>of</strong><br />
an average 2.3t/ha/yr yield. This gives a capital item <strong>of</strong> LE 875/t/yr.<br />
Allowing for 15%/yr inflation, at current prices this would represent<br />
approx. LE 2000 to 2675/t/yr which equalls that calculated in Table 30.<br />
In other words tank systems per tonnage production represent the same<br />
capital expenditure as per pond systems.<br />
The greatest expenditure in tank systems is the construction <strong>of</strong><br />
tanks [Fig. 31J. Bearing in mind that safety factors were taken into<br />
account during costing and further that the Osman Group has its own<br />
construction company it is very likely that this construction item could<br />
be substantially reduced if built inhouse. Further reduction is<br />
possible in pump costs if the pump head could be maintained at a<br />
minimum, an important feature in site selection.<br />
5.3.2 Operation Costs<br />
A detailed operation cost analysis accounting for the given<br />
potential range <strong>of</strong> operation is given in Table 31, illustrated in Fig.<br />
33 with detail <strong>of</strong> cost distribution shown in Fig. 34.<br />
It is evident that the economics <strong>of</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> operation indicates<br />
that for systems above 50t/yr there is a considerably reduction in cost<br />
per unit weight <strong>of</strong> fish produced and ranges between LE 1.75 to 2.5/kg<br />
production. From Fig. 33 it is clearly evident that at the prices for<br />
tilapia given in Fig. 30, for good management the break-even point<br />
approaches a 100t/yr unit and for poor management is a unit over<br />
300tlyr. The average size uni t therefore is about 200t/yr. However<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it margins are very small. This is contrary to that reported in the<br />
summary report [Appendix IIIJ as greater safety factors have been<br />
incorporated both in construction cost and operation costings. For<br />
example depreciation [10%] and overheads [20%J add considerably to cost<br />
factors such that miscellaneous costs range between 30 to 38% [Fig. 34].<br />
In addition fingerlings make up 10 to 18% <strong>of</strong> operations. It should be<br />
noted that these have been costed at LE 60/1000 which is almost double<br />
the estimated production cost and therefore also includes pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
allocated to the hatchery operations <strong>of</strong> the farm. Making allowances for<br />
these inclusions it is feasible that the tank systems could realise<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it but it is doubtful that this will be anywhere near substantial.<br />
From Table 22 pond production costs 1977 - 1980 prices averaged LE<br />
253/kg which at current rates would approximate LE 585 - 890/kg,<br />
substantially lower than the tank unit and yielding areturn to capital<br />
<strong>of</strong> 26%. More recent data, [Fig. 10] indicates that for larger pond<br />
farms compared to Fig. 31 for tanks, the most striking difference is<br />
that tank systems as costed have a disproportionately higher cost <strong>of</strong><br />
over 50% attributed to miscellaneouS items and seed purchase. This<br />
emphasises the statement above that these items have been oversubscribed<br />
in the budgets put forward in Table 31.<br />
5.3.3 Conclusions<br />
It is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this consultancy to consider cost<br />
sensitivity and arrive at a working model for implementation. The<br />
objectives <strong>of</strong> this mission have been met in that economic parameters<br />
have been used to indicate potential. <strong>An</strong>y further calculations need<br />
more detailed and accurate cost estimates which were not available<br />
during this mission and would have to be the subject <strong>of</strong> aseparate<br />
study.