which management decisions rest, as well as the state of the <strong>HCV</strong>F attributes, and must be sitespecific. When an assumption is not supported in the course of monitoring, the precautionary approach requires a system of adaptive management that halts or alters actions related to those assumptions until a full evaluation is made. Monitoring by certification bodies should include all aspects of the management plan, including the quality and responsiveness of the monitoring plan as well as the quality of the “adaptive management” (FSC 2001) 26
REFERENCES <strong>Forest</strong> Stewardship Council (2001). Principle 9 Advisory Panel Recommendation Report, Version 1.1. FSC, Oaxaca, Mexico. <strong>Forest</strong> Stewardship Council (2004). FSC Principles and Criteria for <strong>Forest</strong> Stewardship. <strong>Forest</strong> Stewardship Council, Berlin, Germany. Nguyen Nghia Bien, Le Thien Duc and Ho Van Cu (2006). <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> Assessment for A Vuong Protection <strong>Forest</strong> Management Board, WWF Greater Mekong Programme, Hanoi. Nguyen Nghia Bien, Le Thien Duc and Ho Van Cu (2006). <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> Assessment for Song Kon Protection <strong>Forest</strong> Management Board, WWF Greater Mekong Programme, Hanoi. Olsen D. M. and E. Dinerstein (1998). The Global 200: a representation approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. <strong>Conservation</strong> Biology 12 pp 502-515. Papua New Guinea <strong>Forest</strong> Stewardship Council Incorporated (2006). <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Toolkit</strong> for PNG, Boroko, Papua New Guinea. Pollard, E. (2005). <strong>Toolkit</strong> for the Identification of <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> in Viet Nam, WWF Greater Mekong Programme, Hanoi. Pollard, E. and colleagues (2005). Preliminary <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> Assessment for Ha Nung State <strong>Forest</strong> Enterprise, WWF Greater Mekong Programme, Hanoi. Pollard, E. and colleagues (2005). Preliminary <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> Assessment for So Pai State <strong>Forest</strong> Enterprise, WWF Greater Mekong Programme, Hanoi. Pro<strong>Forest</strong> (2003). The <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Toolkit</strong> (edn.1). Part 1: Introduction. Pro<strong>Forest</strong>, Oxford. Pro<strong>Forest</strong> (2003). The <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Toolkit</strong> (edn.1). Part 2: Defining <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong>s at a national level: a practical guide. Pro<strong>Forest</strong>, Oxford. Pro<strong>Forest</strong> (2003). The <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong> <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Toolkit</strong> (edn.1). Part 3: Identifying and managing <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong>s <strong>Forest</strong>s: a guide for forest managers. Pro<strong>Forest</strong>, Oxford. Pro<strong>Forest</strong> (2003). The <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong> <strong>Toolkit</strong>. Vol. 1 & 2. Pro<strong>Forest</strong>, Oxford. Pro<strong>Forest</strong> (2004a). <strong>HCV</strong>F for conservation practitioners. Pro<strong>Forest</strong>, Oxford. Pro<strong>Forest</strong> (2004b). A Sourcebook for Landscape analysis of <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>. Pro<strong>Forest</strong>, Oxford. Pro<strong>Forest</strong> (2007). Use of the <strong>HCV</strong> framework in Mozambique: A summary of workshop Outputs. Pro<strong>Forest</strong>, Oxford. Rainforest Alliance and Pro<strong>Forest</strong> (2003). Identifying, Managing, and Monitoring <strong>High</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Value</strong> <strong>Forest</strong>s in Indonesia: A <strong>Toolkit</strong> for <strong>Forest</strong> Managers and other Stakeholders, SmartWood, Jakarta, Indonesia. Schmid, M. (1989) <strong>Vietnam</strong>, Kampuchea and Laos. Pp 83-90 in D. G. Campbell and Hammond, H. D. eds. Floristic inventory of tropical countries. New York: The New York Botanical Garden, WWF-WARPO (2006). An Interpretation of Global <strong>HCV</strong>F <strong>Toolkit</strong> for use in Ghana, WWF-WARPO, Accra. A-27
Change language