15.01.2014 Views

District Educational Technology Plan Team - Humboldt County ...

District Educational Technology Plan Team - Humboldt County ...

District Educational Technology Plan Team - Humboldt County ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

3<br />

School Board of Trustees<br />

Tammy Stephens, President<br />

Leslie O'Neil<br />

Deborah East<br />

Jeff Jacobs<br />

Tammy Robison<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>Team</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> Personnel<br />

Curriculum / Data Personnel<br />

James Malloy, Superintendent/Principal<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Personnel<br />

None<br />

Financial Personnel<br />

James Malloy, Superintendent/Principal<br />

Site Administrators<br />

James Malloy, Superintendent/Principal<br />

Teachers<br />

Jackie Carter, Eighth Grade Math/Science<br />

Paulette Cortez, Third Grade<br />

Laurel Stokes, Special Education Resource Teacher<br />

Classified Staff / Parents<br />

Julie Winburn, Librarian / Computer Lab Instructional Aide<br />

Gracelia Sanchez, Parent/ESL Instructional Aide<br />

Government Agencies<br />

CTAP Region 1<br />

<strong>Humboldt</strong> <strong>County</strong> Office of Education<br />

Community Group & Businesses<br />

Higher Education


<strong>District</strong> Profile<br />

4<br />

Loleta Elementary School serves a small rural community about eight miles south of Eureka, California. Loleta is a<br />

diverse community, consisting of the town of Loleta, the Table Bluff Reservation, and the Bear River Rancheria,<br />

and a large agricultural area. The school has always enjoyed a positive reputation for its high quality academic<br />

programs and fine teaching staff<br />

The following data offers a snapshot of our district during the 2003-04 school year from the Ed Data<br />

(http://www.ed-data.k12.ca.us/welcome.asp ) and Dataquest (http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ ) web sites.<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> 2003-04 School Data<br />

Number of Schools Enrollment Full-Time Equivalent Teachers Pupil-Teacher Ratio<br />

Elementary 1 187 11.5 16.3<br />

Middle<br />

High School<br />

K-12<br />

Alternative<br />

Continuation<br />

Total 1 187 11.5 16.3<br />

Loleta Union Elementary <strong>District</strong>, Students by Ethnicity 2003-04<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Enrollment<br />

Percent of Total<br />

American Indian 38 20.3%<br />

Hispanic 51 27.3%<br />

African American 1 0.5%<br />

White 97 51.9%<br />

Total 187 100%<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong>, Student & Teacher Data 2003-04<br />

English Learners 44<br />

Fluent-English-Proficient Students 1<br />

Students Redesignated FEP 0<br />

Graduates (prior year)<br />

n/a<br />

UC/CSU Elig Grads (prior year)<br />

n/a<br />

Dropouts (prior year, grade 9-12)<br />

n/a<br />

1 Yr Drop Rate (prior year, grade 9-12) n/a<br />

4 Yr Drop Rate (prior year, grade 9-12) n/a<br />

% Fully Credentialed Teachers 100%<br />

Pupil Teacher Ratio 16.3:1<br />

Avg. Class Size 18<br />

Free or Reduced Price Meals 70.6%<br />

CalWORKs (formerly AFDC) 20.9%


Education <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> Overview<br />

5<br />

The mission of the Loleta Elementary Union School <strong>District</strong> is to provide our students with:<br />

• An opportunity to learn about themselves and the world around them in a stable school environment that<br />

is orderly, organized, respectful, supportive and free from prejudice.<br />

• An opportunity to grow as responsible citizens with a sense of responsibility towards themselves,<br />

society, and the environment.<br />

• A quality basic education with a life-long desire for learning and personal development.<br />

• A program that integrates and weaves the community into the learning process.<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> is committed to appropriately integrating technology into all areas of the<br />

curriculum and dedicated to the acquisition and support of effective educational technology. Implementing<br />

technology-based solutions into all functions and processes of instruction, management and communication is the<br />

responsibility of district and school site curriculum and technology leaders. Specifically our role is to implement<br />

technology solutions that will make accountable differences in instruction, assessment, and management of students<br />

as well as improve communication and collaboration.<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong>'s Education <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is intended to serve as both a guide for<br />

technology related decision making and an instrument to monitor and evaluate progress toward identified goals and<br />

objectives. An updated assessment of district technology status, needs, and resources has been completed for each<br />

section of our revised tech plan and has guided the development of our new technology goals, objectives and<br />

implementation activities. Our goals and objectives were established to meet the identified needs of integrating<br />

technology to improve student learning, providing equitable technology access and support, providing secure, timely<br />

information flow between home, school, and community, and providing coordinated, ongoing high quality<br />

educational technology professional development.<br />

1a. <strong>Plan</strong> Duration<br />

The Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> School <strong>District</strong> educational technology plan covers five years, from<br />

July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2009. It will serve as the primary tool to guide the district’s acquisition,<br />

sustainability, and integration of technology to support the district’s curricular goals. This plan will be monitored by<br />

the Superintendent/Principal and school library/media specialist and reviewed and revised annually by technology<br />

stakeholders after the state releases achievement data for district school sites. Any modifications required through<br />

such review will be communicated to the school board. The Superintendent/Principal will work with staff to<br />

implement any required revisions.<br />

2a. Stakeholders<br />

Our district's <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> planning team is comprised of representatives responsible for implementing<br />

the plan, including the Superintendent/Principal, teachers, and parents.<br />

The team originally convened in the 2004-05 school year to serve as a strategic planning committee in the<br />

development of this technology plan. Since then, the team has met regularly. Progress was reviewed to:<br />

• Evaluate the draft technology plan and make adjustments if needed.<br />

• Gather and evaluate district technology data with regard to hardware, wiring, resources, professional<br />

development and projects.<br />

• Collect and analyze survey, technology, and student achievement data.<br />

• Identify and update common technology needs and issues.<br />

As the stakeholders developed our technology plan, the following key questions were addressed:<br />

• Is the district and schools’ vision for student success aligned to today's technology?<br />

• Is student academic achievement improving where technology is being used?<br />

• Are students demonstrating proficiency in technological literacy?<br />

• Are teachers proficient in implementing, assessing and supporting a variety of effective practices for<br />

teaching and learning?


Stakeholder Groups<br />

6<br />

<strong>District</strong> Curriculum Personnel – Superintendent/Principal, teachers and library/media specialist.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

Representatives on our Tech <strong>Plan</strong> team promote, direct, and facilitate the technology team’s development of goals<br />

and objectives for curriculum, resources, and operations that technology into the curriculum. Teachers and the<br />

library/media specialist implement standards-aligned academic objective; support research-based best practices and<br />

instructional programs; monitor student assessment and data monitoring systems and school performance and make<br />

adjustments based on school performance.<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Personnel –The district is too small to have technology personnel. The technology component<br />

is shared between the Superintendent/Principal, library media specialist and until January 2005 a teacher, since<br />

retired.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

The <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> team provides coordination of the technology implementation and the implementation of the<br />

goals and objectives set forth in this updated technology plan.<br />

<strong>District</strong> Financial Personnel – Superintendent/Principal<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

Superintendent/Principal provides coordination of technology funds and budget issues.<br />

Site Administration – Superintendent/Principal<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

Superintendent/Principal provides site-based updates on tech plan implementation and needs; monitor teacher<br />

performance and student learning; make adjustments based on teacher and student performance; ensure the use of<br />

adopted materials, research-based best practices and instructional programs; provide input on how technology can<br />

better support the teaching of standards-aligned academic objectives.<br />

Site Teachers –<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> is a single school elementary school district.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

Teachers provide input on efforts and outcomes using research-based technology programs and practices to support<br />

the district curricular goals and academic content standards and improve teaching and learning.<br />

Parents –<br />

Parents of children enrolled in our school.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

Parents advocate for equity in access to technology and the opportunity to master core subjects.<br />

Government Agencies –<br />

Representatives from the California <strong>Technology</strong> Assistance Project (CTAP) Region 1 and the <strong>Humboldt</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

Office of Education.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

Representatives offered technical assistance in the data analyses and revision of our goals and objectives,<br />

professional development planning and implementation, EETT Formula Funding, E-rate, compliance issues,<br />

hardware, software, and infrastructure.


Community Groups & Businesses –<br />

The rural setting of Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> has not provided us an opportunity to collaborate with<br />

Community & Business groups.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

N/A<br />

Higher Education –<br />

The two institutions of higher education have not been responsive to collaboration with Loleta Union Elementary<br />

School <strong>District</strong> because of our rural setting.<br />

Design & Implementation Roles:<br />

N/A<br />

7<br />

The Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> continues to solicit and expand our partnerships with stakeholders to<br />

enhance the infusion of educational technology into the curriculum. Our district recognizes that schools alone do not<br />

have the resources or expertise to keep pace with rapidly changing technology. We believe that these partnerships<br />

will help us serve the growing needs of an increasingly technical and global education system and society.


8<br />

CURRICULUM DRIVEN TECHNOLOGY GOALS<br />

The following goals will strategically meet our students’ need to acquire and refine their technology and information<br />

literacy skills in order to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and ideally the enjoyment of their learning<br />

experiences as they master the core content standards.<br />

Goal 1:<br />

Goal 2:<br />

Goal 3:<br />

Goal 4:<br />

Students will use technology to attain rigorous performance in identified state curriculum standards.<br />

Students and teachers will use technology to increase communication and accessibility between<br />

parents, school, and the community concerning student needs and achievements.<br />

Students will have increased opportunities to access technology, school information, and resources<br />

during school and non-school hours.<br />

Students will meet established technology performance standards in six areas: basic operation and<br />

concepts, social, ethical and human issues; technology productivity tools; technology communication<br />

tools; technology research tools, and technology problem solving; and decision making tools.<br />

3a. Current <strong>Technology</strong> Access<br />

In 2000, Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> developed a committee to design a technology plan to develop<br />

technological competence in all students. The committee developed several goals. Two goals particularly related to<br />

usage are: 1) to provide equal student access to computer usage during and after school hours and 2) to increase<br />

communication with parents through technology. Currently, Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> has<br />

technology throughout all classrooms and has provided a teacher computer for each classroom each equipped with<br />

email access. A computer lab is maintained in the school library with daily student access. Teachers use email to<br />

communicate with other teachers, parents, and students regarding student achievement.<br />

The district utilizes <strong>Humboldt</strong> <strong>County</strong> Office of Education as our Internet service provider. To create a safe Internet<br />

experience, the <strong>District</strong> has adopted an Acceptable Use Policy that students, parents, and staff are required to sign<br />

and submit to school sites before Internet access is allowed to individual students. Each site has provided computer<br />

lab access for all grade levels.<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong>, <strong>Technology</strong> by School Type 2003-04<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Students per Computer<br />

