10.01.2014 Views

AR01042_WODAN_Final_Report_10.pdf - The Heritage Council

AR01042_WODAN_Final_Report_10.pdf - The Heritage Council

AR01042_WODAN_Final_Report_10.pdf - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Principal investigator<br />

Ingelise Stuijts<br />

Research assistants<br />

Lorna O’Donnell<br />

Amy Bunce<br />

Project partners<br />

Robert Shaw<br />

Anthony Corns<br />

Aoife Kane<br />

Kathleen O’Sullivan<br />

Otto Brinkkemper<br />

John Mc Auley<br />

Mary Dillon<br />

Ellen O’Carroll<br />

Scott Timpany<br />

Cathy Moore<br />

Adrienne Corless<br />

Conor Mc Dermott<br />

Robert Sands<br />

Susan Lyons<br />

Aidan O’Sullivan<br />

Discussion partners<br />

Birthe Stuijts<br />

Caroline Vermeeren<br />

Kirsti Hänninen<br />

Laura Kooistra<br />

Pauline Van Rijn<br />

Mitchell Power<br />

Oliver Nelle<br />

Koen Deforce<br />

Jaromir Benes<br />

Vincent Bernard<br />

Peter Hambro Mikkelsen<br />

Philip Buckland<br />

2


Page<br />

1 Introduction ……………….……………..……………………………………………7<br />

2 Aims ………………..………………….……………………………………………...13<br />

3 Methodology ……………………………………………………………………...15<br />

4 Tulsk case study ………….………………….……………………………………..23<br />

5 Sustainability model …………………………………..……………………………29<br />

6 Outreach and publication plan …………………..………..………………………..38<br />

7 Dissemination ………..…………………………………………………………….39<br />

8 Licensing …………….………………………...……………………………………43<br />

9 Aims for the future …..…………………………..…………………………………..50<br />

10 Conclusions ……………………………….…………………………………….51<br />

3


Illustrations<br />

Tables<br />

Table 1<br />

Query 1- Tulsk data<br />

Figures<br />

Figure 1<br />

Figure 2<br />

Figure 3<br />

Figure 4<br />

Figure 5<br />

Figure 6<br />

Figure 7<br />

Figure 8<br />

Figure 9<br />

Entry page of the <strong>WODAN</strong> database<br />

Character and growth page of fragment level<br />

Query interface of the database<br />

My<strong>WODAN</strong><br />

Fragment count of charcoal from Tulsk<br />

S3590, flot fragment count<br />

S3590, weight of flot fragments<br />

S3590 Retent fragment count<br />

S3590 Weight of fragments in retent.<br />

4


Acknowledgements<br />

We would like to thank the <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and the Discovery Programme for the chance to<br />

work on this project. We would also like to thank all the project and discussion partners for their<br />

extremely valuable input into the <strong>WODAN</strong> database.<br />

5


Executive summary<br />

<strong>WODAN</strong> is an integrated on-line wood and charcoal database that can be used for archaeological<br />

and biological studies and investigations in Ireland and beyond. It will serve both as a digital<br />

archive and a powerful tool for scientific research for environmental analysis both within Ireland<br />

and Internationally. For the first time, this database will allow specialists and non-specialists alike<br />

to search and query charcoal and wood results from excavations in Ireland and beyond.<br />

<strong>The</strong> development of an on-line database application is a fundamental departure from other<br />

environmental databases. It makes the catchment area of the database far greater than any<br />

previously designed environmental database. At all times there will only be one, central, updated<br />

version available. It was designed with all known methods of charcoal and wood analysis in mind,<br />

in order to enable as many people as possible to use it.<br />

<strong>The</strong> database was developed in two stages. Firstly a prototype (alpha product), that served as a<br />

test bed for demonstration, amendment and refinement was developed. During this period, the<br />

team concentrated on implementing many advanced features that help to illustrate the<br />

capabilities of our approach. <strong>The</strong> second, or beta phase, involved stabilizing the system and<br />

ensuring that that overall user experience was successful.<br />

<strong>The</strong> development of the <strong>WODAN</strong> database and web application has all been carried out using<br />

free open source software. <strong>The</strong> content or data component of the <strong>WODAN</strong> resides in a MySQL<br />

relational database whose schema is based upon the standardised fields. <strong>The</strong> construction of the<br />

web interface to access the <strong>WODAN</strong> database is carried out using several components including<br />

Ruby on Rails (RoR), CSS and HTML<br />

Most commercial archaeological companies, universities and research institutions in Ireland are<br />

keen to use the <strong>WODAN</strong> database as a permanent digital archive of their wood and charcoal<br />

results from Irish excavations. Almost all specialists who have worked on Irish material are<br />

currently entering data into <strong>WODAN</strong>. 24 profiles have been created. Over 370 sites have been<br />

added, including approximately 1500 charcoal and 1000 wood samples.<br />

<strong>The</strong> scope for synthesis is immense. <strong>The</strong> database will be used as a springboard for<br />

environmental research. <strong>The</strong> wide ranging scope and nature of the data collection will mean that<br />

it will be possible to address important questions on the nature of woodland throughout Ireland’s<br />

history.<br />

Standardization of methods was one of the key aims of the <strong>WODAN</strong> project. This has been<br />

achieved through the development of database fields through numerous discussions and<br />

workshops. As a result, all specialists working in Ireland currently use the same recording sheets<br />

and methods.<br />

An international element has been added with wood and charcoal specialists from England,<br />

Belgium, Holland, France, Germany, Australia and America, all of whom have played an active<br />

role in the creation of the database.<br />

6


1 Introduction<br />

1.1 Knowledge context.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>WODAN</strong> database has been a three year programme funded by the <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Council</strong> through<br />

its INSTAR grant scheme.<br />

During the Celtic Tiger in Ireland, the level of developments (residential and infrastructural) rose<br />

to unprecedented levels. Concurrently, the amount of commercial archaeology rose equally<br />

steeply. This led to a similar vast increase in the level of environmental data generated from<br />

excavations. <strong>The</strong> environmental data takes on many forms such as pollen, coleopteran, plant<br />

remains, wood and charcoal. One of the most commonly found ecofat on Irish archaeological<br />

sites is charcoal. It will be found in most contexts, whereas the preservation of waterlogged wood,<br />

plant remains, pollen and beetle remains are more dependant on the soil conditions.<br />

In 2007, seeing this volume of data being produced, wood and charcoal specialists came together<br />

in Ireland to form the Irish Wood Anatomists Association (IWAA). <strong>The</strong> IWAA realized the need<br />

for communication, dissemination and collaboration of their results to each other and to the<br />

public at large. One of issues raised during the meetings was the archive of environmental work.<br />

Each of the specialists had different methods to store their results. Some used paper copies; some<br />

excel sheets, some databases (access). <strong>The</strong> IWAA freely shared information between members<br />

which facilitated easy comparison of results form similar site types and periods. It was felt that<br />

this was needed to be completed in a more standardized format. <strong>The</strong> need for a digital archive<br />

was clear, how, when and where were the unanswered questions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> possibility of the Discovery Programme building an environmental database was raised, but<br />

due to funding it was not possible. In 2008, Dr. Ingelise Stuijts applied for funding to build a<br />

database to hold wood and charcoal information through a new grant scheme (INSTAR) funded<br />

by the <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

7


Due to the nature of the funding, a three step plan was envisaged for the creation of the database.<br />

