19.01.2014 Views

不同海拔高度对毛竹主要物理力学性质的影响3 - ICBR

不同海拔高度对毛竹主要物理力学性质的影响3 - ICBR

不同海拔高度对毛竹主要物理力学性质的影响3 - ICBR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

, 2007, 34 (2) : 2222225<br />

Journal of Anhui Agricultural University<br />

3<br />

1 , 2 , 2 , 1 , 1<br />

(11,230036; 21,100102)<br />

:, <br />

: (1) , <br />

01699 01715 g cm - 3 ;01798 01827 g cm - 3 ,0105T2<br />

(2) 12 368128 11 934107, 551858<br />

5918401831203 1961293 MPa, ,0105T2<br />

:;;;;;<br />

: S781129 : A : 16722352X (2007) 0220222204<br />

Effects of d ifferen t a ltitudes on ma in physica l and m echan ica l properties of bam boo<br />

WANG You2hong 1 , TIAN Gen2lin 2 , L IU Xing2e 2 ,WANG Chuan2gui 1 , KE Shu2hua 1<br />

(11School of Forestry and Landscape A rchitecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036;<br />

21 International Centre for Bamboo and Rattan, Beijing 100102)<br />

Abstract: The main physical and mechanical p roperties of bamboo was measured to investigate the effects of<br />

different altitudes on those p roperties. The results show that both of the air2dry density and basic density increase a2<br />

long with axial height and the altitude increasing. The basic density of bamboo at foot and top of the hill are 01699<br />

g cm - 3 and 01715 gcm - 3 , and the air2dry density are 01798 gcm - 3 and 01827 gcm - 3 respectively. Both the<br />

density differences between the bamboo at foot and top of the hill are significant. The modulus of elasticity in static<br />

bending, the comp ressive strength parallel to grain and the bending strength of bamboo at foot and top of the hill are<br />

12 368128 MPa & 11 934107 MPa, 551858 MPa & 591840 MPa and 1831203 MPa & 1961293 MPa respectively.<br />

Among them, the differences between the comp ressive strength parallel to grain, the bending strength of bamboo at<br />

foot and top of the hill are also significant.<br />

Key words: bamboo; altitude; density; modulus of elasticity in static bending; the comp ressive strength parallel<br />

