15.01.2014 Views

District Educational Technology Plan Team - Humboldt County ...

District Educational Technology Plan Team - Humboldt County ...

District Educational Technology Plan Team - Humboldt County ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

3<br />

School Board of Trustees<br />

Tammy Stephens, President<br />

Leslie O'Neil<br />

Deborah East<br />

Jeff Jacobs<br />

Tammy Robison<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>Team</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> Personnel<br />

Curriculum / Data Personnel<br />

James Malloy, Superintendent/Principal<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Personnel<br />

None<br />

Financial Personnel<br />

James Malloy, Superintendent/Principal<br />

Site Administrators<br />

James Malloy, Superintendent/Principal<br />

Teachers<br />

Jackie Carter, Eighth Grade Math/Science<br />

Paulette Cortez, Third Grade<br />

Laurel Stokes, Special Education Resource Teacher<br />

Classified Staff / Parents<br />

Julie Winburn, Librarian / Computer Lab Instructional Aide<br />

Gracelia Sanchez, Parent/ESL Instructional Aide<br />

Government Agencies<br />

CTAP Region 1<br />

<strong>Humboldt</strong> <strong>County</strong> Office of Education<br />

Community Group & Businesses<br />

Higher Education


<strong>District</strong> Profile<br />

4<br />

Loleta Elementary School serves a small rural community about eight miles south of Eureka, California. Loleta is a<br />

diverse community, consisting of the town of Loleta, the Table Bluff Reservation, and the Bear River Rancheria,<br />

and a large agricultural area. The school has always enjoyed a positive reputation for its high quality academic<br />

programs and fine teaching staff<br />

The following data offers a snapshot of our district during the 2003-04 school year from the Ed Data<br />

(http://www.ed-data.k12.ca.us/welcome.asp ) and Dataquest (http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ ) web sites.<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> 2003-04 School Data<br />

Number of Schools Enrollment Full-Time Equivalent Teachers Pupil-Teacher Ratio<br />

Elementary 1 187 11.5 16.3<br />

Middle<br />

High School<br />

K-12<br />

Alternative<br />

Continuation<br />

Total 1 187 11.5 16.3<br />

Loleta Union Elementary <strong>District</strong>, Students by Ethnicity 2003-04<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Enrollment<br />

Percent of Total<br />

American Indian 38 20.3%<br />

Hispanic 51 27.3%<br />

African American 1 0.5%<br />

White 97 51.9%<br />

Total 187 100%<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong>, Student & Teacher Data 2003-04<br />

English Learners 44<br />

Fluent-English-Proficient Students 1<br />

Students Redesignated FEP 0<br />

Graduates (prior year)<br />

n/a<br />

UC/CSU Elig Grads (prior year)<br />

n/a<br />

Dropouts (prior year, grade 9-12)<br />

n/a<br />

1 Yr Drop Rate (prior year, grade 9-12) n/a<br />

4 Yr Drop Rate (prior year, grade 9-12) n/a<br />

% Fully Credentialed Teachers 100%<br />

Pupil Teacher Ratio 16.3:1<br />

Avg. Class Size 18<br />

Free or Reduced Price Meals 70.6%<br />

CalWORKs (formerly AFDC) 20.9%


Education <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Overview<br />

5<br />

The mission of the Loleta Elementary Union School <strong>District</strong> is to provide our students with:<br />

• An opportunity to learn about themselves and the world around them in a stable school environment that<br />

is orderly, organized, respectful, supportive and free from prejudice.<br />

• An opportunity to grow as responsible citizens with a sense of responsibility towards themselves,<br />

society, and the environment.<br />

• A quality basic education with a life-long desire for learning and personal development.<br />

• A program that integrates and weaves the community into the learning process.<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> is committed to appropriately integrating technology into all areas of the<br />

curriculum and dedicated to the acquisition and support of effective educational technology. Implementing<br />

technology-based solutions into all functions and processes of instruction, management and communication is the<br />

responsibility of district and school site curriculum and technology leaders. Specifically our role is to implement<br />

technology solutions that will make accountable differences in instruction, assessment, and management of students<br />

as well as improve communication and collaboration.<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong>'s Education <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is intended to serve as both a guide for<br />

technology related decision making and an instrument to monitor and evaluate progress toward identified goals and<br />

objectives. An updated assessment of district technology status, needs, and resources has been completed for each<br />

section of our revised tech plan and has guided the development of our new technology goals, objectives and<br />

implementation activities. Our goals and objectives were established to meet the identified needs of integrating<br />

technology to improve student learning, providing equitable technology access and support, providing secure, timely<br />

information flow between home, school, and community, and providing coordinated, ongoing high quality<br />

educational technology professional development.<br />

1a. <strong>Plan</strong> Duration<br />

The Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> School <strong>District</strong> educational technology plan covers five years, from<br />

July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2009. It will serve as the primary tool to guide the district’s acquisition,<br />

sustainability, and integration of technology to support the district’s curricular goals. This plan will be monitored by<br />

the Superintendent/Principal and school library/media specialist and reviewed and revised annually by technology<br />

stakeholders after the state releases achievement data for district school sites. Any modifications required through<br />

such review will be communicated to the school board. The Superintendent/Principal will work with staff to<br />

implement any required revisions.<br />

2a. Stakeholders<br />

Our district's <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> planning team is comprised of representatives responsible for implementing<br />

the plan, including the Superintendent/Principal, teachers, and parents.<br />

The team originally convened in the 2004-05 school year to serve as a strategic planning committee in the<br />

development of this technology plan. Since then, the team has met regularly. Progress was reviewed to:<br />

• Evaluate the draft technology plan and make adjustments if needed.<br />

• Gather and evaluate district technology data with regard to hardware, wiring, resources, professional<br />

development and projects.<br />

• Collect and analyze survey, technology, and student achievement data.<br />

• Identify and update common technology needs and issues.<br />

As the stakeholders developed our technology plan, the following key questions were addressed:<br />

• Is the district and schools’ vision for student success aligned to today's technology?<br />

• Is student academic achievement improving where technology is being used?<br />

• Are students demonstrating proficiency in technological literacy?<br />

• Are teachers proficient in implementing, assessing and supporting a variety of effective practices for<br />

teaching and learning?


Stakeholder Groups<br />

6<br />

<strong>District</strong> Curriculum Personnel – Superintendent/Principal, teachers and library/media specialist.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

Representatives on our Tech <strong>Plan</strong> team promote, direct, and facilitate the technology team’s development of goals<br />

and objectives for curriculum, resources, and operations that technology into the curriculum. Teachers and the<br />

library/media specialist implement standards-aligned academic objective; support research-based best practices and<br />

instructional programs; monitor student assessment and data monitoring systems and school performance and make<br />

adjustments based on school performance.<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Personnel –The district is too small to have technology personnel. The technology component<br />

is shared between the Superintendent/Principal, library media specialist and until January 2005 a teacher, since<br />

retired.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

The <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> team provides coordination of the technology implementation and the implementation of the<br />

goals and objectives set forth in this updated technology plan.<br />

<strong>District</strong> Financial Personnel – Superintendent/Principal<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

Superintendent/Principal provides coordination of technology funds and budget issues.<br />

Site Administration – Superintendent/Principal<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

Superintendent/Principal provides site-based updates on tech plan implementation and needs; monitor teacher<br />

performance and student learning; make adjustments based on teacher and student performance; ensure the use of<br />

adopted materials, research-based best practices and instructional programs; provide input on how technology can<br />

better support the teaching of standards-aligned academic objectives.<br />

Site Teachers –<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> is a single school elementary school district.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

Teachers provide input on efforts and outcomes using research-based technology programs and practices to support<br />

the district curricular goals and academic content standards and improve teaching and learning.<br />

Parents –<br />

Parents of children enrolled in our school.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

Parents advocate for equity in access to technology and the opportunity to master core subjects.<br />

Government Agencies –<br />

Representatives from the California <strong>Technology</strong> Assistance Project (CTAP) Region 1 and the <strong>Humboldt</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Office of Education.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

Representatives offered technical assistance in the data analyses and revision of our goals and objectives,<br />

professional development planning and implementation, EETT Formula Funding, E-rate, compliance issues,<br />

hardware, software, and infrastructure.


Community Groups & Businesses –<br />

The rural setting of Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> has not provided us an opportunity to collaborate with<br />

Community & Business groups.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

N/A<br />

Higher Education –<br />

The two institutions of higher education have not been responsive to collaboration with Loleta Union Elementary<br />

School <strong>District</strong> because of our rural setting.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

N/A<br />

7<br />

The Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> continues to solicit and expand our partnerships with stakeholders to<br />

enhance the infusion of educational technology into the curriculum. Our district recognizes that schools alone do not<br />

have the resources or expertise to keep pace with rapidly changing technology. We believe that these partnerships<br />

will help us serve the growing needs of an increasingly technical and global education system and society.


8<br />

CURRICULUM DRIVEN TECHNOLOGY GOALS<br />

The following goals will strategically meet our students’ need to acquire and refine their technology and information<br />

literacy skills in order to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and ideally the enjoyment of their learning<br />

experiences as they master the core content standards.<br />

Goal 1:<br />

Goal 2:<br />

Goal 3:<br />

Goal 4:<br />

Students will use technology to attain rigorous performance in identified state curriculum standards.<br />

Students and teachers will use technology to increase communication and accessibility between<br />

parents, school, and the community concerning student needs and achievements.<br />

Students will have increased opportunities to access technology, school information, and resources<br />

during school and non-school hours.<br />

Students will meet established technology performance standards in six areas: basic operation and<br />

concepts, social, ethical and human issues; technology productivity tools; technology communication<br />

tools; technology research tools, and technology problem solving; and decision making tools.<br />

3a. Current <strong>Technology</strong> Access<br />

In 2000, Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> developed a committee to design a technology plan to develop<br />

technological competence in all students. The committee developed several goals. Two goals particularly related to<br />

usage are: 1) to provide equal student access to computer usage during and after school hours and 2) to increase<br />

communication with parents through technology. Currently, Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> has<br />

technology throughout all classrooms and has provided a teacher computer for each classroom each equipped with<br />

email access. A computer lab is maintained in the school library with daily student access. Teachers use email to<br />

communicate with other teachers, parents, and students regarding student achievement.<br />

The district utilizes <strong>Humboldt</strong> <strong>County</strong> Office of Education as our Internet service provider. To create a safe Internet<br />

experience, the <strong>District</strong> has adopted an Acceptable Use Policy that students, parents, and staff are required to sign<br />

and submit to school sites before Internet access is allowed to individual students. Each site has provided computer<br />

lab access for all grade levels.<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong>, <strong>Technology</strong> by School Type 2003-04<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Students per Computer<br />