1. Phase 1 (2008)-design stage of the project, scoping out the possibilities of the database<br />

and designing a prototype.<br />

2. Phase 2 (2009) - creation of the database.<br />

3. Phase 3 (2010) –further design and maintenance of the database.<br />

1.2 Phase 1 2008.<br />

Funding was received in 2008 and so the team could be assembled. <strong>The</strong> project office was based<br />

in the Discovery Programme where the Principal Investigator Dr. Ingelise Stuijts is employed.<br />

Anthony Corns, Robert Shaw and John Mc Auley took on the role of designing the database.<br />

Lorna O’Donnell and Susan Lyons were hired as research assistants.<br />

One of the first enterprises of the essentially ‘scoping out’ phase of Year 1 was to assess the level<br />

of interest and consent that the database may achieve from its target audience.<br />

<strong>The</strong> database design had the full support of the IWAA, who came on board as discussion partners.<br />

Through surveys, it was ascertained that most of the commercial archaeological companies and<br />

individual archaeologists were also willing to collaborate on the project. <strong>The</strong> university and state<br />

run sector were similarly supportive. An international dimension to the work was lent by various<br />

European discussion partners, including Biax Consult, Oliver Nelle and Otto Brinkkemper.<br />

An insight into just how large an influence the boom years had on environmental archaeology<br />

was demonstrated by a survey of published and unpublished charcoal and wood results in Ireland.<br />

This showed that material had been identified from over 900 sites including almost 25, 000 wood<br />

samples and almost 4,000 charcoal samples.<br />

Information was collated on the requirements people have of the database and the nature of the<br />

output they would like. This provided a basis for recording wood and charcoal from Ireland in the<br />

future. Based on this data, a prototype wood database was built.<br />

<strong>The</strong> need for standardization was flagged early in the <strong>WODAN</strong> project and formed an important<br />

focus of Phase 1.<br />

8


1.3 Phase 2 2009.<br />

In Phase 2, the <strong>WODAN</strong> integrated wood and charcoal database was built. Particular principals<br />

were adhered to in the building of the database:<br />

• Full involvement with the user community for the standardized inclusion of their own<br />

data into <strong>WODAN</strong>.<br />

• Developed using open source software and principles.<br />

• Online availability of both data and analysis tools.<br />

In order to maximize the potential of the database it was integral to develop queries which could<br />

effectively deal with the vast amount of data present and effectively ‘turn data into knowledge’.<br />

Two workshops (one International and one Irish) introduced the prototype database to the<br />

specialists and gave people an opportunity to use the database. This led to crucial feedback from<br />

the intended user community, which was subsequently used to change some of the structure and<br />

fields of the database. Standardizing methodologies was an important thread that linked through<br />

the database development in 2009. <strong>The</strong> workshops were very effectively used to formalize the<br />

standards that would be adhered to in Irish archaeology in the future. In this respect, Ireland is<br />

one of the first countries in the world to develop and agree to this standardized methodology for<br />

charcoal and wood analysis and thereby is at the forefront of international development of this<br />

discipline.<br />

<strong>The</strong> development of My<strong>WODAN</strong> (a personal archive on the website which displays each user’s<br />

results) meant that each specialist will have instant access to their own research. <strong>The</strong> content of<br />

My<strong>WODAN</strong> also acts as an effective CV for wood specialists, providing visible evidence of all<br />

the excavations they have worked on.<br />

10


1.4 Phase 3 2010.<br />

<strong>The</strong> focus in the 2010 phase of the project was to eliminate bugs within the software and populate<br />

the database and develop a synthesis publication plan.<br />

1.4.1 Further development and maintenance of the database (Figure 1)<br />

<strong>The</strong> majority of database work has, to date, focussed on integrating the wood and charcoal<br />

databases into a single structure. While a query interface has been implemented, there are still<br />

amendments required to refine the advanced query builder.<br />

<strong>The</strong> profiles have now been fully integrated, each <strong>WODAN</strong> member has their own profile, and a<br />

permission structure has been set in place to encourage commitment for the <strong>WODAN</strong> members<br />

yet provide access to the general public.<br />

Google map integration, providing the ability to browse and define a query by interfacing with<br />

the map, is still ongoing, but the initial mapping interface has been implemented.<br />

11


Figure 1 Entry page of the <strong>WODAN</strong> database<br />

1.4.2 Population of the database<br />

<strong>The</strong> key Irish wood and charcoal specialists now have their own, personal profiles and are<br />

currently entering their wood and charcoal data including Dr. Ingelise Stuijts, Ellen O’Carroll,<br />

Lorna O’Donnell, Susan Lyons, Mary Dillon, Dr. Scott Timpany, Phil Austin and Dr. Anne<br />

Crone. Two part time research positions were created to input data into the database. We have<br />

created browsing profiles for some environmentalists who are keen to collaborate with us in the<br />

future.<br />

A profile has been created for the <strong>Heritage</strong> council to allow browsing of <strong>WODAN</strong> database.<br />

2 Aims<br />

12


<strong>The</strong> essential aim of the project was to design a database that would be a trusted digital repository<br />

for wood and charcoal data (both biological and archaeological).<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> main aim of the project is to establish an online database to store published and<br />

unpublished data (when accessible). This will be updated by the user community through<br />

input of their own results, thus in effect creating an online archive.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> online database is constructed with an associated web application which provides<br />

tools for the systematic inputting of data, and a series of tools to query and browse both<br />

your own and the user community data.<br />

3. A further aim is to use the <strong>WODAN</strong> project to standardise methodologies, storage of data<br />

and presentation of results within the IWAA. On-going workshops, meetings and<br />

demonstrations of the database are facilitating this. Standardisation will eventually lead to<br />

better comparison of data and easier data entry into <strong>WODAN</strong>.<br />

4. Only one version of the <strong>WODAN</strong> database (excluding backup data) will be utilised to<br />

supply centralised access via the web to all users, eliminating the problems of data<br />

versioning and data replication.<br />

5. <strong>The</strong> online nature of the <strong>WODAN</strong> database is a new departure for environmental<br />

databases. This allows people to input their results anytime, anywhere.<br />

6. <strong>The</strong> My<strong>WODAN</strong> facility provides a summary of each specialists own sites and their own<br />

access policy.<br />

7. <strong>The</strong> queries (particularly the query builder) will allow specialists to deal effectively with<br />

their thousands of identifications. This will be particularly valuable when answering<br />

research questions and enhancing publications for large infrastructural developments.<br />

8. <strong>The</strong> <strong>WODAN</strong> database will provide the ability for the first time for specialists to query<br />

each others results thereby uniting all the work and identifications that were completed in<br />

Ireland during the boom years.<br />

13


9. We aim to establish the needs for the future to input all data from the Celtic Tiger years<br />

by noting how much time it takes for data entry, for example data entry speed and<br />

preparing metadata for entry.<br />

14


3 Methodology<br />

3.1 Database Development<br />

This phase of development aimed to finalize several design decisions and to ensure the stability<br />

of the overall system. Thus, much of the effort was concentrated on optimizing and stabilizing<br />

the system. <strong>The</strong> queries and mapping interfaces were further enhanced, and a degree of<br />

international support was implemented to allow for the addition of non-Irish wood and charcoal<br />

sites. While the initial design sought to approach both wood and charcoal as separate entities, this<br />

round of development integrated both the wood and charcoal schemas into a single coordinated<br />

database structure. An advanced query-builder has also been implemented that enhances access<br />

to the database and enables users to submit more elaborate queries to the database. Several<br />

export functions have also been implemented that allow users to export the results from a query<br />

into an excel file ready for publication. A backup solution was also implemented, ensuring that a<br />

snapshot of the database is backed-up nightly. Snapshots are recycled every two days.<br />