Elementary 5.3<br />

Source: California Department of Education, <strong>Educational</strong> Demographics Office (CBEDS, sifade03 4/26/04, sifgl 7/6/04,<br />

pubschls 6/4/04) In addition to computers available for use by students, those used by staff for instructional activities are<br />

also included when counting computers at the various schools. This count is then divided by student enrollment to arrive at<br />

a students-per-computer figure.<br />

However, according to our current California <strong>Technology</strong> Survey and district records, our student to computer ratio<br />

for computers four years old or newer is 8:1. All teachers have access to a minimum of one multi-media computer<br />

with Internet access in their classrooms as well as in the Library/Media Computer Lab, before, during, and after<br />

school hours. All teachers have scheduled Computer Lab time for students to complete classroom activities.<br />

Elementary School Name: Loleta Union Elementary<br />

All Students, including Special Ed, ELL, and GATE students, have equal access to<br />

technology in the following areas:<br />

# of computers in Classrooms 37<br />

# of computers in Library/media centers 2<br />

# of computers in Computer Labs 8<br />

Total # of Internet Connected Computers 40


3b. Current <strong>Technology</strong> Integration in Curriculum<br />

Frequency and Type of <strong>Technology</strong> Use at Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong><br />

Grade <strong>Technology</strong> Use<br />

Level Daily Usage<br />

K-2 Subject Areas Supported by<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> (daily):<br />

Language Arts / Reading<br />

Mathematics (limited software)<br />

Science (limited use)<br />

Fine Arts<br />

Spanish Immersion Program<br />

Library Skills<br />

3-5 Subject Areas Supported by<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> (daily):<br />

Language Arts / Reading<br />

Mathematics (increased availability)<br />

Science (limited use)<br />

Social Studies<br />

Fine Arts<br />

Library Skills<br />

6-8 Subject Areas Supported by<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> (daily):<br />

Language Arts<br />

Reading<br />

Mathematics<br />

Science<br />

Social Studies<br />

Elective Program<br />

Yearbook Production<br />

Library Skills<br />

Teacher <strong>Technology</strong> Use<br />

As Instruction Dictates<br />

Create instructional materials<br />

Communicate with parents and<br />

colleagues<br />

Create and deliver lessons<br />

Use surround sound field system<br />

VHS Video / VCR<br />

Low incidence items<br />

Teach timers<br />

Create and deliver multimedia<br />

presentations<br />

Create instructional materials<br />

Communicate with students, parents, and<br />

colleagues<br />

Create and deliver lessons<br />

Create and deliver multimedia<br />

presentations<br />

Use surround sound field system<br />

VHS Video / VCR<br />

Low incidence items<br />

Teach timers<br />

Create instructional materials<br />

Communicate with students, parents,<br />

colleagues, and community<br />

Grading & Attendance<br />

Student Records<br />

Multi-media Presentations<br />

CDs<br />

Science Probes<br />

Microscopes (computer linked)<br />

Digital Cameras/Video<br />

VHS Video / VCR<br />

Low Incidence Items<br />

Internet – lesson research and design<br />

9<br />

Student <strong>Technology</strong> Use<br />

As Instruction Dictates<br />

Students use a variety of technologies that<br />

facilitates auditory, visual, and textual<br />

learning. This includes:<br />

Listening stations<br />

Word processing<br />

CDs<br />

Multi-media software<br />

Keyboarding/word processing<br />

Students use a variety of technologies that<br />

facilitates auditory, visual, and textual<br />

learning. This includes:<br />

Listening stations<br />

Keyboarding/word processing<br />

CDs<br />

Multi-media software<br />

Simulations<br />

Calculators<br />

Internet<br />

Alpha Smarts<br />

Students use a variety of technologies that<br />

facilitates auditory, visual, and textual<br />

learning. This includes:<br />

Keyboarding/word processing<br />

CDs<br />

Multi-media software<br />

Calculators<br />

Spreadsheets<br />

Internet<br />

Alpha Smarts<br />

Accelerated Reading Program<br />

Digital Camera/Video<br />

Scanners<br />

Science Probes<br />

Microscopes<br />

VHS Video Camera


10<br />

Frequency and Type of <strong>Technology</strong> Use at Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong><br />

Grade Curriculum-Integrated <strong>Technology</strong> Information Literacy Skills <strong>Technology</strong> Skills<br />

Level<br />

K-2 Students use curriculum-integrated<br />

technology for language acquisition,<br />

sound recognition, and develop<br />

mathematical concepts. Examples<br />

include:<br />

Kids Works Deluxe<br />

Appleworks<br />

Spanish Immersion Software<br />

Library search software<br />

3-5 Students use curriculum-integrated Library search software<br />

technology to develop skills in reading, Internet<br />

vocabulary building, and reinforce Grade level projects or reports (i.e. 3 rd<br />

mathematical concepts. Examples grade animal projects, 4 th grade<br />

include:<br />

mission projects, 5 th grade astronomy<br />

Kids Works Deluxe<br />

projects, science fair projects –<br />

Appleworks<br />

multiple grades)<br />

On-line Simulations (Social Studies and<br />

Science)<br />

Mathematical Software<br />

Students learn:<br />

how to identify computer terminology and<br />

how to use components of a computer (i.e.<br />

mouse, printing, etc.)<br />

how to navigate through software (i.e. library<br />

search software)<br />

computer etiquette<br />

Students have scheduled computer time to<br />

develop:<br />

keyboarding skills<br />

word processing<br />

Internet<br />

research skills<br />

manipulation and transfer of data between<br />

software<br />

computer etiquette<br />

Internet safety<br />

6-8 Students use curriculum-integrated<br />

technology for comprehension of written<br />

language; to research, create, and present<br />

multi-media projects and or reports in<br />

curricular areas; and develop and<br />

reinforce mathematical concepts.<br />

Examples include:<br />

Office 2000<br />

Adobe Photo Deluxe<br />

Type to Learn<br />

Microsoft Works<br />

Appleworks<br />

On-line Simulations (Social Studies and<br />

Science)<br />

Library search software<br />

Internet<br />

Grade level projects or reports (i.e. 6 th<br />

grade Ancient Egypt, 7 th grade<br />

Renaissance, 8 th grade Civil War<br />

projects, science fair projects –<br />

multiple grades)<br />

Students have scheduled computer time to<br />

develop:<br />

Keyboarding skills<br />

word processing skills<br />

Internet navigation skills<br />

Internet research skills<br />

Internet resources<br />

manipulation and transfer of data between<br />

software<br />

computer etiquette<br />

Internet safety<br />

spreadsheets<br />

skills needed to manipulate graphics (i.e.<br />

digital camera, Internet, scanner, etc.)<br />

3c. Curricular Goals and Standards Curriculum<br />

The curricular goals and standard are outlined in the Local <strong>Educational</strong> Agency <strong>Plan</strong> developed in the 2002-2003<br />

school year. The goals defined in the LEAP include:<br />

• All students reading at proficiency or above on the California Standards Test by the year 2013-2014.<br />

• All English Language Learners will become proficient in English and reach high academic standards at a<br />

minimum attaining proficiency or better in reading/language arts and mathematics.<br />

• By 2005-2006 all students will be taught by Highly Qualified Teachers.<br />

The Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> Board of Trustees has adopted the California Academic Performance<br />

Standards as the minimum academic standards for the district.


3d<br />

Goals & <strong>Plan</strong>s: Improving Teaching & Learning Curriculum<br />

The following goals will strategically meet our students’ need to acquire and refine their technology and information<br />

literacy skills in order to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and ideally the enjoyment of their learning<br />

experiences as they master the core content standards.<br />

Goal 1: Students will use technology to attain rigorous performance in identified state curriculum standards.<br />

Goal 2: Students and teachers will use technology to increase communication and accessibility between<br />

parents, school, and the community concerning student needs and achievements.<br />

Goal 3: Students will have increased opportunities to access technology, school information, and resources<br />

during school and non-school hours.<br />

Goal 4: Students will meet established technology performance standards in six areas: basic operation and<br />

concepts, social, ethical and human issues; technology productivity tools; technology communication<br />

tools; technology research tools, and technology problem solving; and decision making tools.<br />

ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT GOAL 1: Students will use technology to attain rigorous performance in identified<br />

state curriculum standards.<br />

Curriculum Focus Area – Language Arts / Reading: The activities listed are repetitive over the five-year term of<br />

the plan. Staff members identified curriculum focus areas for grades 2-8:<br />

Grade<br />

Level<br />

Activity<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Date Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

K-2 Students will use:<br />

phonics software to increase phonemic awareness and<br />

language acquisition;<br />

Accelerated Reader software to improve reading<br />

comprehension skills;<br />

listening stations to improve comprehension of context<br />

and vocabulary;<br />

word processing software to develop basic writing skills.<br />

Teachers End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

• district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student work, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 85% of students will access<br />

Accelerated Reader leveled<br />

library to grow their reading<br />

skills as evidenced by class<br />

printouts, each year.<br />

• 85% of students will use<br />

listening stations as evidenced by<br />

class records, each year.<br />

• 85% of students will use a<br />

word processing program as<br />

evidenced by class records, each<br />

year.<br />

• 85% of students will access the<br />

Waterford Early Reading<br />

Program as evidenced by<br />

6-8 Students will use:<br />

graphic organization software to continue developing the<br />

organization of their writing;<br />

interactive software that focuses on overall grammar and<br />

spelling skills;<br />

Internet and word processing software that develops<br />

research, interpretation of text, and enhances the writing<br />

process; and<br />

variety of technology, - digital cameras, scanners,<br />

overhead. projectors, digital video, CD burners, to<br />

research & present their acquisition of content standards.<br />

Teachers<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

11<br />

program reporting, each year.<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple<br />

measures, samples of student<br />

writing, and software reports that<br />

assess student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

graphic organization software as<br />

evidenced by student work, each<br />

year.<br />

• 95% of students will complete a<br />

research paper as evidenced by<br />

student work, each year.<br />

• 95% of 7th & 8th graders will<br />

develop web science fair projects<br />

for the Virtual Science Fair using<br />

a variety of technology, each year


Curriculum Focus Area – Mathematics: The activities listed are repetitive over the five-year term of the plan.<br />

Staff members identified curriculum focus areas for grades 2-8.<br />

12<br />

Grade Activity<br />

Level<br />

K-2 Students will use:<br />

software to develop problem solving skills, number sense,<br />

measurement and spatial reasoning;<br />

auditory CDs that reinforce number facts.<br />

3-5 Students will use:<br />

software to develop problem solving strategies,<br />

measurement, geometry, estimation, and computation<br />

skills;<br />

auditory CDs that reinforce computation skills and number<br />

facts.<br />

6-8 Students will use:<br />

diagnostic software to improve and reinforce measurement,<br />

statistics, and computation skills;<br />

graphing calculators to develop statistical and algebraic<br />

concepts;<br />

classroom computer stations to improve and reinforce<br />

measurement, statistics, and computation skills.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