Elementary 5.3<br />

Source: California Department of Education, <strong>Educational</strong> Demographics Office (CBEDS, sifade03 4/26/04, sifgl 7/6/04,<br />

pubschls 6/4/04) In addition to computers available for use by students, those used by staff for instructional activities are<br />

also included when counting computers at the various schools. This count is then divided by student enrollment to arrive at<br />

a students-per-computer figure.<br />

However, according to our current California <strong>Technology</strong> Survey and district records, our student to computer ratio<br />

for computers four years old or newer is 8:1. All teachers have access to a minimum of one multi-media computer<br />

with Internet access in their classrooms as well as in the Library/Media Computer Lab, before, during, and after<br />

school hours. All teachers have scheduled Computer Lab time for students to complete classroom activities.<br />

Elementary School Name: Loleta Union Elementary<br />

All Students, including Special Ed, ELL, and GATE students, have equal access to<br />

technology in the following areas:<br />

# of computers in Classrooms 37<br />

# of computers in Library/media centers 2<br />

# of computers in Computer Labs 8<br />

Total # of Internet Connected Computers 40


3b. Current <strong>Technology</strong> Integration in Curriculum<br />

Frequency and Type of <strong>Technology</strong> Use at Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong><br />

Grade <strong>Technology</strong> Use<br />

Level Daily Usage<br />

K-2 Subject Areas Supported by<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> (daily):<br />

Language Arts / Reading<br />

Mathematics (limited software)<br />

Science (limited use)<br />

Fine Arts<br />

Spanish Immersion Program<br />

Library Skills<br />

3-5 Subject Areas Supported by<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> (daily):<br />

Language Arts / Reading<br />

Mathematics (increased availability)<br />

Science (limited use)<br />

Social Studies<br />

Fine Arts<br />

Library Skills<br />

6-8 Subject Areas Supported by<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> (daily):<br />

Language Arts<br />

Reading<br />

Mathematics<br />

Science<br />

Social Studies<br />

Elective Program<br />

Yearbook Production<br />

Library Skills<br />

Teacher <strong>Technology</strong> Use<br />

As Instruction Dictates<br />

Create instructional materials<br />

Communicate with parents and<br />

colleagues<br />

Create and deliver lessons<br />

Use surround sound field system<br />

VHS Video / VCR<br />

Low incidence items<br />

Teach timers<br />

Create and deliver multimedia<br />

presentations<br />

Create instructional materials<br />

Communicate with students, parents, and<br />

colleagues<br />

Create and deliver lessons<br />

Create and deliver multimedia<br />

presentations<br />

Use surround sound field system<br />

VHS Video / VCR<br />

Low incidence items<br />

Teach timers<br />

Create instructional materials<br />

Communicate with students, parents,<br />

colleagues, and community<br />

Grading & Attendance<br />

Student Records<br />

Multi-media Presentations<br />

CDs<br />

Science Probes<br />

Microscopes (computer linked)<br />

Digital Cameras/Video<br />

VHS Video / VCR<br />

Low Incidence Items<br />

Internet – lesson research and design<br />

9<br />

Student <strong>Technology</strong> Use<br />

As Instruction Dictates<br />

Students use a variety of technologies that<br />

facilitates auditory, visual, and textual<br />

learning. This includes:<br />

Listening stations<br />

Word processing<br />

CDs<br />

Multi-media software<br />

Keyboarding/word processing<br />

Students use a variety of technologies that<br />

facilitates auditory, visual, and textual<br />

learning. This includes:<br />

Listening stations<br />

Keyboarding/word processing<br />

CDs<br />

Multi-media software<br />

Simulations<br />

Calculators<br />

Internet<br />

Alpha Smarts<br />

Students use a variety of technologies that<br />

facilitates auditory, visual, and textual<br />

learning. This includes:<br />

Keyboarding/word processing<br />

CDs<br />

Multi-media software<br />

Calculators<br />

Spreadsheets<br />

Internet<br />

Alpha Smarts<br />

Accelerated Reading Program<br />

Digital Camera/Video<br />

Scanners<br />

Science Probes<br />

Microscopes<br />

VHS Video Camera


10<br />

Frequency and Type of <strong>Technology</strong> Use at Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong><br />

Grade Curriculum-Integrated <strong>Technology</strong> Information Literacy Skills <strong>Technology</strong> Skills<br />

Level<br />

K-2 Students use curriculum-integrated<br />

technology for language acquisition,<br />

sound recognition, and develop<br />

mathematical concepts. Examples<br />

include:<br />

Kids Works Deluxe<br />

Appleworks<br />

Spanish Immersion Software<br />

Library search software<br />

3-5 Students use curriculum-integrated Library search software<br />

technology to develop skills in reading, Internet<br />

vocabulary building, and reinforce Grade level projects or reports (i.e. 3 rd<br />

mathematical concepts. Examples grade animal projects, 4 th grade<br />

include:<br />

mission projects, 5 th grade astronomy<br />

Kids Works Deluxe<br />

projects, science fair projects –<br />

Appleworks<br />

multiple grades)<br />

On-line Simulations (Social Studies and<br />

Science)<br />

Mathematical Software<br />

Students learn:<br />

how to identify computer terminology and<br />

how to use components of a computer (i.e.<br />

mouse, printing, etc.)<br />

how to navigate through software (i.e. library<br />

search software)<br />

computer etiquette<br />

Students have scheduled computer time to<br />

develop:<br />

keyboarding skills<br />

word processing<br />

Internet<br />

research skills<br />

manipulation and transfer of data between<br />

software<br />

computer etiquette<br />

Internet safety<br />

6-8 Students use curriculum-integrated<br />

technology for comprehension of written<br />

language; to research, create, and present<br />

multi-media projects and or reports in<br />

curricular areas; and develop and<br />

reinforce mathematical concepts.<br />

Examples include:<br />

Office 2000<br />

Adobe Photo Deluxe<br />

Type to Learn<br />

Microsoft Works<br />

Appleworks<br />

On-line Simulations (Social Studies and<br />

Science)<br />

Library search software<br />

Internet<br />

Grade level projects or reports (i.e. 6 th<br />

grade Ancient Egypt, 7 th grade<br />

Renaissance, 8 th grade Civil War<br />

projects, science fair projects –<br />

multiple grades)<br />

Students have scheduled computer time to<br />

develop:<br />

Keyboarding skills<br />

word processing skills<br />

Internet navigation skills<br />

Internet research skills<br />

Internet resources<br />

manipulation and transfer of data between<br />

software<br />

computer etiquette<br />

Internet safety<br />

spreadsheets<br />

skills needed to manipulate graphics (i.e.<br />

digital camera, Internet, scanner, etc.)<br />

3c. Curricular Goals and Standards Curriculum<br />

The curricular goals and standard are outlined in the Local <strong>Educational</strong> Agency <strong>Plan</strong> developed in the 2002-2003<br />

school year. The goals defined in the LEAP include:<br />

• All students reading at proficiency or above on the California Standards Test by the year 2013-2014.<br />

• All English Language Learners will become proficient in English and reach high academic standards at a<br />

minimum attaining proficiency or better in reading/language arts and mathematics.<br />

• By 2005-2006 all students will be taught by Highly Qualified Teachers.<br />

The Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> Board of Trustees has adopted the California Academic Performance<br />

Standards as the minimum academic standards for the district.


3d<br />

Goals & <strong>Plan</strong>s: Improving Teaching & Learning Curriculum<br />

The following goals will strategically meet our students’ need to acquire and refine their technology and information<br />

literacy skills in order to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and ideally the enjoyment of their learning<br />

experiences as they master the core content standards.<br />

Goal 1: Students will use technology to attain rigorous performance in identified state curriculum standards.<br />

Goal 2: Students and teachers will use technology to increase communication and accessibility between<br />

parents, school, and the community concerning student needs and achievements.<br />

Goal 3: Students will have increased opportunities to access technology, school information, and resources<br />

during school and non-school hours.<br />

Goal 4: Students will meet established technology performance standards in six areas: basic operation and<br />

concepts, social, ethical and human issues; technology productivity tools; technology communication<br />

tools; technology research tools, and technology problem solving; and decision making tools.<br />

ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT GOAL 1: Students will use technology to attain rigorous performance in identified<br />

state curriculum standards.<br />

Curriculum Focus Area – Language Arts / Reading: The activities listed are repetitive over the five-year term of<br />

the plan. Staff members identified curriculum focus areas for grades 2-8:<br />

Grade<br />

Level<br />

Activity<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Date Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

K-2 Students will use:<br />

phonics software to increase phonemic awareness and<br />

language acquisition;<br />

Accelerated Reader software to improve reading<br />

comprehension skills;<br />

listening stations to improve comprehension of context<br />

and vocabulary;<br />

word processing software to develop basic writing skills.<br />

Teachers End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

• district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student work, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 85% of students will access<br />

Accelerated Reader leveled<br />

library to grow their reading<br />

skills as evidenced by class<br />

printouts, each year.<br />

• 85% of students will use<br />

listening stations as evidenced by<br />

class records, each year.<br />

• 85% of students will use a<br />

word processing program as<br />

evidenced by class records, each<br />

year.<br />

• 85% of students will access the<br />

Waterford Early Reading<br />

Program as evidenced by<br />

6-8 Students will use:<br />

graphic organization software to continue developing the<br />

organization of their writing;<br />

interactive software that focuses on overall grammar and<br />

spelling skills;<br />

Internet and word processing software that develops<br />

research, interpretation of text, and enhances the writing<br />

process; and<br />

variety of technology, - digital cameras, scanners,<br />

overhead. projectors, digital video, CD burners, to<br />

research & present their acquisition of content standards.<br />

Teachers<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

11<br />

program reporting, each year.<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple<br />

measures, samples of student<br />

writing, and software reports that<br />

assess student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

graphic organization software as<br />

evidenced by student work, each<br />

year.<br />

• 95% of students will complete a<br />

research paper as evidenced by<br />

student work, each year.<br />

• 95% of 7th & 8th graders will<br />

develop web science fair projects<br />

for the Virtual Science Fair using<br />

a variety of technology, each year


Curriculum Focus Area – Mathematics: The activities listed are repetitive over the five-year term of the plan.<br />

Staff members identified curriculum focus areas for grades 2-8.<br />

12<br />

Grade Activity<br />

Level<br />

K-2 Students will use:<br />

software to develop problem solving skills, number sense,<br />

measurement and spatial reasoning;<br />

auditory CDs that reinforce number facts.<br />

3-5 Students will use:<br />

software to develop problem solving strategies,<br />

measurement, geometry, estimation, and computation<br />

skills;<br />

auditory CDs that reinforce computation skills and number<br />

facts.<br />

6-8 Students will use:<br />

diagnostic software to improve and reinforce measurement,<br />

statistics, and computation skills;<br />

graphing calculators to develop statistical and algebraic<br />

concepts;<br />

classroom computer stations to improve and reinforce<br />

measurement, statistics, and computation skills.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