3.2 Programming and design report<br />

<strong>The</strong> database was developed in two stages. Firstly, much effort was placed in developing a<br />

prototype, or alpha product, that served as a test bed for demonstration, amendment and<br />

refinement. During this period, the team concentrated on implementing many advanced features<br />

that help to illustrate the capabilities of our approach. <strong>The</strong> second, or beta phase, involved<br />

stabilizing the system and ensuring that that overall user experience was successful. <strong>The</strong> system<br />

has been refined considerably since the implementation of the alpha phase but also a systematic<br />

approach to the removal of software bugs and other design issues has also been implemented.<br />

Naturally, this is an ongoing process that will continue throughout the lifetime of the application.<br />

Having said that, the software is currently stable and it is expected that any glitches or bugs will<br />

be resolved before the end of the year.<br />

3.3 Technical sustainability<br />

<strong>The</strong> database is implemented with Ruby on Rails 2.0. This is frozen to ensure there are no<br />

updates that can result in defunct operations. Similarly, Mysql, Apache and Passenger Phusion<br />

are used to manage the persistence and serve the content. <strong>The</strong> project can be hosted with a<br />

minimum of cost. Currently we have purchased three years hosting from the Irish hosting agency<br />

Blacknight. Thus, overall the technical sustainability is guaranteed for up-to three years.<br />

15


Ensuring, of course, that no unforseen difficulties arise, it is expected that maintainance costs<br />

will be negligable for the period.<br />

3.4 Standardisation<br />

In order to design a database that would hold the relevant information it was important that the<br />

IWAA all were recording the same type of information from their samples. Thus the<br />

standardization of methods through the IWAA formed an integral part of the database design.<br />

Analysis of archaeological wood and charcoal is a relatively new discipline, and Ireland is only a<br />

small country. It became integral to research the standards and recording methods in other<br />

countries in order to come to the consensus on the methods the IWAA would use. It was also vital<br />

to be able to incorporate as many different countries methodologies as possible as this would<br />

greatly add to the internationality of the database.<br />

For these reasons, the methods used particularly by European specialists were researched. This<br />

formed an important part of the final report of 2009. Specific thought was given to the French<br />

methodologies used, as the Montpellier and Valbonne schools in France (Chabal 1992, Vernet<br />

1968). This research resulted in the <strong>WODAN</strong> database design incorporating identifications at the<br />

Taxon level (grouped recordings by species identification) and at the fragment level (single<br />

recordings per each fragment of charcoal) (Figure 2).<br />

16


Figure 2 Character and growth page of fragment level<br />

Other methodologies of recording were also incorporated in the <strong>WODAN</strong> database, including a<br />

template recording sheet from Ludemann and Nelle (2002) and a recording method used by<br />

Marguerie (2007).<br />

Furthermore, it was vital that the database could be linked in with as many other existing<br />

databases as possible. For these reasons linking fields were used for <strong>WODAN</strong> which in the future<br />

will allow collaboration between the DCCD and TriDAS database.<br />

In order to promote standardization, workshops and meetings were held for a European and<br />

IWAA audience, to come to a consensus on what features and recording methods would be used<br />

on Irish material. In doing this, Ireland is one of the first countries that the charcoal and wood<br />

specialists have unanimously agreed on their standards of recording.<br />

Further standardization is achieved by the queries. <strong>The</strong>se produce several pre-formatted tables<br />

which results in all the specialists using the same tables and graphs within their reports.<br />

17


3.5 Development of queries<br />

<strong>The</strong> design of the database meant that it is to be used as a repository of charcoal and wood<br />

information, potentially for thousands of sites. How then could this data be turned into knowledge<br />

and the value of the database realized to answer research questions posed by the user community?<br />

This is where the development of suitable queries became crucial within the database design. Five<br />

simple queries were developed in total. Two produced tables and additions that are commonly<br />

used by each specialist in their reports, thereby cutting down on work and having everybody<br />

produce the same table of results and thus further standardization.<br />

In the same vein a query that would produce pre-formatted line graphs of annual ring widths was<br />

also developed. <strong>The</strong>se can be used to possibly build on site chronologies and to examine growth<br />

conditions/possible management practices from archaeological material.<br />

Two further queries incorporate the results of research from European colleagues, a graph<br />

examining the age profiles of each wood species (Marguerie/Hunot query) and one that estimates<br />

the original size of a charcoal fragment based on its curvature (Ludemann/Nelle query).<br />

An advanced query tool was then constructed (Figure 3). This is more flexible and complicated<br />

than the simple queries. Five crucial fields were selected for querying. This would strike the<br />

balance between flexibility of queries and also rigidity of field descriptions to make the queries<br />

meaningful. You can select none or all of the queries present in the advanced query builder.<br />

One of the first fields selected was project code. This was chosen because queries may need to be<br />

applied to one project, for example a large infrastructural scheme or group of sites. It also enables<br />

schemes which were analyzed by more than one specialist to be effectively re-joined.<br />

Data can be further queried by County, sample context, sample period and Taxon.<br />

This provides the ability to discuss countless important research questions about the use and<br />

availability of wood resources in Ireland from the prehistoric period to present day.<br />

For example,<br />

18


• What was the role of elm during different periods in Ireland?<br />

• How much did ash benefit from felling of primary woodlands during the Neolithic and<br />

Bronze Age?<br />

• What was the tree composition of Ireland’s woodland by the Early Medieval and<br />

Medieval period?<br />

• When were woodland management techniques in use in the country – how does this<br />

differ from other countries?<br />

Figure 3 Query interface of the database<br />

19


3.6 My<strong>WODAN</strong><br />

Part of the feedback from the workshops was centered on the level of information that users felt<br />

comfortable presenting to the public. In some cases it would be appropriate to temporarily or<br />

permanently hide results for particular sites. Reasons for this may include if the material is being<br />

used for research such as for a PhD, be under embargo until publication or a client may not wish<br />

for these results to be displayed. If this is the case then the My<strong>WODAN</strong> button can be selected<br />

and thus none of this site information or results will be displayed on the database. My<strong>WODAN</strong> is<br />

also a profile page where the specialist’s details and number of sites entered is displayed (Figure<br />