Date<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student writing, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use math<br />

software as evidenced by student<br />

records, each year<br />

• 80% of students will use<br />

auditory CD as evidenced by<br />

classroom records, each year<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student writing, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use math<br />

software as evidenced by student<br />

records, each year<br />

• 80% of students will use<br />

auditory CD as evidenced by<br />

classroom records, each year<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student writing, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use math<br />

software as evidenced by student<br />

records, each year


Curriculum Focus Area – Science: The activities listed are repetitive over the five-year term of the plan.<br />

Modifications these activities will be reflected in the plan based on recommendations made to the <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Committee at the annual review meeting. Staff members identified curriculum focus areas for grades 2-<br />

8.<br />

Grade Activity<br />

Person<br />

Date<br />

Benchmark<br />

Level<br />

K-2 Students will use:<br />

CD research software.<br />

Responsible<br />

Teachers<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

13<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year<br />

3-5 Students will use:<br />

technology such as digital cameras, Internet, and word<br />

processing to develop the concepts of the scientific process<br />

while participating in on-line projects;<br />

problem solving science simulations to improve and<br />

reinforce the scientific process;<br />

CD research software.<br />

6-8 Students will use:<br />

technology such as digital cameras, Internet, and word<br />

processing to develop the concepts of the scientific process<br />

while participating in on-line projects;<br />

problem solving science simulations to improve and<br />

reinforce the scientific process;<br />

CD research software<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

technology to process a science<br />

project as evidenced on Science<br />

Night, each year<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

simulations as evidenced on<br />

Science Night, each year<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year<br />

Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

technology to process a science<br />

project as evidenced on Science<br />

Night, each year<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

simulations as evidenced on<br />

Science Night, each year<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year


ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT GOAL 2: Students and teachers will use technology to increase communication and<br />

accessibility between parents, school, and the community concerning student needs and achievement.<br />

Current Status: The <strong>Technology</strong> Committee surveyed the district’s staff regarding communication technology and<br />

found the following: The district web page is updated regarding school calendars, lunch menus, activities and<br />

district reports’, but the school site web pages are not currently updated on a regular basis. All teachers have<br />

telephones in their classrooms to facilitate parent contact, and they have access to email through their classroom<br />

computers<br />

To facilitate increased communication and accessibility between parents, school, and the community, sites proposed<br />

the following activities<br />

Site Activity Person Responsible Date Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

<strong>District</strong> Wide Provide staff development on<br />

email<br />

Implement Power Schools home<br />

communication program<br />

Send letters home to parents<br />

about the use of on-line<br />

communication service<br />

Teachers will increase their use of<br />

email with staff, parents, and<br />

students<br />

Staff will utilize Power School to<br />

record and evaluate results of<br />

student achievement through<br />

Multiple Measures data.<br />

Principal<br />

Staff Development<br />

2004/2005 School Year<br />

for Staff Development<br />

Days<br />

2005/2006 School Year<br />

for Staff Development<br />

Days<br />

Training Rosters<br />

Staff Survey<br />

Printout of Multiple<br />

Measures data from Power<br />

School<br />

95% of students with internet<br />

access will access Power<br />

School for e-mail,<br />

homework, progress reports<br />

and newsletters, each year.<br />

ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT GOAL 3: Students will have increased opportunities to access technology, school<br />

information, and resources during school and non-school hours.<br />

Activity<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Date Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

Access to technology will be provided in each<br />

district classroom, in the computer lab in the<br />

library.<br />

Upgrade or purchase equipment as needed.<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Coordinator<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

The teaching of technology skills will take<br />

place within the context of the curriculum and<br />

be supported by training in the computer lab.<br />

Principal<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

14<br />

Inventory of district technology that will insure<br />

that all district equipment is functional<br />

Records of Purchase Order, each year<br />

Samples of student work<br />

Site computer lab schedules<br />

Classroom observations using Walk'bout will<br />

indicate use of technology in 70% of the<br />

observations, each year<br />

Information literacy training for students will<br />

take place in the classroom and be supported by<br />

computer lab activities.<br />

Principal<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Samples of student work<br />

Site computer lab schedules<br />

Classroom observations using Walk'bout will<br />

indicate use of technology in 70% of the<br />

observations, each year<br />

80% of students in grades 3 - 8 will access library<br />

materials from their classroom as evidenced by<br />

library records, each year


ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT GOAL 4: Students will meet established technology performance<br />

standards in six areas: basic operation and concepts, social, ethical and human issues; technology<br />

productivity tools; technology communication tools; technology research tools, and technology<br />

problem solving; and decision making tools.<br />

Activity<br />

Person<br />

Date<br />

Benchmark<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Committee will revise the<br />

district standards for technology and<br />

information literacy by grade level.<br />

Each grade level will review the proposed<br />

technology performance standards.<br />

Final draft of proposed technology<br />

performance standards, including evaluation<br />

models, will be submitted to the board.<br />

Implement new district standards for<br />

technology and information literacy through<br />

classroom curriculum.<br />

3e<br />

Goals/<strong>Plan</strong>s<br />

Responsible<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Subcommittee<br />

15<br />

2006/2007 Draft recommendations for grade level<br />

performance standards will be distributed by<br />

April 2007.<br />

Teachers 2006/2007 Report by teacher on acceptance of changes to<br />

proposed technology performance standards will<br />

be returned to committee by May 2007<br />

Superintendent 2006/2007 Approval and adoption by the Loleta Union<br />

Elementary School <strong>District</strong> Board by June 2007<br />

Teachers<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004 – 2008<br />

90% of student portfolios will contain samples of<br />

student work in technology<br />

• Lesson plans will indicate use of technology,<br />

each year<br />

When we assess a classroom to ensure that 85% are meeting a benchmark we are assessing an average of 15<br />

students per classroom. The use of daily logs, anecdotal records, lesson plans and other daily activities have proven<br />

to be adequate for evaluating the progress towards meeting benchmarks.<br />

3f<br />

Goals/<strong>Plan</strong>s for appropriate access to the Curriculum<br />

As reference in the <strong>District</strong> Profile, Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> has a significantly diverse student<br />

population. Equal access to the curriculum is not an issue in the district. As referenced in the <strong>District</strong> Profile the<br />

class sizes are small. The percentage of Socially Economically Disadvantaged students is 70%+. The number of<br />

Hispanic and Native American students is equally dispersed throughout the student population. There are an equal<br />

number of boys and girls in the population. Every student has equal access to the curriculum and to the use of<br />

technology. Goal 3, listed at the beginning of this section, and the activities to support this goal, listed on page 14,<br />

address appropriate access to the curriculum<br />

3g<br />

Goals/<strong>Plan</strong> For Records/Assessment<br />

The district's implementation of Power School and Power Grade, as identified in Activities to Support Goal 2,<br />

supports the use of technology to improve student achievement data collection, analysis, reporting and research/data<br />

driven decision-making.<br />

3h. Goals/<strong>Plan</strong>s For Parent Access to Teachers/Administrators<br />

Beginning in September 2005, parents will have access to Power Grade, a component of Power School our student<br />

information system, as identified in Activities to Support Goal 2. Parents will be able to view student academic<br />

progress, contact teachers, read newsletters and view homework assignments at their convenience. The district web<br />

site has been upgraded with classroom pages to be maintained by teams of sixth and seventh grade students. The<br />

weekly school newsletter is posed each Friday on the website.<br />

Activity<br />

By June 2006, all parents will have password<br />

protected online access to their student’s<br />

attendance, assignments and grades through<br />

Power Grade a web-based student information<br />

system<br />

By September 2006, two computers in the<br />

computer will be available for parent access to<br />

Power Grade.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Principal<br />

<strong>District</strong> Office Staff<br />

Principal<br />

Librarian<br />

Date<br />

September<br />

2005<br />

September<br />

2005<br />

Evidence<br />

Signatory cards of parents for obtaining their<br />

password.<br />

Sign in sheets for parent use of these computers.


3i. Benchmarks and Timelines<br />

The benchmarks and timelines for Goal 1 are described on pages 12 - 13 for Reading, Math and Science include:<br />

16<br />

Reading<br />

Grade Activity<br />

Level<br />

K-2 Students will use:<br />

CD research software.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Teachers<br />

Date<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year<br />

3-5 Students will use:<br />

technology such as digital cameras, Internet, and word<br />

processing to develop the concepts of the scientific process<br />

while participating in on-line projects;<br />

problem solving science simulations to improve and<br />

reinforce the scientific process;<br />

CD research software.<br />

6-8 Students will use:<br />

technology such as digital cameras, Internet, and word<br />

processing to develop the concepts of the scientific process<br />

while participating in on-line projects;<br />

problem solving science simulations to improve and<br />

reinforce the scientific process;<br />

CD research software<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

technology to process a science<br />

project as evidenced on Science<br />

Night, each year<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

simulations as evidenced on<br />

Science Night, each year<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year<br />

Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

technology to process a science<br />

project as evidenced on Science<br />

Night, each year<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

simulations as evidenced on<br />

Science Night, each year<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year


17<br />

Math<br />

Grade Activity<br />

Level<br />

K-2 Students will use:<br />

software to develop problem solving skills, number sense,<br />

measurement and spatial reasoning;<br />

auditory CDs that reinforce number facts.<br />

3-5 Students will use:<br />

software to develop problem solving strategies,<br />

measurement, geometry, estimation, and computation<br />

skills;<br />

auditory CDs that reinforce computation skills and number<br />

facts.<br />

6-8 Students will use:<br />

diagnostic software to improve and reinforce measurement,<br />

statistics, and computation skills;<br />

graphing calculators to develop statistical and algebraic<br />

concepts;<br />

classroom computer stations to improve and reinforce<br />

measurement, statistics, and computation skills.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

Date<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student writing, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use math<br />

software as evidenced by student<br />

records, each year<br />

• 80% of students will use<br />

auditory CD as evidenced by<br />

classroom records, each year<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student writing, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use math<br />

software as evidenced by student<br />

records, each year<br />

• 80% of students will use<br />

auditory CD as evidenced by<br />

classroom records, each year<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, district multiple measures,<br />

samples of student writing, and<br />

software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use math<br />

software as evidenced by student<br />

records, each year


18<br />

Science<br />

Grade Activity<br />

Level<br />

K-2 Students will use:<br />

CD research software.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Teachers<br />

Date<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

• Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year<br />

3-5 Students will use:<br />

technology such as digital cameras, Internet, and word<br />

processing to develop the concepts of the scientific process<br />

while participating in on-line projects;<br />

problem solving science simulations to improve and<br />

reinforce the scientific process;<br />

CD research software.<br />

6-8 Students will use:<br />

technology such as digital cameras, Internet, and word<br />

processing to develop the concepts of the scientific process<br />

while participating in on-line projects;<br />

problem solving science simulations to improve and<br />

reinforce the scientific process;<br />

CD research software<br />

Teachers<br />

Teachers<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

End of each<br />

year, 2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

technology to process a science<br />

project as evidenced on Science<br />

Night, each year<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

simulations as evidenced on<br />

Science Night, each year<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year<br />