Date<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student writing, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use math<br />

software as evidenced by student<br />

records, each year<br />

• 80% of students will use<br />

auditory CD as evidenced by<br />

classroom records, each year<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student writing, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use math<br />

software as evidenced by student<br />

records, each year<br />

• 80% of students will use<br />

auditory CD as evidenced by<br />

classroom records, each year<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student writing, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use math<br />

software as evidenced by student<br />

records, each year


Curriculum Focus Area – Science: The activities listed are repetitive over the five-year term of the plan.<br />

Modifications these activities will be reflected in the plan based on recommendations made to the <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Committee at the annual review meeting. Staff members identified curriculum focus areas for grades 2-<br />

8.<br />

Grade Activity<br />

Person<br />

Date<br />

Benchmark<br />

Level<br />

K-2 Students will use:<br />

CD research software.<br />

Responsible<br />

Teachers<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

13<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year<br />

3-5 Students will use:<br />

technology such as digital cameras, Internet, and word<br />

processing to develop the concepts of the scientific process<br />

while participating in on-line projects;<br />

problem solving science simulations to improve and<br />

reinforce the scientific process;<br />

CD research software.<br />

6-8 Students will use:<br />

technology such as digital cameras, Internet, and word<br />

processing to develop the concepts of the scientific process<br />

while participating in on-line projects;<br />

problem solving science simulations to improve and<br />

reinforce the scientific process;<br />

CD research software<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

technology to process a science<br />

project as evidenced on Science<br />

Night, each year<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

simulations as evidenced on<br />

Science Night, each year<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year<br />

Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

technology to process a science<br />

project as evidenced on Science<br />

Night, each year<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

simulations as evidenced on<br />

Science Night, each year<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year


ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT GOAL 2: Students and teachers will use technology to increase communication and<br />

accessibility between parents, school, and the community concerning student needs and achievement.<br />

Current Status: The <strong>Technology</strong> Committee surveyed the district’s staff regarding communication technology and<br />

found the following: The district web page is updated regarding school calendars, lunch menus, activities and<br />

district reports’, but the school site web pages are not currently updated on a regular basis. All teachers have<br />

telephones in their classrooms to facilitate parent contact, and they have access to email through their classroom<br />

computers<br />

To facilitate increased communication and accessibility between parents, school, and the community, sites proposed<br />

the following activities<br />

Site Activity Person Responsible Date Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

<strong>District</strong> Wide Provide staff development on<br />

email<br />

Implement Power Schools home<br />

communication program<br />

Send letters home to parents<br />

about the use of on-line<br />

communication service<br />

Teachers will increase their use of<br />

email with staff, parents, and<br />

students<br />

Staff will utilize Power School to<br />

record and evaluate results of<br />

student achievement through<br />

Multiple Measures data.<br />

Principal<br />

Staff Development<br />

2004/2005 School Year<br />

for Staff Development<br />

Days<br />

2005/2006 School Year<br />

for Staff Development<br />

Days<br />

Training Rosters<br />

Staff Survey<br />

Printout of Multiple<br />

Measures data from Power<br />

School<br />

95% of students with internet<br />

access will access Power<br />

School for e-mail,<br />

homework, progress reports<br />

and newsletters, each year.<br />

ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT GOAL 3: Students will have increased opportunities to access technology, school<br />

information, and resources during school and non-school hours.<br />

Activity<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Date Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

Access to technology will be provided in each<br />

district classroom, in the computer lab in the<br />

library.<br />

Upgrade or purchase equipment as needed.<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Coordinator<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

The teaching of technology skills will take<br />

place within the context of the curriculum and<br />

be supported by training in the computer lab.<br />

Principal<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

14<br />

Inventory of district technology that will insure<br />

that all district equipment is functional<br />

Records of Purchase Order, each year<br />

Samples of student work<br />

Site computer lab schedules<br />

Classroom observations using Walk'bout will<br />

indicate use of technology in 70% of the<br />

observations, each year<br />

Information literacy training for students will<br />

take place in the classroom and be supported by<br />

computer lab activities.<br />

Principal<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Samples of student work<br />

Site computer lab schedules<br />

Classroom observations using Walk'bout will<br />

indicate use of technology in 70% of the<br />

observations, each year<br />

80% of students in grades 3 - 8 will access library<br />

materials from their classroom as evidenced by<br />

library records, each year


ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT GOAL 4: Students will meet established technology performance<br />

standards in six areas: basic operation and concepts, social, ethical and human issues; technology<br />

productivity tools; technology communication tools; technology research tools, and technology<br />

problem solving; and decision making tools.<br />

Activity<br />

Person<br />

Date<br />

Benchmark<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Committee will revise the<br />

district standards for technology and<br />

information literacy by grade level.<br />

Each grade level will review the proposed<br />

technology performance standards.<br />

Final draft of proposed technology<br />

performance standards, including evaluation<br />

models, will be submitted to the board.<br />

Implement new district standards for<br />

technology and information literacy through<br />

classroom curriculum.<br />

3e<br />

Goals/<strong>Plan</strong>s<br />

Responsible<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Subcommittee<br />

15<br />

2006/2007 Draft recommendations for grade level<br />

performance standards will be distributed by<br />

April 2007.<br />

Teachers 2006/2007 Report by teacher on acceptance of changes to<br />

proposed technology performance standards will<br />

be returned to committee by May 2007<br />

Superintendent 2006/2007 Approval and adoption by the Loleta Union<br />

Elementary School <strong>District</strong> Board by June 2007<br />

Teachers<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004 – 2008<br />

90% of student portfolios will contain samples of<br />

student work in technology<br />

• Lesson plans will indicate use of technology,<br />

each year<br />

When we assess a classroom to ensure that 85% are meeting a benchmark we are assessing an average of 15<br />

students per classroom. The use of daily logs, anecdotal records, lesson plans and other daily activities have proven<br />

to be adequate for evaluating the progress towards meeting benchmarks.<br />

3f<br />

Goals/<strong>Plan</strong>s for appropriate access to the Curriculum<br />

As reference in the <strong>District</strong> Profile, Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> has a significantly diverse student<br />

population. Equal access to the curriculum is not an issue in the district. As referenced in the <strong>District</strong> Profile the<br />

class sizes are small. The percentage of Socially Economically Disadvantaged students is 70%+. The number of<br />

Hispanic and Native American students is equally dispersed throughout the student population. There are an equal<br />

number of boys and girls in the population. Every student has equal access to the curriculum and to the use of<br />

technology. Goal 3, listed at the beginning of this section, and the activities to support this goal, listed on page 14,<br />

address appropriate access to the curriculum<br />

3g<br />

Goals/<strong>Plan</strong> For Records/Assessment<br />

The district's implementation of Power School and Power Grade, as identified in Activities to Support Goal 2,<br />

supports the use of technology to improve student achievement data collection, analysis, reporting and research/data<br />

driven decision-making.<br />

3h. Goals/<strong>Plan</strong>s For Parent Access to Teachers/Administrators<br />

Beginning in September 2005, parents will have access to Power Grade, a component of Power School our student<br />

information system, as identified in Activities to Support Goal 2. Parents will be able to view student academic<br />

progress, contact teachers, read newsletters and view homework assignments at their convenience. The district web<br />

site has been upgraded with classroom pages to be maintained by teams of sixth and seventh grade students. The<br />

weekly school newsletter is posed each Friday on the website.<br />

Activity<br />

By June 2006, all parents will have password<br />

protected online access to their student’s<br />

attendance, assignments and grades through<br />

Power Grade a web-based student information<br />

system<br />

By September 2006, two computers in the<br />

computer will be available for parent access to<br />

Power Grade.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Principal<br />

<strong>District</strong> Office Staff<br />

Principal<br />

Librarian<br />

Date<br />

September<br />

2005<br />

September<br />

2005<br />

Evidence<br />

Signatory cards of parents for obtaining their<br />

password.<br />

Sign in sheets for parent use of these computers.


3i. Benchmarks and Timelines<br />

The benchmarks and timelines for Goal 1 are described on pages 12 - 13 for Reading, Math and Science include:<br />

16<br />

Reading<br />

Grade Activity<br />

Level<br />

K-2 Students will use:<br />

CD research software.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Teachers<br />

Date<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year<br />

3-5 Students will use:<br />

technology such as digital cameras, Internet, and word<br />

processing to develop the concepts of the scientific process<br />

while participating in on-line projects;<br />

problem solving science simulations to improve and<br />

reinforce the scientific process;<br />

CD research software.<br />

6-8 Students will use:<br />

technology such as digital cameras, Internet, and word<br />

processing to develop the concepts of the scientific process<br />

while participating in on-line projects;<br />

problem solving science simulations to improve and<br />

reinforce the scientific process;<br />

CD research software<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

technology to process a science<br />

project as evidenced on Science<br />

Night, each year<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

simulations as evidenced on<br />

Science Night, each year<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year<br />

Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

technology to process a science<br />

project as evidenced on Science<br />

Night, each year<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

simulations as evidenced on<br />

Science Night, each year<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year


17<br />

Math<br />

Grade Activity<br />

Level<br />

K-2 Students will use:<br />

software to develop problem solving skills, number sense,<br />

measurement and spatial reasoning;<br />

auditory CDs that reinforce number facts.<br />

3-5 Students will use:<br />

software to develop problem solving strategies,<br />

measurement, geometry, estimation, and computation<br />

skills;<br />

auditory CDs that reinforce computation skills and number<br />

facts.<br />

6-8 Students will use:<br />

diagnostic software to improve and reinforce measurement,<br />

statistics, and computation skills;<br />

graphing calculators to develop statistical and algebraic<br />

concepts;<br />

classroom computer stations to improve and reinforce<br />

measurement, statistics, and computation skills.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

Date<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student writing, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use math<br />

software as evidenced by student<br />

records, each year<br />

• 80% of students will use<br />

auditory CD as evidenced by<br />

classroom records, each year<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student writing, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use math<br />

software as evidenced by student<br />

records, each year<br />

• 80% of students will use<br />

auditory CD as evidenced by<br />

classroom records, each year<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student writing, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use math<br />

software as evidenced by student<br />

records, each year


18<br />

Science<br />

Grade Activity<br />

Level<br />

K-2 Students will use:<br />

CD research software.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Teachers<br />

Date<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year<br />

3-5 Students will use:<br />

technology such as digital cameras, Internet, and word<br />

processing to develop the concepts of the scientific process<br />

while participating in on-line projects;<br />

problem solving science simulations to improve and<br />

reinforce the scientific process;<br />

CD research software.<br />

6-8 Students will use:<br />

technology such as digital cameras, Internet, and word<br />

processing to develop the concepts of the scientific process<br />

while participating in on-line projects;<br />

problem solving science simulations to improve and<br />

reinforce the scientific process;<br />

CD research software<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

technology to process a science<br />

project as evidenced on Science<br />

Night, each year<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

simulations as evidenced on<br />

Science Night, each year<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year<br />

Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

technology to process a science<br />

project as evidenced on Science<br />

Night, each year<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

simulations as evidenced on<br />

Science Night, each year<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year


The benchmarks and timelines for Goal 2 include:<br />

19<br />

Site Activity Person Responsible Date Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

<strong>District</strong> Wide Provide staff development on<br />

email<br />

Implement Power Schools home<br />

communication program<br />

Send letters home to parents<br />

about the use of on-line<br />

communication service<br />

Teachers will increase their use of<br />

email with staff, parents, and<br />

students<br />

Staff will utilize Power School to<br />

record and evaluate results of<br />

student achievement through<br />

Multiple Measures data.<br />

Principal<br />

Staff Development<br />

2004/2005 School Year<br />

for Staff Development<br />

Days<br />

2005/2006 School Year<br />

for Staff Development<br />

Days<br />

Training Rosters<br />

Staff Survey<br />

Printout of Multiple<br />

Measures data from Power<br />

School<br />

95% of students with internet<br />

access will access Power<br />

School for e-mail,<br />

homework, progress reports<br />

and newsletters, each year.<br />

The benchmarks and timelines for Goal 3 include:<br />

Activity<br />

Access to technology will be provided in each<br />

district classroom, in the computer lab in the<br />

library.<br />

Upgrade or purchase equipment as needed.<br />

The teaching of technology skills will take<br />

place within the context of the curriculum and<br />

be supported by training in the computer lab.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Coordinator<br />

Principal<br />

Date<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

Inventory of district technology that will insure<br />

that all district equipment is functional<br />

Records of Purchase Order, each year<br />

Samples of student work<br />

Site computer lab schedules<br />

Classroom observations using Walk'bout will<br />

indicate use of technology in 70% of the<br />

observations, each year<br />

Information literacy training for students will<br />

take place in the classroom and be supported by<br />

computer lab activities.<br />

Principal<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Samples of student work<br />

Site computer lab schedules<br />

Classroom observations using Walk'bout will<br />

indicate use of technology in 70% of the<br />

observations, each year<br />

80% of students in grades 3 - 8 will access<br />

library materials from their classroom as<br />

evidenced by library records, each year<br />

The benchmarks and timelines for Goal 4 include:<br />

Activity<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Committee will revise the<br />

district standards for technology and<br />

information literacy by grade level.<br />

Each grade level will review the proposed<br />

technology performance standards.<br />

Final draft of proposed technology<br />

performance standards, including evaluation<br />

models, will be submitted to the board.<br />

Implement new district standards for<br />

technology and information literacy through<br />

classroom curriculum.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Subcommittee<br />

Date<br />

Benchmark<br />

2006/2007 Draft recommendations for grade level<br />

performance standards will be distributed by<br />

April 2007.<br />

Teachers 2006/2007 Report by teacher on acceptance of changes to<br />

proposed technology performance standards will<br />

be returned to committee by May 2007<br />

Superintendent 2006/2007 Approval and adoption by the Loleta Union<br />

Elementary School <strong>District</strong> Board by June 2007<br />

Teachers<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004 – 2008<br />

90% of student portfolios will contain samples of<br />

student work in technology<br />

• Lesson plans will indicate use of technology,<br />

each year


20<br />

3j. Process to Monitor Curriculum Benchmarks/timelines<br />

Evaluation Activities -Goals 1, 3, & 4: Over the five years of the plan, classroom and student work will include<br />

but not be limited to:<br />

Language Arts/Reading - At each grade level, student writing will demonstrate mastery of technology and<br />

information literacy skills. This would include pre and post writing samples. Students will demonstrate<br />

improvement of technology and information literacy skills through the use of word processing programs, and the<br />

Internet. Students will use Alphasmarts for all stages of the writing process.<br />

Mathematics – At each grade level student work will demonstrate mastery of problem solving strategies through<br />

multiple representations (symbolic, numeric, graphic, and verbal/written representation). Printouts of computer<br />

generated documents, i.e. spreadsheets, would be another form of assessment that would demonstrate acquisition of<br />

mathematical concepts.<br />

Science – At each grade level student work will demonstrate mastery of the scientific process with the support of<br />

technology. Student work could include projects, printouts from software, and/or audio visual presentations that<br />

demonstrate their understanding of the scientific process.<br />

Multiple Measures – These measures are a compilation of classroom grades, standardized test scores, and <strong>District</strong><br />

Performance Assessment.<br />

Evaluation Activities Goal 2: Over the five years of the plan, the principal and staff will review supporting<br />

benchmark data.


PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT<br />

21<br />

4a. Summary of <strong>District</strong> Teachers’ & Administrators’ <strong>Technology</strong> Skills<br />

Ongoing professional development is essential to the effective use of technology. Loleta Union Elementary School<br />

<strong>District</strong> recognizes that teachers, librarians, administrators, and support staff must receive training in order to use<br />

technology to promote student achievement.<br />

One hundred percent (100%) of staff participated in an individual technology assessment in the fall of 2004. The<br />

summary for Credentialed Teachers and Administrators are displayed in the charts below. The teachers’ results<br />

indicated that we have demonstrated Intermediate or Proficiency level in the general use of technology and word<br />

processing categories. The administrators’ results show Intermediate or Proficiency level.<br />

Teachers<br />

Credential<br />

Unrated Intermediate Proficient Intermediate<br />

Number % Number % Number % or Better<br />

General computer<br />

Knowledge 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Internet 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Email 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Word Processing 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Publishing 0 0.0% 5 38.5% 7 53.8% 92.4%<br />

Databases 0 0.0% 5 38.5% 8 61.5% 100.0%<br />

Spreadsheets 0 0.0% 5 38.5% 7 53.8% 92.4%<br />

Presentation Software 0 0.0% 4 30.7% 4 30.7% 61.4%<br />

Instructional<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> 0 0.0% 2 15.4% 10 76.9% 92.3%<br />

Average All Areas 0 0.0% 21 32.3% 88 75.2% 93.2%<br />

Administrators<br />

Unrated Intermediate Proficient Intermediate<br />

Number % Number % Number % or Better<br />

General computer<br />

Knowledge 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Internet 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Email 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Word Processing 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Publishing 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Databases 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Spreadsheets 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 100.0%<br />

Presentation Software 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%<br />

Instructional<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Average All Areas 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 8 37.8% 80.0%<br />

In addition to survey results, collaborative discussions were conducted to determine professional development needs<br />

for district personnel. The administrators will participate in all aspects of the professional development with a<br />

particular focus in Instructional <strong>Technology</strong>. In summary, they are<br />

• research and collaborate on software related to curriculum<br />

• collaborate and design lessons that integrate software and hardware into curriculum<br />

• visit sites demonstrating student achievement through the use of technology<br />

• attend staff development workshops and/or conferences during non-school hours<br />

• develop curriculum-based technology lessons


4b. Professional Development Goals & <strong>Plan</strong><br />

22<br />

The <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Team</strong> identified the following professional development goals:<br />

Goal 1: The district will assist teachers in reaching proficiency of technology skills in areas specific to their<br />

curriculum focus through staff development activities.<br />

Goal 2: The district will provide training that integrates technology with state curriculum standards.<br />

Goal 3: The district will provide training that is concurrent with equipment acquisition and installation.<br />

Goal 4: The district will provide appropriate technology training for classified staff.<br />

Activity Person Responsible Timeline Benchmark<br />

Survey staffs’ current technology skills and<br />

needs for professional development<br />

Work with local CTAP representative,<br />

HCOE, and the <strong>Technology</strong> committee to<br />

analyze district data to identify professional<br />

development needs.<br />

Principal September 2006<br />

annually<br />

• Principal<br />

• CTAP representative<br />

• HCOE representative<br />

Spring 2005<br />

annually<br />

• 100% completed surveys<br />

from certificated staff, each<br />

year<br />

• The list of professional<br />

development needs will be<br />

presented to site council in<br />

August yearly.<br />

Work with a local CTAP representative and<br />

HCOE to assist the <strong>Technology</strong> Committee to<br />

make grade level recommendations<br />

concerning revisions to the district standards<br />

for technology and information literacy.<br />

Distance learning professional development<br />

opportunities will be offered yearly,<br />

including, CTAP Online, MarcoPolo, Digital<br />

curriculum, etc.<br />

• Principal<br />

• CTAP representative<br />

• Principal<br />

• Site Council<br />

• PAR committee<br />

Summer<br />

2007<br />

Annually<br />

• Grade level<br />

recommendations presented to<br />

staff in September 2007.<br />

• Recommendation presented<br />

to site council in September<br />

2007<br />

• 50% of certificated staff wil<br />

take a distant learning<br />

profession development<br />

offering yearly, as indicated o<br />

staff development tracking<br />

form.<br />

4c. Professional Development Benchmarks & Timeline<br />

These are included in the chart in 4b above. Our professional development plan is based on the analysis of our<br />

teachers’ and administrators’ technology skills and needs as well as our district’s curricular goals. The district will<br />

offer a variety of training options such as the CTAP Online (http://www.ctaponline.org) learning portal, face-toface<br />

training & collaboration time, and one-on-one coaching. We will maximize the use of technology and site<br />

resources to support the district’s goals and objectives for curriculum, instruction, intervention, and assessment.<br />

4d. Professional Development Monitoring, and Evaluation.<br />

The district uses a professional development form to monitor the staff development activities of each teacher. Each<br />

teacher completes a form indicating the workshop and the technology component. Through the use of the<br />

Walk’bout program, the Principal tracks the use of technology in the classroom during informal classroom<br />

observation. The principal follows up each Walk'bout observation with a printout of the observation for the teacher.<br />

Teachers are evaluated using the CA Standards of Teaching, Standard 6, Element 3, addressing gaining skills in the<br />

use of technology in the classrooms, all teachers must meet this element.