4).<br />

A further level of security was added with the <strong>WODAN</strong> colleague’s button. People can choose if<br />

they wish to share the information only with their wood anatomy colleagues. <strong>The</strong> highest level of<br />

availability is to tick neither My<strong>WODAN</strong> nor <strong>WODAN</strong> colleagues. If this is the case then the<br />

results are available to the general public.<br />

<strong>The</strong> My<strong>WODAN</strong> facility is very useful also in the respect that people can opt to query their<br />

results only. This could be very important if you only wanted to harness your own results not<br />

everybody else’s.<br />

20


Figure 4 My<strong>WODAN</strong><br />

21


4 Tulsk case study<br />

<strong>The</strong> site of Tulsk in Co. Roscommon was subject to excavation by the Discovery Programme<br />

between 2004 and 2009. <strong>The</strong> licensed director was Niall Brady and the excavation team largely<br />

comprised students during 12 weeks each summer. It is presented here as a case study due to the<br />

charcoal results, and indeed the site results, being in an advanced state of post-excavation<br />

analysis.<br />

Tulsk is a multi-period site within the O’Connor Roe gaelic lordship and it is this period of its<br />

occupation that sees the most striking use of the site with the construction of a, previously<br />

archaeologically unknown, tower house. Prior to this the site, originally a natural mound<br />

overlooking significant lowlands and probably at the crossroads of two ancient route ways, had<br />

prehistoric occupation only tantalizingly glimpsed at during excavation. Iron Age occupation was<br />

also revealed before the construction of an early medieval ringfort; this rath was later raised and<br />

then subsequently divided when the tower house was constructed to the north-western side. Ditch<br />

fortifications were re-dug but were later built over following the final collapse of the tower. Later<br />

medieval occupational evidence is located just off the mound while the top of the mound is<br />

truncated during Elizabethan military garrisoning.<br />

Although singular charcoal samples were hand-picked from the site during excavation, those that<br />

have been entered into the <strong>WODAN</strong> database so far have been from the environmental<br />

processing. <strong>The</strong> site was systematically sampled so as to ensure at least one sample from each<br />

context and some significant contexts, such as the main fills of the external ditch and the base of<br />

the garderobe chute, were 100% sampled. Almost all samples were then floated in the field<br />

resulting in charcoal fragments in both the residue and as part of the floated material. As part of<br />

the post-excavation process the charcoal was picked from these dried samples and was then<br />

passed on to Ingelise Stuijts for analysis. To date the majority of these samples have been<br />

analyzed and entered into the <strong>WODAN</strong> database and manipulation of the data is now possible.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sampling technique of the Tulsk samples makes it particularly relevant because it includes all<br />

contexts and not just the ‘interesting’ data. Although this has led to many samples being<br />

comprised of just a few fragments, in many samples a broader picture of species selection can be<br />

seen. Whether the larger samples have also managed to produce saturated results, whereby the<br />

limit of species present is deemed to have been reached after a certain amount of counting with<br />

no new species identified, remains to be seen. However the discipline during analysis necessary<br />

22


for a saturation curve to be produced, that of not visually selecting in which order to analyse<br />

fragments, was closely followed therefore any bias within the material will be that of on site<br />

selection rather than bias introduced during post-excavation.<br />

Using the pre-built query 1 within the database produces this result for the Tulsk data (Table 1):<br />

Table 1 Query 1- Tulsk data<br />

<strong>The</strong> fragments counts are therefore very easy to export and graphically represent:<br />

23


Ulmus sp.<br />

Unidentified Angiosperm<br />

Bark<br />

Calluna sp.<br />

Ilex aquifolium<br />

Sambucus sp.<br />

Taxus baccata<br />

Betula sp.<br />

Alnus sp. 3%<br />

5%<br />

Prunus spinosa<br />

5%<br />

Salix sp.<br />

6%<br />

Maloideae<br />

9%<br />

Fraxinus sp.<br />

10%<br />

Corylus sp.<br />

30%<br />

Tulsk charcoal fragment counts<br />

Quercus sp.<br />

29%<br />

Figure 5 Fragment count of charcoal from Tulsk<br />

<strong>The</strong> vast majority of samples taken were from the medieval layers (early to late medieval) as<br />

these were the ones encountered most frequently on site. To date there is little prehistoric data<br />

from Tulsk within the <strong>WODAN</strong> database and due to the nature of the archaeological remains<br />

what prehistoric charcoal there will be is in limited quantities to the point of being statistically<br />

invalid.<br />

An interesting facet of the Tulsk data is that the charcoal from the processing residue and that<br />

from the floated material were analysed separately. An example within the database can be found<br />

with sample 3590. This was sampled from context 3152, a later medieval ditch fill from the<br />

internal ditch 4317 in area 3C. <strong>The</strong> flot was relatively small while the retent was 1.5l in volume<br />

from a 10l soil sample.<br />

24


Figure 6 S3590, flot fragment count<br />

Figure 7 S3590, weight of flot fragments<br />

25


Figure 8 S3590 Retent fragment count<br />

Figure 9 S3590 weight of fragments in retent.<br />

<strong>The</strong> limited species within the flot (Figures 6 and 7) are revealed to be comparatively<br />

insignificant species within the retent where oak dominates (Figures 8 and 9). This is primarily<br />

due to weight of the fragments and, as can be seen, the five oak fragments within the retent<br />

(Figure 8) occupy a considerably larger percentage of the chart by weight. Willow is perhaps the<br />

26


species most affected by the difference between flot and retent results, however a larger sample<br />

size would be preferable to really draw conclusions since this is based on a total of 7 flot<br />

fragments and 14 retent fragments. However, this is a substantially more valid picture of the<br />

species represented within this context than that produced by hand picking samples from the site.<br />

Most significantly the results from sample 3590 reasonably closely match that of the dominant<br />

species from the site as a whole. Those outliers from the whole site results chart are context<br />

specific with the Calluna sp. Ilex aquifolium and Sambucus sp. being largely from individual<br />

contexts while the Taxus baccata represents a possibly worked piece that has later been disposed<br />

of in fire.<br />

In general the use of the <strong>WODAN</strong> database enables results to be quickly pulled up and whole site<br />

trends observed. Advanced queries can quickly isolate stratigraphic variations and saturation<br />

curves can confirm that a sample is statistically valid. It is a valuable tool even before postexcavation<br />

work has been completed and, perhaps most importantly, enables anyone to use the<br />

same data to produce results tailored to their specific queries.<br />

27


5 Sustainability model<br />

5.1 Work is on-going on developing a model for the future sustainability and safeguarding of<br />

data within the <strong>WODAN</strong> database. <strong>The</strong> key aims of the model are:<br />

1. Persistent storage of the data in an OAIS compliant digital repository: <strong>The</strong> Discovery<br />

Programme is currently constructing a Fedora Commons digital repository before the end<br />

of 2011 to house Discovery Programme digital content and additional archaeological<br />

data.<br />

2. Provide for maintenance: day to day alteration of the code due to bugs and additional<br />

activities such as data backups and user administration<br />

3. Provide for the future development of new application tools and extend the use of the<br />

software beyond Ireland and the palaeo-environmental datasets chosen<br />

4. Researching legalities relating to the database (copyright etc.).<br />

<strong>The</strong> online hosting of the application and database is currently being carried out by Black<br />

