MANUAL Part II Visual Assessment of Crown Condition - ICP Forests
MANUAL Part II Visual Assessment of Crown Condition - ICP Forests
MANUAL Part II Visual Assessment of Crown Condition - ICP Forests
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
26 <strong>II</strong>. CROWN CONDITION ASSESSMENTS<br />
Hint: Some species produce large amounts <strong>of</strong> green tissues associated with the flowers (e.g.<br />
Carpinus betulus and Fraxinus excelsior). These tissues contain chlorophyll and contribute to the<br />
carbon budget <strong>of</strong> the tree. It is recommended that such tissues are included with the foliage mass<br />
when assessing defoliation. As fruiting in such species remains relatively constant from year to<br />
year, annual changes in fruiting will not significantly affect the defoliation estimates.<br />
A1.21 Fruiting (optional Level I and Level <strong>II</strong>)<br />
Definition<br />
This score is defined as the estimation <strong>of</strong> fruiting in the crown. Only fruits produced in the year<br />
<strong>of</strong> assessment are included.<br />
Information on fruiting is useful to have because <strong>of</strong> its effect on the carbon economy <strong>of</strong> the tree.<br />
As with flowering, fruiting diverts energy away from other parts <strong>of</strong> the tree. As with flowering, it<br />
may also have an effect on the future branch structure <strong>of</strong> the tree.<br />
Especially on beech this parameter may provide very valuable information and its submission is<br />
very much encouraged.<br />
Methods<br />
As with flowering, two assessments are made: <strong>of</strong> the assessable part <strong>of</strong> the crown and <strong>of</strong> the<br />
whole crown. Scoring is:<br />
1 Absent or scarce. The fruits are not seen in a cursory examination.<br />
2 Common. Fruiting is clearly visible.<br />
3 Abundant. Fruiting dominates the appearance <strong>of</strong> the tree.<br />
Note<br />
Quantitative estimates <strong>of</strong> both flowering and fruiting can be obtained by the use <strong>of</strong> litter traps.<br />
However, such data cannot be readily related to individual trees.<br />
A1.22 Secondary shoots and epicormics (optional Level <strong>II</strong>)<br />
Definition<br />
Secondary shoots and epicormics are used synonymously and are defined as shoots that have<br />
developed from dormant buds on the stem or on branches.<br />
In some species, the development <strong>of</strong> secondary shoots is the normal part <strong>of</strong> crown formation. For<br />
example, in Picea abies, secondary shoots develop along the main branches to replace older<br />
shoots that have lost their needles. In other species, particularly broadleaves, the development <strong>of</strong><br />
epicormic shoots in the crown and on the stem may reflect increased levels <strong>of</strong> light penetration<br />
through the foliage <strong>of</strong> the outer crown.<br />
Scoring <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> shoots reveals whether the tree is responding to loss <strong>of</strong> foliage and<br />
thus the regenerative capacity <strong>of</strong> the tree. For example, a heavily defoliated Picea abies that has<br />
no secondary shoots is indicative <strong>of</strong> a tree under extreme stress.<br />
updated 06/2006