INFRASTRUCTURE, HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT<br />

23<br />

5a Anticipated needs to support our tech plan objectives.<br />

Needed Hardware / Workstations<br />

Administrative Staff Equipment: Most of the hardware has been replaced within the past four years. We will<br />

continue a process of upgrading hardware and software as needed.<br />

Computer Lab: In order to support the Curriculum Component Goal 1 below are the needs of hardware for the<br />

computer lab and classrooms. Our lab will be equipped with the following:<br />

• 20 workstations<br />

• One network printer<br />

• One digital projector<br />

• One scanner<br />

• One digital camera<br />

• One digital video camera<br />

• One teacher workstation<br />

• Pull-down screen or white board for projection<br />

Teacher Classroom Equipment: We recognize the importance of portability for teaching staff. The teaching staff<br />

should be provided with a dedicated laptop workstation. Portable technology provides teachers the flexibility to<br />

communicate with staff, parents, students and community, prepare lesson plans, and take notes in and out of the<br />

classroom. The school has one networked color laser printer and one black and white laser printer available for<br />

teaching staff and students. As current teacher desktop workstations are replaced by laptops, these desktop<br />

workstations will be made available in classrooms for student use.<br />

Student Classroom Equipment: The long-term goal for the school is to have a classroom set of wireless laptop<br />

computers in grades 5 through 8. For the term of this technology plan, the goal is to equip every classroom with a<br />

minimum of three student computer workstations. We will attempt to acquire a minimum of one computer per<br />

classroom per year depending on budgetary constraints. This establishes a pattern of replacement and equal<br />

distribution of newer equipment. Older equipment will be cycled out of service.<br />

Network Access Needed<br />

Updating the network allows students to more efficiently access information as it pertains to the identified state<br />

curriculum standards; for example, access to distance learning as well as professional development through video<br />

streaming. In addition, by reducing the amount of time it takes to access information on-line or through email,<br />

communication concerning student needs and achievement between staff, parents, students, and community will<br />

improve.<br />

The following needs are necessary to upgrade network access:<br />

• upgrade the wiring from Category 5 to Category 5e and/or convert to wireless technology as computer<br />

workstations become faster and technology evolves<br />

• upgrade to two Apple G5 servers<br />

• install additional fiber lines to handle newer technologies that come into play, such as streaming video<br />

Electronic Learning Resources<br />

Software purchases will be made to support the curriculum and professional development goals as stated in the<br />

technology plan. We will expand upon our current inventory of software by researching and developing a list of<br />

software that supports the activities listed in the Curriculum Component Goal 1. The software will include, but not<br />

be limited to the following content areas: reading, language arts, mathematics, and science. In addition, we will<br />

need other electronic learning resources to support the identified state standards.


24<br />

Site<br />

<strong>District</strong> Wide<br />

Software<br />

Needed<br />

phonics<br />

Accelerated Math<br />

number theory<br />

computation skills<br />

geometry<br />

graphic organizer<br />

Microsoft Office (updated version)<br />

Other Electronic Resources<br />

Needed<br />

auditory CDs<br />

digital still cameras<br />

digital video cameras<br />

scanner<br />

color printers<br />

TV/VCR<br />

AlphaSmarts<br />

Library<br />

Resources Needed<br />

listening stations<br />

projectors<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Support Needed<br />

We anticipate the need for additional technical support staff. We are working with other local<br />

schools to employ an IT specialist to assist in troubleshooting current problems, assisting with<br />

upgrading issues and planning for future technology.<br />

Monitoring and Evaluating<br />

Inventory of all equipment will be maintained and updated annually. Review will take place to determine<br />

equipment condition, location, and compatibility with current technology and curriculum. Workstations older than<br />

four years will be evaluated for use within the district or disposed of. Bi-annually, we will assess our progress and<br />

success in implementing this plan.<br />

5b. Current <strong>District</strong> Hardware<br />

Existing hardware and electronic resources at each of our sites is included in Component 3a:<br />

Current <strong>Technology</strong> Access in our tech plan. This data comes from both our CBEDS data and our annual California<br />

School <strong>Technology</strong> Surveys.<br />

The CBED computer to student ratio by grade band is summarized in the chart below and includes all computers<br />

regardless of age. However data from the 2003-04 California School Tech Survey shows the average student<br />

computer ratio for computers four years old and newer is 8:1.<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> by School Type 2003-04<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Students per Computer<br />

Elementary 5.3<br />

Source: California Department of Education, <strong>Educational</strong> Demographics Office (CBEDS, sifade03 4/26/04, sifgl<br />

7/6/04, pubschls 6/4/04) In addition to computers available for use by students, those used by staff for instructional<br />

activities are also included when counting computers at the various schools. This count is then divided by student<br />

enrollment to arrive at a students-per-computer figure.<br />

The total number of internet connected multi-media computers in the district (from 2004 California Tech Survey) is<br />

summarized in the chart below.<br />

Elementary Schools <strong>District</strong> Total<br />

40 40<br />

Administrative Staff Equipment: Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> personnel have the necessary<br />

equipment (laptops and PDAs) to allow them to perform their administrative duties.


Computer Lab Equipment: There is one networked 9-station lab with networked color printer, scanner, and two<br />

digital cameras.<br />

25<br />

Teacher Classroom Equipment: Each teacher has at least one networked multimedia computer workstation. All<br />

classrooms have independent inkjet printers and are networked with a color and black & white printer in the office<br />

and library.<br />

Student Classroom Equipment: Computers vary greatly within the school. Some classrooms have no dedicated<br />

student computers while others have as many as four. All student computer workstations are networked; however, a<br />

few have limited access due to age of machine. This depends on grade level and subject area. Most student<br />

workstations are over four years old. Upgrades have been made where benefit could be affected without an<br />

unacceptable financial investment. Computers have, for the most part, been placed on tables that were not originally<br />

intended for computer use; therefore, the workstations are not ergonomically designed.<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> uses Power School to maintain student records and student achievement.<br />

Email is used extensively by administration to communicate with staff, parents, students, and community. Many<br />

teachers are beginning to utilize Power School's Power Grade to communicate with staff, parents, students, and<br />

community. The district is committed to continued support of these software and continued staff development to<br />

ensure optimal use of the software capabilities.<br />

The Local Area Network backbone is one strand fiber optic that connects to 100/10 Base-T HP switches. Wide<br />

Area Network connection to the Internet and email is T1 line through the <strong>Humboldt</strong> <strong>County</strong> Office of Education.<br />

The <strong>District</strong> has a total of two servers ranging from 300 MHz older NT 4 servers to Macintosh G5 800 MHz OSX.<br />

5c Benchmarks and Timeline<br />

The <strong>Technology</strong> Committee recommends that the school adhere to the following timeline for equipment purchases.<br />

Workstation purchases using this timeline are reflected in the following table. This table shows new purchases each<br />

year.<br />

Year Need Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Research, develop, and prioritize a list of <strong>Technology</strong> Subcommittee<br />

electronic learning resources to be purchased. Site principal prepares purchase order<br />

2 Purchase laptops and workstations equal to Technical support personnel<br />

replace outdated hardware<br />

Technical support personnel<br />

Repurpose teacher workstations to student Site principal prepares purchase order<br />

workstations.<br />

Technical support personnel<br />

Purchase two projectors for classroom use. Assistant Superintendent and site<br />

Evaluate network infrastructure for needed principals<br />

upgrades.<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Specialist<br />

Review budget as it pertains to Year 3.<br />

Annual inventory of infrastructure, hardware,<br />

and electronic learning resources.<br />

Evidence of Completion<br />

List of recommended electronic resources<br />

Invoices for electronic learning resources<br />

Update Hardware Inventory<br />

Update Hardware Inventory<br />

Invoices for electronic learning resources<br />

Report of infrastructure needs<br />

Copy of Year 12final budget & Year 3<br />

projections<br />

Copy of inventory


26<br />

Year Need Person<br />

Responsible<br />

3 Purchase electronic learning resources as identified in<br />

the list developed in Year 2.<br />

Repurpose older classroom student workstations to the<br />

computer loaner program and phase out non-functioning<br />

computers.<br />

Purchase a new server.<br />

Evaluate network infrastructure for needed upgrades.<br />

Review budget as it pertains to Year 4.<br />

Annual inventory of infrastructure, hardware, and<br />

electronic learning resources.<br />

Principal prepares purchase order<br />

Technical support personnel<br />

Principal prepares purchase order<br />

Technical support personnel<br />

Assistant Superintendent and site<br />

principals<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Specialist<br />

Evidence of Completion<br />

Invoices for electronic learning<br />

resources<br />

Update Hardware Inventory<br />

Invoices for electronic learning<br />

resources<br />

Report of infrastructure needs<br />

Copy of Year 3 final budget & Ye<br />

projections<br />

Copy of inventory<br />

Year Need Person<br />

Responsible<br />

4-5 Purchase the remaining electronic learning resources on Site principal prepares purchase order<br />

the list made in Year 1.<br />

Site principal prepares purchase order<br />

Purchase laptops and workstations equal to replace Technical support personnel<br />

outdated hardware<br />

Site principal prepares purchase order<br />

Repurpose older equipment to the computer loaner Site principal prepares purchase order<br />

program and phase out non-functioning equipment. Technical support personnel<br />

Evaluate network infrastructure for needed upgrades. Assistant Superintendent and site<br />

Review budget as it pertains to Year 5.<br />

principals<br />

Annual inventory of infrastructure, hardware, and <strong>Technology</strong> Specialist<br />

electronic learning resources.<br />

Evidence of Completion<br />

Invoices for electronic learning<br />

resources<br />

Invoices for electronic learning<br />

resources<br />

Update Hardware Inventory<br />

Invoices for electronic learning<br />

resources<br />

Invoices for electronic learning<br />

resources<br />

Report of infrastructure needs<br />

Copy of Year 4 final budget & Ye<br />

projections<br />

Copy of inventory<br />

5d Monitoring Infrastructure<br />

The district has a process of tracking, feedback and adjustments for the purpose of buying and deploying<br />

infrastructure resources: computers, networks, televisions, telephones, etc. The district inventory clerk tracks the<br />

age of the infrastructure and the repairs records of each. When a system records a pattern of repairs the clerk<br />

notifies the Superintendent/Principal. The Superintendent/Principal then researches to determine if the item or<br />

system needs to be replaced or upgraded. In a small district, this has work well since the Superintendent/Principal is<br />

the responsible party for the decision as well as the district budget.<br />

Activity Responsible Party Evidence of Completion Date<br />

Hardware, Software,<br />

Infrastructure and Technical<br />

Support Component:<br />

Staff will submit documentation<br />

on activities from this<br />

component to the Principal<br />

Principal<br />

• Inventory, purchase<br />

orders and invoices will<br />

be collected.<br />

By 6/1 each year of<br />

plan


ED. TECHNOLOGY FUNDING & BUDGET<br />

27<br />

Provisions in the current budget are made for technology expenditures and professional development. The sources<br />

of these funds include: general fund, site budgets, categorical funds, lottery revenue, E-Rate discounts, and grants.<br />

These funds provide for current and future funding of this plan. The <strong>Technology</strong> Committee will research and<br />

suggest options for future funding sources. Funding beyond the usual sources are a priority and will be critical<br />

particularly during tight budget times.<br />

6A. Established and Potential Funding Sources<br />

Established Funding Sources<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Support Funding<br />