Knights. Usually an annual subscription is used to secure this facility, however due to the<br />

uncertainty of funding in the interim, it has been arranged that Black Knight will provide hosting<br />

facilities for the next three years until further funding is secured.<br />

28


<strong>The</strong>re are a number of different funding mechanisms which could be used for the <strong>WODAN</strong><br />

project. <strong>The</strong>se include:<br />

A. National/Regional Government Funding<br />

B. Project/Grant Funding<br />

C. Subscription Funding<br />

D. Endowment/Philanthropy<br />

E. Commercial Partnership<br />

F. Advertising Revenue<br />

G. Direct Charging/Pay per View<br />

H. Low Cost Business/Internal Resource Deployment<br />

I. Multiple Streams/Hybrid Funding<br />

J. Consortium Model<br />

A<br />

National/Regional Government Funding<br />

Direct and indirect funding derived from governments, departments and NGOs<br />

Advantages<br />

Most stable for organisations/projects in the early stages<br />

Sense of security and authority over content<br />

Government can influence the standards and access to the cultural content<br />

Access can be provided free of charge<br />

Effort and investment in spent on generating income and subscriptions can be spent more<br />

effectively on content collection and promotion<br />

Disadvantages<br />

Less sustainable in the long term with current evidence highlighting those governments are<br />

forcing funded bodies to diversify their funding sources<br />

Hard to secure in current economic climate<br />

Strong competition for government funding as other funding revenues become reduced in the<br />

current economic climate<br />

<strong>The</strong>me of project may not be priority of government<br />

29


o<br />

This would be an ideal source of funding for the <strong>WODAN</strong> project. It would cover all<br />

aspects of what is needed for storage, maintenance and development. This would be<br />

possibly be suitable for providing the funding for the extending of the <strong>WODAN</strong><br />

capabilities or geographic application (i.e. EU grants).<br />

B<br />

Project/Grant Funding<br />

Funding provided for specific period with specific outcomes<br />

Advantages<br />

Good for the development of a project initiative<br />

Suitable for academic projects<br />

Disadvantages<br />

By nature a short term option and therefore unreliable for longer term security<br />

Highly competitive<br />

Uncertainty to the availability of funding<br />

o<br />

While this would be very useful for the <strong>WODAN</strong> project, it would not solve the long<br />

term sustainability problems facing the project.<br />

C<br />

Subscription Funding<br />

Charging subscription to cover operational costs, offered to individuals, groups or institutions.<br />

Usually operates as an annual charge/subscription. Value based pricing can be used to provide<br />

tiered charging according to general ability to pay. New derived product is the “freemium”<br />

model where basic content is provided without charge. However, access to certain functions and<br />

the complete data records is only available to paying subscribers. Other variants of this model is<br />

the pay per click/pay per use scenario where the user is charged based upon the volume of data<br />

observed, and the “contributor pays” model where content authors pay to have their data hosted<br />

and published by a trusted and secure online repository<br />

Advantages<br />

Historically stable as it is based on periodical and journal costing models<br />

Once established it can provide profit for the investment into developing the service<br />

30


Disadvantages<br />

Charges may not cover the costs<br />

Can provide extra costs and effort including marketing, billing and sales<br />

Users have higher expectation of user support, and service updates<br />

Revenue stream poor at initial stages<br />

Susceptible to changes in the economy leading to cancelled subscriptions<br />

Goes against commitment to provide open access if content users pay<br />

Note: A “freemium” product could be offered where the public can gain access to the basic<br />

<strong>WODAN</strong> data. However, the deposition of data with the system and to utilize the online tools<br />

could be limited to subscribers. One drawback is in trying to attract users to deposit their data<br />

the extra cost may deter them. One possible solution is to provide a limited number of free data<br />

deposits and online queries before they pay<br />

o<br />

For the <strong>WODAN</strong> project, a subscription from the user community who are entering<br />

information into the database could deter people from using it. <strong>The</strong> IWAA, however,<br />

have an annual subscription fee of €15. Members are happy for this to be increased and<br />

for some of the money to be used for sustaining the <strong>WODAN</strong> database. This would<br />

generate approximately €150 per annum.<br />

D<br />

Endowment/Philanthropy<br />

Following fundraising efforts a large fund is created which subsequently provides a sufficient<br />

annual return on investment to support the resource.<br />

Advantages<br />

Allows for free data access for users<br />

Researchers can concentrate on actual research rather than fund raising (after endowment is<br />

secured)<br />

Can provide greatest stability and hence provide a more effective service<br />

Disadvantages<br />

Cannot function without initial investment<br />

Approximately 20 times the annual operating costs need to be generated<br />

Linked to success and failure of financial markets<br />

31


Inflexible to large market changes as the project would be locked into a specific development<br />

model, i.e. costs may grow but endowment cannot keep pace<br />

o<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>WODAN</strong> project may be a difficult one to fundraise for; it is unlikely that this model<br />

would work for this context.<br />

E<br />

Commercial Partnership<br />

Project is carried out in conjunction with commercial partner who can potentially generate<br />

revenue or reuse the content for their own purposes.<br />

Advantages<br />

Can use skills and expertise within a commercial company e.g. developments in new technologies<br />

and potential applications<br />

Costs can be reduced as reuse of commercial partner’s infrastructure can be implemented<br />

Digitisation rates increase<br />

Responsibility of content management can be removed from researchers’ workload<br />

Disadvantages<br />

Loss of control of data and data standards<br />

Sustainability of relationship, as commercial partner may change direction or cease to exist<br />

Complex business models and planning required to function successfully<br />

Certain models can go against the ethical ideals of access to academic data<br />

Specialised content material may not be attractive to commercial partners<br />

o<br />

Due to the current economic climate a commercial partner would most likely be difficult<br />

to source.<br />

F<br />

Advertising Revenue<br />

32


<strong>The</strong> insertion of advertising banners and content within a website is used to derive revenue for<br />

website sustainability and growth. <strong>The</strong> cost derived by the advertising is dependent upon the<br />

perceived value of the visitors to the website.<br />

Advantages<br />

If a niche service is created advertising for specific products can be attracted<br />

Disadvantages<br />

Customers turned off by the presence of advertising<br />

Revenue not guaranteed<br />

Uncommon for non-profit and academic sectors<br />

Perception of the commercialisation of scholarship<br />

Requires sufficiently large audiences<br />

Complicated by variety of advertising forms<br />

o<br />

<strong>The</strong> level of web traffic going through the database is unlikely to be enough to generate<br />

any revenue from advertising.<br />

G<br />

Direct Charging/Pay per View<br />

Similar to the subscription model however users opt to purchase individual content or gain access<br />

to content for a specific time period e.g. 24 hours<br />

Advantages<br />

Offers alternative to full subscription for irregular users<br />

Allows for smaller more attractive pricing for users unable to commit to a full subscription<br />

Can allow users to “test drive” a service before committing to full subscription costs<br />

Can be used by project to establish how much users are willing to pay for a service<br />

Disadvantages<br />

Pricing models can be difficult to establish (low to attract usage but high enough to sustain<br />

service)<br />

33


o<br />

This model could work well for the <strong>WODAN</strong> project. It could entice people in to use the<br />

product and perhaps pave the way for a subscription model in the future.<br />

34


H<br />

Low Cost Business/Internal Resource Deployment<br />

In effect the sustainability represented here is the ability to remain in existence without the ability<br />

for any significant development of a service beyond its current level. Further development is<br />

dependent upon access to future grants and other incomes. Costs are minimised by embedding the<br />

resource in an existing organisation, thus reusing some of their staffing and infrastructure<br />

facilities<br />

Advantages<br />

Achieved at modest or low cost<br />

Potential to offer income streams to host organisations<br />

Provide host institution to be ahead of the game and manage strategic assets<br />

Can change strategic thinking in institution and sector to help embed digital practices<br />