Content cluster reports from<br />

STAR, samples of student work,<br />

and software reports that assess<br />

student progress<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

technology to process a science<br />

project as evidenced on Science<br />

Night, each year<br />

• 90% of students will use<br />

simulations as evidenced on<br />

Science Night, each year<br />

• 95% of students will use CD<br />

software to research science<br />

material as evidenced by student<br />

work and classroom records, each<br />

year


The benchmarks and timelines for Goal 2 include:<br />

19<br />

Site Activity Person Responsible Date Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

<strong>District</strong> Wide Provide staff development on<br />

email<br />

Implement Power Schools home<br />

communication program<br />

Send letters home to parents<br />

about the use of on-line<br />

communication service<br />

Teachers will increase their use of<br />

email with staff, parents, and<br />

students<br />

Staff will utilize Power School to<br />

record and evaluate results of<br />

student achievement through<br />

Multiple Measures data.<br />

Principal<br />

Staff Development<br />

2004/2005 School Year<br />

for Staff Development<br />

Days<br />

2005/2006 School Year<br />

for Staff Development<br />

Days<br />

Training Rosters<br />

Staff Survey<br />

Printout of Multiple<br />

Measures data from Power<br />

School<br />

95% of students with internet<br />

access will access Power<br />

School for e-mail,<br />

homework, progress reports<br />

and newsletters, each year.<br />

The benchmarks and timelines for Goal 3 include:<br />

Activity<br />

Access to technology will be provided in each<br />

district classroom, in the computer lab in the<br />

library.<br />

Upgrade or purchase equipment as needed.<br />

The teaching of technology skills will take<br />

place within the context of the curriculum and<br />

be supported by training in the computer lab.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Coordinator<br />

Principal<br />

Date<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Benchmark<br />

These are yearly percentages<br />

Inventory of district technology that will insure<br />

that all district equipment is functional<br />

Records of Purchase Order, each year<br />

Samples of student work<br />

Site computer lab schedules<br />

Classroom observations using Walk'bout will<br />

indicate use of technology in 70% of the<br />

observations, each year<br />

Information literacy training for students will<br />

take place in the classroom and be supported by<br />

computer lab activities.<br />

Principal<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004/5-<br />

2008/9<br />

Samples of student work<br />

Site computer lab schedules<br />

Classroom observations using Walk'bout will<br />

indicate use of technology in 70% of the<br />

observations, each year<br />

80% of students in grades 3 - 8 will access<br />

library materials from their classroom as<br />

evidenced by library records, each year<br />

The benchmarks and timelines for Goal 4 include:<br />

Activity<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Committee will revise the<br />

district standards for technology and<br />

information literacy by grade level.<br />

Each grade level will review the proposed<br />

technology performance standards.<br />

Final draft of proposed technology<br />

performance standards, including evaluation<br />

models, will be submitted to the board.<br />

Implement new district standards for<br />

technology and information literacy through<br />

classroom curriculum.<br />

Person<br />

Responsible<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Subcommittee<br />

Date<br />

Benchmark<br />

2006/2007 Draft recommendations for grade level<br />

performance standards will be distributed by<br />

April 2007.<br />

Teachers 2006/2007 Report by teacher on acceptance of changes to<br />

proposed technology performance standards will<br />

be returned to committee by May 2007<br />

Superintendent 2006/2007 Approval and adoption by the Loleta Union<br />

Elementary School <strong>District</strong> Board by June 2007<br />

Teachers<br />

Ongoing<br />

2004 – 2008<br />

90% of student portfolios will contain samples of<br />

student work in technology<br />

• Lesson plans will indicate use of technology,<br />

each year


20<br />

3j. Process to Monitor Curriculum Benchmarks/timelines<br />

Evaluation Activities -Goals 1, 3, & 4: Over the five years of the plan, classroom and student work will include<br />

but not be limited to:<br />

Language Arts/Reading - At each grade level, student writing will demonstrate mastery of technology and<br />

information literacy skills. This would include pre and post writing samples. Students will demonstrate<br />

improvement of technology and information literacy skills through the use of word processing programs, and the<br />

Internet. Students will use Alphasmarts for all stages of the writing process.<br />

Mathematics – At each grade level student work will demonstrate mastery of problem solving strategies through<br />

multiple representations (symbolic, numeric, graphic, and verbal/written representation). Printouts of computer<br />

generated documents, i.e. spreadsheets, would be another form of assessment that would demonstrate acquisition of<br />

mathematical concepts.<br />

Science – At each grade level student work will demonstrate mastery of the scientific process with the support of<br />

technology. Student work could include projects, printouts from software, and/or audio visual presentations that<br />

demonstrate their understanding of the scientific process.<br />

Multiple Measures – These measures are a compilation of classroom grades, standardized test scores, and <strong>District</strong><br />

Performance Assessment.<br />

Evaluation Activities Goal 2: Over the five years of the plan, the principal and staff will review supporting<br />

benchmark data.


PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT<br />

21<br />

4a. Summary of <strong>District</strong> Teachers’ & Administrators’ <strong>Technology</strong> Skills<br />

Ongoing professional development is essential to the effective use of technology. Loleta Union Elementary School<br />

<strong>District</strong> recognizes that teachers, librarians, administrators, and support staff must receive training in order to use<br />

technology to promote student achievement.<br />

One hundred percent (100%) of staff participated in an individual technology assessment in the fall of 2004. The<br />

summary for Credentialed Teachers and Administrators are displayed in the charts below. The teachers’ results<br />

indicated that we have demonstrated Intermediate or Proficiency level in the general use of technology and word<br />

processing categories. The administrators’ results show Intermediate or Proficiency level.<br />

Teachers<br />

Credential<br />

Unrated Intermediate Proficient Intermediate<br />

Number % Number % Number % or Better<br />

General computer<br />

Knowledge 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Internet 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Email 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Word Processing 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Publishing 0 0.0% 5 38.5% 7 53.8% 92.4%<br />

Databases 0 0.0% 5 38.5% 8 61.5% 100.0%<br />

Spreadsheets 0 0.0% 5 38.5% 7 53.8% 92.4%<br />

Presentation Software 0 0.0% 4 30.7% 4 30.7% 61.4%<br />

Instructional<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> 0 0.0% 2 15.4% 10 76.9% 92.3%<br />

Average All Areas 0 0.0% 21 32.3% 88 75.2% 93.2%<br />

Administrators<br />

Unrated Intermediate Proficient Intermediate<br />

Number % Number % Number % or Better<br />

General computer<br />

Knowledge 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Internet 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Email 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Word Processing 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Publishing 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Databases 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Spreadsheets 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 100.0%<br />

Presentation Software 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 100.0%<br />

Instructional<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 100.0%<br />

Average All Areas 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 8 37.8% 80.0%<br />

In addition to survey results, collaborative discussions were conducted to determine professional development needs<br />

for district personnel. The administrators will participate in all aspects of the professional development with a<br />

particular focus in Instructional <strong>Technology</strong>. In summary, they are<br />

• research and collaborate on software related to curriculum<br />

• collaborate and design lessons that integrate software and hardware into curriculum<br />

• visit sites demonstrating student achievement through the use of technology<br />

• attend staff development workshops and/or conferences during non-school hours<br />

• develop curriculum-based technology lessons


4b. Professional Development Goals & <strong>Plan</strong><br />

22<br />

The <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Team</strong> identified the following professional development goals:<br />

Goal 1: The district will assist teachers in reaching proficiency of technology skills in areas specific to their<br />

curriculum focus through staff development activities.<br />

Goal 2: The district will provide training that integrates technology with state curriculum standards.<br />

Goal 3: The district will provide training that is concurrent with equipment acquisition and installation.<br />

Goal 4: The district will provide appropriate technology training for classified staff.<br />

Activity Person Responsible Timeline Benchmark<br />

Survey staffs’ current technology skills and<br />

needs for professional development<br />

Work with local CTAP representative,<br />

HCOE, and the <strong>Technology</strong> committee to<br />

analyze district data to identify professional<br />

development needs.<br />

Principal September 2006<br />

annually<br />

• Principal<br />

• CTAP representative<br />

• HCOE representative<br />

Spring 2005<br />

annually<br />

• 100% completed surveys<br />

from certificated staff, each<br />

year<br />

• The list of professional<br />

development needs will be<br />

presented to site council in<br />

August yearly.<br />

Work with a local CTAP representative and<br />

HCOE to assist the <strong>Technology</strong> Committee to<br />

make grade level recommendations<br />

concerning revisions to the district standards<br />

for technology and information literacy.<br />

Distance learning professional development<br />

opportunities will be offered yearly,<br />

including, CTAP Online, MarcoPolo, Digital<br />

curriculum, etc.<br />

• Principal<br />

• CTAP representative<br />

• Principal<br />

• Site Council<br />

• PAR committee<br />

Summer<br />

2007<br />

Annually<br />

• Grade level<br />

recommendations presented to<br />

staff in September 2007.<br />

• Recommendation presented<br />

to site council in September<br />

2007<br />

• 50% of certificated staff wil<br />

take a distant learning<br />

profession development<br />

offering yearly, as indicated o<br />

staff development tracking<br />

form.<br />

4c. Professional Development Benchmarks & Timeline<br />

These are included in the chart in 4b above. Our professional development plan is based on the analysis of our<br />

teachers’ and administrators’ technology skills and needs as well as our district’s curricular goals. The district will<br />

offer a variety of training options such as the CTAP Online (http://www.ctaponline.org) learning portal, face-toface<br />

training & collaboration time, and one-on-one coaching. We will maximize the use of technology and site<br />

resources to support the district’s goals and objectives for curriculum, instruction, intervention, and assessment.<br />

4d. Professional Development Monitoring, and Evaluation.<br />

The district uses a professional development form to monitor the staff development activities of each teacher. Each<br />

teacher completes a form indicating the workshop and the technology component. Through the use of the<br />

Walk’bout program, the Principal tracks the use of technology in the classroom during informal classroom<br />

observation. The principal follows up each Walk'bout observation with a printout of the observation for the teacher.<br />

Teachers are evaluated using the CA Standards of Teaching, Standard 6, Element 3, addressing gaining skills in the<br />

use of technology in the classrooms, all teachers must meet this element.