Currently the General Fund provides funds for the Library Computer Lab Aide position that supports technology by<br />

maintaining the computer lab, teaching computer courses, and troubleshooting classroom computer problems.<br />

Professional Development Funding<br />

Funding for Professional Development sources include Title I, Title II, Title III, Peer Assistance and Review (PAR),<br />

and Staff Development Buyback days. The primary focus of the <strong>District</strong> staff development plan is to provide the<br />

necessary skills to improve student achievement. <strong>Technology</strong> is a tool to support that change. At this time there is<br />

approximately $12,000 a year available for staff development. The full amount is not dedicated to technology staff<br />

development but with the emphasis on the use of technology in the core curriculum the goals of this plan will be<br />

easily achieved as it is integrated in the over all staff development plan for the <strong>District</strong>. <strong>Technology</strong> will not be<br />

viewed as a separate component but as an underlining base.<br />

Potential Funding Sources<br />

Categorical Funding<br />

The purchase of new ELRs will come funds that are categorical in nature and consist of Title I, School<br />

Improvement, Economic Impact Aid, and the Lottery.<br />

Bear River Bank of the Rohnerville Rancheria<br />

One of two Native American Rancherias is opening a casino in the summer of 2005. The tribal council has<br />

committed to donating substantial funds to the school. A portion of these funds will be used to upgrade the<br />

infrastructure and hardware in this plan.<br />

Modernization<br />

The district will begin construction on a modernization project in the summer of 2006. The needs identified in this<br />

plan will be used to address the technology infrastructure and hardware needs of each classroom.<br />

Options for Reducing Costs<br />

The following options for reducing costs are now used in the district and will continue to be used in the future.<br />

• Participation in California Teleconnect Program (DAS) for reduced-cost phone service.<br />

• Participation in the E-Rate funding program.<br />

• T-1 Internet access through <strong>Humboldt</strong> <strong>County</strong> Office of Education.<br />

• Bulk purchasing through Mendocino <strong>County</strong> Office of Education, C-SMART, and other “educational<br />

buy” programs.<br />

• Licensing software on a site basis, rather than on an individual-computer basis.<br />

• Pursuing donations of modern equipment.


6b. <strong>Plan</strong> Implementation Costs<br />

28<br />

Electronic Learning Resources<br />

Electronic Learning Resources (ELR) are used extensively. The purchase of new ELRs will come funds that are<br />

categorical in nature and consist of Title I, School Improvement, Economic Impact Aid, and local grants. The<br />

following are the significant purchase items. All others are minor in cost.<br />

Software<br />

Year Two-Accelerated/Star Math $3,000<br />

Year Three-Waterford Early Reading System - $9,000<br />

Year Three-Update Microsoft Office $1,000<br />

Equipment (not computers)<br />

Year Two-Three Projectors $2,500 each<br />

Computers<br />

Year Two-10 Lap Tops for $12,000<br />

Year Two- 9 Regular Workstations (one per classroom) $10,800<br />

Year Three-9 Regular Workstations (one per classroom) $10,800<br />

Year Four-9 Regular Workstations (one per classroom) $10,800<br />

Future Years-Replace Twenty Percent of Equipment $12,500<br />

As the purchase of new workstations occurs older equipment will be repurposed. The priority is to have the multimedia<br />

laptop computer for each teacher and at least one new workstation per classroom<br />

Summary of Electronic Learning Resources/Computers<br />

Year Software Equipment Computers Total<br />

Two $ 3,000 $ 2,500 $ 22,500 $ 28,000<br />

Three $ 10,000 $ 10,800 $ 20,800<br />

Four $ 10,800 $ 10,800<br />

Five $ 12,500 $ 12,500<br />

Total $ 13,000 $ 2,500 $ 56,600 $ 72,100<br />

6c. <strong>District</strong> Provision Tech Support<br />

Currently the General Fund provides funds for the Library Computer Lab Aide position that supports technology by<br />

maintaining the computer lab, teaching computer courses, and trouble shooting classroom computer problems.<br />

The district is investigating the sharing of a tech support person with other small rural districts in a similar situation<br />

as ours. When technical support is needed the <strong>Humboldt</strong> <strong>County</strong> Office of Education, Capital Business Machines,<br />

and other commercial support providers are used.<br />

6d. Costs and TCO Funding<br />

The district replacement policy for obsolete equipment is every five years. Budgetary constraints impact the district's<br />

ability to strictly adhere to this policy. The district does not have the ability to set aside a fixed percentage or dollar<br />

amount to replace obsolete equipment. When funds become available the principal and technology committee<br />

determine the equipment that will be replaced.<br />

6e. Monitoring the Funding <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Activity Responsible Party Benchmark Date<br />

Budget and Funding Component:<br />

Budget process will include<br />

consideration of budget goals.<br />

Superintendent<br />

School Site Council<br />

Board of Trustees<br />

• Inclusion in <strong>District</strong>'s<br />

adopted budget of<br />

technology.<br />

By 6/30 of each year of<br />

plan


MONITORING & EVALUATION OF TECHNOLOGY PLAN<br />

29<br />

7. a. Description of how technology’s impact on student learning and<br />

attainment of the district’s curricular goals, as well as classroom and school<br />

management, will be evaluated.<br />

Each program year, the <strong>Technology</strong> Committee will assess the achievement of the goals, activities and benchmarks<br />

of each component of the plan as indicators of success. Recommended steps to meet goals not yet achieved,<br />

recommended ways to provide adequate funding to support the plan, and/or recommended revisions in the plan will<br />

be presented to the district administration and the Board.<br />

Sources of data on which to base evaluations will take a variety of forms depending upon the activity being<br />

evaluated and the learner outcomes that are being assessed. Sources of data include but are not limited to:<br />

• Formal assessment examples: test scores, portfolios, pre-testing and post-testing of learner performance,<br />

and CDE <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Surveys.<br />

• Informal assessment examples: observation and interview of teachers, students, parents and<br />

administrators; and participant evaluations of teacher in-service presentations.<br />

• Documentation of activities and learner outcomes: include but are not limited to multimedia reports,<br />

student-developed and teacher-developed web pages, incorporation of technology-based resources<br />

into written and oral reports, and completion rates for students and staff in technology-based<br />

courses or workshops.<br />

• Documentation of budget expenditures, donations, and other financial data.<br />

Goals for Monitoring, Evaluating and Assessing the <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Goal 1: Monitoring, evaluation and assessment information will be formative.<br />

Goal 2: Monitoring, evaluation and assessment information will be summative.<br />

Goal 3: Data from the monitoring, evaluation and assessment process will be used to guide budget and funding decisions and to<br />

modify, change and update the <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> to ensure that the goals and activities of each section of the plan are<br />

consistent and current.<br />

7. b. Schedule for evaluating the effect of plan implementation.<br />

7. c. Description of how the information obtained through the monitoring and<br />

evaluation will be used.<br />

Activities for Monitoring, Evaluating and Assessing the <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Activity Responsible Party Evidence of Completion Date<br />

Curriculum Component:<br />

Staff will submit documentation on<br />

activities to Principal.<br />

Principal<br />

• Portfolios of student<br />

work will include<br />

technology based<br />

products<br />

• observations using the<br />

Walk'bout will document<br />

technology usage<br />

By 6/1 each year of plan.


30<br />

Activity Responsible Party Evidence of Completion Date<br />

Staff Development Component:<br />

Staff will submit documentation on<br />

technology-related staff<br />

development activities to the<br />

Principal<br />

Principal<br />

• Staff Development<br />

Record of Attendance<br />

forms will indicate the<br />

technology components of<br />

the workshop<br />

By 6/1 each year of plan<br />

Hardware, Software, Infrastructure<br />

and Technical Support Component:<br />

Staff will submit documentation on<br />

activities from this component to<br />

the Principal<br />

Budget and Funding Component:<br />

Budget process will include<br />

consideration of budget goals.<br />

Principal<br />

Superintendent<br />

School Site Council<br />

Board of Trustees<br />

• Inventory, purchase<br />

orders and invoices will be<br />

collected.<br />

• Inclusion in <strong>District</strong>'s<br />

adopted budget of<br />

technology.<br />

By 6/1 each year of plan<br />

By 6/30 of each year of<br />

plan<br />

Curriculum, Staff Development,<br />

Infrastructure, Budget, and<br />

Evaluation Components:<br />

Principal will report progress on<br />

components of the plan to <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Committee<br />

Monitoring, Assessment and<br />

Evaluation Component: Reports on<br />

all components of the plan<br />

evaluated by <strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Committee and recommendations<br />

for revisions to plan presented to the<br />

Superintendent.<br />

Education <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> updated<br />

by School Board based on <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Committee<br />

recommendations and<br />

administrative input.<br />

Principal<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Committee<br />

Board of Trustees<br />

Report to <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Committee<br />

Presentation of findings to<br />

Board, including<br />

recommended actions and<br />

revisions in Education<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Updated Education<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

By 10/15 each year of<br />

plan<br />

By 11/15 each year of<br />

plan<br />

By 12/15 each year of<br />

plan


Adult Literacy and <strong>Technology</strong><br />

31<br />

Criteria 8: Effective Collaborative Strategies with Adult Literacy Providers to Maximize<br />

the Use of <strong>Technology</strong><br />

The Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> does not provide adult education courses. However, we have<br />

identified the following adult education providers in our area:<br />

1. Fortuna Union High School <strong>District</strong><br />

2. College of the Redwoods<br />

During the Spring of 2004, the Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong>’s <strong>Technology</strong> Committee will meet with<br />

adult literacy providers. The <strong>Technology</strong> Committee will share information about our technology plan, learn how<br />

Adult Literacy Providers currently incorporate technology into their classes, and discover how we may collaborate<br />

to better provide services to our students, our parents, and the general community. Possible assistance may include<br />

providing facilities so that classes may be offered locally, providing ideas and aid so that technology may be<br />

integrated into their curriculum, and collaboratively pursuing funding sources for adult literacy.