Disadvantages<br />

Host organisation must be able to change their operational practices and mindset to accommodate<br />

services effectively<br />

Low priority in times of “austerity”<br />

Lack of additional funding could stagnate development of service thus reduce its effectiveness<br />

“Low Cost” does not mean “No Cost”<br />

o<br />

It may be possible to embed the <strong>WODAN</strong> project into a government funded organisation.<br />

This is all dependent on future funding.<br />

I<br />

Multiple Streams/Hybrid Funding<br />

Institutions raise income to sustain the service by combining different funding streams as<br />

described in the previous paragraphs<br />

Advantages<br />

Loss of one funding stream would not cause the demise in the complete service<br />

Eliminates the risk caused by the dependency on a single funding source<br />

Profitability of individual funding streams can vary<br />

Ability to promote content and resources to different audiences by using variable funding streams<br />

35


Disadvantages<br />

Difficult to manage and administrate if funding streams are too numerous and complex<br />

Conflicts of interest may occur in the adoption of conflicting funding schemes i.e. profit making<br />

vs non-profitable status<br />

o<br />

If managed properly this could be a good solution for <strong>WODAN</strong>.<br />

J<br />

Consortium Model<br />

Not a sustainability model as described in the previous examples. Organisations can effectively<br />

work together in supporting a resource by contributing administration, skills and technology<br />

resources<br />

Advantages<br />

Financially advantageous model due to economies of scale<br />

Attractive within the current reduction in budgets<br />

Fosters good sharing practice amongst supporting institutions<br />

Disadvantages<br />

Require significant up-front planning and ongoing management<br />

o<br />

This could work for <strong>WODAN</strong> if government or commercially funded bodies felt that the<br />

database was a good enough product to amalgamate resources on.<br />

36


6 Outreach and Publication plan<br />

<strong>The</strong> publication plan is focussed on bringing the <strong>WODAN</strong> database to as wide an audience as<br />

possible. An article has already been submitted to Archaeology Ireland for publication in winter<br />

2010.<br />

We will start working on a joint publication from Dr. Ingelise Stuijts, Dr. Scott Timpany, Dr.<br />

Eileen Reilly, Dr. Bettina Stefanini, Ellen O’Carroll, Lorna O’Donnell, Mary Dillon, Mick Monk,<br />

Abigail Brewer, Penny Johnston, Cathy Moore and Susan Lyons which was presented at the<br />

Kilkenny Archaeological Landscapes conference in October. This publication will use<br />

environmental material from Kilkenny which is currently entered on the <strong>WODAN</strong> database. It<br />

may become a template for future environmental synthesis publications working with the<br />

database on a county to county basis.<br />

Two technical papers looking at the construction of the software and user interface considerations<br />

are being prepared for submission to both Internet Archaeology (http://intarch.ac.uk/); and online<br />

e-journal and for the Computer Applications in Archaeology (CAA) conference in Beijing in<br />

2011.<br />

Further publications may result from the AEA conference in Kyoto in Dec 2010 and from the Vth<br />

Meeting of Anthracology in Spain in 2011.<br />

37


7 Dissemination of the database<br />

7.1 General dissemination<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>WODAN</strong> project has been disseminated through a variety of different means both in Ireland,<br />

Europe and America.<br />

<strong>The</strong> primary source of dissemination has always been the <strong>WODAN</strong> website (www.wodan.ie)<br />

which is frequently updated and is a focus point for communications about the project. This was<br />

set up at the start of the project in 2008. Interim and final reports are available for download from<br />

the <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Website and sent electronically to all interested parties.<br />

7.2 2008 Dissemination<br />

• June-July– Poster presentation - World Archaeological Congress (WAC-6) in Ireland.<br />

• September- Poster presentation- IVth International Meeting of Anthracology in Brussels<br />

• September-poster presentation - Association for Environmental Archaeology in Aarhus<br />

(Denmark)<br />

• Workshop – Charcoal database workshop (Mitchell Power, University of Utah), Brussels.<br />

• September- Handouts- European Archaeological Association in Malta<br />

7.3 2009 Dissemination<br />

• July- poster presentation Institute of Archaeologists of Ireland in Dublin<br />

• August – poster presentation National Roads Authority Conference in Dublin<br />

• September – poster presentation 15 th annual meeting of the European Association of<br />

Archaeologists, held in Riva del Garda, Italy<br />

• October – poster presentation XXXe Rencontres Internationales d'Archéologie et<br />

d'Histoire d'Antibes in France<br />

• Date - 'Holz' symposium in the University of Karl-Franzens in Graz, Austria,<br />

• October – International workshop, Dublin (see below).<br />

• October – IWAA workshop (see below)<br />

38


A networking site was created using Ning Social network software. It is available at<br />

http://wodan-eu.ning.com. It is expected that this site will become more active when the<br />

database has become active online.<br />

7.4 2009 International workshop<br />

<strong>The</strong> international <strong>WODAN</strong> workshop was held on Tuesday 6 th October 2009 to demonstrate the<br />

database to the wider community and receive valuable feedback for its continuing development.<br />

A morning of introductions to the work to date was followed by a practical session in which the<br />

charcoal database was trialed in small groups. <strong>The</strong> feedback received from these sessions was indepth,<br />

specific to elements of the database, and very useful. Participants were also able to test out<br />

the database personally and discover how well their data would fit into the established model.<br />

<strong>The</strong> workshop was attended in total by twenty eight people, specialists not only in wood and<br />

charcoal but in related disciplines such as dendrochronology, pollen and insect analysis. <strong>The</strong> aim<br />

of the well rounded nature of the expertise was to make the database as easy to integrate with<br />

other disciplines as possible. While the main active members of the online database community<br />

will be the wood and charcoal specialists, other members of the environmental and archaeological<br />

community will be free to access information for comparable purposes. This will aim to provide<br />

integration of environmental and archaeological results. This is a crucial aspect that is sometimes<br />

missing in Irish archaeology, one that the <strong>WODAN</strong> project aims to go some way towards<br />

rectifying.<br />

All of the attendants at the International workshop got a chance to fill in some charcoal<br />

information on the database. This was extremely valuable in terms of the input received. Many<br />

features were flagged and discussed, in some cases the participants felt too many details were<br />

being recorded, and in other cases extra fields were called for where more description was<br />

necessary. <strong>The</strong> most important changed flagged as a direct result of the workshop can be seen in<br />

Appendix 3.<br />

After the International workshop, a user profile was set up for each participant to allow them to<br />

use the database online and come back to us with further comments.<br />

39


Many of the people who attended the workshop also filled out an online questionnaire to enable<br />

feedback for the structure of the database and the fields. <strong>The</strong> questionnaire highlighted that the<br />

user community felt that the database functioned well, and that it was relatively easy to use. <strong>The</strong><br />

level of presentation scored highly. Most people felt they would recommend the database to their<br />

colleagues and that it was very useful.<br />

7.5 2009- IWAA workshop<br />

Following on from the International workshop, a further workshop was held for the IWAA<br />

members on the 17 th of November. This was to allow the Irish people to use the newest amended<br />

database version to provide feedback from the work they had completed with their user profiles.<br />

<strong>The</strong> structure of the database was outlined again (including recommended changes from the<br />