INFRASTRUCTURE, HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT<br />

23<br />

5a Anticipated needs to support our tech plan objectives.<br />

Needed Hardware / Workstations<br />

Administrative Staff Equipment: Most of the hardware has been replaced within the past four years. We will<br />

continue a process of upgrading hardware and software as needed.<br />

Computer Lab: In order to support the Curriculum Component Goal 1 below are the needs of hardware for the<br />

computer lab and classrooms. Our lab will be equipped with the following:<br />

• 20 workstations<br />

• One network printer<br />

• One digital projector<br />

• One scanner<br />

• One digital camera<br />

• One digital video camera<br />

• One teacher workstation<br />

• Pull-down screen or white board for projection<br />

Teacher Classroom Equipment: We recognize the importance of portability for teaching staff. The teaching staff<br />

should be provided with a dedicated laptop workstation. Portable technology provides teachers the flexibility to<br />

communicate with staff, parents, students and community, prepare lesson plans, and take notes in and out of the<br />

classroom. The school has one networked color laser printer and one black and white laser printer available for<br />

teaching staff and students. As current teacher desktop workstations are replaced by laptops, these desktop<br />

workstations will be made available in classrooms for student use.<br />

Student Classroom Equipment: The long-term goal for the school is to have a classroom set of wireless laptop<br />

computers in grades 5 through 8. For the term of this technology plan, the goal is to equip every classroom with a<br />

minimum of three student computer workstations. We will attempt to acquire a minimum of one computer per<br />

classroom per year depending on budgetary constraints. This establishes a pattern of replacement and equal<br />

distribution of newer equipment. Older equipment will be cycled out of service.<br />

Network Access Needed<br />

Updating the network allows students to more efficiently access information as it pertains to the identified state<br />

curriculum standards; for example, access to distance learning as well as professional development through video<br />

streaming. In addition, by reducing the amount of time it takes to access information on-line or through email,<br />

communication concerning student needs and achievement between staff, parents, students, and community will<br />

improve.<br />

The following needs are necessary to upgrade network access:<br />

• upgrade the wiring from Category 5 to Category 5e and/or convert to wireless technology as computer<br />

workstations become faster and technology evolves<br />

• upgrade to two Apple G5 servers<br />

• install additional fiber lines to handle newer technologies that come into play, such as streaming video<br />

Electronic Learning Resources<br />

Software purchases will be made to support the curriculum and professional development goals as stated in the<br />

technology plan. We will expand upon our current inventory of software by researching and developing a list of<br />

software that supports the activities listed in the Curriculum Component Goal 1. The software will include, but not<br />

be limited to the following content areas: reading, language arts, mathematics, and science. In addition, we will<br />

need other electronic learning resources to support the identified state standards.


24<br />

Site<br />

<strong>District</strong> Wide<br />

Software<br />

Needed<br />

phonics<br />

Accelerated Math<br />

number theory<br />

computation skills<br />

geometry<br />

graphic organizer<br />

Microsoft Office (updated version)<br />

Other Electronic Resources<br />

Needed<br />

auditory CDs<br />

digital still cameras<br />

digital video cameras<br />

scanner<br />

color printers<br />

TV/VCR<br />

AlphaSmarts<br />

Library<br />

Resources Needed<br />

listening stations<br />

projectors<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Support Needed<br />

We anticipate the need for additional technical support staff. We are working with other local<br />

schools to employ an IT specialist to assist in troubleshooting current problems, assisting with<br />

upgrading issues and planning for future technology.<br />

Monitoring and Evaluating<br />

Inventory of all equipment will be maintained and updated annually. Review will take place to determine<br />

equipment condition, location, and compatibility with current technology and curriculum. Workstations older than<br />

four years will be evaluated for use within the district or disposed of. Bi-annually, we will assess our progress and<br />

success in implementing this plan.<br />

5b. Current <strong>District</strong> Hardware<br />

Existing hardware and electronic resources at each of our sites is included in Component 3a:<br />

Current <strong>Technology</strong> Access in our tech plan. This data comes from both our CBEDS data and our annual California<br />

School <strong>Technology</strong> Surveys.<br />

The CBED computer to student ratio by grade band is summarized in the chart below and includes all computers<br />

regardless of age. However data from the 2003-04 California School Tech Survey shows the average student<br />

computer ratio for computers four years old and newer is 8:1.<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> by School Type 2003-04<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

Students per Computer<br />

Elementary 5.3<br />

Source: California Department of Education, <strong>Educational</strong> Demographics Office (CBEDS, sifade03 4/26/04, sifgl<br />

7/6/04, pubschls 6/4/04) In addition to computers available for use by students, those used by staff for instructional<br />

activities are also included when counting computers at the various schools. This count is then divided by student<br />

enrollment to arrive at a students-per-computer figure.<br />

The total number of internet connected multi-media computers in the district (from 2004 California Tech Survey) is<br />

summarized in the chart below.<br />

Elementary Schools <strong>District</strong> Total<br />

40 40<br />

Administrative Staff Equipment: Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> personnel have the necessary<br />

equipment (laptops and PDAs) to allow them to perform their administrative duties.


Computer Lab Equipment: There is one networked 9-station lab with networked color printer, scanner, and two<br />

digital cameras.<br />

25<br />

Teacher Classroom Equipment: Each teacher has at least one networked multimedia computer workstation. All<br />

classrooms have independent inkjet printers and are networked with a color and black & white printer in the office<br />

and library.<br />

Student Classroom Equipment: Computers vary greatly within the school. Some classrooms have no dedicated<br />

student computers while others have as many as four. All student computer workstations are networked; however, a<br />

few have limited access due to age of machine. This depends on grade level and subject area. Most student<br />

workstations are over four years old. Upgrades have been made where benefit could be affected without an<br />

unacceptable financial investment. Computers have, for the most part, been placed on tables that were not originally<br />

intended for computer use; therefore, the workstations are not ergonomically designed.<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> uses Power School to maintain student records and student achievement.<br />

Email is used extensively by administration to communicate with staff, parents, students, and community. Many<br />

teachers are beginning to utilize Power School's Power Grade to communicate with staff, parents, students, and<br />

community. The district is committed to continued support of these software and continued staff development to<br />

ensure optimal use of the software capabilities.<br />

The Local Area Network backbone is one strand fiber optic that connects to 100/10 Base-T HP switches. Wide<br />

Area Network connection to the Internet and email is T1 line through the <strong>Humboldt</strong> <strong>County</strong> Office of Education.<br />

The <strong>District</strong> has a total of two servers ranging from 300 MHz older NT 4 servers to Macintosh G5 800 MHz OSX.<br />

5c Benchmarks and Timeline<br />

The <strong>Technology</strong> Committee recommends that the school adhere to the following timeline for equipment purchases.<br />

Workstation purchases using this timeline are reflected in the following table. This table shows new purchases each<br />

year.<br />

Year Need Person<br />

Responsible<br />

Research, develop, and prioritize a list of <strong>Technology</strong> Subcommittee<br />

electronic learning resources to be purchased. Site principal prepares purchase order<br />

2 Purchase laptops and workstations equal to Technical support personnel<br />

replace outdated hardware<br />

Technical support personnel<br />

Repurpose teacher workstations to student Site principal prepares purchase order<br />

workstations.<br />

Technical support personnel<br />

Purchase two projectors for classroom use. Assistant Superintendent and site<br />

Evaluate network infrastructure for needed principals<br />

upgrades.<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Specialist<br />

Review budget as it pertains to Year 3.<br />

Annual inventory of infrastructure, hardware,<br />

and electronic learning resources.<br />

Evidence of Completion<br />

List of recommended electronic resources<br />

Invoices for electronic learning resources<br />

Update Hardware Inventory<br />

Update Hardware Inventory<br />

Invoices for electronic learning resources<br />

Report of infrastructure needs<br />

Copy of Year 12final budget & Year 3<br />

projections<br />

Copy of inventory


26<br />

Year Need Person<br />

Responsible<br />

3 Purchase electronic learning resources as identified in<br />

the list developed in Year 2.<br />

Repurpose older classroom student workstations to the<br />

computer loaner program and phase out non-functioning<br />

computers.<br />

Purchase a new server.<br />

Evaluate network infrastructure for needed upgrades.<br />

Review budget as it pertains to Year 4.<br />

Annual inventory of infrastructure, hardware, and<br />

electronic learning resources.<br />

Principal prepares purchase order<br />

Technical support personnel<br />

Principal prepares purchase order<br />

Technical support personnel<br />

Assistant Superintendent and site<br />

principals<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Specialist<br />

Evidence of Completion<br />

Invoices for electronic learning<br />

resources<br />

Update Hardware Inventory<br />

Invoices for electronic learning<br />

resources<br />

Report of infrastructure needs<br />

Copy of Year 3 final budget & Ye<br />

projections<br />

Copy of inventory<br />

Year Need Person<br />

Responsible<br />

4-5 Purchase the remaining electronic learning resources on Site principal prepares purchase order<br />

the list made in Year 1.<br />

Site principal prepares purchase order<br />

Purchase laptops and workstations equal to replace Technical support personnel<br />

outdated hardware<br />

Site principal prepares purchase order<br />

Repurpose older equipment to the computer loaner Site principal prepares purchase order<br />

program and phase out non-functioning equipment. Technical support personnel<br />

Evaluate network infrastructure for needed upgrades. Assistant Superintendent and site<br />

Review budget as it pertains to Year 5.<br />

principals<br />

Annual inventory of infrastructure, hardware, and <strong>Technology</strong> Specialist<br />

electronic learning resources.<br />

Evidence of Completion<br />

Invoices for electronic learning<br />

resources<br />

Invoices for electronic learning<br />

resources<br />

Update Hardware Inventory<br />

Invoices for electronic learning<br />

resources<br />

Invoices for electronic learning<br />

resources<br />

Report of infrastructure needs<br />

Copy of Year 4 final budget & Ye<br />

projections<br />

Copy of inventory<br />

5d Monitoring Infrastructure<br />

The district has a process of tracking, feedback and adjustments for the purpose of buying and deploying<br />

infrastructure resources: computers, networks, televisions, telephones, etc. The district inventory clerk tracks the<br />

age of the infrastructure and the repairs records of each. When a system records a pattern of repairs the clerk<br />

notifies the Superintendent/Principal. The Superintendent/Principal then researches to determine if the item or<br />

system needs to be replaced or upgraded. In a small district, this has work well since the Superintendent/Principal is<br />

the responsible party for the decision as well as the district budget.<br />

Activity Responsible Party Evidence of Completion Date<br />

Hardware, Software,<br />

Infrastructure and Technical<br />

Support Component:<br />

Staff will submit documentation<br />

on activities from this<br />

component to the Principal<br />

Principal<br />

• Inventory, purchase<br />

orders and invoices will<br />

be collected.<br />

By 6/1 each year of<br />

plan


ED. TECHNOLOGY FUNDING & BUDGET<br />

27<br />

Provisions in the current budget are made for technology expenditures and professional development. The sources<br />

of these funds include: general fund, site budgets, categorical funds, lottery revenue, E-Rate discounts, and grants.<br />

These funds provide for current and future funding of this plan. The <strong>Technology</strong> Committee will research and<br />

suggest options for future funding sources. Funding beyond the usual sources are a priority and will be critical<br />

particularly during tight budget times.<br />

6A. Established and Potential Funding Sources<br />

Established Funding Sources<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Support Funding<br />