EFFECTIVE, RESEARCH-BASED METHODS AND STRATEGIES<br />

32<br />

Criteria 9: Effective, Research-Based Methods and Strategies<br />

The integration of technology into the curriculum is core to this <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> the <strong>District</strong>'s Mission<br />

Statement. <strong>Technology</strong> links classrooms with educational resources within the school, the community, the nation<br />

and the world. Our district-wide plan encourages use of multimedia tools that enable students to become producers<br />

of knowledge as well as active learners. Our plan encourages student use of technology in project-based learning<br />

activities that support <strong>District</strong> learning goals and help students acquire technology and information-literacy skills,<br />

while achieving <strong>District</strong> curricular standards.<br />

The strategies in this plan for student learning, teaching, and technology management are based on relevant research<br />

and effective practices. The following are some examples we believe relate to student achievement:<br />

Curriculum Component Goals: Students will collect, organize, and analyze information through the use of<br />

electronic graphic organizers and the Internet to improve their writing, information literacy skills, as well as their<br />

mastery of the science process.<br />

“And in the ACOT study, student engagement remained highest when technology use was<br />

integrated into the larger curricular framework, rather than being an “add-on” to an already<br />

full curriculum.” 1<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> supports differentiated learning. One way to meet the needs of all students<br />

is through the use of technology. The curriculum goals of this plan support differentiated learning by utilizing<br />

“technology to provide the means for students with special need to communicate via email and use the Internet for<br />

research, and [technology] can also help teachers accommodate students’ varying learning styles.” 2<br />

Professional Development Goals: Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> recognizes that teachers, librarians,<br />

administrators, and support staff must receive training in order to use technology to promote student achievement..<br />

Our staff development component outlines the scope of teacher training.<br />

In 2000, a report on the effectiveness of technology in schools reported that, “… results of over 300 studies of<br />

technology use, authors concluded that teacher training was the most significant factor influencing the effective use<br />

of educational technology to improve student achievement. Specifically, the report states that students of teacher<br />

with more than ten hours of training significantly out performed students of teachers with five or fewer training<br />

hours.” 3<br />

To ensure that students receive a rigorous, academic education, the <strong>District</strong> developed this technology plan that<br />

supports our mission statement. Part of the Mission Statement says, "Students will have an opportunity to learn<br />

about themselves and the world around them in a stable school environment that is orderly, organized, respectful,<br />

supportive and free from prejudice. Student will have an opportunity to grow as responsible citizens with a sense of<br />

responsibility towards themselves, society, and the environment." The plan’s process included identifying state<br />

curriculum standards and activities that use technology to improve student achievement. In addition, as stated in the<br />

Section V of the plan, we identified the need to update our network infrastructure in order to include distance<br />

learning. This technology plan supports the district’s mission statement for today, and can also be carried forward<br />

into the future.<br />

1<br />

Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with technology:<br />

Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.<br />

2<br />

Silverstein, G., Frechtling, J., & Miyoaka, A. (2000). Evaluation of the use of technology in Illinois public schools: Final report<br />

(prepared for Research Division, Illinois State Board of Education). Rockville, MD: Westat.<br />

3 Sivin-Kachala, J., & Gialo, E. (2000) research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools (7th ed.). Washington, DC:<br />

Software and Information Industry Association


APPENDIX C<br />

CRITERIA FOR EETT-FUNDED EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLANS<br />

In order to be approved, a technology plan needs to have “Adequately Addressed” each of the<br />

following criteria:<br />

• For corresponding EETT Requirements, see Appendix F.<br />

• If the technology plan is revised, insert the Education <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Benchmark Review Form (Appendix I) at the beginning of the technology<br />

plan.<br />

• Include this form (Appendix C) with “Page in <strong>District</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>” completed at the<br />

end of your technology plan.<br />

33<br />

1. PLAN DURATION<br />

CRITERION<br />

a. The plan should guide<br />

the district’s use of<br />

education technology for<br />

the next three to five<br />

years.<br />

2. STAKEHOLDERS<br />

CRITERION<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 7 & 11<br />

(Appendix F)<br />

a. Description of how a<br />

variety of stakeholders<br />

from within the school<br />

district and the<br />

community-at-large<br />

participated in the<br />

planning process.<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

5<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

3 - 7<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The education technology<br />

plan describes the districts<br />

use of education technology<br />

for the next three to five<br />

years.<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The planning team<br />

consisted of representatives<br />

who will implement the<br />

plan. If a variety of<br />

stakeholders did not assist<br />

with the development of the<br />

plan, a description of why<br />

they were not involved is<br />

included.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan is less than three years<br />

or more than five years in<br />

length.<br />

Not Adequately Addressed<br />

Little evidence is included that<br />

shows that the district actively<br />

sought participation from a<br />

variety of stakeholders.


34<br />

3. CURRICULUM<br />

COMPONENT<br />

CRITERIA<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 1, 2, 3, 8,<br />

10, & 12 (Appendix F)<br />

a. Description of teachers’<br />

and students’ current<br />

access to technology tools<br />

both during the school day<br />

and outside of school<br />

hours.<br />

b. Description of the<br />

district’s current use of<br />

hardware and software to<br />

support teaching and<br />

learning.<br />

c. Summary of the district’s<br />

curricular goals and<br />

academic content<br />

standards in various<br />

district and site<br />

comprehensive planning<br />

documents.<br />

d. List of clear goals and a<br />

specific implementation<br />

plan for using technology<br />

to improve teaching and<br />

learning by supporting the<br />

district curricular goals<br />

and academic content<br />

standards.<br />

e. List of clear goals and a<br />

specific implementation<br />

plan detailing how and<br />

when students will acquire<br />

technology and<br />

information literacy skills<br />

needed to succeed in the<br />

classroom and the<br />

workplace.<br />

f. List of clear goals and a<br />

specific implementation<br />

plan for programs and<br />

methods of utilizing<br />

technology that ensure<br />

appropriate access to all<br />

students.<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

8<br />

9 - 10<br />

10<br />

11 - 15<br />

13 - 16<br />

15<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan describes the<br />

technology access available in<br />

the classrooms, library/media<br />

centers, or labs for all<br />

students and teachers.<br />

The plan describes the typical<br />

frequency and type of use<br />

(technology skills/information<br />

literacy/integrated into the<br />

curriculum).<br />

The plan references other<br />

district documents that guide<br />

the curriculum and/or<br />

establish goals and standards.<br />

The plan delineates clear,<br />

specific, and realistic goals<br />

and target groups for using<br />

technology to support the<br />

district’s curriculum goals<br />

and academic content<br />

standards to improve<br />

learning. The implementation<br />

plan clearly supports<br />

accomplishing the goals.<br />

For the focus areas, the plan<br />

delineates clear, specific and<br />

realistic goals for using<br />

technology to help students<br />

acquire technology and<br />

information literacy skills.<br />

The implementation plan<br />

clearly supports<br />

accomplishing the goals.<br />

For the focus areas, the plan<br />

delineates clear, specific and<br />

realistic goals for using<br />

technology to support the<br />

progress of all students. The<br />

implementation plan clearly<br />

supports accomplishing the<br />

goals.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan explains technology<br />

access in terms of a student-tocomputer<br />

ratio, but does not<br />

explain where access is available,<br />

who has access, and when various<br />

students and teachers can use the<br />

technology.<br />

The plan cites district policy<br />

regarding use of technology, but<br />

provides no information about its<br />

actual use.<br />

The plan does not reference<br />

district curriculum goals.<br />

The plan suggests how<br />

technology will be used, but is<br />

not specific enough to know what<br />

action needs to be taken to<br />

accomplish the goals.<br />

The plan suggests how<br />

technology will be used, but is<br />

not specific enough to determine<br />

what action needs to be taken to<br />

accomplish the goals.<br />

The plan suggests how<br />

technology will be used, but is<br />

not specific enough to know what<br />

action needs to be taken to<br />

accomplish the goals.


g. List of clear goals and a<br />

specific implementation<br />

plan to utilize technology<br />

to make student record<br />

keeping and assessment<br />

more efficient and<br />

supportive of teachers’<br />

efforts to meet individual<br />

student academic needs.<br />

h. List of clear goals and a<br />

specific implementation<br />

plan to utilize technology<br />

to make teachers and<br />

administrators more<br />

accessible to parents.<br />

15<br />

15<br />

i. List of benchmarks and a<br />

timeline for implementing<br />

planned strategies and<br />

activities. 16 - 19<br />

j. Description of the process<br />

that will be used to<br />

monitor whether the<br />

strategies and<br />

methodologies utilizing<br />

technology are being<br />

implemented according to<br />

the benchmarks and<br />

timeline.<br />

20<br />

The plan delineates clear,<br />

specific and realistic goals for<br />

using technology to support<br />

the district’s student recordkeeping<br />

and assessment<br />

efforts. The implementation<br />

plan clearly supports<br />

accomplishing the goals.<br />

The plan delineates clear,<br />

specific and realistic goals for<br />

using technology to facilitate<br />

improved two-way<br />

communication between<br />

home and school. The<br />

implementation plan clearly<br />

supports accomplishing the<br />

goals.<br />

The benchmarks and timeline<br />

are specific and realistic.<br />

Teachers, administrators and<br />

students implementing the<br />

plan can easily discern what<br />

steps will be taken, by whom,<br />

and when.<br />

The monitoring process is<br />

described in sufficient detail<br />

so that who is responsible,<br />

and what is expected is clear.<br />

35<br />

The plan suggests how<br />

technology will be used, but is<br />

not specific enough to know what<br />

action needs to be taken to<br />

accomplish the goals.<br />

The plan suggests how<br />

technology will be used, but is<br />

not specific enough to know what<br />

action needs to be taken to<br />

accomplish the goals.<br />

The benchmarks and timeline are<br />

either absent or so vague that it<br />

would be difficult to determine<br />

what should occur at any<br />

particular time.<br />

The monitoring process is either<br />

absent, or lacks detail regarding<br />

who is responsible and what is<br />

expected.


36<br />

4. PROFESSIONAL<br />

DEVELOPMENT<br />

COMPONENT<br />

CRITERIA<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 5 & 12<br />

(Appendix F)<br />

a. Summary of the teachers’<br />

and administrators’<br />

current technology skills<br />

and needs for professional<br />

development.<br />

b. List of clear goals and a<br />

specific implementation<br />

plan for providing<br />

professional development<br />

opportunities based on the<br />

needs assessment and the<br />

Curriculum Component<br />

goals, benchmarks, and<br />

timeline.<br />

c. List of benchmarks and a<br />

timeline for implementing<br />

planned strategies and<br />

activities.<br />

d. Description of the process<br />

that will be used to<br />

monitor whether the<br />

professional development<br />

goals are being met and<br />

whether the planned<br />

professional development<br />

activities are being<br />

implemented in<br />

accordance with the<br />

benchmarks and timeline.<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

21<br />

22<br />

22<br />

22<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan provides a clear<br />

summary of the teachers’<br />

and administrators’ current<br />

technology skills and needs<br />

for professional<br />

development. The findings<br />

are summarized in the plan<br />

by discrete skills to facilitate<br />

providing professional<br />

development that meets the<br />

identified needs and plan<br />

goals.<br />

The plan delineates clear,<br />

specific and realistic goals<br />

for providing teachers and<br />

administrators with<br />

sustained, ongoing<br />

professional development<br />

necessary to implement the<br />

Curriculum Component of<br />

the plan. The implementation<br />

plan clearly supports<br />

accomplishing the goals.<br />

The benchmarks and<br />

timeline are specific and<br />

realistic. Teachers and<br />

administrators implementing<br />

the plan can easily discern<br />

what steps will be taken, by<br />

whom, and when.<br />

The monitoring process is<br />

described in sufficient detail<br />

so that who is responsible<br />

and what is expected is clear.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

Description of current level of staff<br />

expertise is too general or relates<br />

only to a limited segment of the<br />

district’s teachers and<br />

administrators in the focus areas or<br />

does not relate to the focus areas,<br />

i.e., only the fourth grade teachers<br />

when grades four to eight are the<br />

focus grade levels.<br />

The plan speaks only generally of<br />

professional development and is<br />

not specific enough to ensure that<br />

teachers and administrators will<br />

have the necessary training to<br />

implement the Curriculum<br />

Component.<br />

The benchmarks and timeline are<br />

either absent or so vague that it<br />

would be difficult to determine<br />

what steps will be taken, by whom,<br />

and when.<br />

The monitoring process is either<br />

absent, or lacks detail regarding<br />

who is responsible and what is<br />

expected.


