22.01.2014 Views

representation of an induction motor in field-oriented steering ...

representation of an induction motor in field-oriented steering ...

representation of an induction motor in field-oriented steering ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Representation <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>duction</strong> <strong>motor</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>field</strong>-<strong>oriented</strong> steer<strong>in</strong>g algorithm ... 137<br />

The experiment was executed depend<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g to the memory <strong>of</strong><br />

the converter two sets <strong>of</strong> parameters to describe the equivalent model <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>motor</strong> <strong>in</strong> the algorithm <strong>of</strong> control. These were the follow<strong>in</strong>g parameters:<br />

calculated with the classic method procedures – Fig. 6 a) i c) <strong>an</strong>d obta<strong>in</strong>ed from<br />

identification – Fig. 6 b) i d). In Fig. 6, for example, are shown the curves<br />

acquired dur<strong>in</strong>g start<strong>in</strong>g the converter with <strong>motor</strong> SzJe-24a, with parameters<br />

counted with the classic method as well as measured dur<strong>in</strong>g the start<strong>in</strong>g<br />

procedure with parameters got from identification. Essential differences come<br />

out <strong>in</strong> the values <strong>an</strong>d time <strong>of</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the magnetic flux. Differences occur<br />

also <strong>in</strong> the tr<strong>an</strong>sient processes <strong>in</strong> the <strong>motor</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g switch<strong>in</strong>g current <strong>an</strong>d voltage<br />

models, this me<strong>an</strong>s the utilization <strong>of</strong> the sensorless vector control algorithm. In<br />

settled state however, the acquired curves are very similar to each other. If the<br />

ch<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>of</strong> schema parameters has the essential <strong>in</strong>fluence on dynamics (what<br />

we notice <strong>in</strong> shape <strong>an</strong>d time, for example, <strong>of</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g the current component <strong>of</strong><br />

stator Isq - <strong>in</strong> consequence the torque <strong>of</strong> the <strong>motor</strong>) then it does not cause<br />

essential ch<strong>an</strong>ges <strong>in</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> the speed controller.<br />

5. CONCLUSIONS<br />

The considerations concern<strong>in</strong>g the work <strong>of</strong> a drive arr<strong>an</strong>gement with vector<br />

control steer<strong>in</strong>g algorithm give rise to the follow<strong>in</strong>g conclusion: the vector control<br />

is preferable due to the improved control characteristics e.g. accelerat<strong>in</strong>g along<br />

the current limit <strong>an</strong>d also due to the improved immunity to stall<strong>in</strong>g. Usually the<br />

vector control is also possible, even when several <strong>motor</strong>s are connected to<br />

a s<strong>in</strong>gle drive converter, as normally, the <strong>motor</strong>s are similarly loaded. On the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>of</strong> the model with const<strong>an</strong>t parameters <strong>of</strong> <strong><strong>in</strong>duction</strong> <strong>motor</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> dynamic states we c<strong>an</strong> see, that its behavior is similar to the response <strong>of</strong><br />

a real <strong>motor</strong> despite accept<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> model<strong>in</strong>g such simplifications, as the<br />

omission <strong>of</strong> hysteresis, accept<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> perm<strong>an</strong>ent saturation <strong>of</strong> magnetic circuit<br />

as well as omission <strong>of</strong> current displacement <strong>in</strong> rotor w<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs for the <strong>motor</strong><br />

Sg-90L4 (differences <strong>in</strong> relation to measurements <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial value <strong>of</strong> dynamic<br />

torque amount to about 28 % - difference <strong>in</strong> time <strong>of</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> the process is<br />

near to 0,27 s). It is good to underl<strong>in</strong>e that the area <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>compatibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

torque amplitudes from the po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> drive perform<strong>an</strong>ce has no larger<br />

me<strong>an</strong><strong>in</strong>g because it is outside the area <strong>of</strong> limitations specified by the sett<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong><br />

functional parameters, <strong>an</strong>d also it results from different − subord<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

parameters <strong>of</strong> the drive steer<strong>in</strong>g, form<strong>in</strong>g the electromagnetic phenomena <strong>in</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!