25.01.2014 Views

Ulla Werlauff Methods to assess physical functioning - Danske ...

Ulla Werlauff Methods to assess physical functioning - Danske ...

Ulla Werlauff Methods to assess physical functioning - Danske ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Visual Analog Scale (study IV)<br />

The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is used <strong>to</strong> measure a variety of subjective phenomena, among them<br />

fatigue. The score is rated on a 100 mm horizontal line with descriptions at each end, and represents<br />

the patient’s perception on the phenomenon. The reliability of a VAS scale <strong>to</strong> measure fatigue<br />

severity has been presented in healthy individuals and patients with sleep-disorder [Lee 1991] and<br />

in patients with stroke [Tseng 2010].<br />

Focus-groups (study IV)<br />

Focus-groups were used <strong>to</strong> <strong>assess</strong> the content validity of the FSS and its relevance <strong>to</strong> measure<br />

impact of fatigue in patients with CM. A purposive sampling was performed <strong>to</strong> identify patients<br />

with FSS score ≥ 4; among these patients, 16 were randomly selected and invited <strong>to</strong> participate in<br />

one of two focus-group interviews. Interviews were based on an interview-guide with six main<br />

themes. For each theme, a set of 2-6 sub-questions were constructed, in case the group needed<br />

inspiration for the discussions. At the end of the discussion, the participants could add further<br />

comments on a piece of paper or write information they wouldn’t bring up in the group. After a<br />

short break, the FSS was handed <strong>to</strong> each of the participants, who were then asked <strong>to</strong> comment on<br />

whether fatigue according <strong>to</strong> their perception was contained in the FSS , and if not – which<br />

dimensions of fatigue was not captured in the scale. The focus-group interviews were recorded on<br />

tape.<br />

Data analyses / Statistics<br />

Statistical analyses was conducted by means of Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS<br />

16.0) in study I, SAS 9.2 software package (SAS Institute Inc) in studies II and III, and Stata<br />

version 11.2 in study IV. Significance levels were set at p < 0.05, using two-tailed testing. Nonparametric<br />

statistics were used when criteria for normal distribution were not met, and when the<br />

sample size was small. For calculation of unpaired differences between groups, Mann-Whitney U<br />

test was used in studies I and II and the parametric analogue, student t-test, in study IV. To calculate<br />

paired differences within groups, Wilcoxon signed rank test was used in studies I and III. Kruskal<br />

Wallis’ test was used <strong>to</strong> calculate differences among groups in study II. Linear regression analyses<br />

were used <strong>to</strong> test longitudinal data in study III. Spearman’s rank order correlation coefficient (r s )<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!