37<br />

5. INFRASTRUCTURE,<br />

HARDWARE,<br />

TECHNICAL SUPPORT,<br />

AND SOFTWARE<br />

COMPONENT<br />

CRITERIA<br />

a. Describe the technology<br />

hardware, electronic<br />

learning resources,<br />

networking and<br />

telecommunications<br />

infrastructure, physical<br />

plant modifications, and<br />

technical support needed<br />

by the district’s teachers,<br />

students, and<br />

administrators to support<br />

the activities in the<br />

Curriculum and<br />

Professional Development<br />

Components of the plan.<br />

b. Describe the existing<br />

hardware, Internet access,<br />

electronic learning<br />

resources, and technical<br />

support already in the<br />

district that could be used<br />

to support the Curriculum<br />

and Professional<br />

Development Components<br />

of the plan.<br />

c. List of clear benchmarks<br />

and a timeline for obtaining<br />

the hardware,<br />

infrastructure, learning<br />

resources and technical<br />

support required to support<br />

the other plan components.<br />

d. Description of the process<br />

that will be used to monitor<br />

whether the goals and<br />

benchmarks are being<br />

reached within the<br />

specified time frame.<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

23 - 24<br />

24 - 25<br />

25 - 26<br />

26 - 27<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan clearly summarizes<br />

the technology hardware,<br />

electronic learning resources,<br />

networking and<br />

telecommunications<br />

infrastructure, physical plant<br />

modifications, and technical<br />

support proposed to support<br />

the implementation of the<br />

district’s Curriculum and<br />

Professional Development<br />

Components. The plan also<br />

includes the list of items to be<br />

acquired, which may be<br />

included as an appendix.<br />

The plan clearly summarizes<br />

the existing technology<br />

hardware, electronic learning<br />

resources, networking and<br />

telecommunication<br />

infrastructure, and technical<br />

support to support the<br />

implementation of the<br />

Curriculum and Professional<br />

Development Components.<br />

The current level of technical<br />

support is clearly explained.<br />

The benchmarks and timeline<br />

are specific and realistic.<br />

Teachers and administrators<br />

implementing the plan can<br />

easily discern what needs to<br />

be acquired or repurposed, by<br />

whom, and when.<br />

The monitoring process is<br />

described in sufficient detail<br />

so that who is responsible and<br />

what is expected is clear.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan includes a description<br />

or list of hardware,<br />

infrastructure and other<br />

technology necessary to<br />

implement the plan, but there<br />

doesn’t seem to be any real<br />

relationship between the<br />

activities in the Curriculum and<br />

Professional Development<br />

Components and the listed<br />

equipment. Future technical<br />

support needs have not been<br />

addressed or do not relate to the<br />

needs of the Curriculum and<br />

Professional Development<br />

Components.<br />

The inventory of equipment is<br />

so general that it is difficult to<br />

determine what must be<br />

acquired to implement the<br />

Curriculum and Professional<br />

Development Components. The<br />

summary of current technical<br />

support is missing or lacks<br />

sufficient detail.<br />

The benchmarks and timeline<br />

are either absent or so vague<br />

that it would be difficult to<br />

determine what needs to be<br />

acquired or repurposed, by<br />

whom, and when.<br />

The monitoring process is either<br />

absent, or lacks detail regarding<br />

who is responsible and what is<br />

expected.


38<br />

6. FUNDING AND<br />

BUDGET<br />

COMPONENT<br />

CRITERIA<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 7 & 13,<br />

(Appendix F)<br />

a. List of established and<br />

potential funding sources<br />

and cost savings, present<br />

and future.<br />

b. Estimate implementation<br />

costs for the term of the<br />

plan (three to five years).<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

27<br />

28<br />

c. Description of the level<br />

of ongoing technical<br />

support the district will<br />

provide. 28<br />

d. Description of the<br />

district’s replacement<br />

policy for obsolete<br />

equipment.<br />

e. Description of the<br />

feedback loop used to<br />

monitor progress and<br />

update funding and<br />

budget decisions.<br />

28<br />

28<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan clearly describes<br />

resources* that are available<br />

or could be obtained to<br />

implement the plan. The<br />

process for identifying future<br />

funding sources is described.<br />

Cost estimates are reasonable<br />

and address the total cost of<br />

ownership.<br />

The plan describes the level<br />

of technical support that will<br />

be provided for<br />

implementation given<br />

current resources and<br />

describes goals for additional<br />

technical support should new<br />

resources become available.<br />

The level of technical<br />

support is based on some<br />

logical unit of measure.<br />

<strong>Plan</strong> recognizes that<br />

equipment will need to be<br />

replaced and outlines a<br />

realistic replacement plan<br />

that will support the<br />

Curriculum and Professional<br />

Development Components.<br />

The monitoring process is<br />

described in sufficient detail<br />

so that who is responsible,<br />

and what is expected is clear.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

Resources to implement the plan<br />

are not identified or are so<br />

general as to be useless.<br />

Cost estimates are unrealistic,<br />

lacking, or are not sufficiently<br />

detailed to determine if the total<br />

cost of ownership is addressed.<br />

The description of the ongoing<br />

level of technical support is either<br />

vague or not included, is so<br />

inadequate that successful<br />

implementation of the plan is<br />

unlikely, or is so unrealistic as to<br />

raise questions of the viability of<br />

sustaining that level of support.<br />

Replacement policy is either<br />

missing or vague. It is not clear<br />

that the replacement policy could<br />

be implemented.<br />

The monitoring process is either<br />

absent, or lacks detail regarding<br />

who is responsible and what is<br />

expected.<br />

* In this document, the term “resources” means funding, in-kind services, donations, or other items of value.


39<br />

7. MONITORING AND<br />

EVALUATION<br />

COMPONENT<br />

CRITERIA<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 11<br />

(Appendix F)<br />

a. Description of how<br />

technology’s impact on<br />

student learning and<br />

attainment of the<br />

district’s curricular<br />

goals, as well as<br />

classroom and school<br />

management, will be<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

29<br />

evaluated.<br />

b. Schedule for evaluating<br />

the effect of plan<br />

implementation. 29 - 30<br />

c. Description of how the<br />

information obtained<br />

through the monitoring<br />

and evaluation will be<br />

used.<br />

29 - 30<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan describes the<br />

process for evaluation<br />

utilizing the goals and<br />

benchmarks of each<br />

component as the<br />

indicators of success.<br />

Evaluation timeline is<br />

specific and realistic.<br />

The plan describes a<br />

process to report the<br />

monitoring and<br />

evaluation results to<br />

persons responsible for<br />

implementing and<br />

modifying the plan, as<br />

well as to the plan<br />

stakeholders.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

No provision for an evaluation is<br />

included in the plan. How success is<br />

determined is not defined. The<br />

evaluation is defined, but the process to<br />

conduct the evaluation is missing.<br />

The evaluation timeline is not included<br />

or indicates an expectation of<br />

unrealistic results that does not support<br />

the continued implementation of the<br />

plan.<br />

The plan does not provide a process for<br />

using the monitoring and evaluation<br />

results to improve the plan and/or<br />

disseminate the findings.


40<br />

8. EFFECTIVE<br />

COLLABORATIVE<br />

STRATEGIES WITH<br />

ADULT LITERACY<br />

PROVIDERS TO<br />

MAXIMIZE THE USE<br />

OF TECHNOLOGY<br />

CRITERION<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 11<br />

(Appendix F)<br />

a. If the district has<br />

identified adult literacy<br />

providers, there is a<br />

description of how the<br />

program will be<br />

developed in<br />

collaboration with those<br />

providers.<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

31<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan explains how the<br />

program will be<br />

developed in<br />

collaboration with adult<br />

literacy providers.<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>ning included or will<br />

include consideration of<br />

collaborative strategies<br />

and other funding<br />

resources to maximize the<br />

use of technology. If no<br />

adult literacy providers<br />

are indicated, the plan<br />

describes the process used<br />

to identify adult literacy<br />

providers.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

There is no evidence that the plan has<br />

been, or will be developed in<br />

collaboration with adult literacy<br />

service providers, to maximize the use<br />

of technology.


41<br />

9. EFFECTIVE,<br />

RESEARCHED-BASED<br />

METHODS,<br />

STRATEGIES, AND<br />

CRITERIA<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 4 & 9<br />

(Appendix F)<br />

a. Description of how<br />

education technology<br />

strategies and proven<br />

methods for student<br />

learning, teaching, and<br />

technology management<br />

are based on relevant<br />

research and effective<br />

practices.<br />

b. Description of thorough<br />

and thoughtful<br />

examination of<br />

externally or locally<br />

developed education<br />

technology models and<br />

strategies.<br />

c. Description of<br />

development and<br />

utilization of innovative<br />

strategies for using<br />

technology to deliver<br />

rigorous academic<br />

courses and curricula,<br />

including distancelearning<br />

technologies<br />

(particularly in areas that<br />

would not otherwise<br />

have access to such<br />

courses or curricula due<br />

to geographical distances<br />

or insufficient<br />

resources).<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

32<br />

32<br />

32<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan describes the<br />

relevant research behind the<br />

plan’s design for strategies<br />

and/or methods selected.<br />

The plan describes<br />

references to research<br />

literature that supports why<br />

or how the model improves<br />

student achievement.<br />

The plan describes the<br />

process for development and<br />

utilization of strategies to<br />

use technology to deliver<br />

specialized or rigorous<br />

academic courses and<br />

curricula, including distance<br />

learning.<br />

Not Adequately Addressed<br />

The description of the research<br />

behind the plan’s design for<br />

strategies and/or methods selected<br />

is unclear or missing.<br />

No research is cited.<br />

There is no plan to utilize<br />

technology to extend or supplement<br />

the district’s curriculum offerings

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!