NTS Report 4 Aug 2010 - National Trust for Scotland
NTS Report 4 Aug 2010 - National Trust for Scotland
NTS Report 4 Aug 2010 - National Trust for Scotland
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
40<br />
Collecting the Voices<br />
What You Said about <strong>NTS</strong><br />
96% – Core <strong>NTS</strong><br />
purpose is<br />
Conservation<br />
89% – Key issue is<br />
financial<br />
sustainability<br />
82% – Property<br />
Portfolio should be<br />
reviewed<br />
80% – More<br />
Partnerships with<br />
other Heritage<br />
organisations<br />
77% – Re<strong>for</strong>m<br />
Agenda needed<br />
[98% with some<br />
qualifications]<br />
64% - Governance<br />
should be slimmed<br />
[97% with some<br />
qualifications]<br />
Nine thousand and sixty one members of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong> responded to<br />
the Questionnaire issued by the Review.<br />
In overwhelming numbers they said:<br />
• The core purpose of the charity is the conservation of <strong>Scotland</strong>’s natural and<br />
built heritage<br />
• The principal challenge to <strong>NTS</strong> is its financial security and stability<br />
• There should be a review of the present portfolio of properties<br />
• There should be greater cooperation across <strong>Scotland</strong>’s heritage sector<br />
• The governance of the <strong>Trust</strong> should be simplified<br />
The survey is the biggest into the attitudes and motivation of members ever carried out<br />
by <strong>NTS</strong>. By charity standards the response rate was high, particularly as those who<br />
completed the 5-page questionnaire were asked to pay the postage as a contribution to<br />
the work of the Review.<br />
The team processing the data agree that the returns are likely to come from people who<br />
take a keen interest in the affairs of the charity, who vote in its elections and who may<br />
wish to attend the AGM. The analysis does not claim, there<strong>for</strong>e, to be representative of<br />
every single member of the <strong>Trust</strong>. That in<strong>for</strong>mation is simply not known.<br />
What the survey does provide – taken together with responses from the 1800 people<br />
who attended consultative meetings or who made submissions in writing and interviews<br />
– is an identified pool of around 12,000 <strong>NTS</strong> supporters with a strong commitment to<br />
conservation and the future of the charity.<br />
Reason <strong>for</strong> Membership<br />
Members<br />
generally<br />
expressed<br />
satisfaction with<br />
the state of <strong>NTS</strong><br />
properties,<br />
though a small<br />
Two out of five respondents said they<br />
had joined <strong>NTS</strong> because of their<br />
“commitment to the conservation of<br />
<strong>Scotland</strong>’s natural and cultural heritage”.<br />
The second reason was “love of historic<br />
properties”.<br />
Around one in ten expressed a specific<br />
interest in exploring the country’s open<br />
spaces. The same number wanted to<br />
visit gardens.<br />
One quarter replied that they were<br />
primarily interested in a “pleasant day<br />
out” and valued free entry not just to the<br />
<strong>NTS</strong> estate but also, in other parts of the<br />
UK, to properties in the ownership of the<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>.<br />
Expectation of Visits—————–————–——————————————–<br />
Asked what they expected of a visit to<br />
an <strong>NTS</strong> property, two-thirds of<br />
respondents focused on “learning the<br />
significance of the place” and finding<br />
“conservation of the highest standard”.<br />
Most expressed high satisfaction on both<br />
points.<br />
Around one in ten particularly valued<br />
the warmth of welcome from <strong>Trust</strong> staff.<br />
The importance of a cafe, shop and<br />
facilities <strong>for</strong> children scored low —<br />
again, perhaps, indicating that most<br />
respondents were core conservationists.