Currently the General Fund provides funds for the Library Computer Lab Aide position that supports technology by<br />

maintaining the computer lab, teaching computer courses, and troubleshooting classroom computer problems.<br />

Professional Development Funding<br />

Funding for Professional Development sources include Title I, Title II, Title III, Peer Assistance and Review (PAR),<br />

and Staff Development Buyback days. The primary focus of the <strong>District</strong> staff development plan is to provide the<br />

necessary skills to improve student achievement. <strong>Technology</strong> is a tool to support that change. At this time there is<br />

approximately $12,000 a year available for staff development. The full amount is not dedicated to technology staff<br />

development but with the emphasis on the use of technology in the core curriculum the goals of this plan will be<br />

easily achieved as it is integrated in the over all staff development plan for the <strong>District</strong>. <strong>Technology</strong> will not be<br />

viewed as a separate component but as an underlining base.<br />

Potential Funding Sources<br />

Categorical Funding<br />

The purchase of new ELRs will come funds that are categorical in nature and consist of Title I, School<br />

Improvement, Economic Impact Aid, and the Lottery.<br />

Bear River Bank of the Rohnerville Rancheria<br />

One of two Native American Rancherias is opening a casino in the summer of 2005. The tribal council has<br />

committed to donating substantial funds to the school. A portion of these funds will be used to upgrade the<br />

infrastructure and hardware in this plan.<br />

Modernization<br />

The district will begin construction on a modernization project in the summer of 2006. The needs identified in this<br />

plan will be used to address the technology infrastructure and hardware needs of each classroom.<br />

Options for Reducing Costs<br />

The following options for reducing costs are now used in the district and will continue to be used in the future.<br />

• Participation in California Teleconnect Program (DAS) for reduced-cost phone service.<br />

• Participation in the E-Rate funding program.<br />

• T-1 Internet access through <strong>Humboldt</strong> <strong>County</strong> Office of Education.<br />

• Bulk purchasing through Mendocino <strong>County</strong> Office of Education, C-SMART, and other “educational<br />

buy” programs.<br />

• Licensing software on a site basis, rather than on an individual-computer basis.<br />

• Pursuing donations of modern equipment.


6b. <strong>Plan</strong> Implementation Costs<br />

28<br />

Electronic Learning Resources<br />

Electronic Learning Resources (ELR) are used extensively. The purchase of new ELRs will come funds that are<br />

categorical in nature and consist of Title I, School Improvement, Economic Impact Aid, and local grants. The<br />

following are the significant purchase items. All others are minor in cost.<br />

Software<br />

Year Two-Accelerated/Star Math $3,000<br />

Year Three-Waterford Early Reading System - $9,000<br />

Year Three-Update Microsoft Office $1,000<br />

Equipment (not computers)<br />

Year Two-Three Projectors $2,500 each<br />

Computers<br />

Year Two-10 Lap Tops for $12,000<br />

Year Two- 9 Regular Workstations (one per classroom) $10,800<br />

Year Three-9 Regular Workstations (one per classroom) $10,800<br />

Year Four-9 Regular Workstations (one per classroom) $10,800<br />

Future Years-Replace Twenty Percent of Equipment $12,500<br />

As the purchase of new workstations occurs older equipment will be repurposed. The priority is to have the multimedia<br />

laptop computer for each teacher and at least one new workstation per classroom<br />

Summary of Electronic Learning Resources/Computers<br />

Year Software Equipment Computers Total<br />

Two $ 3,000 $ 2,500 $ 22,500 $ 28,000<br />

Three $ 10,000 $ 10,800 $ 20,800<br />

Four $ 10,800 $ 10,800<br />

Five $ 12,500 $ 12,500<br />

Total $ 13,000 $ 2,500 $ 56,600 $ 72,100<br />

6c. <strong>District</strong> Provision Tech Support<br />

Currently the General Fund provides funds for the Library Computer Lab Aide position that supports technology by<br />

maintaining the computer lab, teaching computer courses, and trouble shooting classroom computer problems.<br />

The district is investigating the sharing of a tech support person with other small rural districts in a similar situation<br />

as ours. When technical support is needed the <strong>Humboldt</strong> <strong>County</strong> Office of Education, Capital Business Machines,<br />

and other commercial support providers are used.<br />

6d. Costs and TCO Funding<br />

The district replacement policy for obsolete equipment is every five years. Budgetary constraints impact the district's<br />

ability to strictly adhere to this policy. The district does not have the ability to set aside a fixed percentage or dollar<br />

amount to replace obsolete equipment. When funds become available the principal and technology committee<br />

determine the equipment that will be replaced.<br />

6e. Monitoring the Funding <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Activity Responsible Party Benchmark Date<br />

Budget and Funding Component:<br />

Budget process will include<br />

consideration of budget goals.<br />

Superintendent<br />

School Site Council<br />

Board of Trustees<br />

• Inclusion in <strong>District</strong>'s<br />

adopted budget of<br />

technology.<br />

By 6/30 of each year of<br />

plan


MONITORING & EVALUATION OF TECHNOLOGY PLAN<br />

29<br />

7. a. Description of how technology’s impact on student learning and<br />

attainment of the district’s curricular goals, as well as classroom and school<br />

management, will be evaluated.<br />

Each program year, the <strong>Technology</strong> Committee will assess the achievement of the goals, activities and benchmarks<br />

of each component of the plan as indicators of success. Recommended steps to meet goals not yet achieved,<br />

recommended ways to provide adequate funding to support the plan, and/or recommended revisions in the plan will<br />

be presented to the district administration and the Board.<br />

Sources of data on which to base evaluations will take a variety of forms depending upon the activity being<br />

evaluated and the learner outcomes that are being assessed. Sources of data include but are not limited to:<br />

• Formal assessment examples: test scores, portfolios, pre-testing and post-testing of learner performance,<br />

and CDE <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Surveys.<br />

• Informal assessment examples: observation and interview of teachers, students, parents and<br />

administrators; and participant evaluations of teacher in-service presentations.<br />

• Documentation of activities and learner outcomes: include but are not limited to multimedia reports,<br />

student-developed and teacher-developed web pages, incorporation of technology-based resources<br />

into written and oral reports, and completion rates for students and staff in technology-based<br />

courses or workshops.<br />

• Documentation of budget expenditures, donations, and other financial data.<br />

Goals for Monitoring, Evaluating and Assessing the <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Goal 1: Monitoring, evaluation and assessment information will be formative.<br />

Goal 2: Monitoring, evaluation and assessment information will be summative.<br />

Goal 3: Data from the monitoring, evaluation and assessment process will be used to guide budget and funding decisions and to<br />

modify, change and update the <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> to ensure that the goals and activities of each section of the plan are<br />

consistent and current.<br />

7. b. Schedule for evaluating the effect of plan implementation.<br />

7. c. Description of how the information obtained through the monitoring and<br />

evaluation will be used.<br />

Activities for Monitoring, Evaluating and Assessing the <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Activity Responsible Party Evidence of Completion Date<br />

Curriculum Component:<br />

Staff will submit documentation on<br />

activities to Principal.<br />

Principal<br />

• Portfolios of student<br />

work will include<br />

technology based<br />

products<br />

• observations using the<br />

Walk'bout will document<br />

technology usage<br />

By 6/1 each year of plan.


30<br />

Activity Responsible Party Evidence of Completion Date<br />

Staff Development Component:<br />

Staff will submit documentation on<br />

technology-related staff<br />

development activities to the<br />

Principal<br />

Principal<br />

• Staff Development<br />

Record of Attendance<br />

forms will indicate the<br />

technology components of<br />

the workshop<br />

By 6/1 each year of plan<br />

Hardware, Software, Infrastructure<br />

and Technical Support Component:<br />

Staff will submit documentation on<br />

activities from this component to<br />

the Principal<br />

Budget and Funding Component:<br />

Budget process will include<br />

consideration of budget goals.<br />

Principal<br />

Superintendent<br />

School Site Council<br />

Board of Trustees<br />

• Inventory, purchase<br />

orders and invoices will be<br />

collected.<br />

• Inclusion in <strong>District</strong>'s<br />

adopted budget of<br />

technology.<br />

By 6/1 each year of plan<br />

By 6/30 of each year of<br />

plan<br />

Curriculum, Staff Development,<br />

Infrastructure, Budget, and<br />

Evaluation Components:<br />

Principal will report progress on<br />

components of the plan to <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Committee<br />

Monitoring, Assessment and<br />

Evaluation Component: Reports on<br />

all components of the plan<br />

evaluated by <strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Committee and recommendations<br />

for revisions to plan presented to the<br />

Superintendent.<br />

Education <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> updated<br />

by School Board based on <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Committee<br />

recommendations and<br />

administrative input.<br />

Principal<br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Committee<br />

Board of Trustees<br />

Report to <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Technology</strong> Committee<br />

Presentation of findings to<br />

Board, including<br />

recommended actions and<br />

revisions in Education<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Updated Education<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

By 10/15 each year of<br />

plan<br />

By 11/15 each year of<br />

plan<br />

By 12/15 each year of<br />

plan


Adult Literacy and <strong>Technology</strong><br />

31<br />

Criteria 8: Effective Collaborative Strategies with Adult Literacy Providers to Maximize<br />

the Use of <strong>Technology</strong><br />

The Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> does not provide adult education courses. However, we have<br />

identified the following adult education providers in our area:<br />

1. Fortuna Union High School <strong>District</strong><br />

2. College of the Redwoods<br />

During the Spring of 2004, the Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong>’s <strong>Technology</strong> Committee will meet with<br />

adult literacy providers. The <strong>Technology</strong> Committee will share information about our technology plan, learn how<br />

Adult Literacy Providers currently incorporate technology into their classes, and discover how we may collaborate<br />

to better provide services to our students, our parents, and the general community. Possible assistance may include<br />

providing facilities so that classes may be offered locally, providing ideas and aid so that technology may be<br />

integrated into their curriculum, and collaboratively pursuing funding sources for adult literacy.


