jacana valley master plan visioning framework - Hume City Council
jacana valley master plan visioning framework - Hume City Council
jacana valley master plan visioning framework - Hume City Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Consultation<br />
Consultation Activity 05<br />
Stakeholder Workshop 2<br />
Broader community<br />
group and end users<br />
workshop<br />
Description + Participants<br />
The purpose of this workshop was to engage with the key user groups and<br />
community groups (friends of groups, environment groups, religious spiritual groups,<br />
sports clubs, mothers groups other potential end users to provide an overview of the<br />
Master Plan Project.<br />
• To gather their input into the Master<br />
• Plan in terms of what they value<br />
• What key principles they would like to see incorporated?<br />
• To launch the Appreciative Inquiry approach<br />
• To uncover key champions who are willing to help the Inquiry process.<br />
Attendees included:<br />
• Metropolitan Fire Board<br />
• Jacana Football Club<br />
• Jacana Cricket Club<br />
• Kororoit Institute Proponents and Supporters Association<br />
• <strong>Hume</strong> BUG<br />
• Broadmeadows Rotary<br />
• Friends of Upper Moonee Ponds Creek<br />
Facilitated by :<br />
• <strong>Hume</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />
• AECOM<br />
Findings + Outcomes<br />
• All the participants are engaged to see improvements for the site.<br />
• The football and cricket clubs are keen to see a clear direction pertaining to the<br />
improvement of their club and associated facilities.<br />
• MFB noted the importance of the path network as a means of emergency access.<br />
• There was a general consensus for the <strong>City</strong> to ensure ownership of the project and<br />
the site; to ‘convert’ the promise and deliver the outcomes from a strategic level<br />
through to operations, management and maintenance.<br />
• Ensure that any staged works match spatial connectivity of nodes, facilities and<br />
amenities.<br />
• Other specifics included a reconciliation between commuter and recreational<br />
cyclists through the site – that a meandering path might not always be the most<br />
appropriate proposition; ratification of car parking if amenities are to increase, and<br />
ensure outcomes are community focussed.<br />
15