14.01.2014 Views

Download PDF - Hudson Institute

Download PDF - Hudson Institute

Download PDF - Hudson Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Hudson</strong> Historically:<br />

THE YEAR 2000<br />

As <strong>Hudson</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> approaches its<br />

50th anniversary in 2011, <strong>Hudson</strong><br />

<strong>Institute</strong> News and Review will feature<br />

summaries of <strong>Institute</strong> studies<br />

that have shaped public policy.<br />

Forty years ago, in 1967, <strong>Hudson</strong><br />

<strong>Institute</strong> published The Year 2000:<br />

A Framework for Speculation on<br />

the Next Thirty-Three Years—a<br />

book-length study commissioned<br />

by the prestigious American Aca -<br />

demy of Arts and Sciences.<br />

Whereas some, if not most, think<br />

tank studies have a short-term perspective,<br />

The Year 2000 was a visionary<br />

exercise, an immediate best-seller<br />

translated in num erous languages<br />

that sought to sketch alternative<br />

world futures.<br />

The study’s authors—<strong>Institute</strong><br />

founder and chairman Herman Kahn<br />

and researcher Anthony J. Wiener—<br />

pioneered mathematical models to<br />

predict developments in economics,<br />

science, technology, and international<br />

relations—often highlighting the<br />

dynamic interplay between trends.<br />

These models’ use of imaginative<br />

scenarios helped shape the future of<br />

corporate strategic planning.<br />

Kahn and Wiener argued that the<br />

world would likely see sustained glo -<br />

bal economic development. Whereas<br />

the United States and Soviet<br />

Union would decline in influence,<br />

intermediate powers would play a<br />

rising role, both economically and<br />

politically—especially Japan, West<br />

Germany, France, China, the United<br />

King dom, and India, and the increasingly<br />

integrated “European political<br />

community.”<br />

The Year 2000 predicted the wide<br />

use of robots, mobile phones, video<br />

communication, high-speed data<br />

processors, international computer<br />

networks, and home satellites.<br />

negotiations to foster cooperation in<br />

economic regulation and security procedures<br />

among the United States,<br />

Canada, and Mexico. Sands and<br />

Anderson find that the fears some<br />

critics raise—that this process is the<br />

first step toward a European-style<br />

“North American Union”—are<br />

unfounded, but that the SPP process is<br />

fatally flawed by the exclusion of<br />

Congress and a lack of transparency.<br />

Leaders failed to address these problems<br />

at their recent summit in<br />

Montebello, Quebec, leaving it to next<br />

year’s summit in the United States, or<br />

to the next U.S. administration.<br />

■ The U.N. and Beyond:<br />

United Democratic Nations<br />

(<strong>Hudson</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>)<br />

Edited by Anne Bayefsky<br />

The U.N. and Beyond is a compilation<br />

of essays from 19 experts in<br />

gov ernment, politics, journalism,<br />

and academia. The essays present<br />

evidence of increasing anti-Ameri -<br />

canism and anti-Semitism within the<br />

United Nations and challenge the<br />

assumption that for democratic<br />

nations there is no alternative to the<br />

U.N. Con trib utors include <strong>Hudson</strong><br />

President Herbert London, distinguished<br />

Middle East scholar Bernard<br />

Lewis, author Aayan Hirsi Ali, former<br />

Education Secretary William Bennett,<br />

former U.N. Ambassador John<br />

Bolton, Senator Tom Coburn, and<br />

Senator Norman Coleman. The<br />

papers were originally presented at a<br />

conference <strong>Hudson</strong> convened in New<br />

York in September 2006 to discuss<br />

alternatives to the U.N. This book<br />

is available for purchase on<br />

Amazon.com.<br />

■ Is The United States<br />

Losing Turkey?<br />

(<strong>Hudson</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>)<br />

By S. Enders Wimbush<br />

and Rajan Menon<br />

The alliance between the United<br />

States and Turkey, which has endured<br />

since the Truman doctrine in 1947,<br />

currently finds itself in a downward<br />

spiral, with neither side taking serious<br />

steps to remedy the situation. Should<br />

this neglect continue, the price paid by<br />

both sides will be high.<br />

This paper presents several<br />

recommendations, including fashioning<br />

a “Grand Bargain” between the<br />

Kurdistan Regional Government and<br />

Turkey, and making Turkey a central<br />

participant in any regional settlement<br />

on Iraq.<br />

16 HUDSON INSTITUTE / FALL 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!