EFFECTIVE, RESEARCH-BASED METHODS AND STRATEGIES<br />

32<br />

Criteria 9: Effective, Research-Based Methods and Strategies<br />

The integration of technology into the curriculum is core to this <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> the <strong>District</strong>'s Mission<br />

Statement. <strong>Technology</strong> links classrooms with educational resources within the school, the community, the nation<br />

and the world. Our district-wide plan encourages use of multimedia tools that enable students to become producers<br />

of knowledge as well as active learners. Our plan encourages student use of technology in project-based learning<br />

activities that support <strong>District</strong> learning goals and help students acquire technology and information-literacy skills,<br />

while achieving <strong>District</strong> curricular standards.<br />

The strategies in this plan for student learning, teaching, and technology management are based on relevant research<br />

and effective practices. The following are some examples we believe relate to student achievement:<br />

Curriculum Component Goals: Students will collect, organize, and analyze information through the use of<br />

electronic graphic organizers and the Internet to improve their writing, information literacy skills, as well as their<br />

mastery of the science process.<br />

“And in the ACOT study, student engagement remained highest when technology use was<br />

integrated into the larger curricular framework, rather than being an “add-on” to an already<br />

full curriculum.” 1<br />

Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> supports differentiated learning. One way to meet the needs of all students<br />

is through the use of technology. The curriculum goals of this plan support differentiated learning by utilizing<br />

“technology to provide the means for students with special need to communicate via email and use the Internet for<br />

research, and [technology] can also help teachers accommodate students’ varying learning styles.” 2<br />

Professional Development Goals: Loleta Union Elementary School <strong>District</strong> recognizes that teachers, librarians,<br />

administrators, and support staff must receive training in order to use technology to promote student achievement..<br />

Our staff development component outlines the scope of teacher training.<br />

In 2000, a report on the effectiveness of technology in schools reported that, “… results of over 300 studies of<br />

technology use, authors concluded that teacher training was the most significant factor influencing the effective use<br />

of educational technology to improve student achievement. Specifically, the report states that students of teacher<br />

with more than ten hours of training significantly out performed students of teachers with five or fewer training<br />

hours.” 3<br />

To ensure that students receive a rigorous, academic education, the <strong>District</strong> developed this technology plan that<br />

supports our mission statement. Part of the Mission Statement says, "Students will have an opportunity to learn<br />

about themselves and the world around them in a stable school environment that is orderly, organized, respectful,<br />

supportive and free from prejudice. Student will have an opportunity to grow as responsible citizens with a sense of<br />

responsibility towards themselves, society, and the environment." The plan’s process included identifying state<br />

curriculum standards and activities that use technology to improve student achievement. In addition, as stated in the<br />

Section V of the plan, we identified the need to update our network infrastructure in order to include distance<br />

learning. This technology plan supports the district’s mission statement for today, and can also be carried forward<br />

into the future.<br />

1<br />

Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with technology:<br />

Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.<br />

2<br />

Silverstein, G., Frechtling, J., & Miyoaka, A. (2000). Evaluation of the use of technology in Illinois public schools: Final report<br />

(prepared for Research Division, Illinois State Board of Education). Rockville, MD: Westat.<br />

3 Sivin-Kachala, J., & Gialo, E. (2000) research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools (7th ed.). Washington, DC:<br />

Software and Information Industry Association


APPENDIX C<br />

CRITERIA FOR EETT-FUNDED EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLANS<br />

In order to be approved, a technology plan needs to have “Adequately Addressed” each of the<br />

following criteria:<br />

• For corresponding EETT Requirements, see Appendix F.<br />

• If the technology plan is revised, insert the Education <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Benchmark Review Form (Appendix I) at the beginning of the technology<br />

plan.<br />

• Include this form (Appendix C) with “Page in <strong>District</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>” completed at the<br />

end of your technology plan.<br />

33<br />

1. PLAN DURATION<br />

CRITERION<br />

a. The plan should guide<br />

the district’s use of<br />

education technology for<br />

the next three to five<br />

years.<br />

2. STAKEHOLDERS<br />

CRITERION<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 7 & 11<br />

(Appendix F)<br />

a. Description of how a<br />

variety of stakeholders<br />

from within the school<br />

district and the<br />

community-at-large<br />

participated in the<br />

planning process.<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

5<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

3 - 7<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The education technology<br />

plan describes the districts<br />

use of education technology<br />

for the next three to five<br />

years.<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The planning team<br />

consisted of representatives<br />

who will implement the<br />

plan. If a variety of<br />

stakeholders did not assist<br />

with the development of the<br />

plan, a description of why<br />

they were not involved is<br />

included.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan is less than three years<br />

or more than five years in<br />

length.<br />

Not Adequately Addressed<br />

Little evidence is included that<br />

shows that the district actively<br />

sought participation from a<br />

variety of stakeholders.


34<br />

3. CURRICULUM<br />

COMPONENT<br />

CRITERIA<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 1, 2, 3, 8,<br />

10, & 12 (Appendix F)<br />

a. Description of teachers’<br />

and students’ current<br />

access to technology tools<br />

both during the school day<br />

and outside of school<br />

hours.<br />

b. Description of the<br />

district’s current use of<br />

hardware and software to<br />

support teaching and<br />

learning.<br />

c. Summary of the district’s<br />

curricular goals and<br />

academic content<br />

standards in various<br />

district and site<br />

comprehensive planning<br />

documents.<br />

d. List of clear goals and a<br />

specific implementation<br />

plan for using technology<br />

to improve teaching and<br />

learning by supporting the<br />

district curricular goals<br />

and academic content<br />

standards.<br />

e. List of clear goals and a<br />

specific implementation<br />

plan detailing how and<br />

when students will acquire<br />

technology and<br />

information literacy skills<br />

needed to succeed in the<br />

classroom and the<br />

workplace.<br />

f. List of clear goals and a<br />

specific implementation<br />

plan for programs and<br />

methods of utilizing<br />

technology that ensure<br />

appropriate access to all<br />

students.<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

8<br />

9 - 10<br />

10<br />

11 - 15<br />

13 - 16<br />

15<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan describes the<br />

technology access available in<br />

the classrooms, library/media<br />

centers, or labs for all<br />

students and teachers.<br />

The plan describes the typical<br />

frequency and type of use<br />

(technology skills/information<br />

literacy/integrated into the<br />

curriculum).<br />

The plan references other<br />

district documents that guide<br />

the curriculum and/or<br />

establish goals and standards.<br />

The plan delineates clear,<br />

specific, and realistic goals<br />

and target groups for using<br />

technology to support the<br />

district’s curriculum goals<br />

and academic content<br />

standards to improve<br />

learning. The implementation<br />

plan clearly supports<br />

accomplishing the goals.<br />

For the focus areas, the plan<br />

delineates clear, specific and<br />

realistic goals for using<br />

technology to help students<br />

acquire technology and<br />

information literacy skills.<br />

The implementation plan<br />

clearly supports<br />

accomplishing the goals.<br />

For the focus areas, the plan<br />

delineates clear, specific and<br />

realistic goals for using<br />

technology to support the<br />

progress of all students. The<br />

implementation plan clearly<br />

supports accomplishing the<br />

goals.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan explains technology<br />

access in terms of a student-tocomputer<br />

ratio, but does not<br />

explain where access is available,<br />

who has access, and when various<br />

students and teachers can use the<br />

technology.<br />

The plan cites district policy<br />

regarding use of technology, but<br />

provides no information about its<br />

actual use.<br />

The plan does not reference<br />

district curriculum goals.<br />

The plan suggests how<br />

technology will be used, but is<br />

not specific enough to know what<br />

action needs to be taken to<br />

accomplish the goals.<br />

The plan suggests how<br />

technology will be used, but is<br />

not specific enough to determine<br />

what action needs to be taken to<br />

accomplish the goals.<br />

The plan suggests how<br />

technology will be used, but is<br />

not specific enough to know what<br />

action needs to be taken to<br />

accomplish the goals.


g. List of clear goals and a<br />

specific implementation<br />

plan to utilize technology<br />

to make student record<br />

keeping and assessment<br />

more efficient and<br />

supportive of teachers’<br />

efforts to meet individual<br />

student academic needs.<br />

h. List of clear goals and a<br />

specific implementation<br />

plan to utilize technology<br />

to make teachers and<br />

administrators more<br />

accessible to parents.<br />

15<br />

15<br />

i. List of benchmarks and a<br />

timeline for implementing<br />

planned strategies and<br />

activities. 16 - 19<br />

j. Description of the process<br />

that will be used to<br />

monitor whether the<br />

strategies and<br />

methodologies utilizing<br />

technology are being<br />

implemented according to<br />

the benchmarks and<br />

timeline.<br />

20<br />

The plan delineates clear,<br />

specific and realistic goals for<br />

using technology to support<br />

the district’s student recordkeeping<br />

and assessment<br />

efforts. The implementation<br />

plan clearly supports<br />

accomplishing the goals.<br />

The plan delineates clear,<br />

specific and realistic goals for<br />

using technology to facilitate<br />

improved two-way<br />

communication between<br />

home and school. The<br />

implementation plan clearly<br />

supports accomplishing the<br />

goals.<br />

The benchmarks and timeline<br />

are specific and realistic.<br />

Teachers, administrators and<br />

students implementing the<br />

plan can easily discern what<br />

steps will be taken, by whom,<br />

and when.<br />

The monitoring process is<br />

described in sufficient detail<br />

so that who is responsible,<br />

and what is expected is clear.<br />

35<br />

The plan suggests how<br />

technology will be used, but is<br />

not specific enough to know what<br />

action needs to be taken to<br />

accomplish the goals.<br />

The plan suggests how<br />

technology will be used, but is<br />

not specific enough to know what<br />

action needs to be taken to<br />

accomplish the goals.<br />

The benchmarks and timeline are<br />

either absent or so vague that it<br />

would be difficult to determine<br />

what should occur at any<br />

particular time.<br />

The monitoring process is either<br />

absent, or lacks detail regarding<br />

who is responsible and what is<br />

expected.


36<br />

4. PROFESSIONAL<br />

DEVELOPMENT<br />

COMPONENT<br />

CRITERIA<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 5 & 12<br />

(Appendix F)<br />

a. Summary of the teachers’<br />

and administrators’<br />

current technology skills<br />

and needs for professional<br />

development.<br />

b. List of clear goals and a<br />

specific implementation<br />

plan for providing<br />

professional development<br />

opportunities based on the<br />

needs assessment and the<br />

Curriculum Component<br />

goals, benchmarks, and<br />

timeline.<br />

c. List of benchmarks and a<br />

timeline for implementing<br />

planned strategies and<br />

activities.<br />

d. Description of the process<br />

that will be used to<br />

monitor whether the<br />

professional development<br />

goals are being met and<br />

whether the planned<br />

professional development<br />

activities are being<br />

implemented in<br />

accordance with the<br />

benchmarks and timeline.<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

21<br />

22<br />

22<br />

22<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan provides a clear<br />

summary of the teachers’<br />

and administrators’ current<br />

technology skills and needs<br />

for professional<br />

development. The findings<br />

are summarized in the plan<br />

by discrete skills to facilitate<br />

providing professional<br />

development that meets the<br />

identified needs and plan<br />

goals.<br />

The plan delineates clear,<br />

specific and realistic goals<br />

for providing teachers and<br />

administrators with<br />

sustained, ongoing<br />

professional development<br />

necessary to implement the<br />

Curriculum Component of<br />

the plan. The implementation<br />

plan clearly supports<br />

accomplishing the goals.<br />

The benchmarks and<br />

timeline are specific and<br />

realistic. Teachers and<br />

administrators implementing<br />

the plan can easily discern<br />

what steps will be taken, by<br />

whom, and when.<br />

The monitoring process is<br />

described in sufficient detail<br />

so that who is responsible<br />

and what is expected is clear.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

Description of current level of staff<br />

expertise is too general or relates<br />

only to a limited segment of the<br />

district’s teachers and<br />

administrators in the focus areas or<br />

does not relate to the focus areas,<br />

i.e., only the fourth grade teachers<br />

when grades four to eight are the<br />

focus grade levels.<br />

The plan speaks only generally of<br />

professional development and is<br />

not specific enough to ensure that<br />

teachers and administrators will<br />

have the necessary training to<br />

implement the Curriculum<br />

Component.<br />

The benchmarks and timeline are<br />

either absent or so vague that it<br />

would be difficult to determine<br />

what steps will be taken, by whom,<br />

and when.<br />

The monitoring process is either<br />

absent, or lacks detail regarding<br />

who is responsible and what is<br />

expected.