International workshop). <strong>The</strong> queries envisaged were discussed in more detail than was possible<br />

at the International workshop, aiming to see that we are covering as many questions as possible<br />

with the queries that we are developing.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two workshops allowed the <strong>WODAN</strong> database to be demonstrated by the creators and<br />

database designers to the intended user community. This allowed the database to be fully<br />

explained and provided a forum for people to ask various questions on its use and structure. <strong>The</strong><br />

workshops also received essential feedback from the intended user community. This resulted in a<br />

considerable amount of adjustments to the database in order to make it more intuitive to the<br />

intended user community.<br />

As well as the workshops, some of the wood and charcoal specialists who would have a large<br />

personal archive dedicated time in the Discovery Programme offices populating the database with<br />

their own projects, to build up their My<strong>WODAN</strong> archive (Susan Lyons, Ellen O’Carroll, Mary<br />

Dillon).<br />

7.6 2010 Dissemination<br />

• February – poster presentation at Wetland Archaeology in Ireland and Beyond<br />

conference in UCD, Dublin.<br />

• September – flyer presentation at the EAA conference 2010 1-5 th September (<strong>The</strong> Hague,<br />

Netherlands).<br />

• September – poster presentation Meso 2010 (Santander, Spain)<br />

• October – presentation of a case study at Kilkenny Archaeological landscapes conference<br />

40


• October – presentation at Wood anatomy and Tree Ring ecology course, Lisbon.<br />

• December – presentation at the Association for Environmental Archaeology (AEA)<br />

Annual Conference in Kyoto, Japan.<br />

7.7 2010 IWAA Workshop<br />

<strong>The</strong> IWAA workshop was attended by nine members of the IWAA and five other interested<br />

parties, including representatives from UCD, the IADG (Irish Archaeobotanical Discussion<br />

Group) and the DOE. During the morning, progress on the database was presented. A round table<br />

discussion meeting was then held. Items on the agenda of this meeting included requirements<br />

from the database, access policy, backlog of information, future collaboration and a publication<br />

plan. This meeting was very fruitful, offering some insights into dealing with the backlog of<br />

information possibly through PhD or masters students. Ownership of the data was also discussed<br />

in detail, along with possibilities for future funding for input of data.<br />

After the meeting, the participants were broken into groups and the database was demonstrated,<br />

with a particular emphasis on the queries now available.<br />

7.8 Future dissemination<br />

• Publication plan (Section 6)<br />

• Presentation at the Vth International meeting of Anthracology in Spain, 2010.<br />

• Forthcoming lecture at Clontibret National School.<br />

• Forthcoming lecture for the Kilkenny beekeepers society.<br />

41


8 Licensing of the <strong>WODAN</strong> database.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>WODAN</strong> database will house a large body of unpublished material. This needs some form of<br />

licensing regulation to ensure that people’s data is not being used in an inappropriate manner.<br />

Obviously this is not the first time such a situation has occurred and there are many precedents<br />

for similar circumstances.<br />

Two types of licensing agreements will be reviewed: creative commons and the data access<br />

policy – Global Palaeofire working group<br />

8.1 Creative commons<br />

This can be found at www.creativecommons.org and the tag line is Share, Remix, Reuse, the idea<br />

is to help people easily and quickly understand what they can do with a piece of work created by<br />

someone else.<br />

Creative Commons as a corporation are a non-profit, community-based (online community that<br />

is) organization that provide free licenses and legal tools to mark work thus allowing easy sharing<br />

with limited risk of getting your work stolen or not properly credited. As they aim to promote a<br />

standard, using CC tools helps end users to quickly understand how they can reuse the work and<br />

so encourages sharing.<br />

<strong>The</strong> website offers form-based legal documents and advice on how to use them to protect your<br />

work in whichever way you want it protected. Once a license is attached to a piece of work there<br />

is little further connection with the Creative Commons organization as their use does not require<br />

further involvement, e.g. paying to access the terms.<br />

At a basic level a piece of work protected by a CC license requires the original author to be<br />

properly attributed. Unless the author specifies the manner of attribution then five basic principles<br />

apply: copyright notices must be left intact and reproduced proportionately; the authors name (or<br />

other user identity) must be cited; the work’s title (if one exists) must be cited; the CC license<br />

must be cited; and finally if the work has been adapted in any way this must be stated.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are six main, commonly-used licenses and they are identifiable by four symbols (see<br />

below). With regard to <strong>WODAN</strong>, the advantages of licensing by symbols is instantly identifiable<br />

42


and the ease of use, ease of attaching different restrictions to different parts and the fact it’s free<br />

are all good.<br />

Attribution by<br />

You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform your copyrighted work — and derivative<br />

works based upon it — but only if they give credit the way you request.<br />

Share Alike sa<br />

You allow others to distribute derivative works only under a license identical to the license that<br />

governs your work.<br />

Non-Commercial nc<br />

You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform your work — and derivative works based<br />

upon it — but for non-commercial purposes only.<br />

No Derivative Works nd<br />

You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work, not<br />

derivative works based upon it.<br />

43


<strong>The</strong> Licenses<br />

Attribution<br />

cc by<br />

This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as<br />

long as they credit you for the original creation. This is the most accommodating of licenses<br />

offered, in terms of what others can do with your works licensed under Attribution.<br />

Attribution Share Alike<br />

cc by-sa<br />

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial reasons, as<br />

long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. This license is<br />

often compared to open source software licenses. All new works based on yours will carry the<br />

same license, so any derivatives will also allow commercial use.<br />

Attribution No Derivatives<br />

cc by-nd<br />

This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed<br />

along unchanged and in whole, with credit to you.<br />

Attribution Non-Commercial<br />

cc by-nc<br />

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although<br />

their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license<br />

their derivative works on the same terms.<br />

Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike<br />

cc by-nc-sa<br />

44


This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as<br />

they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. Others can download<br />

and redistribute your work just like the by-nc-nd license, but they can also translate, make<br />

remixes, and produce new stories based on your work. All new work based on yours will carry<br />

the same license, so any derivatives will also be non-commercial in nature.<br />

Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives<br />

cc by-nc-nd<br />

This license is the most restrictive of our six main licenses, allowing redistribution. This license is<br />

often called the “free advertising” license because it allows others to download your works and<br />

share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to you, but they can’t change<br />

them in any way or use them commercially.<br />

45


8.2 DATA ACCESS POLICY: GLOBAL PALAEOFIRE WORKING GROUP<br />

http://www.bridge.bris.ac.uk/projects/QUEST_IGBP_Global_Palaeofire_WG/database/accesspoli<br />

cy.html<br />

<strong>The</strong> aim of the Global Palaeofire Working Group is to continue the growth of the first global<br />

palaeofire dataset collected. <strong>The</strong> data policy used by the group is listed below:<br />

