Isis Current Bibliography 2010 - History of Science Society

12 12. Rhetorical & visual analysis of science
Irony, Cognition and Visual Skill,” 67-88; Simon
COHN, “Seeing and Drawing: The Role of Play
in Medical Imaging,” 91-105 [ref. 3940]; Wendy
GUNN, “Learning within the Workplaces of Artists,
Anthropologists and Architects: Making Stories for
Drawings and Writings,” 106-124; David TURN-
BULL, “Maps and Plans in ‘Learning to See’: The
London Underground and Chartres Cathedral as
Examples of Performing Design,” 125-141; Barry
SAUNDERS, “CT Suite: Visual Apprenticeship in
the Age of the Mechanical Viewbox,” 145-165
[ref. 3959]; Daniela BLEICHMAR, “Training the
Naturalist’s Eye in the Eighteenth Century: Perfect
Global Visions and Local Blind Spots,” 166-190
[ref. 2003]; Andreas ROEPSTORFF, “Navigating
the Brainscape: When Knowing Becomes Seeing,”
191-206 [ref. 3908]; Michael HERZFELD, “Envisioning
Skills: Insight, Hindsight, and Second
Sight,” 207-218.
Reviews: [ref. R359]
Renée van de VALL, “A Penny for your Thoughts:
Brain-Scans and the Mediation of Subjective Embodiment,”
91-105 [ref. 3962]; Jenny SLATMAN,
“Transparent Bodies: Revealing the Myth of Interiority,”
107-122 [ref. 2982]; Maud RADSTAKE,
“Looking for a Sponge: How a Body Learns to be
Affected by Ultrasound,” 123-137 [ref. 3779]; Babette
MÜLLER-ROCKSTROH, “Imagin(in)g Pregnancy
in Northwest Tanzania: Networks, Experiences,
and Translations,” 139-155 [ref. 3952];
José van DIJCK, “Mediated Memories as Amalgamations
of Mind, Matter, and Culture,” 157-172
[ref. 3905]; Gail WEISS, “Intertwined Identities,”
173-186; Miriam van RIJSINGEN, “Framing Interiority:
Portraits in the Age of Genomics,” 187-205
[ref. 3740].
181. VERTESI, Janet. “Mind the Gap: The London
Underground Map and Users’ Representations of
Urban Space.” Soc. Stud. Sci. 38 (2008): 7–33.
176. LÜTHY, Christoph, and Alexis SMETS. “Words,
Lines, Diagrams, Images: Towards a History of
Scientific Imagery.” Part of special issue: Evidence
and Interpretation: Studies on Early Science and
Medicine in Honor of John E. Murdoch [ref. 951].
Early Sci. & Med. 14 (2009): 398–439.
“Examines the problems encountered in contemporary
attempts to establish a typology of medieval
and early modern scientific images, and to associate
apparent types with certain standard meanings.”
(from the abstract)
177. PANESE, Francesco. “Décrire et convaincre :
rhétoriques visuelles de la cinématographie en
médecine.” Part of a special issue: Film und Wissenschaft:
Übergänge, Zusammenhänge und Parallelitäten.
[ref. 216]. Gesnerus 66 (2009): 40–66.
178. PICKSTONE, John V. “The Disunities of Representation.”
Brit. J. Hist. Sci. 42 (2009): 595–600.
Essay review of Lorraine DASTON and Peter GAL-
ISON, Objectivity (2007).
179. TIETGE, David J. Rational Rhetoric: The Role
of Science in Popular Discourse. (xiv + 455 pp.; ill.;
bibl.; index.) West Lafayette: Parlor Press, 2008.
ISBN: 9781602350694.
180. VALL, Renée van de, and Robert ZWIJNEN-
BERG. (Eds.) The Body Within: Art, Medicine and
Visualization. Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History,
176. (xiii + 227 pp.; ill.; bibl.; index.) Leiden: Brill,
2009. ISBN: 9789004176218.
Contents: Renée van de VALL, “The Body Within:
Art, Medicine and Visualization,” 1-13; Robert
ZWIJNENBERG, “Leonardo and Female Interiority,”
15-30 [ref. 1481]; Rina KNOEFF, “Animals
Inside: Anatomy, Interiority and Virtue in the
Early Modern Dutch Republic,” 31-50 [ref. 2026];
Mieneke te HENNEPE, “Depicting Skin: Microscopy
and the Visual Articulation of Skin Interior
1820–1850,” 51-65 [ref. 2541]; Michael
HAGNER, “The Mind at Work: The Visual Representation
of Cerebral Processes,” 67-90 [ref. 417];