to grain; the bending strength<br />

,<br />

,,,<br />

,<br />

<br />

,<br />

2 200hm 2 ,1 800t [ 1 ] <br />

48500,720<br />

hm 2 ,420 hm 2 , 300 <br />

hm 2 <br />

300hm 2 ,3,800<br />

900t,600t,<br />

90% ,600m 3 ,<br />

: <br />

,<br />

3 : 2006211216<br />

: <br />

:(1970 - ) ,,,


342<br />

<br />

223<br />

[ 2, 3 ] <br />

,<br />

,<br />

[ 4 ] <br />

,1971,<br />

<br />

[ 2, 529 ] <br />

<br />

<br />

, ,<br />

,<br />

<br />

1<br />

111<br />

( Phy llostachys pubescens Mazel ex H. de<br />

Lehaie),<br />

,,,<br />

,,,<br />

, ,<br />

,,,<br />

<br />

,<br />

[ 10 ] ,4 hm 2 ,<br />

200 m,20pH 615<br />

,1 m , <br />

018,6,11 m,<br />

1<br />

4 t <br />

5 t (01001<br />

g) <br />

112<br />

<br />

, [ 11 ] <br />

<br />

Item<br />

/m<br />

A ltitude<br />

1<br />

Table 1The growth situations of bamboo<br />

/%<br />

Reen MC<br />

/cm<br />

DBH<br />

/m<br />

Height<br />

/m<br />

Height of branch<br />

(HF) Foot of hill 200 9612 71824 1315 516<br />

(HT) Top of hill 300 8213 81092 1414 518<br />

2<br />

<br />

211<br />

,<br />

1,,,<br />

[ 12214 ] <br />

115 215 315 415515 m<br />

,<br />

,017% 116%<br />

114% 413%218% ;<br />

214% 118% 216% 611%415%<br />

01699 gcm - 3 ,<br />

01715 gcm - 3 ,<br />

213% ,<br />

[ 15 ] 01798 g<br />

cm - 3 ,01827 gcm - 3 ,<br />

<br />

316%T2,: t stat = - 51405, t<br />

0105 = 11981,0105 ;<br />

: t stat = - 31704, t 0105 = 11981,0105<br />

A1Basic density at HF; a1<br />

Basic density at HT; B1A ir2dry density at<br />

HF; b1A ir2dry density at HT<br />

1<br />

Figure 1Effects of different altitudes on bamboo density<br />

,,<br />

,,,<br />

,; <br />

,,,<br />

,,,


224<br />

2007<br />

, [ 12214 ] <br />

212<br />

21211 <br />

<br />

,<br />

2,<br />

<br />

21212 <br />

3,<br />

,<br />

,<br />

,215515 m ,<br />

<br />

11 934107 MPa;<br />

12 368128 MPa,<br />

,<br />

315%0105T2( t stat =<br />

11443, t 0105 = 11981) <br />

21213 <br />

,<br />

,<br />

,4<br />

A1Comp ressive strength parallel to<br />

grain at HF; a1Comp ressive strength<br />

parallel to grain at HT<br />

2<br />

Figure 2Effects of different altitudes on comp ressive strength<br />

parallel to grain of the bamboo<br />

551859 MPa;<br />

591840 MPa,<br />

<br />

,711%0105T2<br />

( t stat = - 21802, t 0105 = 11981) <br />

,,<br />

,,,,<br />

[ 12214 ] <br />

A1Modulus of elasticity in static ben2<br />

ding at HF; a1Modulus of elasticity in<br />

static bending at HT<br />

3<br />

Figure 3Effects of different altitudes on modulus of elas2<br />

ticity in static bending of bamboo<br />

A1Bending strength at HF; a1<br />

Bending strength at HT<br />

4<br />

Figure 4Effects of different altitudes on bending strength of<br />

the bamboo<br />

1831203 MPa,<br />

1961293 MPa,<br />

<br />

711% , [ 15 ] 0105T2<br />

( t stat = - 31880, t 0105 = 11981) <br />

<br />

,,,,<br />

<br />

<br />

3<br />

,<br />

<br />

01699 gcm - 3 , 01715 gcm - 3 ;01798<br />

01827 gcm - 3 <br />

213% ,


342<br />

<br />

225<br />

316%<br />

,0105T2<br />

<br />

: 551858 MPa591840 MPa 1831203 MPa<br />

1961293 MPa, <br />

,,<br />

711% ,<br />

0105,T2 <br />

,<br />

12 368128 MPa 11 934107 MPa,<br />

315% , <br />

0105,T2<br />

,,<br />

,;,<br />

,, <br />

,,<br />

,<br />

,;<br />

,<br />

:<br />

[ 1 ],,. <br />

[ J ]. , 2003, 31 ( 5) : 712<br />

77.<br />

[ 2 ]. [M ]. : ,<br />

2002: 9.<br />

[ 3 ]. <br />

[ J ]. , 2004 (1) : 9211.<br />

[ 4 ]. , [ J ]. , 1990, 4<br />

(4) : 31234.<br />

[ 5 ],. <br />

[ J ]. , 1996, 13 (1) : 21227.<br />

[ 6 ] Gm sser D, L iese W. On the anatomy of A sian bamboos,<br />

with special reference to their vascular bundles[ J ]. Wood<br />

Sci Technol, 1971, 5: 2902312.<br />

[ 7 ] Suzuki K, Itoh T. The changes in cellwall architecture dur2<br />

ing lignification of bamboo [ J ]. Phyllostachys Aurea Carr<br />

Trees, 2001, 15: 1372147.<br />

[ 8 ] Kumar S, Dobriyal P B. Treatability and flow path studies<br />

in bamboo [ J ]. Wood and Fiber Science, 1992, 24 ( 2 ) :<br />

1132117.<br />

[ 9 ] Mansur Ahmad. Analysis of calcutta bamboo for structural<br />

composite materials. D issertation for the degree of doctor of<br />

philosophy [ C ] / /Wood Science and Forest Products.<br />

B lacksburg, V irginia, 2000.<br />

[ 10 ]. <br />

[ S]. GB /T 1578021995.<br />

[ 11 ]. [ S ]. GB /T 26902<br />

2000.<br />

[ 12 ]. [M ]. :<br />

, 1985.<br />

[ 13 ]. [M ]. :, 1996.<br />

[ 14 ]. [M ]. :, 2006.<br />

[ 15 ],. [M ]. :<br />

, 2004.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!