12.01.2014 Views

NTS Report 4 Aug 2010 - National Trust for Scotland

NTS Report 4 Aug 2010 - National Trust for Scotland

NTS Report 4 Aug 2010 - National Trust for Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

35<br />

Volunteer Commitment to the Cause of Conservation<br />

Volunteers emphasise that they need a cause to work <strong>for</strong> – that they<br />

do not sign up just to help <strong>NTS</strong> fill financial and administrative gaps.<br />

They want to add value to the conservation of <strong>Scotland</strong>’s natural and<br />

cultural heritage.<br />

The <strong>National</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> simply could not function<br />

without its 3500 volunteers.<br />

Their commitment to the cause of conservation is displayed<br />

through an extraordinary range of activities. They bring<br />

properties to life <strong>for</strong> visitors. They help out in tearooms and<br />

kitchens. They weed, plant and dig gardens.<br />

They bring skills learned in their professional lives to areas<br />

where <strong>NTS</strong> is short of resources. They help archive precious<br />

collections. They research brochures and books. They drive<br />

minibuses <strong>for</strong> work parties. They sit at computers doing routine<br />

administrative tasks, freeing staff to work on projects and<br />

programmes.<br />

They enjoy fresh air and exercise as well. Whether they are<br />

digging a newt pond at Culzean, laying the foundations <strong>for</strong> a<br />

new bridge in Dollar Glen or repairing a mountain path in the<br />

Highlands, they have the satisfaction of being outside and<br />

putting their mark on <strong>Scotland</strong>’s natural and cultural heritage.<br />

And they learn new skills along the way. Proficiency in drystane<br />

dyking, ditching and garden design gained from<br />

engagement with the <strong>Trust</strong> has been put to use later in<br />

community projects throughout the country.<br />

The Review has talked to a wide cross-section of volunteers.<br />

We are impressed by their enthusiasm and the potential to recruit<br />

many more.<br />

We were made aware, however, of a common view that the<br />

<strong>Trust</strong> in recent years – as one volunteer put it – “appears to have<br />

lost its way somewhat.” He added: “I joined a cause, not a<br />

commercial enterprise.”<br />

The proposals put <strong>for</strong>ward in this report <strong>for</strong> a refocused <strong>NTS</strong><br />

What Members Want<br />

– Responses to the Review’s Questionnaire<br />

on pages 42 to 44 of the report<br />

Mission Statement, <strong>for</strong> strategic planning which involves<br />

everyone engaged in <strong>Trust</strong> business and <strong>for</strong> clearer<br />

communications, will help to address this situation. The<br />

concerns of the volunteer cited above are widespread at all levels<br />

throughout the charity – people want to help, know what is<br />

required of them within their own tasks, but need to understand<br />

how they fit within the big picture and add value to the overall<br />

impact of the charity.<br />

We believe that stronger emphasis on the work of the <strong>Trust</strong> as a<br />

conservation charity will be particularly attractive to commercial<br />

companies, government agencies and young people.<br />

Corporate Engagement<br />

The current Corporate Challenge programme offers commercial<br />

firms the opportunity of residential and day courses aimed at<br />

team-building while making a contribution to communities<br />

through volunteer activity. Pricewaterhouse Coopers, Ryden<br />

and Shell UK are among companies which report beneficial<br />

results. BT seconds staff to work on specific <strong>Trust</strong> projects.<br />

The Review believes that such activities are capable of<br />

considerable expansion, building corporate links which will<br />

benefit the <strong>Trust</strong> in its future Development activities.<br />

Agency Engagement<br />

Young people already work <strong>for</strong> <strong>NTS</strong> gardens and properties<br />

through the Future Jobs Employability Scheme run by the<br />

Scottish Council of Voluntary Organisations.<br />

We believe there are real benefits in the <strong>Trust</strong> expanding such<br />

secondment and internship opportunities. In a number of cases,<br />

participation in employability and training schemes may well<br />

attract public funding.<br />

Robert Shepherd has racked up<br />

almost 1300 volunteer hours in<br />

the past year, running the <strong>Trust</strong>’s<br />

Twitter feed, co-editing the<br />

volunteer newsletter, creating<br />

promotional material and<br />

providing media releases <strong>for</strong> the<br />

local press.<br />

Youth Engagement<br />

There are over 100,000 visits by schoolchildren to <strong>Trust</strong><br />

properties each year. There have also been programmes such as<br />

sculpture workshops at Kellie Castle <strong>for</strong> blind young people and,<br />

in Glasgow, projects <strong>for</strong> pupils on the impact of slavery.<br />

The Review encourages <strong>NTS</strong> to expand such outreach work and<br />

to promote ongoing engagement of young people in<br />

conservation work, through its Thistle and Trailblazer camps.<br />

A commitment to the cause of conservation is, by itself, not<br />

enough. It has to be underwritten by education and engagement.<br />

P22: The Review proposes that <strong>NTS</strong> should strongly promote its<br />

Access, Enjoyment and Education Principles in future<br />

campaigns to attract more volunteers.<br />

The Review welcomes proposals that the <strong>Trust</strong> should receive<br />

Investors in Volunteering accreditation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!