37<br />

5. INFRASTRUCTURE,<br />

HARDWARE,<br />

TECHNICAL SUPPORT,<br />

AND SOFTWARE<br />

COMPONENT<br />

CRITERIA<br />

a. Describe the technology<br />

hardware, electronic<br />

learning resources,<br />

networking and<br />

telecommunications<br />

infrastructure, physical<br />

plant modifications, and<br />

technical support needed<br />

by the district’s teachers,<br />

students, and<br />

administrators to support<br />

the activities in the<br />

Curriculum and<br />

Professional Development<br />

Components of the plan.<br />

b. Describe the existing<br />

hardware, Internet access,<br />

electronic learning<br />

resources, and technical<br />

support already in the<br />

district that could be used<br />

to support the Curriculum<br />

and Professional<br />

Development Components<br />

of the plan.<br />

c. List of clear benchmarks<br />

and a timeline for obtaining<br />

the hardware,<br />

infrastructure, learning<br />

resources and technical<br />

support required to support<br />

the other plan components.<br />

d. Description of the process<br />

that will be used to monitor<br />

whether the goals and<br />

benchmarks are being<br />

reached within the<br />

specified time frame.<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

23 - 24<br />

24 - 25<br />

25 - 26<br />

26 - 27<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan clearly summarizes<br />

the technology hardware,<br />

electronic learning resources,<br />

networking and<br />

telecommunications<br />

infrastructure, physical plant<br />

modifications, and technical<br />

support proposed to support<br />

the implementation of the<br />

district’s Curriculum and<br />

Professional Development<br />

Components. The plan also<br />

includes the list of items to be<br />

acquired, which may be<br />

included as an appendix.<br />

The plan clearly summarizes<br />

the existing technology<br />

hardware, electronic learning<br />

resources, networking and<br />

telecommunication<br />

infrastructure, and technical<br />

support to support the<br />

implementation of the<br />

Curriculum and Professional<br />

Development Components.<br />

The current level of technical<br />

support is clearly explained.<br />

The benchmarks and timeline<br />

are specific and realistic.<br />

Teachers and administrators<br />

implementing the plan can<br />

easily discern what needs to<br />

be acquired or repurposed, by<br />

whom, and when.<br />

The monitoring process is<br />

described in sufficient detail<br />

so that who is responsible and<br />

what is expected is clear.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan includes a description<br />

or list of hardware,<br />

infrastructure and other<br />

technology necessary to<br />

implement the plan, but there<br />

doesn’t seem to be any real<br />

relationship between the<br />

activities in the Curriculum and<br />

Professional Development<br />

Components and the listed<br />

equipment. Future technical<br />

support needs have not been<br />

addressed or do not relate to the<br />

needs of the Curriculum and<br />

Professional Development<br />

Components.<br />

The inventory of equipment is<br />

so general that it is difficult to<br />

determine what must be<br />

acquired to implement the<br />

Curriculum and Professional<br />

Development Components. The<br />

summary of current technical<br />

support is missing or lacks<br />

sufficient detail.<br />

The benchmarks and timeline<br />

are either absent or so vague<br />

that it would be difficult to<br />

determine what needs to be<br />

acquired or repurposed, by<br />

whom, and when.<br />

The monitoring process is either<br />

absent, or lacks detail regarding<br />

who is responsible and what is<br />

expected.


38<br />

6. FUNDING AND<br />

BUDGET<br />

COMPONENT<br />

CRITERIA<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 7 & 13,<br />

(Appendix F)<br />

a. List of established and<br />

potential funding sources<br />

and cost savings, present<br />

and future.<br />

b. Estimate implementation<br />

costs for the term of the<br />

plan (three to five years).<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

27<br />

28<br />

c. Description of the level<br />

of ongoing technical<br />

support the district will<br />

provide. 28<br />

d. Description of the<br />

district’s replacement<br />

policy for obsolete<br />

equipment.<br />

e. Description of the<br />

feedback loop used to<br />

monitor progress and<br />

update funding and<br />

budget decisions.<br />

28<br />

28<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan clearly describes<br />

resources* that are available<br />

or could be obtained to<br />

implement the plan. The<br />

process for identifying future<br />

funding sources is described.<br />

Cost estimates are reasonable<br />

and address the total cost of<br />

ownership.<br />

The plan describes the level<br />

of technical support that will<br />

be provided for<br />

implementation given<br />

current resources and<br />

describes goals for additional<br />

technical support should new<br />

resources become available.<br />

The level of technical<br />

support is based on some<br />

logical unit of measure.<br />

<strong>Plan</strong> recognizes that<br />

equipment will need to be<br />

replaced and outlines a<br />

realistic replacement plan<br />

that will support the<br />

Curriculum and Professional<br />

Development Components.<br />

The monitoring process is<br />

described in sufficient detail<br />

so that who is responsible,<br />

and what is expected is clear.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

Resources to implement the plan<br />

are not identified or are so<br />

general as to be useless.<br />

Cost estimates are unrealistic,<br />

lacking, or are not sufficiently<br />

detailed to determine if the total<br />

cost of ownership is addressed.<br />

The description of the ongoing<br />

level of technical support is either<br />

vague or not included, is so<br />

inadequate that successful<br />

implementation of the plan is<br />

unlikely, or is so unrealistic as to<br />

raise questions of the viability of<br />

sustaining that level of support.<br />

Replacement policy is either<br />

missing or vague. It is not clear<br />

that the replacement policy could<br />

be implemented.<br />

The monitoring process is either<br />

absent, or lacks detail regarding<br />

who is responsible and what is<br />

expected.<br />

* In this document, the term “resources” means funding, in-kind services, donations, or other items of value.


39<br />

7. MONITORING AND<br />

EVALUATION<br />

COMPONENT<br />

CRITERIA<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 11<br />

(Appendix F)<br />

a. Description of how<br />

technology’s impact on<br />

student learning and<br />

attainment of the<br />

district’s curricular<br />

goals, as well as<br />

classroom and school<br />

management, will be<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

29<br />

evaluated.<br />

b. Schedule for evaluating<br />

the effect of plan<br />

implementation. 29 - 30<br />

c. Description of how the<br />

information obtained<br />

through the monitoring<br />

and evaluation will be<br />

used.<br />

29 - 30<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan describes the<br />

process for evaluation<br />

utilizing the goals and<br />

benchmarks of each<br />

component as the<br />

indicators of success.<br />

Evaluation timeline is<br />

specific and realistic.<br />

The plan describes a<br />

process to report the<br />

monitoring and<br />

evaluation results to<br />

persons responsible for<br />

implementing and<br />

modifying the plan, as<br />

well as to the plan<br />

stakeholders.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

No provision for an evaluation is<br />

included in the plan. How success is<br />

determined is not defined. The<br />

evaluation is defined, but the process to<br />

conduct the evaluation is missing.<br />

The evaluation timeline is not included<br />

or indicates an expectation of<br />

unrealistic results that does not support<br />

the continued implementation of the<br />

plan.<br />

The plan does not provide a process for<br />

using the monitoring and evaluation<br />

results to improve the plan and/or<br />

disseminate the findings.


40<br />

8. EFFECTIVE<br />

COLLABORATIVE<br />

STRATEGIES WITH<br />

ADULT LITERACY<br />

PROVIDERS TO<br />

MAXIMIZE THE USE<br />

OF TECHNOLOGY<br />

CRITERION<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 11<br />

(Appendix F)<br />

a. If the district has<br />

identified adult literacy<br />

providers, there is a<br />

description of how the<br />

program will be<br />

developed in<br />

collaboration with those<br />

providers.<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

31<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan explains how the<br />

program will be<br />

developed in<br />

collaboration with adult<br />

literacy providers.<br />

<strong>Plan</strong>ning included or will<br />

include consideration of<br />

collaborative strategies<br />

and other funding<br />

resources to maximize the<br />

use of technology. If no<br />

adult literacy providers<br />

are indicated, the plan<br />

describes the process used<br />

to identify adult literacy<br />

providers.<br />

Example of Not Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

There is no evidence that the plan has<br />

been, or will be developed in<br />

collaboration with adult literacy<br />

service providers, to maximize the use<br />

of technology.


41<br />

9. EFFECTIVE,<br />

RESEARCHED-BASED<br />

METHODS,<br />

STRATEGIES, AND<br />

CRITERIA<br />

Corresponding EETT<br />

Requirement(s): 4 & 9<br />

(Appendix F)<br />

a. Description of how<br />

education technology<br />

strategies and proven<br />

methods for student<br />

learning, teaching, and<br />

technology management<br />

are based on relevant<br />

research and effective<br />

practices.<br />

b. Description of thorough<br />

and thoughtful<br />

examination of<br />

externally or locally<br />

developed education<br />

technology models and<br />

strategies.<br />

c. Description of<br />

development and<br />

utilization of innovative<br />

strategies for using<br />

technology to deliver<br />

rigorous academic<br />

courses and curricula,<br />

including distancelearning<br />

technologies<br />

(particularly in areas that<br />

would not otherwise<br />

have access to such<br />

courses or curricula due<br />

to geographical distances<br />

or insufficient<br />

resources).<br />

Page in<br />

<strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

32<br />

32<br />

32<br />

Example of Adequately<br />

Addressed<br />

The plan describes the<br />

relevant research behind the<br />

plan’s design for strategies<br />

and/or methods selected.<br />

The plan describes<br />

references to research<br />

literature that supports why<br />

or how the model improves<br />

student achievement.<br />

The plan describes the<br />

process for development and<br />

utilization of strategies to<br />

use technology to deliver<br />

specialized or rigorous<br />

academic courses and<br />

curricula, including distance<br />

learning.<br />

Not Adequately Addressed<br />

The description of the research<br />

behind the plan’s design for<br />

strategies and/or methods selected<br />

is unclear or missing.<br />

No research is cited.<br />

There is no plan to utilize<br />

technology to extend or supplement<br />

the district’s curriculum offerings

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!