<strong>The</strong> following data access policy is designed to cover both observational data and modeling<br />

results.<br />

1. <strong>The</strong> data held in the data base is used by the Palaeofire Working Group for specified<br />

analyses (i.e., the Dartington Hall papers).<br />

2. People contributing charcoal data to the database are co-authors of the paper in which the<br />

specified analysis is published.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> data underlying the analyses and the results of the analysis are considered publicaccess<br />

once the initial paper describing the database and the specified analyses is "in<br />

press".<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> database is made available to all project members throughout the project via the<br />

project website. Although this is primarily designed to facilitate checking and verification<br />

of the database, it would be possible to use the data for other analyses as the need or<br />

opportunity for this arises. People who wish to use the data for such analyses must<br />

contact the working group coordinators, who will then seek permission for access from<br />

the relevant members of the working group.<br />

5. Members of the project may request access to data in the database for their own analyses<br />

during the course of the project through the coordinator of the synthesis.<br />

6. On publication, the most current version of the database is lodged with the archive<br />

facilities at NOAA-NGDC WDC-A (Palaeoclimatology) and at BADC in the UK, and is<br />

therefore freely available to the scientific community. Appropriate synthetic products<br />

from the database and paper will also be lodged with the Palaeoclimate Modelling<br />

Intercomparison Project.<br />

7. <strong>The</strong> database may be used for further analyses after the publication of the initial paper.<br />

Co-authorship of subsequent analyses of the data from the database is determined by<br />

46


intellectual input to these analyses, not contribution of data. To facilitate collaboration,<br />

the coordinator of each synthesis will announce planned analyses on the project website.<br />

<strong>The</strong> data-access policy is based on the policy adopted by the Palaeovegetation Mapping Project<br />

(BIOME 6000). It conforms to the guidelines laid down in the PAGES data guide Other<br />

initiatives within the BIOME 6000 project (e.g. PAIN, CiMBIO) and in QUEST have similar<br />

data-access policies, and these policies are in conformity with the guidelines given by WDC-A,<br />

IGBP-PAGES, and funding agencies such as the EU and the UK NERC, and is consistent with<br />

the public-access policy of journals such as Nature.<br />

8.3 <strong>WODAN</strong> – the best policy to use?<br />

Drawing on the experience of both Creative Commons and the Global palaeofire working group<br />

the below solution for <strong>WODAN</strong> is suggested. A default licence may be set that as soon as a user<br />

opens the <strong>WODAN</strong> database they have to tick before they can progress further. <strong>The</strong> below picture<br />

will appear on the link to the user agreement.<br />

Creative Commons<br />

Creative Commons License Deed<br />

Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported<br />

You are free:<br />

• to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work<br />

47


• to Remix — to adapt the work<br />

Under the following conditions:<br />

• Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or<br />

licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).<br />

• Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes.<br />

With the understanding that:<br />

• Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the<br />

copyright holder.<br />

• Public Domain — Where the work or any of its elements is in the public domain under<br />

applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.<br />

• Other Rights — In no way are any of the following rights affected by the license:<br />

o Your fair dealing or fair use rights, or other applicable copyright exceptions and<br />

limitations;<br />

o<br />

o<br />

<strong>The</strong> author's moral rights;<br />

Rights other persons may have either in the work itself or in how the work is<br />

used, such as publicity or privacy rights.<br />

• Notice — For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms<br />

of this work. <strong>The</strong> best way to do this is with a link to this web page.<br />

48


9 Aims for the future<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>WODAN</strong> project has achieved a considerable amount in the three years it has been in<br />

operation. Due to the time constraints imposed, it was not possible to achieve everything in the<br />

original aims. Much of our aims for the future come from feedback from the user community,<br />

either at the workshops or through questionnaires.<br />

Further development of the database would include the development of a rapid data entry tool.<br />

This is a dedicated computer programme which will be tailored to a particular specialist or<br />

project. <strong>The</strong> programme would automatically incorporate data from excel sheets currently in use.<br />

Feedback from the user community also flagged the need for further development of the worked<br />

wood forms, for example to incorporate components of domestic wooden artifacts.<br />

We would also like to apply for future funding to enter extant charcoal and wood information into<br />

the database. We have recorded how long it takes to input samples. Depending on the fragment<br />

counts and level of detail, specialists are able to input approximately 20-40 charcoal samples per<br />

day.<br />

We hope that in the future, the <strong>WODAN</strong> database will become the main repository for charcoal<br />

and wood results from Ireland and in Europe.<br />

49


10 Conclusions<br />

In 2008 the IWAA identified a knowledge gap in the area of wood and charcoal research in<br />

Ireland. This had two main facets – a need for standardization and a need for a secure digital<br />

repository of the huge amount of wood and charcoal results being generated in Celtic Tiger<br />

Ireland. <strong>The</strong> INSTAR grants provided a unique opportunity to fund this work. Standardization<br />

and a safe working database were both achieved within the boundaries of the <strong>WODAN</strong> project.<br />

<strong>The</strong> strength of the <strong>WODAN</strong> database lies in its user community. In this respect, the <strong>WODAN</strong><br />

project is extremely fortunate in having the full backing of the IWAA. <strong>WODAN</strong> grew by<br />

reputation and publicizing it both in Ireland and abroad. Now all the wood and charcoal<br />

specialists working in Ireland are committed to using the database along with many people from<br />

other countries, in Europe, America and Australia.Other international charcoal specialists who<br />

have come on board include Dr. Oliver Nelle (Holland), Dr. Otto Brinkkemper (Germany), Dr.<br />

Robyn Veal (Australia), Dr. Stéphanie Thiébault (France) and Dr. Mitchell Power (America).<br />

<strong>The</strong> development of queries was a crucial part of the <strong>WODAN</strong> database. This will allow<br />

specialists and non specialists alike to search results from any part of Ireland, indeed from any<br />

part of the world. It will be invaluable for the interpretation of both large developments and<br />

smaller sites. For the first time, we have the potential for all the analysis of this important<br />

environmental material from Ireland to be housed in one safe and secure media. <strong>The</strong> online<br />

viability means that it can be accessed and queried, any time, any place in the world. It also<br />

removes the problem of databases having to be updated and sent around individuals.<br />

Over 370 sites have been added to the <strong>WODAN</strong> database, including approximately 1500 charcoal<br />

and 1000 wood samples. This is only the beginning; in the future we aim for thousands of sites to<br />

be added, making Ireland one of the leaders in archaeological wood and charcoal research.<br />

50


References<br />

Chabal, L. 1992. La représentativité paléo-écologique des charbons de bois archéolgiques issus<br />

du bois de feu. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 139, 213-36.<br />

Ludemann, T. and Nelle, O. 2002. Die Wälder am Schauinsland und ihre Nutzung durch Bergbau<br />

und Köhlerei. Förstliche Versuchs-und Forschungsanstalt Baden-Württemberg. Abteilung<br />

Botanik und Standortskunde, 15, Freiburg.<br />

Marguerie, D. and Hunot, J.Y. 2007. Charcoal analysis and dendrology: data from archaeological<br />

sites in north-western France. Journal of Archaeological Science 34 1417-1433.<br />

Stuijts, I., Lyons, S. and O’Donnell, L. 2008. <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Council</strong> INSTAR ref:16679. <strong>WODAN</strong> –<br />

Developing a wood and charcoal database for Ireland 2008 final report. Unpublished report for<br />

the <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Stuijts, I. and O’Donnell, L. 2009. <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Council</strong> INSTAR ref:16705. <strong>The</strong> development of a<br />

wood database and a charcoal database for Ireland (<strong>WODAN</strong>). Unpublished report for the<br />

<strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Vernet, J.L. 1968. La couverture forestiére des Causses du Massif Central de France au Postglaciaire<br />

d’aprés l’étude de charbons de bois préhistoriques, dans Bull. Assoc. Fr. Ét. Quat., 16, p.<br />

181-196.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!